RNNR Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Minutes of Proceedings
Francesco Sorbara moved, — That, in relation to the consideration of Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, and Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts:
(a) the minister and officials be invited to appear on C-50, on a date to be determined by the Chair but no later than Wednesday November 8, 2023;
(b) the minister and officials be invited to appear on C-49, on a date to be determined by the Chair but no later than Wednesday December 6, 2023;
(c) members submit their lists of suggested witnesses concerning C-50 by noon on Friday November 3, 2023, and that the Chair, the clerk and the analysts create witness panels which reflect the representation of the parties on the committee and, once complete, that the Chair begin scheduling those meetings;
(d) members submit their lists of suggested witnesses concerning C-49 by noon on Friday November 10, 2023, and that the Chair, the clerk and the analysts create witness panels which reflect the representation of the parties on the committee, and, once complete, that the Chair begin scheduling those meetings;
(e) the Chair seek additional meeting times and that meetings be scheduled, if resources available, for up to three hours each;
(f) the Chair issue press releases for C-50 and C-49 inviting written submissions from the public and establishing a deadline for those submissions;
(g) the committee hold at least four meetings with witnesses on C-50 before clause-by-clause consideration is scheduled;
(h) the committee hold at least four meetings with witnesses on C-49 before clause-by-clause consideration is scheduled, and;
(i) the Chair set deadlines for the submission of proposed amendments for C-50 and C-49 in advance of the beginning of their respective clause-by-clause considerations, but no sooner than after the completion of the respective witness meetings for each, and that the members of the committee, as well as independent Members, submit to the clerk all of their proposed amendments to C-50 and C-49 no later than 5:00 p.m. on the respective days established by the Chair, in both officials languages, and that these be distributed to members.
Debate arose thereon.
At 11:14 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 11:22 a.m., the sitting resumed.
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That the motion be amended by adding after the words “consequential amendments to other Acts" the following:
"(a) before the committee considers C-50, it first undertakes a study of the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling that Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, is unconstitutional; that for the purposes of this study, the committee: (a) hold at least five (5) meetings, (b) invite the minister of Energy and Natural Resources and the minister of the Environment and Climate Change to appear for one hour each, (c) report its findings and recommendations to the House, and that (d) pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee request that the government table a comprehensive response to the report;
(b) before the committee considers C-50, it completes its consideration of C-49".
Debate arose thereon.
At 1:08 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 1:21 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the amendment continued.
Jeremy Patzer moved, — That the amendment be further amended by adding after the words “for one hour each” the words “, and stakeholders from the resource sector from the riding of Sudbury”.
Debate arose thereon.
The question was put on the subamendment of Jeremy Patzer and it was agreed to, by a show of hands: YEAS: 7; NAYS: 4.
At 3:02 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 3:34 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the amendment continued.
Ted Falk moved, — That the amendment be further amended by adding after the words “for one hour each” the words “, and stakeholders from the resource sector from the riding of Timmins”.
Debate arose thereon.
A point of order was raised as to the participation of non-members of the committee in the current debate.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that non-members of the committee are not allowed to participate in the current debate.
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: " Shall the Chair’s ruling be sustained?" was put and was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Bardish Chagger, Marc G. Serré, Mario Simard — 7;
NAYS: Garnett Genuis, Shannon Stubbs, Arnold Viersen — 4.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 4:28 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:06 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 5:21 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:26 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
A point of order was raised as to the participation of non-members of the committee in the current debate.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that non-members of the committee are allowed to participate in the current debate, unless a committee member objects.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 5:51 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:32 p.m., on Wednesday, November 1, 2023, the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
A point of order is raised as to the participation of non-members of the committee in the current debate.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that non-members of the committee are allowed to participate in its public proceedings, unless the House or the committee orders otherwise, provided that they do not vote or count for quorum.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 5:21 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:49 p.m., the sitting resumed.
A point of order is raised as whether the privileges of Mr. Viersen were violated by a previous ruling that non-members of the committee were not allowed to participate in the current debate.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that such a question is rather a point of order as it does not touch on parliamentary privilege.
At 5:55 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 6:02 p.m., the sitting resumed.
Whereupon, Shannon Stubbs appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "“Shall the Chair’s ruling be sustained?”" was put and was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Caroline Desbiens, Wayne Long — 7;
NAYS: — 0.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 6:06 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 6:13 p.m., the sitting resumed.
A point of order was raised as to who is the member that currently has the floor.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that Mr. Angus has the floor.
At 6:18 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 6:28 p.m, the sitting resumed and was suspended.
At 11:05 a.m., on Monday, November 6, 2023, the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
A point of order is raised as to who is the member that currently has the floor.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that Mr. Angus has the floor.
At 11:26 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 11:39 a.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 11:48 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 12:10 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that points of order should state the procedural issue at stake, and not be used for debate.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 12:38 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 3:52 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 4:13 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:31 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 4:48 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:02 p.m., the sitting resumed.
