|
Q-1055
|
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
With regard to the National Broadband Map which Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada uses to determine eligibility of federally funded support for Internet Service Provider projects to meet the federal government’s goal of providing high-speed internet (up to 50/10 Mbps) or broadband internet to all Canadians and broken down by fiscal year beginning in 2020-21: (a) how many discrepancies or errors of the National Broadband Map have been reported to Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, broken down by (i) overreport of coverage, (ii) underreport of coverage; (b) what actions does Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada take to investigate such reports; (c) how many reports have been corrected or closed with no action taken, borken down by Internet Service Provider; (d) does Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada take any enforcement action when Internet Service Providers overreport service and this overreport results in the area not being considered for future federal funding; (e) what areas were identified as incorrectly receiving broadband coverage listed by street, town and province or territory; (f) how does a member of the public report to Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada that the National Broadband Map is incorrect in their area; (g) how many communications has Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada received from the general public or Internet Service Providers regarding National Broadband Map errors, borken down by (i) date of communication, (ii) type (email, phone call, letter, through the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada account feedback tool), (iii) action taken, (iv) origin of the report (member of the public, Internet Service Provider, Parliamentarian's office); (h) how many errors on the National Broadband Map resulted in an area not receiving federal funding for a broadband project; and (j) what actions is the government taking to identify errors on the National Broadband Map and ensure all Canadians including those in areas considered the “last mile” receive reasonable internet options from Internet Service Providers? |
Awaiting response |
|
|
Q-1054
|
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
With regard to Health Canada’s Consumer Product Safety Program since 2019-20 and broken down by fiscal year: (a) how many complaints, notifications or consumer product incident reports were received by Health Canada regarding manufactured non-compliant products in the Canadian market; (b) of the products in (a), how many were (i) manufactured in Canada, (ii) imported into Canada from elsewhere, broken down by country of primary manufacturer; (c) of the products in (a), what North American Industry Classification System subsector did these products fall under; (d) how many of the consumer product incident reports in (a) relate to ASTM F2057-23 – Standard Safety Specification for Clothing Storage Units; (e) what was the average response timeline to the complainant that submitted a consumer product incident report, broken down by year; (f) how many consumer product incident reports have not received a response; (g) does the complainant receive confirmation that a full investigation was completed, and of the outcome of this investigation; (h) how many investigations are currently open, broken down by the year the consumer product incident report was submitted; (i) how many products have been removed from the Canadian market based on consumer product incident reports, broken down by the year the consumer product incident report was submitted; (j) what administrative monetary penalties or enforcement actions have been issued through the Consumer Product Safety Program, broken down by (i) the year the complaint was received, (ii) the manufacturer or importer name, (iii) the amount of the fine, (iv) whether a compliance agreement was implemented, (v) whetehr the fine was paid or unpaid? |
Awaiting response |
|
|
Q-1053
|
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
With regards to the government firearms confiscation compensation program (known as the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program): (a) how many registered participants had a criminal record; (b) out of the legal, trained, vetted and licenced firearms owners that participated, (i) how many possess a Restricted Possession and Acquisition Licence, (ii) how many of the participants were on their initial Possession and Acquisition Licence or Restricted Possession and Acquisition Licence, (iii) how many of the participants were on a renewed Possession and Acquisition Licence or Restricted Possession and Acquisition Licence; (c) in cross-referencing the program’s information with the government’s database of all Canadian Armed Forces members, Royal Canadian Mounted Police members, veterans, and public servants, how many of the participants in this compensation program are (i) members of the Canadian Armed Forces , (ii) members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, (iii) veterans, (iv) federal public employees (listed by department); and (d) how many participants were indigenous based on their Possession and Acquisition Licence or Restricted Possession and Acquisition Licence application being under the Aboriginal Peoples of Canada Adaptations Regulations? |
Awaiting response |
|
|
Q-966
|
Thursday, March 19, 2026 |
With regard to Weatheradio Canada and Hello Weather, operated by Environment and Climate Change Canada, and the federal decision to discontinue both services effective March 16, 2026: (a) what were the total federal costs to operate Weatheradio Canada for each of the last five fiscal years, broken down by operations, maintenance and capital expenditures; (b) what was the annual cost to operate the Hello Weather telephone service for each of the same five fiscal years; (c) what is the total approved federal budget to decommission Weatheradio Canada and Hello Weather, broken down by fiscal year; (d) what are the details of all contracts issued for decommissioning work, including, for each vendor, the (i) dollar amount, (ii) procurement method, (iii) description of the goods or services provided; (e) what are the projected annual savings the federal government expects following the discontinuation of these services; (f) what analyses, briefings or cost comparison documents did Environment and Climate Change Canada rely on to justify the discontinuation, and on what dates were these documents completed; (g) what