HESA Committee Report
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at email@example.com.
On 8 December 2016, the House of Commons passed Private Members’ Business M-47 stating:
That the Standing Committee on Health be instructed to examine the public health effects of the ease of access and viewing of online violent and degrading sexually explicit material on children, women and men, recognizing and respecting the provincial and territorial jurisdictions in this regard, and that the said Committee report its findings to the House no later than July 2017.
The House of Commons Standing Committee on Health (the Committee) agreed to hold four meetings as part of its study. During the first meeting, the Committee heard from Mr. Arnold Viersen, Member of Parliament (MP) and sponsor of M-47, who provided the Committee with an overview of his motion and outlined possible directions for the Committee’s study. During the remaining three meetings, the Committee heard from a total of 11 witnesses, including academic researchers, medical professionals and other stakeholders. In addition, the Committee received 23 written submissions from interested individuals, researchers, adult entertainment industry representatives, medical professionals and community organizations.
This report summarizes testimony and written evidence received by the Committee on the public health effects of the ease of access and viewing of online violent and degrading sexually explicit material on children, women and men, focusing in particular on the peer-reviewed scientific research presented by witnesses. Drawing on the evidence and recommendations received from witnesses and through written submissions, this report also outlines possible areas where the federal government could take action in collaboration with provinces and territories and other stakeholders to address the ease of access to online violent and degrading sexually explicit material.
Though access to sexually explicit material in Canada is legal, its content is regulated under the Criminal Code. Under section 163(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, it is an offence to make, print, publish, distribute, or circulate “any obscene written matter, picture, model, phonograph record or other thing whatever.” It is also an offence to possess such material for the purpose of publication, distribution or circulation. An “obscene” publication is one that has “the undue exploitation of sex, or of sex and any one or more of the following subjects, namely, crime, horror, cruelty and violence” as a dominant characteristic (section 163(8) of the Criminal Code). In addition, producing, distributing and possessing child pornography is a crime under section 163.1 of the Criminal Code.
In 1992, in R. v. Butler, the Supreme Court of Canada considered whether the definition of obscenity contained in section 163(8) of the Criminal Code infringed the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter). The Court ruled that section 163(8) did infringe section 2(b) of the Charter, but that the infringement was demonstrably justified under section 1 of the Charter. Writing for the majority, Justice Sopinka noted that there are three tests to be applied to determine whether the exploitation of sex is “undue”: the “community standard of tolerance” test; the “degradation or dehumanization” test; and, the “internal necessities test” or “artistic defence.” He also divided pornography into three categories: (1) explicit sex with violence; (2) explicit sex without violence but which subjects people to treatment that is degrading or dehumanizing; and (3) explicit sex without violence that is neither degrading nor dehumanizing.
With respect to harm and pornography, Justice Sopinka further stated:
Some segments of society would consider that all three categories of pornography cause harm to society because they tend to undermine its moral fibre. Others would contend that none of the categories cause harm. Furthermore there is a range of opinion as to what is degrading or dehumanizing. . . .
The courts must determine as best they can what the community would tolerate others being exposed to on the basis of the degree of harm that may flow from such exposure. Harm in this context means that it predisposes persons to act in an anti-social manner as, for example, the physical or mental mistreatment of women by men, or, what is perhaps debatable, the reverse. Anti-social conduct for this purpose is conduct which society formally recognizes as incompatible with its proper functioning. The stronger the inference of a risk of harm the lesser the likelihood of tolerance. The inference may be drawn from the material itself or from the material and other evidence. Similarly evidence as to the community standards is desirable but not essential.
In making this determination with respect to the three categories of pornography referred to above, the portrayal of sex coupled with violence will almost always constitute the undue exploitation of sex. Explicit sex which is degrading or dehumanizing may be undue if the risk of harm is substantial. Finally, explicit sex that is not violent and neither degrading nor dehumanizing is generally tolerated in our society and will not qualify as the undue exploitation of sex unless it employs children in its production.
The Committee agreed that, in keeping with the text of M-47, it would focus its study on “violent and degrading sexually explicit material.” However, witnesses noted that pornography itself lacks a common definition, and there does not appear to be a clear distinction between violent or degrading sexually explicit material and other sexually explicit material. As Ms. Kathleen Hare, Doctoral Student, Department of Language and Literacy Education, University of British Columbia noted, “[h]ow ideas of pornography, sexual health, and violence can even be defined to start these types of conversations is subject to debate in the body of research on this topic.” She continued,
I think there's definitely a distinction between pornography and violent pornography, both by what you can draw from the literature and by the way that the youth in my study talked about it. I think in regular pornography, they would often talk about the variety of genres that exist. You have everything from erotica to couples uploading amateur videos of themselves to Hentai, which is a kind of cartoon. You have a variety of different types. Then you also have the types that people would talk about in terms of their violence.
