SMIP Committee Report

NEW TECHNOLOGIES

54.   During our deliberations, we considered a number of issues related to new technologies. Clearly, the Internet offers opportunities for the House of Commons and its Members. We note that several Members in particular have demonstrated their interest in and commitment to the use of technology in the parliamentary sphere. There are a number of areas, such as communications, where change is warranted. More use should be made of hyper-links in parliamentary documents and on the parliamentary website. It has also been suggested that there should be “streaming” of committee proceedings on the Internet. This should certainly be done for committees that are currently videotaped by the House of Commons, and it is hoped that, as time goes on, more and more committees will become available in this way. Proposals have been put forward to facilitate the electronic filing of petitions with Members, and the electronic filing of documents with the House. The development of electronic signatures should assist in this regard. Obviously, in adapting our practices and procedures, we must be mindful of and respectful of parliamentary traditions, but within this context we should take advantage of the advantages offered by modern technology. (We wish to make it clear that the Committee is not referring to the taking of votes by electronic means in making this recommendation.)

The Committee recommends that the administration of the House of Commons proceed with plans for enhanced use of technology for the House, its committees and its Members.

 PRIVATE MEMBERS’ BUSINESS

55.A great many of the Members who spoke during the debates in the House of Commons on March 21, 2001, and May 1, 2001, addressed the issue of Private Members’ Business. Among the suggestions that were made were that all items should be votable; that all Members should have an opportunity to propose a votable bill or motion during the course of a parliamentary session; that more time be devoted to the consideration of Private Members’ Business, as well as the possibility of setting aside Fridays for such matters; and that questions and comments be permitted during debate on Private Members’ Business.

56.The members of the Committee are aware that there is considerable dissatisfaction with Private Members’ Business as it presently operates. The current rules essentially date from the Special Committee on Reform of the House of Commons (the McGrath Committee) in 1985. There has been some tinkering over the years, but the basic features remain the same. While there is general agreement that changes are required, however, there is no consensus on the nature of specific reforms. Considerable support, for instance, has been indicated for making virtually all items of Private Members’ Business votable, but serious concerns have also been voiced, and the details any such scheme would have to be worked out.

57.The Sub-committee on Private Members’ Business recently sent a comprehensive survey to all Members, seeking their input into possible amendments. It would be preferable if private Members themselves proposed reforms in this area. We hope that the Sub-committee, and the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs through which it reports, will be in a position to make proposals in the near future. If this issue is not dealt with, however, the members will consider re-constituting this Committee to do so.