Skip to main content
Start of content

HESA Committee Report

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

PDF

Chapter 4: hhr Research
and Data Collection in canadA

Introduction

Research and data collection play a significant role in HHR planning. In order to determine that there will be sufficient health professionals with the right skills to provide high quality health care, policy makers first require sufficient data on the current supply of health professionals.[52] According to CIHI, a minimum data set for measuring the supply of health professionals includes: demographic information; education and training; geographic distribution; migration; non-migration related attrition; employment and practice characteristics; and productivity.[53] Adequate measuring of the current supply of health professionals therefore marks the first step in HHR planning. In addition, policy makers require adequate information on future population health needs in order to determine which types of health professionals are needed.[54] Research on best practices in health care delivery is also essential for determining how health professionals should work together to achieve the best possible outcomes. This chapter examines current initiatives in HHR data collection and research that serve as the basis for HHR planning across Canada.

Data Collection

The Committee learned that CIHI has been collecting detailed demographic and workforce information on a broad range of health professionals, including: physicians, nurses, occupational therapists, pharmacists, physiotherapists, medical laboratory technologists, and medical radiation technologists.[55] CIHI also collects aggregate data for an additional 17 health occupations, including: chiropractors, midwives and psychologists. CIHI further noted that its data collection facilitated national collaborative planning, as it provided a source of interprovincial comparison in regards to workforce supply trends to HHR planners and policy makers across the country. According to CIHI, these data collection projects were made possible by CIHI funding received from Health Canada’s Pan-Canadian Health Human Resource Strategy.[56]

In its report submitted to Committee members, Canada’s Health Care Providers, 2007, CIHI presented current demographic and workforce trends among different categories of health professionals in Canada. The report further indicated that there were gaps in research regarding some of these trends, for example: the retirement profile of a variety of health professionals; exit rates from health professions and reasons for them; and the percentage of Aboriginal Canadians in specific health professions.[57] Other witnesses appearing before the Committee also reinforced the fact that there was a lack of minimum data available on Aboriginal HHR.[58] Health Canada officials appearing before the Committee indicated that they were working with CIHI to analyse the data available on Aboriginal HHR, as well as work with communities to gather further information at the local level.[59]

Witnesses further identified gaps in data collection that needed to be addressed, including the need for CIHI and Statistics Canada to repeat the national survey of work and health of nurses, which was considered by witnesses to be out of date.[60] They further noted that the survey should be expanded to include other categories of health professionals.[61] Other witnesses stressed the need to focus data collection not only on health professional supply trends, but on future population health needs, such as the management of chronic diseases as a result of the aging population.[62] This was due to the fact that HHR planning was moving away from a model linked to current health service utilization patterns towards the future health needs of the population. Officials from Statistics Canada indicated that such data was available to policy makers and planners on a cost-recovery basis through the Canadian Community Health Survey, which collects data on the determinants of health, health status and the utilization of health services.[63] They indicated that it was possible to produce the data at the regional health level, but faced difficulties in producing the data at the community level due to reliability and confidentiality issues.

The Committee acknowledges CIHI’s efforts in expanding its data collection initiatives to include a broad range of health professionals. However, the Committee also recognizes that there is a need for CIHI to collect detailed demographic and work information on all categories of health professionals, including information gathered through survey research. Furthermore, they could make efforts to ensure that its data remains current by repeating surveys, such as the national survey on the work and health of nurses. Moreover, CIHI could also work with Health Canada to examine ways of addressing gaps in HHR data collection related to Aboriginal health human resources. Finally, the Committee notes that there is also a need for CIHI to work with other relevant federal government departments and agencies to collect HHR data related to the provision of health care services and benefits to other federal client groups, including: RCMP; immigrants and refugees; members of the Canadian Forces; veterans; and federal inmates. The Committee therefore recommends that:

Recommendation 3:

Health Canada seriously consider providing funding through its Pan-Canadian Health Human Resource Strategy to enable CIHI to:

  • expand its data collection to include demographic and work information on all categories of health professionals;
  • repeat national HHR surveys as necessary so that they remain up to date.

Recommendation 4:

Relevant federal government departments and agencies work closely with CIHI to establish a minimum data set for HHR planning for all federal client groups, including: First Nations and Inuit; RCMP; veterans; members of the Canadian Forces; immigrants and refugees; and federal inmates.