federal expenditures have been allocated in each of the last five fiscal years to the WeatherCAN app, Canada.ca weather systems, and Alert Ready as alternatives to Weatheradio; (h) what were the annual system uptime and outage statistics for Weatheradio and for each alternative service; (i) which internal federal stakeholders, including, but not limited to, Environment and Climate Change Canada branches, Public Safety Canada, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada and the Meteorological Service of Canada, were consulted prior to the decision to discontinue Weatheradio Canada and Hello Weather; (j) which external stakeholders were consulted, including emergency management agencies, provincial or territorial governments, municipalities, first responders, Indigenous communities, broadcasters and disability advocacy organizations; (k) on what dates did these consultations occur and what formats were used (meetings, written communications, technical briefings); (l) what concerns, recommendations or objections were raised by consulted stakeholders and how were they incorporated into the final decision; (m) which stakeholder groups requested that the services not be discontinued and what rationale did they provide; (n) were any stakeholders identified by Environment and Climate Change Canada or the Meteorological Service of Canada as relevant to the decision not consulted, and, if so, which stakeholders were not consulted and what was the reason they were not consulted; (o) were any members of Parliament or their offices consulted regarding the discontinuation, and, if so, what are the details of the consultations, including the (i) dates, (ii) formats, (iii) names of the members or offices consulted; and (p) for any information in (a) through (o) that is not tracked or not available, what are the details, including (i) the specific information that wasn't tracked, (ii) the reason it wasn't tracked, (iii) whether Environment and Climate Change Canada intends to begin tracking it, and, if so, in which fiscal year? |
Awaiting response |
Wednesday, May 6, 2026 |
|
Q-828
|
Monday, February 2, 2026 |
With regard to food waste, food diversion, and organic waste management in Canadian Armed Forces bases, wings, stations, and other Department of National Defence facilities, including all kitchen, galley, dining hall, and mess operations: (a) what amount of food waste was produced by Department of National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces food service operations for each of the past five fiscal years, broken down by (i) base or wing, (ii) type of facility (kitchen, galley, mess, dining hall), (iii) category of food waste (pre-consumer, post-consumer, prepared-but-unserved, expired, etc.); (b) of the food waste identified in (a), what amount was diverted from landfill through (i) donation to community organizations, shelters, or food banks, (ii) repurposing for secondary use (animal feed, secondary processing), (iii) composting (on site or off site), (iv) recycling or anaerobic digestion programs, broken down by fiscal year since 2019-20; (c) what food donation programs or partnerships presently exist, either formally or informally, at any Canadian Armed Forces bases, wings, or stations, broken down by (i) names of partner organizations, (ii) volumes of food donated annually, (iii) the terms or memoranda of understanding governing such donations; (d) what composting or organic waste programs are currently in effect; (e) what recycling programs for food-related materials (such as oils, fats, grease, packaging, or organics) exist at Department of National Defence facilities, broken down by base; (f) what Department of National Defence or Canadian Armed Forces policies, directives, regulations, or risk management rules currently prevent or limit the diversion of edible food for the purposes of donation or repurposing, including food safety, liability, contractual limitations, Treasury Board or other government operational rules; (g) what actions are being taken by the Department of National Defence or Canadian Armed Forces to explore, pilot, or implement measures that would reduce food waste in military messes and kitchens, increase donation or diversion of edible food, and align military food service operations with federal waste reduction and sustainability targets; (h) what studies, internal reviews, consultations, or pilot projects related to food waste reduction or diversion have been undertaken since 2015, broken down by the (i) name of the initiative, (ii) purpose of each initiative, (iii) dates conducted, (iv) participating bases, (v) findings and recommendations; and (i) what funding has been allocated or spent since 2015 on activities, infrastructure, or programs related to food waste management or diversion within Department of National Defence or Canadian Armed Forces food service operations, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) base, (iii) type of expenditure (composting equipment, partnerships, audits, training)? |
Answered |
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
|
Q-827
|
Monday, February 2, 2026 |
With regard to foreign-trained physicians seeking to practice in Canada and the immigration and credentialing processes affecting their ability to serve patients: (a) how many foreign-trained physicians are currently practicing in Canada on a work permit, broken down by (i) the number working as family physicians, (ii) the number working as specialists, (iii) province or territory of practice; (b) how many foreign-trained physicians have received an invitation to apply for permanent residency under the Express Entry system in each of the past five years; (c) of those in (b), how many (i) did not subsequently submit an application, (ii) had an application closed or deemed incomplete due to missing or delayed documentation, (iii) abandoned an application; (d) what were the primary documentation or administrative issues that led to the abandonment or closure of these cases; (e) how many foreign-trained physicians applied through the Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program in each of the past five years; (f) how many had their application closed due to administrative or documentation issues related to navigating provincial or federal processes; (g) what studies have been conducted to explore pathways to reopen such applications; (h) what steps is the federal government taking to address Canada’s physician shortages to ensure that immigration, credentialing, and licensing processes do not prevent qualified physicians from practicing; (i) how