A point of order was raised about the repetitiveness of recent points of order.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that Mr. Angus has the floor and reminded members about the possibility for the committee to challenge his rulings, pursuant to Standing Order 117.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 5:19 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:33 p.m., on Wednesday, November 8, 2023, the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 4:37 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:41 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
A point of order is raised as to whether an oral notice of a motion can be done on a point of order.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that a member cannot give an oral notice of a motion on a point of order.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 5:15 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:27 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
A point of order was raised as whether Mr. Angus has used unparliamentary language.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that Mr. Angus has not used unparliamentary language.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 5:50 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 6:00 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 6:26 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 11:04 a.m., on Monday, November 20, 2023, the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
A point of order was raised as to whether several microphones opened at the same time constitutes a health and safety concerns for the interpreters.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that such a situation does constitute a health and safety concern for the said interpreters and asked members to refrain from talking on each other with multiple microphones opened at the same time.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
A point of order was raised as to the participation of non-members of the committee in the current debate.
At 12:01 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 12:12 p.m., the sitting resumed.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that moving a motion concerning the participation of non-members cannot be done on a point of order but rather when they have the floor during a debate.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
Charlie Angus moved, — That non-members not be allowed to participate in public proceedings, unless there is unanimous consent of members.
A point of order was raised about whether such a motion is a substantive one and if so, if it can be moved.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled that the motion moved by Mr. Angus has a condition attached to it, being “unless there is unanimous consent of members”, and that it make the motion a substantive one, which cannot be moved since there is already a substantive motion being currently debated by the committee.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
Charlie Angus moved, — That the Chair do not recognize non-members to speak.
A point of order is raised about the admissibility of such a motion.
At 12:43 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 12:55 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The Chair reserved his decision.
Mr. Angus said that he no longer wanted to move that motion.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 1:01 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:37 p.m., on Wednesday, November 22, 2023, the sitting resumed.
STATEMENT BY THE CHAIR
Before we proceed to resuming debate on the subamendment of Mr. Falk, I would like to address the concerns expressed by some members at the last meeting in relation to suspensions due to a concern for the health and safety of the interpreters. Some committees, including this one, have been experiencing episodes of disorder in recent weeks. It is not uncommon for members to speak over each other or to open their own microphone without waiting to be recognized by the chair.
As I mentioned, the question arose as to whether this could constitute a health and safety problem. By default, I have been on the cautionary side of things. However, the House administration has consulted the Translation Bureau and multimedia services, who confirm that disorder in committee is not itself a health and safety issue. A feedback incident or someone banging on a microphone could contribute to risk, but this is not the case with many people speaking at the same time.
This type of situation can, however, affect the ability of interpreters to provide interpretation if they are unable to keep up with the flow of conversation. When this happens, there will be an interruption in service. The interpreters will inform the committee when this happens, as they already do in cases where the sound quality of remote participants is not good.
As chair, I will remain vigilant. I want to make sure that interpretation is available to ensure equal and fair participation of all members in accordance with the Official Languages Act and the Constitution. I would like to remind members that there should be no situation where several members open their microphone and speak all at once. Only the chair has the authority to recognize the member who has the floor. At no time are members allowed to open their microphone and speak without first being recognized by the chair, either in the course of a debate or on a point of order.
In the case of disorder, the chair is still allowed to suspend the meeting, as I have mentioned previously, and as stated at pages 1058 and 1059 of the procedural book.
Thank you for your attention and co-operation in this regard.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 5:08 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:15 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendement continued.
At 5:33 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:58 p.m., the sitting resumed and was suspended.
At 11:07 a.m., on Monday, November 27, 2023, the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 12:58 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:43 p.m., on Wednesday, November 29, 2023, the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
At 6:30 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 11:07 a.m., on Monday, December 4, 2023, the sitting resumed.
The debate on the subamendment continued.
By unanimous consent, it was agreed, — That the proposed budget in the amount of $4,500, for the study of Climate Crisis and Canada’s Energy Sector, be adopted.
At 1:00 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 6:36 p.m., on Wednesday, December 6, 2023, the sitting resumed.
Pursuant to Standing Order 75(1), consideration of Clause 1 (short title) and of the Preamble was postponed.
The Chair called Clause 2.
The committee commenced its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
By unanimous consent, Clause 2 was allowed to stand.
On Clause 3,
Jeremy Patzer moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 3 and 4 on page 5 with the following:“3 The purpose of this Act is to improve affordability and to facilitate and promote economic growth, private sector investment, the creation of sustainable jobs and”
Debate arose thereon.
Garnett Genuis moved, — That the amendment be amended by adding after the words “sustainable jobs” the following: “that provide powerful paychecks to Canadian workers”.
Debate arose thereon.
At 8:30 p.m., pursuant to an Order of the House adopted on Monday, December 4, 2023, the debate was interrupted, all remaining amendments submitted to the committee deemed moved and the Chair put the question, forthwith and successively without further debate, on all remaining clauses and amendments submitted to the committee.
The question was put on the subamendment of Garnett Genuis and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: — 0;
NAYS : John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Yvonne Jones, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
The question was put on the amendment of Jeremy Patzer and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: — 0;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Yvonne Jones, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
(a) by replacing line 3 on page 5 with the following:
“3 The purposes of this Act are
(a) to facilitate and promote”
(b) by adding after line 11 on page 5 the following:
“(b) to increase opportunities for high-quality work in high-valued-added, low-carbon industries, to preserve existing good jobs through supports for decarbonizing Canada’s economy, to minimize job losses and to create pathways for workers into sustainable jobs.”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: — 0;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Yvonne Jones, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“shift to a net-zero economy through a framework to improve cooperation with all levels of government, including Indigenous governing bodies, as well as en-”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: — 0;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Peter Fonseca, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“shift to a net-zero economy by 2050 through a framework to en‐”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Claude DeBellefeuille — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Peter Fonseca, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“affordable energy, skills development, the labour market, rights at work,”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Garnett Genuis, Jeremy Patzer — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Yvonne Jones, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
Clause 3 was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 4;
NAYS: Charlie Angus, Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Yvonne Jones, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 7.