The way I would understand violent pornography is that it's non-consensual acts of violence, degradation, or dehumanization in pornography. For me, the key word in there is “non-consensual”, recognizing that there's also pornography from, say, kink communities where it is consensual and might otherwise depict activities that seem violent.
Even an individual’s assessment of what is “violent and degrading” may vary depending on the extent to which the individual has been exposed to “violent and degrading” material.
In her appearance before the Committee, Dr. Gail Dines, professor and Chair of Women’s Studies at Wheelock College and President of Culture Reframed explained that the advent of the Internet resulted in pornography or sexually explicit material becoming more accessible to men, women and children than ever before. While in the past, pornography was only available through videos, magazines and books, the Committee heard that companies such as MindGeek have created Internet pornography sites that allow anonymous free access to pornography seven days a week and 24 hours a day. According to Dr. Dines, MindGeek’s top three free pornography sites attract approximately 100 million visitors and receive over 488 million page views a day.
As these sites do not require a credit card or proof of age for access, children are able to access these sites easily, with one witness asserting that on average, children first view pornography at 11 years of age. In a written submission provided to the Committee, 14 year-old Joseph Deschambault further explained how children can accidentally gain access to Internet pornography, noting that he first accessed it through a pop-up window on a video gaming site when he was 8 years old. He also claimed that pornography websites use search tags commonly used by children.
However, there was debate among witnesses regarding the extent to which men, women and children access violent and degrading sexually explicit images in comparison to non-violent and degrading sexually explicit images. Witnesses noted that what individuals consider to be violent and degrading is very subjective. For example, Ms. Kathleen Hare explained, “For me, the key point is that looking at it, it’s very difficult to separate out, because what is violent is subjective.” Similarly, Dr. Mary Anne Layden, Director of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program, University of Pennsylvania stated, “It’s hard sometimes to categorize depending upon who is looking at it and who is evaluating it. That’s the complication in the research as to who says it’s degrading.” Dr. Layden also explained that while individuals may initially find some sexually explicit material violent and degrading, they may also become desensitized upon repeated viewing resulting in them no longer seeing it as such.
In his appearance before the Committee, Mr. Arnold Viersen explained that the intent of his motion was that the Committee examine online violent and degrading sexually explicit material through a public health lens, drawing on the public health model approach of the United States’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that involves defining the problem; identifying risk and protective factors; developing initiatives and programs; and investing in widespread adoption of effective efforts. According to Dr. Dines, the ease of access to online violent and degrading sexually explicit material should be considered a public health issue because its effects extend beyond the individual, having broader systemic impacts on relationships, culture, gender relations and the workplace.
However, Dr. Jacqueline Gahagan, professor and Interim Assistant Dean, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University, testified that “while we know that pornography in the Internet age is clearly an important health and social issue, the role of public health in addressing this issue is much less clear.” Dr. Gahagan noted that public health focuses on promoting health and preventing illness, injury and premature death by addressing their underlying causes, which are established through epidemiological surveillance data and research. She explained that research regarding the exact causal role of pornography in sexual violence and poor health outcomes remains “hotly debated”, which poses challenges to understanding and responding to it as a public health issue in the same manner as one would for other types of public health concerns, such as communicable diseases.
D. Overview of Scientific Evidence Related to the Public Health Effects of Online Violent and Degrading Sexually Explicit Material
The Committee heard from witnesses that there are significant debates surrounding the scientific research related to the public health effects of sexually explicit material or pornography more broadly, as well as research examining the effects of violent and degrading sexually explicit material more specifically.
Ms. Cordelia Anderson, Founder of Sensibilities Prevention Services, suggested that watching violent sexual material is associated with sexually problematic behaviour among youth, explaining that:
A study of 14 to 21 year olds showed that 9% of them engaged in some form of sexually abusive behavior and that in that 9% there was much more use of violent sexual material. An Australian study showed that, of seven to 11 year olds who were in treatment for problematic sexual behaviour, 75% of the boys and 67% of the girls had been oriented through pornography.