many per capita foreign-trained physicians have been attracted to and are practicing in (i) Canada, (ii) Australia, (iii) New Zealand, (iv) the United Kingdom, (v) Ireland, broken down by year from 2018 to 2025; (j) what studies have Health Canada or other federal departments conducted to identify best practices that could improve national coordination with provinces and streamline federal and provincial processes; (k) what actions is the government taking to improve, expand, or fast track the recognition of foreign medical credentials, broken down by (i) pathways for physicians trained outside of Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States, (ii) improved recognition of doctors currently practicing in Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States who were originally trained in a third country; (l) what consultations, intergovernmental working groups, or federal provincial initiatives have been undertaken since 2018 to modernize the physician credentialing and immigration system, broken down by (i) objectives, (ii) timelines, (iii) participating federal departments and provincial regulatory bodies, (iv) any recommendations or outcomes to date; (m) how many pieces of correspondence has the federal government received from 2018 to 2025 with recommendations to support changes to the foreign credentialing system, broken down by (i) type or medium of correspondence, (ii) department or agency in receipt, (iii) type of sender (private Canadian, lobby group, national organization, provincial government), (iv) year received, (v) action taken with correspondence; (n) what policy changes, legislative amendments, pilot programs, or administrative reforms are being considered or developed by the government to reduce barriers for foreign-trained doctors seeking permanent residency, improve coordination between Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada and credentialing bodies and ensure that Canada’s credentialing and immigration systems support physician recruitment; (o) for the years 2020 to 2025, what is the percentage of foreign-trained doctors that received permanent residency vs total permanent residency immigration to Canada; and (p) broken down for each of the years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, what is the estimated percentage of all qualified doctors per Canadian population? |
Answered |
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
|
Q-793
|
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
With regard to paper T1 income tax packages mailed to Canadians: (a) how many packages were automatically mailed to Canadians for each of the tax years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 based on the fact that they filed their previous tax year on paper; (b) what was the cost for each of the tax years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 to automatically mail T1 income tax packages; (c) how many letters were sent to Canadians to inform them that they would not automatically receive a T1 income tax package for 2025; (d) what was the cost to send the letter to Canadians; (e) what is the total estimated cost to mail 2025 T1 income tax packages to Canadians; (f) what is the estimated savings realized for not automatically mailing T1 income tax packages; (g) what are the savings realized from removing Schedule 2, Schedule (S2), Schedule 3, Schedule 5, Schedule 6, Schedule 7, Schedule 9, Schedule 11, Schedule (S11), Schedule 12, Schedule (S12), Schedule 13, and Schedule 15 from the T1 income tax package; (h) for each of the tax years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024, how many paper returns did the Canada Revenue Agency receive for each schedule in (g), listed by tax year and schedule; (i) what is the estimated cost to mail additional schedules for 2025 to Canadians; (j) from December 1, 2025, to January 26, 2026, how many orders for tax packages were received at (i) 1-855-330-3305, (ii) 1-800-959-8281; (k) how many and for what duration was the Canada Revenue Agency's telephone automated service inaccessible, listed by (i) occurrence date, (ii) duration of service disruption, (iii) estimated number of clients effected; and (l) what additional measures is the Canada Revenue Agency implementing to ensure Canadians with limited access to technology like seniors and religious minorities are treated fairly and with respect in submitting paper based returns? |
Answered |
Friday, March 13, 2026 |
|
Q-792
|
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
With regard to the library book rate and the rate for the blind, also known as the Special Services and Handling provisions for materials for the print disabled, from the Canada Post Corporation Act and related regulations: (a) how many parcels were sent using these rates, listed by (i) year, (ii) library book rate or rate for the blind, from the 2018 operating year to present; (b) what is the estimated cost to Canada Post for these rates, listed by operating year since 2018; (c) how much funding does the government provide to support these programs, listed by operating year; (d) what analysis, studies, or consultation materials did the government rely on to decide to remove this provision in proposed amendments to the Canada Post Act, listed by (i) material name, (ii) originator of the material, (iii) date the material was created; (e) how many pieces of correspondence since November 1, 2025, has the government received regarding the removal of the library rate and rate for the blind, listed by (i) medium or type of correspondence, (ii) personal correspondence or from an organization, (iii) month received; (f) how many correspondence advocated for or recommended removing these rates from the Canada Post Act; (g) what positive outcome does Canada Post or the government receive from removing this provision from the legislation; (h) what new rates has Canada Post recommended to the government for implementation; (i) what correspondence, press releases or other communications has Canada Post or the government sent to stakeholders to commit to continuation of these programs, listed by (i) type of communication, (ii) date published, (iii) the location to access this information; (j) when does the commitment to maintain these programs expire; (k) does the government, a minister or Canada Post maintain the authority to end these programs; and (l) what other actions is the government taking to support persons with disabilities and ensure current federal legislation and policy in support of accessibility is respected? |
Answered |
Friday, March 13, 2026 |