Research

The Committee heard from research organizations that a significant amount of research had been conducted, evaluating current HHR challenges, as well as various innovative pilot projects across the country that were demonstrating positive results in addressing the needs of health care providers.[64] For example, the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF) commissioned a report in 2001 entitled Commitment and Care, which highlighted successful initiatives undertaken by the British Columbia’s Ministry of Health, which launched a program to relieve senior nurses of 20 to 30 % of patient care in return for mentoring new, inexperienced nurses.[65] However, despite the publication of research highlighting positive solutions to HHR challenges, research organizations also emphasized the fact that a mechanism is lacking in Canada to collect and disseminate this information to a broad range of stakeholders.[66]

In addition, witnesses appearing before the Committee raised the issue of health research funding. They articulated that providing sufficient funding for clinical research conducted by health care providers would serve as a means of attracting and retaining health care providers in Canada.[67] Increased funding for clinical research would also serve a dual purpose in providing further opportunities for evaluating and improving the efficiency of Canada’s health care systems.[68]

The Committee recognizes that there may be a need to establish additional mechanisms for collecting and sharing research in the area of HHR in order to move forward in promoting innovation in health service delivery across the country, as reflected in earlier sections of this report. The Committee also thinks that sufficient funding should be provided to CIHR to continue supporting the clinical research of health care providers, as a means of ensuring their recruitment and retention, as well as supporting the overall objective of improving health care delivery. The Committee therefore recommends that:

Recommendation 5:

The federal government seriously consider providing CIHR with funding to develop further mechanisms aimed at supporting clinical research in the area of HHR, recognizing it as a means of attracting and retaining health professionals in Canada.

Recommendation 6:

The federal government continue to provide the Health Council of Canada and CIHR with funding to determine the most appropriate mix of health professionals, both paid and unpaid, for different communities and population groups.


[52] CIHI, “Canada’s Health Care Providers, 2007,” 2007, http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/HCProviders_07_EN_final.pdf.

[53] CIHI, “Guidance Document for the Development of Data Seuts to Support HHR Management in Canada,” February 2005, http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/Guidance_Document_e.pdf, p. 10.

[54] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 16, 2nd Session, 40th Parliament, April 23, 2009, /content/Committee/402/HESA/Evidence/EV3810879/HESAEV16-E.PDF.

[55] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 16, 2nd Session, 40th Parliament, April 23, 2009, /content/Committee/402/HESA/Evidence/EV3810879/HESAEV16-E.PDF.

[56] Further details regarding this strategy will be provided in the sections examining innovative solutions to HHR challenges. Health Canada, “Pan-Canadian Health Human Resource Strategy: 2007/2008,” 2008, http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/alt_formats/pdf/pubs/hhrhs/2008-ar-ra-eng.pdf.

[57] CIHI, “Canada’s Health Care Providers, 2007,” 2007, http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/products/HCProviders_07_EN_final.pdf, p. 73.

[58] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence” No. 5, 3rd Session, 40th Parliament, March 25, 2010, /content/Committee/403/HESA/Evidence/EV4378648/HESAEV05-E.PDF.

[59] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 17, 3rd Session, 40th Parliament, May 13, 2010, /content/Committee/403/HESA/Evidence/EV4531758/HESAEV17-E.PDF.

[60] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 17, 2nd Session, 40th Parliament, April 28, 2009, /content/Committee/402/HESA/Evidence/EV3846660/HESAEV17-E.PDF.

[61] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 17, 2nd Session, 40th Parliament, April 28, 2009, /content/Committee/402/HESA/Evidence/EV3846660/HESAEV17-E.PDF.

[62] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 16, 2nd Session, 40th Parliament, April 23, 2009, /content/Committee/402/HESA/Evidence/EV3810879/HESAEV16-E.PDF.

[63] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 17, 3rd Session, 40th Parliament, May 13, 2010, /content/Committee/403/HESA/Evidence/EV4531758/HESAEV17-E.PDF.  .

[64] Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, “Report to the Standing Committee on Health: Study on Health Human Resources,” Brief submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, April 23, 2009.

[65] Ibid.

[66] House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, Evidence, No. 16, 2nd Session, 40th Parliament, April 23, 2009, /content/Committee/402/HESA/Evidence/EV3810879/HESAEV16-E.PDF.

[67] Ibid.

[68] Ibid.