On new Clause 3.1,
Mario Simard moved, — That Bill C-50 be amended by adding after line 11 on page 5 the following new clause:“3.1 This Act is to be applied in a manner that is consistent with the agreements on workforce development between Canada and Quebec and the legislative jurisdiction of Quebec.”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Yvonne Jones, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
Clause 4 carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Yvonne Jones, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Mario Simard — 1.
On Clause 5,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing lines 15 to 18 on page 5 with the following:“5 The Governor in Council may, by order, designate a member of the King’s Privy Council for Canada, other than the Minister, to be the specified Minister for the purposes of this Act.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“other than the Minister, to be”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
Clause 5 carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 6,
Julie Dabrusin moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 6, be amended by(a) replacing lines 20 to 22 on page 5 with the following:
“tainable Jobs Partnership Council, whose mandate is to provide the Minister and specified Ministers with independent advice — through a process of social dialogue — ”
(b) replacing line 28 on page 5 with the following:
“through skills development, training, retraining and economic development and diversification, as well as through national, regional, federal-provincial and federal-territorial initiatives related to the Sustainable Jobs Action Plans;”
(c) replacing line 4 on page 6 with the following:
“Ministers and, unless their position is vacant, each co-chair of the Council, amend the terms of reference.”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(b.1) measures to avoid regulatory duplication and unnecessary delays in the regulatory process; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(b.1) measures to ensure access to affordable and reliable energy;
(b.2) measures to ensure a strong, export-oriented energy sector; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
Clause 6, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 7,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended(a) by replacing line 8 on page 6 with the following:
“(a) advising the Minister and specified Minister on”
(b) by replacing line 13 on page 6 with the following:
“(b) advising the Minister and specified Minister on”
(c) by replacing line 17 on page 6 with the following:
“(c) advising the Minister and specified Minister on”
(d) by replacing line 21 on page 6 with the following:
“(d) advising the Minister and specified Minister on”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
(a) replacing lines 9 to 11 on page 6 with the following:
“strategies and measures to encourage growth in sustainable jobs in a net-”
(b) replacing line 23 on page 6 with the following:
“(d.1) advising the Minister and the specified Ministers on potential areas of cooperation with the governments of the provinces and territories and other governments in Canada in relation to the Sustainable Jobs Action Plan or the purpose of this Act;
(e) engaging relevant partners and stakeholders, including at the national, regional, provincial, territorial and community levels, in ac-”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 6 with the following:
“net-zero economy, including through the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Final Report of the Task Force on Just Transition for Canadian Coal Power Workers and Communities;”
The question was put on the amendment of Elizabeth May and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Larry Brock, Julie Dabrusin, Ted Falk, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“(b.1) advising the Minister and specified Minister on ways to create economic opportunities for Indigenous communities;”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(b.1) advising the Minister and specified Ministers on ways to create economic opportunities for Indigenous communities;”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“economic growth, private sector investment and the labour market in a net-zero”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“economic growth, the opportunities and vulnerabilities of various sectors and various regions and the changes within and the labour market in a net-zero”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“(c.1) advising the Minister responsible for matters relating to sustainable jobs in relation to greenhouse gas emissions reduction plans under the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act;”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Larry Brock, Julie Dabrusin, Ted Falk, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“cordance with the terms of reference, including
(i) partners that are members of the Net-Zero Advisory Body,
(ii) Indigenous peoples, and
(iii) interested parties, including unionized and non-unionized workers, community representatives, newcomers to Canada, youth and individuals from under-represented groups; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Ted Falk, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 3;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Larry Brock, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara — 8.
“(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), where cooperation and coordinated action between the federal and provincial governments is required, the Council must, in its advice, take into consideration the scope of federal jurisdiction in those matters.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“(g) meeting periodically with the Net-Zero Advisory Body for the purposes of information sharing and coordination of advice regarding Sustainable Jobs Action Plans and greenhouse gas emissions reductions plans.”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Larry Brock, Julie Dabrusin, Ted Falk, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
Clause 7, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 8,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 6 with the following:“8 (1) The Council consists of no more than 20 members,”
The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 772 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Third Edition.
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
(a) replacing lines 28 and 29 on page 6 with the following:
“8 (1) The Council consists of 13 members, who are to be appointed by the”
(b) adding after line 32 on page 6 the following:
“(1.1) The Council is composed of the following members:
(a) two co-chairs;
(b) three members who represent trade unions;
(c) three members who represent Indigenous peoples;
(d) three members who represent industry;
(e) one member who represents an environmental non-governmental organization; and
(f) one member who represents another key stakeholder group.”
(c) replacing lines 6 to 10 on page 7 with the following:
“and underrepresented groups; and
(b) the need for members who have knowledge, exper-”
(d) replacing line 12 on page 7 with the following:
“(i) the key sectors involved in the shift to a net-ze-”
(e) replacing line 29 on page 7 with the following:
“chairs, the Minister is to recommend indi-”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Mario Simard — 1.
