Skip to main content
Start of content

CHPC Committee Meeting

Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
 
Meeting No. 16
 
Monday, October 16, 2006
 

The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage met at 3:31 p.m. this day, in Room 308, West Block, the Chair, Gary Schellenberger, presiding.

 

Members of the Committee present: Jim Abbott, Charlie Angus, Hon. Mauril Bélanger, Sylvie Boucher, Ed Fast, Tina Keeper, Maka Kotto, Luc Malo, Francis Scarpaleggia, Gary Ralph Schellenberger, Scott Simms and Chris Warkentin.

 

In attendance: Library of Parliament: Marion Ménard; Matthew Carnaghan.

 

Witnesses: Canadian Railroad Historical Association: Stephen Cheasley, Exporail, Canadian Railway Museum; Marie-Claude Reid, Exporail, Canadian Railway Museum; Daniel Laurendeau, Exporail, Canadian Railway Museum.

 
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee resumed its study related to Canadian museums.
 

Stephen Cheasley made a statement and, with the other witnesses, answered questions.

 
The Committee proceeded to the consideration of matters related to Committee business.
 

At 5:12 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 5:16 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

Charlie Angus moved, — That the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage invites witnesses from organizations who have utilized the Court Challenges Program.

Debate arose thereon.

 

Ed Fast moved, — That the motion be amended by adding the following words: “and from organizations who have applied and were not successful”.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Ed Fast and it was agreed to, by a show of hands: YEAS: 6; NAYS: 4.

 

The question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to, by a show of hands: YEAS: 6; NAYS: 2.

 

At 5:37 p.m., the Committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.

 



Jacques Lahaie
Clerk of the Committee

 
 
2012/01/25 11:16 a.m.