Skip to main content
Start of content

CHPC Committee Meeting

Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
 
Meeting No. 63
 
Monday, May 6, 2013
 

The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage met at 3:33 p.m. this day, in Room 7-52, 131 Queen Street, the Chair, the Hon. Rob Moore, presiding.

 

Members of the Committee present: Ray Boughen, Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet, Paul Calandra, Andrew Cash, Matthew Dubé, Hon. Rob Moore, Pierre Nantel, Blake Richards, Scott Simms and Terence Young.

 

Acting Members present: Joyce Bateman for Jim Hillyer, Peter Braid for Gordon Brown and David Sweet for Gordon Brown.

 

Associate Members present: Erin O'Toole.

 

In attendance: Library of Parliament: Michael Dewing, Analyst; Marion Ménard, Analyst. House of Commons: Julie Lalande Prud'homme, Procedural Clerk.

 

Witnesses: Operation HUSKY 2013: Michel Maisonneuve, Representative; Steve Gregory, Founder. Canadian Museum of Civilization: Chantal Amyot, Director, Canadian History Hall Project, Research and Exhibitions; Xavier Gélinas, Curator, Canadian Political History.

 
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the Committee on Monday, April 29, 2013, the Committee commenced its study of significant aspects in Canadian history.
 

Michel Maisonneuve and Steve Gregory made statements and answered questions.

 

Scott Simms moved, — That the Committee invite Retired Lieutenant-General Senator Roméo Dallaire as a witness to discuss Canada’s role in United Nations Peacekeeping, NATO, and other aspects of Canadian Military past for the Committee’s study of Significant Aspects in Canadian History.

 

RULING BY THE CHAIR

 

The Chair ruled the proposed motion out of order as the Committee has already dealt with this matter.

 

Whereupon, Scott Simms appealed the decision of the Chair.

The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joyce Bateman, Ray Boughen, Peter Braid, Paul Calandra, Blake Richards, Terence Young — 6; NAYS: Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet, Andrew Cash, Matthew Dubé, Pierre Nantel, Scott Simms — 5.

 

Questioning of the witnesses resumed.

 

At 4:29 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 4:35 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

Chantal Amyot made a statement and, with Xavier Gélinas, answered questions.

 

Pierre Nantel moved, — That the Committee immediately halt its study on Canadian history considering the interference with provincial jurisdiction on education.

 

After debate, the question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet, Andrew Cash, Matthew Dubé, Pierre Nantel — 4; NAYS: Joyce Bateman, Ray Boughen, Peter Braid, Paul Calandra, Blake Richards, Scott Simms, Terence Young — 7.

 

Paul Calandra moved, — That notwithstanding the motion adopted Monday, April 29, 2013, the following words be deleted from the said motion: “A breakdown and comparison of relevant standards and courses of study offered in primary and post-secondary institutions in each of the provinces and territories;”.

Debate arose thereon.

 

Pierre Nantel moved, — That the motion be amended by adding the words “A review of federal, provincial and municipal programs designed to preserve our history and heritage; and” after the word “territories”.

 

The question was put on the amendment of Pierre Nantel and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet, Andrew Cash, Matthew Dubé, Pierre Nantel — 4; NAYS: Joyce Bateman, Ray Boughen, Peter Braid, Paul Calandra, Blake Richards, Scott Simms, Terence Young — 7.

 

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joyce Bateman, Ray Boughen, Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet, Peter Braid, Paul Calandra, Andrew Cash, Matthew Dubé, Pierre Nantel, Blake Richards, Scott Simms, David Sweet, Terence Young — 12; NAYS: — 0.

 

Therefore, the terms of reference of the study read as follows:

That the Committee undertake a thorough and comprehensive review of significant aspects in Canadian history including the following subjects and themes:

  • A review of federal, provincial and municipal programs designed to preserve our history and heritage; and
  • A focus on Canadian history including but not limited to pre-confederation, early confederation, suffrage, World War I, with an emphasis on battles such as Vimy Ridge, World War II including the Liberation of Holland, the Battle of Ortona, Battle of the Atlantic, the Korean conflict, peacekeeping missions, constitutional development, the Afghanistan conflict, early 20th century Canada, post-war Canada, and the late 20th century.

And that emphasis be placed on Canadians’ access to historical information and education, by studying the following topics:

  • How Hansard can be used as a means of preserving important witness testimony and part of the permanent public record;
  • The tools and methods available for Canadians to access and preserve historical content; and
  • The tools and methods available to Canadians to increase their knowledge of Canadian history.

And that the Committee utilize the following information sources in order to undertake this study:

  • Witnesses testimony including firsthand accounts of significant periods;
  • The Committee visit relevant national museums to better understand their efforts at preserving our history and how decisions are made to display our history; and
  • The Committee invite the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the National Film Board and other public ad private broadcasters to discuss their role in preserving important accounts of Canadian history that may be within their collection.

And that the report highlight best practices, new methods and potential opportunities to preserve, protect and enhance Canadians’ knowledge of our history while recommending ways of improving access to our historical collections.

 

At 5:22 p.m., the Committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.

 



Christine Holke David
Clerk of the Committee

 
 
2013/05/27 2:39 p.m.