“ister, after consultation by the Minister with the provinces, to hold office on a part-time basis and at pleasure”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“(a.1) the importance of collaborating with all levels of government, including provincial and municipal governments;”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(a.1) the importance of having members who actively work to promote climate action and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions; ”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Larry Brock, Julie Dabrusin, Ted Falk, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“(ix) compliance with the regulatory framework governing Canada's energy sector, including the framework for the issuance of permits,
(x) Indigenous and constitutional law,
(xi) energy infrastructure management and delivery,
(xii) the corporate governance of energy and clean technology companies, and
(xiii) investment in the energy sector.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“chairs, the Minister is to recommend individuals who represent trade unions and industry and who have the knowledge, expertise or experience referred to in subparagraphs (2)(c)(i) to (viii).”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Larry Brock, Julie Dabrusin, Ted Falk, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
Clause 8, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Terry Dowdall, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
Clause 9 carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Terry Dowdall, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
Clause 10 carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Terry Dowdall, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 11,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 11, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 8 with the following:“specified Minister an annual report”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(a) in the case of the first report, no later than one year after the date on which this Act comes into force; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Ted Falk, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“(b) in the case of each subsequent report, no later than 30 days after the day on which a fall economic statement is released or, in the event that no fall economic statement is released, no later than December 31.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 8;
NAYS: Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 3.
Clause 11, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Mario Simard — 1.
On Clause 12,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 12, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 8 with the following:“within 25 days after the day on which the Minister re‐”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
Clause 12, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 13,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 13, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 8 with the following:“specified Minister and other relevant federal ministers,”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: — 0;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 11.
“specified Ministers, other relevant federal ministers, representatives of provincial governments and Indigenous governing bodies,”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: — 0;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 8.
“prepare a written response to the Council’s annual report and”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 5;
NAYS: Lisa Marie Barron, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 6.
“must make public the response within 100 days after the”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
Clause 13, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 14,
Julie Dabrusin moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 14, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 8 with the following:“search and report on any matter relating to the creation of sustainable jobs or the shift to a net-zero economy that is specified by”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
Clause 14, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 15,
Julie Dabrusin moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 15, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 9 with the following:“vide the Minister with a written progress report on the activities”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“specified by the Minister within 25 days after the day on”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“(2) The Minister must make public a progress report within 15 days after the day on which the Minister receives it.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard — 2;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 8.
“(2) The Minister must make public a progress report within 30 days after the day on which the Minister receives it.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
Clause 15, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 16,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended
(a) by replacing line 6 on page 9 with the following:
“Action Plan no later than December 31, 2040 and must”; and
(b) by replacing lines 12 and 13 on page 9 with the following:
“teenth sitting day of that House after December 31, 2040; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended
(a) by replacing line 7 on page 9 with the following:
“prepare a new Plan no later than January 1 of every”; and
(b) by replacing lines 15 and 16 on page 9 with the following
“the fifteenth sitting day of that House after January 1 of every fifth year after that.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(1.1) The Minister must, when preparing a Sustainable Jobs Action Plan, take a tailored approach that takes into account, in the case of Quebec, the expertise and responsibilities of the Commission des partenaires du marché du travail of Quebec.”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Mario Simard — 3;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 8.
(a) by replacing lines 11 and 12 on page 9 with the following:
“(a) in the case of the first Plan, no later than the tenth sitting day of that House after December 31,”
(b) by replacing line 15 on page 9 with the following:
“the tenth sitting day of that House after December”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“and promote economic growth, including the economic growth of Indigenous communities, the creation of sus‐”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“tainable jobs, the decarbonization of existing workplaces, the preservation of existing jobs, where possible, and support for workers and communities, through a range of policy tools, in the shift to a net-zero economy over the follow‐”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“ing five-year period, including through investments to decarbonize Canada’s economy, the establishment of conditions for accessing federal economic incentives in relation to labour and the identification of pathways to sustainable jobs for workers;”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“(a.1) outline how the federal government will help ensure the affordability and reliability of energy markets;”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(a.1) outline how the federal government will help ensure that major and clean energy projects under federal regulatory frameworks can be delivered on time and on budget;
(a.2) include an assessment of whether that Plan will contribute to lower energy prices and economic growth and, if it is determined that the Plan will not have these effects, the mitigation measures that the federal government will implement;”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(a.1) describe how the federal government is upholding the guiding principles set out in the preamble;”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 9 the following:
“(a.1) outline how the federal government will implement the recommendations contained in the Final Report of the Task Force on Just Transition for Canadian Coal Power Workers and Communities over the following five-year period;”
The question was put on the amendment of Elizabeth May and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“Minister and other relevant federal ministers have”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“identified to be implemented, — including measures relating to skills development, economic and social measures and measures that support workers on an individual, regional, community and sectoral basis — the milestones to be”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