Dr. Neil Malamuth, professor, University of California, Los Angeles, found in his research that men’s sexual aggression could be caused by both primary and secondary factors. If individuals are already at a relatively higher risk of committing sexual aggression, heavy exposure to non-consenting pornography, “makes them more likely both to hold attitudes accepting of violence against women and, in some cases, actually act out in a sexually aggressive manner.”
Though there was significant debate regarding the findings of scientific research related to the public health effects of online violent and degrading sexually explicit material, there was general agreement among witnesses about how to address the ease of access to such material. Witnesses outlined two main areas where the federal government could potentially take action to address this issue: sexual health promotion and restricting children’s access to this material through age verification and other methods.
According to Ms. Hare, viewing sexually explicit material can have positive impacts in terms of promoting communication within couples about sexuality, as well as allow young people to learn about the different spectrum of sexual expression, and provide lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, intersex, queer, questioning, 2 spirited (LGBTQ2+) communities with the opportunity to explore sexual activities outside of heterosexual norms.
In her own research examining the impact of sexually explicit Internet movies on the sexual health of young adults, Ms. Hare found that it had both positive and negative impacts on their sexual health, but these impacts could not be separated from how sexuality is treated more broadly in society through other types of media, as well as through wider social and political discourses. Her research further pointed to how youth are actively engaging with pornography to obtain knowledge of the positive aspects of sexuality, reflecting limited access to and resources for such information in mainstream media and sexual education. From her perspective, these research findings highlight the need for more comprehensive sexual education to be included as part of a broader effort to promote sexual health in Canada.
According to Dr. Gahagan, the federal government could address the health and social concerns raised by online violent and degrading sexually explicit material through the development of a national sexual health promotion strategy that could be included in school sex education courses, as well as provided through online partner agencies and other medical fora. The aim of the strategy would be to provide youth and their parents the tools necessary to support sexual health and healthy behaviours in the digital age. Dr. Gahagan explained that the strategy could “offer information on things such as healthy relationships, sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections prevention and testing, as well as providing information on the potential impacts of violent pornography, including the reality of possible criminal sanctions for producing and circulating pornography without consent.”
Dr. Cooper, Chief Executive Officer, Developmental and Forensic Pediatrics, Ms. Anderson and Dr. Dines also highlighted the importance of comprehensive healthy sex education in addressing the negative images about sexuality and relationships portrayed in pornography. Ms. Anderson and Dr. Fisher, professor, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario explained that online interactive technologies could also play a critical role in providing sexual health education and supports. For example, the Committee heard that the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada had developed the SexualityandU.ca website to provide information to enable youth to make informed choices in relation to sex, as well as promote safer sex and consensual sex. The Committee heard that these online interactive tools are critical as children and youth may not have access to comprehensive sex education in schools for a variety of reasons, including the teacher’s comfort with the topic.
Witnesses stressed to the Committee that sexual health promotion efforts also need to focus on addressing issues of gender equity and gender violence in society more broadly, including promoting discussions regarding sexual consent. Dr. Kim Roberts, professor and Head, Child Memory Lab, Department of Psychology, Wilfred Laurier University, explained that this approach has been implemented successfully in the United Kingdom through a public advertising campaign that discusses sexual consent in terms of being invited in for a cup of tea:
Basically, the whole vignette is that if you offer someone a cup of tea and they say no, don’t give them a cup of tea. If you invite them home for a cup of tea and they say they’d like a cup of tea, but they get home and they don’t want a cup of tea anymore, don’t give them a cup of tea.
Dr. Gahagan suggested that addressing issues related to gender equity and gender-based violence could also be addressed by using a “gender-based analysis Plus” approach to develop and evaluate sexual health promotion programs and materials for youth and women.
2. Restricting Children’s Access to Internet Pornography through Age Verification and Other Measures
The Committee also heard from witnesses that child access to online violent and degrading sexually explicit images could be addressed through various technological measures. In particular, the Committee heard that the United Kingdom is considering measures that would require a credit card for access to pornography websites, which would help prevent young children from accessing their content. The Committee was also told that the United Kingdom is considering an “opt in” approach by which individuals who want to have access to pornography on their digital devices must call their Internet service providers (ISPs) and provide proof of age and a credit card number, otherwise pornography websites and content would automatically be filtered out by the ISPs.
