NDDN Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
CANADA
Standing Committee on National Defence
|
l |
|
l |
|
EVIDENCE
Thursday, May 10, 2007
[Recorded by Electronic Apparatus]
[English]
I now call the meeting to order.
We have two issues to deal with today. First, in open session, we'll deal with a notice of motion from Mr. Coderre. We'll suspend after that's dealt with and move in camera to deal with the report.
In the name of Mr. Coderre, we have a motion that states:
It is recommended that the Standing Committee on National Defence report back to the House with recommendations on its study of the military equipment procurement process.
Mr. Coderre, do you have any comments?
I think it speaks for itself, Mr. Chair.
The fact that we had all those witnesses.... We did an amazing job, and our party will have several recommendations. I don't think we'll go through Afghanistan.... I would say it's kind of short and sweet, but it's to bring back a list of recommendations and show that we've done our homework. I can feel, from all the questions that we had from both sides, that there is some consensus on the procurement itself. We had some good propositions, and I believe it would be appropriate to have that report.
So it speaks for itself, I would say.
I support the idea of a very short report on procurement. I don't want to get into something long and complex, but something short and succinct.
[Translation]
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
What kind of deadline are we talking about exactly? I imagine we have to draft a report. Our analysts did not consider this. I suppose there are deadlines. Did we take that into account? Perhaps we should ask our clerk. If the motion is adopted, how much time do we have to produce a report?
[English]
I think if this motion does pass, it does add an item to our already agreed to agenda. I would think that at some point in time we'll have to have a steering committee, but in the meantime, if the motion does pass, the researcher can certainly be working on compiling a report. I'm not sure how long that would take. I don't even know if he has any idea.
If there are recommendations that are going to be on the table, it would be good to have them before starting the draft so one could write to the recommendations, or not. Because otherwise, you end up drafting a report, everybody puts in their recommendations, and we'll be going through the same sort of thing we went through again.
Mr. Coderre indicates his recommendations could be supplied as the report is being put together. I'll maybe just leave that out for all parties, that if there was something in the evidence that we heard that would prompt you to create a recommendation, then let's get that done and get it into Wolf as he's preparing.
Mr. Hiebert.
I just wanted to say that I generally support this motion and would hope that, as was raised, it won't take too long for us to finish this and move on to our next study.
(Motion agreed to)