(a) replacing line 29 on page 9 with the following:
“(c) include a summary of data that is available within the federal government, that is related to eco-”
(b) replacing line 31 on page 9 with the following:
“economy and that was used in the development of the Plan, including data related to equity, diversity and inclusion in the labour force, along with a description of how that data informed the development of the measures referred to in paragraph (b);”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“(c.1) identify any gaps in the data referred to in paragraph (c) that impact labour market analyses, including data in relation to Indigenous peoples, describe the effect of those gaps on the analyses and indicate which gaps are being addressed;”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(c.2) include information on measures that relate to this Act that have been implemented in support of skills development, training and retraining, as well as to address other relevant labour market and worker-focused issues;”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“(c.3) describe how it takes into account the greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan established under section 9 of the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act;”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(c.4) include information on the key measures that have been taken in cooperation with the governments of the provinces and territories and other governments in Canada in relation to the Plan or the purpose of this Act;”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(c.5) include information on initiatives or other measures taken by the governments of the provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples, trade unions, municipal governments or the private sector that may contribute to the creation of sustainable jobs and to supporting workers and communities; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(c.1) describe how it accounts for the greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan established under the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act and other national economic and environmental policies and strategies to promote a net-zero economy; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“(e) describe how it will account for the greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan established under the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act and other national economic and environmental policies and strategies to promote a net-zero economy.”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
Clause 16, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 17,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 17, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 10 with the following:“tabled in each House of Parliament on any of the first 10”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
Clause 17, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 18,
Charlie Angus moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by(a) replacing line 9 on page 10 with the following:
“(a) take into account advice from the Council;”
(b) replacing line 11 on page 10 with the following:
“federal ministers, including with respect to existing labour market analyses and the economic effects of existing and planned emissions reduction measures;
(c) take into account the most recent greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan established under section 9 of the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act; and
(d) provide the governments of the provinces and territories, Indigenous peoples and any other key experts, partners and stakeholders, including from non-governmental organizations, labour and industry, with the opportunity to make submissions.”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(b) consult the specified Minister and all other relevant”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(b) consult all the specified Ministers and other relevant”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(b) consult the specified Minister and other relevant”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(c) publish on the Minister's departmental website, for the purpose of public consultation, the proposed Plan or amendments for at least 30 days.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“(c) take into consideration the greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan established under the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act.”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“(c) provide a 60-day period to receive comments from the public.”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
Clause 18, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 19,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 10 with the following:
“later than June 1, 2043 and additional progress reports”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“every year after that, no later than 30 days after the day on which the budget is tabled in the House of Commons or the last day of the fiscal year, whichever is earlier.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 10 with the following:
“tabled in each House of Parliament on any of the first 10”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Lisa Marie Barron, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(3) Each progress report must contain an update on the progress made towards achieving the milestones under and implementing the measures set out in the most recent Sustainable Jobs Action Plan and include the details of any additional measures that are being or could be taken to increase the probability of achieving the milestones.”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(b) consult the specified Minister and other relevant”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(b) consult all specified Ministers and all other relevant”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(b) consult the specified Minister and all other relevant”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“federal ministers, as well as representatives of provincial governments and Indigenous governing bodies.”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
Clause 19, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On new Clause 19.1,
Mario Simard moved, — That Bill C-50 be amended by adding after line 26 on page 10 the following new clause:“Agreement
Agreement to plan shift to net-zero emissions
19.1 (1) The Minister may, after consultation with the specified Ministers and the Council, and if the the Minister considers it appropriate to do so, enter into an agreement to plan the shift to net-zero emissions with any government, organization or person in Canada in order to promote the creation of sustainable jobs and the shift to a net-zero economy in a region or specific sector.
Contents
(2) The agreement must provide for the taking of measures that are consistent with the purposes and guiding principles of this Act, and may include
(a) an assessment of the vulnerabilities, challenges and opportunities associated with the shift to a net-zero economy in the region or sector;
(b) measurable targets and objectives that are consistent with Canada's climate commitments and the guiding principles; and
(c) a plan to achieve the targets and objectives that includes
(i) measures to create sustainable jobs and promote the shift to a net-zero economy in that region or sector,
(ii) a timeline for the implementation of the measures,
(iii) monitoring mechanisms,
(iv) a process for engaging with concerned Indigenous communities, industry, trade unions, civil society organizations and the general public,
(v) a description of the way the plan will support the rights of Indigenous peoples recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and the rights of Indigenous peoples recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
(vi) a description of the way the plan will mitigate the impact of the shift on Indigenous communities and other marginalized communities and remedy the historical and current impacts of industrial activity that produces significant greenhouse gas emissions on those communities, and
(vii) a description of the way the plan will support Canada's climate commitments and other regional and sectoral plans to achieve net-zero emissions.