The Committee’s study of M-47 revealed that there are significant debates surrounding the public health effects of the ease of access and viewing of online violent and degrading sexually explicit material. Witnesses presented evidence of both the positive and negative impacts of viewing pornography on sexual attitudes and behaviours among children, women and men. However, despite evidence of a correlation between negative sexual attitudes and behaviours and the viewing of pornography, research has not established any causal relationship among the general population to date. Furthermore, given the lack of agreement on what constitutes “sexually explicit material” and “violent and degrading sexually explicit material” in the scientific literature, the Committee heard that it is difficult to distinguish the impacts of violent and degrading sexually explicit material from those of non-violent and degrading sexually explicit material. Finally, the impacts of sexually explicit material on sexual health and behaviour cannot be separated out from how sexuality is addressed in society more broadly through education, political and social structures, and the wider media environment.
However, the Committee’s study did highlight a need to provide children, youth and parents with better and more comprehensive sources of information regarding sexual health and behaviour. If responsible adults do not provide transparent, thorough information, the Internet will often fill the void. Better information and tools would provide them with the necessary supports to respond to the increasing ease of access to online violent and degrading sexually explicit material, as well as other sexual health issues, such as prevention and testing for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections, healthy relationships, and sexual consent. Witnesses were in agreement that this goal could be achieved through broad-based sexual health promotion efforts, including sex education in schools, community and online interactive programs and information, as well as advertising campaigns. Furthermore, they felt that these sexual health promotion efforts should also aim to address systemic problems related to gender equity and gender-based violence.
Finally, the Committee heard that parents need greater support to help protect children from unwanted exposure to sexually explicit material. As the Canadian Centre for Child Protection pointed out, 60% of the parents that they surveyed were deeply concerned about their children being exposed to inappropriate content and 53% indicated that they needed help in gaining knowledge of the online environment to educate and protect their children. To address this issue, the Committee heard that technology companies should work to create better online content filters and tools that empower parents to protect children while they are online.
In response to these concerns and reflecting the recommendations heard in oral testimony and presented in written submissions, the Committee therefore recommends that:
1. The Public Health Agency of Canada update the 2008 Canadian Guidelines for Sexual Health Education to address sexual health in the digital age, gender-based violence, consent, supplementary information for young people to learn about the different spectrum of sexual expressions and identities including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, intersex, queer, questioning, 2 spirited (LGBTQ2+) communities and provide support for their implementation.
2. The Public Health Agency of Canada, in collaboration with provincial and territorial governments, health care providers, public health and education experts and other relevant stakeholders, develop a Canadian sexual health promotion strategy that would provide comprehensive information on sexuality and sexual health that would include, but not be limited to, sexual identity, gender equity, gender-based violence, consent and behaviour in the digital age and possible risks of exposure to online violent and degrading sexually explicit materials and encourage its usage in school curriculums.
3. The Public Health Agency of Canada apply Gender-based Analysis Plus in the development of the proposed Canadian sexual health promotion strategy and in the update of the Canadian Guidelines for Sexual Health Education.
4. a. The Public Health Agency of Canada compile and make available a list of best practices, information, and currently available tools for parents and families on how to protect children from exposure to online sexually explicit material.
b. That technology companies, electronics manufacturers, software and browser developers work to create better content filters and tools that respect individual privacy while empowering parents to protect children online.
 House of Commons, Parliament of Canada, “Motion,” Journals, 1st Session, 42nd Parliament, 8 December 2016.
 House of Commons, Standing Committee on Health (HESA), Evidence, 4 April 2017, 1145 (Dr. William Fisher, professor, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, As an Individual); 1200 (Dr. Kim Roberts, professor and Head, Child Memory Lab, Department of Psychology, Wilfred Laurier University, As an Individual).
 Ibid., 1230 (Ms. Hare).
 Ibid., 1230 (Dr. Mary Anne Layden, Director of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program, University of Pennsylvania, As an Individual).
 Ibid., 1225 (Dr. Layden).
 Ibid., 1110 (Dr. Gahagan).
 Ibid., 1215 (Dr. Roberts).
 According to Status of Women Canada, “GBA+ is an analytical tool used to assess how diverse groups of women, men and gender-diverse people may experience policies, programs and initiatives. The “plus” in GBA+ acknowledges that GBA goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences. We all have multiple identity factors that intersect to make us who we are; GBA+ also considers many other identity factors, like race, ethnicity, religion, age, and mental or physical disability.” Status of Women Canada, What is GBA+.
 Ibid. (Dr. Malamuth, Dr. Fisher).