Skip to main content
Start of content

HERI Committee Meeting

Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
 
 

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

Meeting No. 75

Monday, June 17, 2002

The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage met at 3:30 p.m. this day, in Room 237-C, Centre Block, the Chair, Clifford Lincoln, presiding.

Members of the Committee present: Jim Abbott, Sarmite Bulte, Claude Duplain, Christiane Gagnon, John Harvard, Betty Hinton, Clifford Lincoln, Dennis Mills and Tony Tirabassi.

Acting Members present: Dominic LeBlanc for Paul Bonwick; Shaun Murphy for Rodger Cuzner; Alan Tonks for Roger Gallaway; James Rajotte for Chuck Strahl; Joe Comartin for Wendy Lill and Peter MacKay for Loyola Hearn.

In attendance: From the Library of Parliament: Joseph Jackson, Terrence Thomas, research officers.

Witnesses: From the Department of Canadian Heritage: Bruce Stockfish, Director General, Copyright Policy; Denis Gratton, Manager, Copyright Policy; Michael Himsl, Senior Policy Analyst; Jeff Richstone, Legal Counsel. From the Department of Industry: Michèle Gervais, Director, Intellectual Property Policy; Elizabeth Britt, Senior Counsel.

Pursuant to its Order of Reference of Friday, February 22, 2002, the Committee resumed consideration of Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Copyright Act (See Minutes of Proceedings, Wednesday, May 29, 2002, Meeting No. 68).

On Clause 1, the Committee proceeded to Clause-by-Clause consideration of the Bill.

Clause 1 carried.

On Clause 2,

Jim Abbott moved, -- That Bill C-48, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 14 to 31 on page 1 with the following:

““retransmitter” means a person who performs a function comparable to that of a cable retransmission system, but does not include a new media retransmitter;”

The question being put on the amendment, it was agreed to.

Jim Abbott moved, -- That Bill C-48, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 2 with the following:

‘‘(2)
Subsection 31(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following in alphabetical order:

‘‘new media retransmitter’’ means a person whose retransmission is lawful under the Broadcasting Act only by reason of the Exemption Order for New Media Broadcasting Undertakings issued by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission as Appendix A to Public Notice CRTC 1999-197, as amended from time to time;

(3) Subsections 31(2) and (3) of the Act’’

The question being put on the amendment, it was agreed to.

Jim Abbott moved, -- That Bill C-48, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 2 with the following:

“ly and without alteration, except as otherwise”

The question being put on the amendment, it was agreed to.

Jim Abbott moved, -- That Bill C-48, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 29 on page 2 with the following:

“signal” for the purposes of subsection (2); and

(b) prescribing conditions for the purposes”

The question being put on the amendment, it was agreed to.

Jim Abbott moved, -- That Bill C-48, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 2 with the following:

“paragraph (3)(b).”

The question being put on the amendment, it was agreed to.

Christiane Gagnon moved, -- That Bill C-48, in Clause 2, be amended

(a) by replacing line 22 on page 2 with the following:

“(3) Subject to subsections (4) to (6), the Governor in Council may make”

(b) by adding after line 32 on page 2 the following:

“(4) The Governor in Council may not make a regulation under subsection (3) unless the Minister has first laid the proposed regulation before the House of Commons.

(5) A proposed regulation that is laid before the House of Commons is deemed to be automatically referred to the appropriate committee of the House, as determined by the rules of the House, and the committee may conduct inquiries or public hearings with respect to the proposed regulation and report its findings to the House.

(6) The Governor in Council may make a regulation under subsection (3) only if

(a) the House of Commons has not concurred in any report from a committee respecting the proposed regulation within the thirty sitting days following the day on which the proposed regulation was laid before the House, in which case the regulation may only be made in the form laid; or

(b) the House of Commons has concurred in a report from a committee approving the proposed regulation or an amended version of it, in which case the Governor in Council may only make the regulation in the form concurred in. ”

After debate, by unanimous consent, the amendment was withdrawn.

Clause 2, as amended, carried.

Clauses 3, 4 and 5 carried severally.

The Title carried.

The Bill, as amended, carried.

ORDERED, -- That the Chair report Bill C-48 with amendments to the House as the Sixth Report of the Committee.

It was moved, - That the Committee order a reprint of the Bill for use by the House at Report Stage.

After debate, the question being put on the motion, it was negatived by a show of hands;

YEAS: 1                      NAYS: 13

At 4:02 p.m., the Committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.

 

 

Christine Fisher
Clerk of the Committee