Funding agreements
(3) The Minister may enter into an agreement with any government, organization or person in Canada to provide for the payment of contributions towards the costs of programs and measures to promote the shift to net-zero emissions, including measures under an agreement entered into under subsection (1).”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
On Clause 20,
Julie Dabrusin moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by(a) replacing lines 4 to 7 on page 11 with the following:
“Jobs Action Plan, supporting the work within the federal government to design the measures set out in those Plans and coordinating the implementation of those measures across federal entities, working in leadership roles in their respective areas of responsibility, including those entities responsible — at the national and regional level — for matters relating to skills”
(b) replacing lines 12 and 13 on page 11 with the following:
“(c) coordinating specific federal-provincial and federal-territorial initiatives related to the Plans and engaging with the governments of provinces and territories in areas of common interest;
(c.1) serving as a source of information and point of contact in respect of federal programs, funding and services for workers and employers with respect to sustainable jobs; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
(a) by replacing line 9 on page 11 with the following:
“nomic development, regional development, Indigenous labour force participation, immigration and emissions reduction;”
(b) by replacing lines 10 and 11 on page 11 with the following:
“(b) using labour market data to support the preparation of the Plans and track progress on them;”
(c) by replacing line 14 on page 11 with the following:
“(d) leading and coordinating the Government of Canada's activities to establish co-operative relations with federal agencies, municipal and Indigenous governments, businesses, trade unions and other public and private organizations in the provinces and territories;
(e) developing guidance and standards for labour force development in Canada;
(f) providing Indigenous peoples, workers, communities, youth, newcomers to Canada and under-represented groups with access to programs and funding to support them in the shift to a net-zero economy and sustainable jobs; and
(g) providing administrative and policy support to the”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
“(a.1) ensuring that affected industries and other stakeholders are consulted, where appropriate;”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“(c.1) consulting provincial governments and Indigenous governing bodies as appropriate in relation to the Plans; and”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
Clause 20, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 21,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 21, be amended(a) by replacing line 16 on page 11 with the following:
“21 (1) Within two years after the day on which this Act”
(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 18 on page 11 with the following:
“period of two years, the Minister must cause a review of”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“tabled in each House of Parliament on any of the first two”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
Clause 21, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
By unanimous consent, the committee reverted to Clause 2 previously stood.
On Clause 2,
Mario Simard moved, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 4 the following:“climate commitments means
(a) obligations and commitments under the following instruments, whether they are binding or not:
(i) the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, done in New York on May 9, 1992, including the principles of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capacities,
(ii) the Paris Agreement, done in Paris on December 12, 2015, which came into force in 2016,
(iii) the amendments to the Paris Agreement made by the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and any additional agreement or instrument adopted by the Conference of the Parties after the coming into force of the Paris Agreement, and
(iv) the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act, including the national greenhouse gas emissions target set for no later than 2050, namely, net-zero emissions, that is provided by section 6 of that Act;
(b) the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases along a trajectory that is consistent with the global carbon budget and allows for limiting global climate warming to 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels, without exceeding that level or while exceeding it in a limited way; and
(c) the strengthening of the capacity to adapt and reduce vulnerability to the actual and expected impacts of climate change, including by increasing the resilience of built, ecological and socio-economic systems. (engagements climatiques)”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6.
“Indigenous governing body means a council, government or other entity that is authorized to act on behalf of an Indigenous group, community or people that holds rights recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. (corps dirigeant autochtone)”
The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it proposed a substantive amendment to the Bill by way of a modification to the interpretation clause, as provided on page 773 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Third Edition.
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
““net-zero economy” means an economy that is aligned with Canada’s nationally determined contribution communicated in accordance with the Paris Agreement and that is consistent with a credible pathway to achieving net-zero emissions as described in the greenhouse gas emissions reduction plan established under section 9 of the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act. (“économie carboneutre”)”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“net-zero economy means an economy that is consistent with Canada's climate commitments and a credible trajectory for limiting climate warming to 1.5ºC, that gives priority to reductions of emissions of greenhouse gases over their removal and that allows for minimizing emissions of greenhouse gases that relate to exports. (économie carboneutre)”
The question was put on the amendment of Mario Simard and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Mario Simard — 1;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Jeremy Patzer, Francesco Sorbara, Shannon Stubbs — 10.
““net-zero emissions” means that anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere are balanced by anthropogenic removals of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere over the period referred to in section 6 of the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act. (“carboneutralité”)”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“specified Ministers means the Minister of Finance and any other federal minister designated under section 5. (ministres responsables)”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“specified Minister means the federal minister designated”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
““sustainable job” means any job that is compatible with Canada’s pathway to achieving a net-zero-emissions and climate-resilient future and that reflects the concept of decent work, namely work — including a job in which the worker is represented by a trade union that has entered into a collective agreement — that can support the worker and their family over time and that includes elements such as fair income, job security, social protection and social dialogue. (“emploi durable”)”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
Clause 2, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
On Preamble,
Julie Dabrusin moved, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing, in the French version, lines 1 and 2 on page 1 with the following:“Attendu :”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“need for an effective response to the”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“to developing a strategic plan to set Canada on a path to”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“silient, prosperous, inclusive and competitive;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“quires immediate and ambitious action by all major global greenhouse gas emitting countries and all govern‐”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Emissions Accountability Act, despite failing to meet a single greenhouse gas emission reduction target to date;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“a net-zero-emissions future presents opportunities and risks”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer — 4.
“having Canadians benefit from and contribute to the”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Larry Brock, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“achieving a fair and equitable net-zero”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer — 4.
“fostering the creation of sustainable jobs and implementing measures to assist workers in the shift to a net-zero economy;”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard — 5.
“fostering the creation of sustainable jobs and supporting impacted workers, including those working in industries that emit large quantities of greenhouse gases;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Larry Brock, Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard — 5.
