Adjournment Motion / Proposed under Standing Order 26 - Application not Accepted

Issue not urgent; other opportunities for debate

Debates p. 10217

Background

Mr. Clark (Leader of the Opposition) sought leave to move the adjournment of the House, under the provisions of Standing Order 26, in order to discuss a "major tax increase on oil products... because it is the role of Parliament to debate substantial tax increases". Mr. Clark argued that the issue was urgent because the tax was effective immediately. The Speaker ruled immediately.

Issue

Does the application meet the requirements of Standing Order 26?

Decision

No. The application is not accepted.

Reasons given by the Speaker

Despite the issue's importance, and a certain element of urgency, the problem is one of continuing concern, since increases occur periodically in the price of petroleum products and in the taxes on such products. Furthermore, "the tabling of notices of Ways and Means, [as] the first step in the legislative process, allows for ample debate". As the House is presently in a supply period during which two days a week are reserved for the Opposition, Members will have an opportunity to discuss a subject of their choice.

Sources cited

Standing Order 60(11).