“have negative effects across different regions, commu‐”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Shelby Kramp-Neuman, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Whereas the Government of Canada”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Whereas the Government of Canada recognizes the Government of Quebec's role as prime mover in matters of workforce development and the key role of the network of labour market partners at the Commission des partenaires du marché du travail of Quebec;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
(a) by replacing line 28 on page 2 with the following:
“building a net-zero economy must be guided by the”
(b) by replacing lines 31 and 32 on page 2 with the following:
“a labour force and people-centred sustainable jobs approach should engage Indigenous peoples, relevant stakehold‐”
(c) by replacing line 37 on page 2 with the following:
“able jobs and a net-zero economy should”
(d) by replacing lines 39 to 42 on page 2 with the following:
“ing good-paying, high-quality jobs that enable workers to be paid remuneration that is greater than or equal to industry standards — including jobs in which workers are represented by a trade union — and to have job security, social protection and opportunities to participate in social dialogue,”
(e) by replacing line 43 on page 2 with the following:
“(ii) recognize local and regional needs and provide support measures tailored to the specific features of each region in order to promote economic growth and diversification, including in rural, remote and resource-based regions and regions in transition,”
(f) by adding after line 49 on page 2 the following:
“(v) promote the fulfilment of Canada's climate commitments in accordance with credible targets for emissions of greenhouse gases that enable limiting climate warming to 1.5ºC by giving priority to the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases rather than their removal,
(vi) account for the social, cultural, economic and environmental consequences of the shift to a net-zero economy for workers and communities,
(vii) promote social and ecological well-being and the right to a clean environment for present and future generations, and
(viii) uphold and enforce the rights of Indigenous peoples, including inherent rights, those recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and those set out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the International Labour Organization Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989;”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“ers and partners, including through meaningful consultation, to build strong social consensus in the shift”
Whereupon, Earl Dreeshen appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“able jobs must”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(i) support the creation of meaningful work, mean‐”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“trade union that has entered into a collective agreement — as well as job security, social”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(i.1) support the decarbonization of workplaces while preserving existing jobs, minimizing job losses, and encouraging the involvement of workers and trade unions in the associated transition processes,”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(ii) recognize local and regional needs, including in Indigenous communities,”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(iii) account for the cultural values, aspirations, strengths”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Jenny Kwan, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
(a) replacing line 45 on page 2 with the following:
“and potential of workers and communities,”
(b) replacing line 49 on page 2 with the following:
“sive economies and societies, and
(v) advance the well-being of workers and communities, as well as the achievement of Canada’s nationally determined contribution communicated in accordance with the Paris Agreement;”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“(iv) create conditions in which enter‐”
Whereupon, Mike Lake appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(v) advance the achievement of Canada’s climate commitments within a framework that prioritizes the well-being of workers and their communities;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“(b.1) the approach taken in Quebec should be consistent with the Canada-Quebec agreements on workforce development and the legislative jurisdiction of Quebec;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“in the labour market, including, but not limited to, women, persons”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“strengthened global efforts to advance the development of sustainable jobs and ensure a level play‐”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“communities, non-governmental organizations and the governments of the provinces and territories, which all”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Whereas the governments of the provinces and territories have an important role to play within their jurisdiction to support the shift to a net-zero economy;”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Whereas trade unions in particular have a critical”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Whereas the Government of Canada’s interim Sustainable Jobs Plan articulated a vision for the Sustainable Jobs Secretariat built on leadership and the enabling of a whole-of-government approach;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“Whereas relevant federal entities, including, but not limited to, those fo‐”
The question was put on the amendment of Shannon Stubbs and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4;
NAYS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7.
“reduction, are committed to working in leadership roles in their respective areas of responsibility to advance the”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“zero economy and the creation of sustainable jobs and to taking the Indigenous knowledge of Indigenous peoples into account when carrying out the purposes of this Act;”
The question was put on the amendment of Charlie Angus and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“zero economy and the creation of sustainable jobs, despite creating conditions that have led to the cancellation of multiple resource projects, including projects that had signed community benefit agreements with Indigenous communities, preventing the creation of many good-paying jobs on and near First Nations communities;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“March 11, 2010, which recognizes and protects the right of per‐”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
(a) by replacing line 41 on page 3 with the following:
“Whereas the Government of Canada is commit‐”
(b) by replacing line 43 on page 3 with the following:
“and removes barriers to employment for persons”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Whereas Canada’s natural resource sector, including oil and gas, has been a reliable source of revenue for the Government of Canada, and has contributed to the sustainability of core social programs;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“And whereas Canada’s plan to reduce its production of oil and gas should be done in lock step with major emitters of greenhouse gas emissions, including China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and the United States;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer — 3.
“Whereas Canada should sell liquified natural gas to its security partners in Europe, so that they can break their dependence on Russian natural gas;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake — 2.
“Whereas Canadian oil and gas workers produce cleaner products than those of any other country in the world;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer — 3.
“Whereas Canada contributes less than 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“Whereas the oil and gas sector has been a reliable source of good-paying jobs for Indigenous peoples in Canada;”
Whereupon, Jeremy Patzer appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“que le gouvernement du Canada est déterminé à”
The question was put on the amendment of Julie Dabrusin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
The Preamble, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
On Clause 1, Short Title,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50, in the short title, be amended by replacing lines 4 and 5 on page 4 with the following:“1 This Act may be cited as the Phasing Out Jobs in the Oil and Gas Sector Act.”
Whereupon, Mike Lake appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Francesco Sorbara — 6;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Mario Simard, Shannon Stubbs — 5.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Anti-Energy Act.”
Whereupon, Mike Lake appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Anti-Energy Worker Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Ending Prosperity in Canada Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Impoverishing the Prairies Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer — 3.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Impoverishing Canada Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Justin's Transition Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Central Planning Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Globalist Plan for Canada Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Expensive Energy Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer — 3.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Threatening the jobs of 2.7 Million Canadians Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer — 3.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Restructuring Canada’s Economy Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Green New Deal Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Economic Reform Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Environmental Reform Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Disappearing Middle Class Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Killing Prairie Jobs Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer — 3.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Just Transition Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the So-called Just Transition Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Killing Canadian Jobs Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Biting the Hand That Feeds You Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the UnJust Transition Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Energy Poverty Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Competitive Disadvantage Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Killing Jobs Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer — 3.
“1 This Act may be cited as the Killing Good-Paying Jobs Act.”
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
Clause 1, Short Title, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
On Title,
Shannon Stubbs moved, — That Bill C-50 be amended by replacing the long title on page 1 with the following:“An Act respecting the phasing out of jobs in the oil and gas sector”
Whereupon, Mike Lake appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
The Title carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
The Bill, as amended, was adopted on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
It was agreed – That the Chair report the Bill, as amended, to the House on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
ORDERED, — That the Chair report the Bill, as amended, to the House.
It was agreed – That Bill C-50, as amended, be reprinted for the use of the House of Commons at report stage on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Aldag, Charlie Angus, Vance Badawey, Julie Dabrusin, Viviane Lapointe, Mario Simard, Francesco Sorbara — 7;
NAYS: Earl Dreeshen, Mike Lake, Jeremy Patzer, Shannon Stubbs — 4.
ORDERED, — That Bill C-50, as amended, be reprinted for the use of the House of Commons at report stage.
At 2:34 a.m., on Thursday, December 7, 2023, the sitting was suspended.
At 11:04 a.m., Monday, December 11, 2023, the sitting resumed.
Julie Dabrusin moved, — That, in relation to the consideration of Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts:
(a) the minister of Energy and Natural Resources and officials be invited to appear before the committee, on a date to be determined by the Chair;
(b) members submit their lists of suggested witnesses by noon on a date to be determined by the Chair, and that the Chair, clerk and analysts create witness panels which reflect the representation of the parties on the committee, and, once complete, that the Chair begin scheduling those meetings;
(c) the Chair seek additional meeting times and that meetings be scheduled, if resources available, for up to three hours each;
(d) the Chair issue a press release for C-49 inviting written submissions from the public and establishing a deadline for those submissions;
(e) the committee hold four meetings with witnesses before clause-by-clause consideration is scheduled, and that that the Chair seek to hold one meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and another one in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador;
(f) the Chair set deadlines for the submission of proposed amendments in advance of the beginning of clause-by-clause consideration, but no sooner than after the completion of the respective witness meetings, and that the members of the committee, as well as Members of Parliament who are not part of a caucus represented on the committee, submit to the clerk all of their proposed amendments no later than 4:00 p.m. on a date established by the Chair, in both official languages, and that these be distributed to members;
(g) up to four meetings be scheduled for clause-by clause consideration, and should the committee not complete it by the end of the scheduled clause-by-clause considerations, at the next available meeting all remaining amendments submitted to the committee shall be deemed moved; the Chair shall put the question, forthwith and successively, without further debate on all remaining clauses and proposed amendments, as well as each and every question necessary to dispose of clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill, as well as all questions necessary to report the Bill to the House; order that it be reprinted; and order the Chair to report the Bill to the House as soon as possible.
Debate arose thereon.
Julie Dabrusin moved, — That the committee proceed to sit in camera.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Charlie Angus, Julie Dabrusin, Yvonne Jones, Viviane Lapointe, Yasir Naqvi, Mario Simard, Joanne Thompson — 7;
NAYS: Shannon Stubbs — 1.
At 11:09 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 11:15 a.m., the sitting resumed in camera.
At 1:03 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:38 p.m., on Wednesday, December 13, 2023, the sitting resumed.
It was agreed, — That, in relation to the consideration of Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord implementation Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts:
(a) the minister of Energy and Natural Resources and officials be invited to appear before the committee, on a date to be determined by the Chair;
(b) the minister of Environment and Climate Change and the minister of Labor and Seniors be invited to appear separately for at least one hour each, on a date to be determined by the Chair;
(c) members submit their lists of suggested witnesses by noon on a date to be determined by the Chair, and that the Chair, clerk and analysts create witness panels which reflect the representation of the parties on the Committee, and, once complete, that the Chair begin scheduling those meetings;
(d) the Chair seek additional meeting times and that meetings be scheduled, if resources available, for up to three hours each;
(e) the Chair issue a press release for C49 inviting written submissions from the public and establishing a deadline for those submissions;
(f) the Committee hold six meetings with witnesses before clause-by-clause consideration is scheduled, and that the Chair seek to hold one meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia and another one in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador;
(g) the Chair set deadlines for the submission of proposed amendments of the beginning of clause-by-clause consideration, but no sooner than after the completion of the respective witness meetings, and that the members of the Committee, as well as Members of Parliament who are not part of a caucus represented on the Committee, submit to the clerk all of their proposed amendments no later than 4:00 p.m. on a date established by the Chair, in both official languages, and that these be distributed to members.At 5:27 p.m., the committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.