|
Q-828
|
Monday, February 2, 2026 |
With regard to food waste, food diversion, and organic waste management in Canadian Armed Forces bases, wings, stations, and other Department of National Defence facilities, including all kitchen, galley, dining hall, and mess operations: (a) what amount of food waste was produced by Department of National Defence and Canadian Armed Forces food service operations for each of the past five fiscal years, broken down by (i) base or wing, (ii) type of facility (kitchen, galley, mess, dining hall), (iii) category of food waste (pre-consumer, post-consumer, prepared-but-unserved, expired, etc.); (b) of the food waste identified in (a), what amount was diverted from landfill through (i) donation to community organizations, shelters, or food banks, (ii) repurposing for secondary use (animal feed, secondary processing), (iii) composting (on site or off site), (iv) recycling or anaerobic digestion programs, broken down by fiscal year since 2019-20; (c) what food donation programs or partnerships presently exist, either formally or informally, at any Canadian Armed Forces bases, wings, or stations, broken down by (i) names of partner organizations, (ii) volumes of food donated annually, (iii) the terms or memoranda of understanding governing such donations; (d) what composting or organic waste programs are currently in effect; (e) what recycling programs for food-related materials (such as oils, fats, grease, packaging, or organics) exist at Department of National Defence facilities, broken down by base; (f) what Department of National Defence or Canadian Armed Forces policies, directives, regulations, or risk management rules currently prevent or limit the diversion of edible food for the purposes of donation or repurposing, including food safety, liability, contractual limitations, Treasury Board or other government operational rules; (g) what actions are being taken by the Department of National Defence or Canadian Armed Forces to explore, pilot, or implement measures that would reduce food waste in military messes and kitchens, increase donation or diversion of edible food, and align military food service operations with federal waste reduction and sustainability targets; (h) what studies, internal reviews, consultations, or pilot projects related to food waste reduction or diversion have been undertaken since 2015, broken down by the (i) name of the initiative, (ii) purpose of each initiative, (iii) dates conducted, (iv) participating bases, (v) findings and recommendations; and (i) what funding has been allocated or spent since 2015 on activities, infrastructure, or programs related to food waste management or diversion within Department of National Defence or Canadian Armed Forces food service operations, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) base, (iii) type of expenditure (composting equipment, partnerships, audits, training)? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
|
Q-827
|
Monday, February 2, 2026 |
With regard to foreign-trained physicians seeking to practice in Canada and the immigration and credentialing processes affecting their ability to serve patients: (a) how many foreign-trained physicians are currently practicing in Canada on a work permit, broken down by (i) the number working as family physicians, (ii) the number working as specialists, (iii) province or territory of practice; (b) how many foreign-trained physicians have received an invitation to apply for permanent residency under the Express Entry system in each of the past five years; (c) of those in (b), how many (i) did not subsequently submit an application, (ii) had an application closed or deemed incomplete due to missing or delayed documentation, (iii) abandoned an application; (d) what were the primary documentation or administrative issues that led to the abandonment or closure of these cases; (e) how many foreign-trained physicians applied through the Ontario Immigrant Nominee Program in each of the past five years; (f) how many had their application closed due to administrative or documentation issues related to navigating provincial or federal processes; (g) what studies have been conducted to explore pathways to reopen such applications; (h) what steps is the federal government taking to address Canada’s physician shortages to ensure that immigration, credentialing, and licensing processes do not prevent qualified physicians from practicing; (i) how many per capita foreign-trained physicians have been attracted to and are practicing in (i) Canada, (ii) Australia, (iii) New Zealand, (iv) the United Kingdom, (v) Ireland, broken down by year from 2018 to 2025; (j) what studies have Health Canada or other federal departments conducted to identify best practices that could improve national coordination with provinces and streamline federal and provincial processes; (k) what actions is the government taking to improve, expand, or fast track the recognition of foreign medical credentials, broken down by (i) pathways for physicians trained outside of Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States, (ii) improved recognition of doctors currently practicing in Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States who were originally trained in a third country; (l) what consultations, intergovernmental working groups, or federal provincial initiatives have been undertaken since 2018 to modernize the physician credentialing and immigration system, broken down by (i) objectives, (ii) timelines, (iii) participating federal departments and provincial regulatory bodies, (iv) any recommendations or outcomes to date; (m) how many pieces of correspondence has the federal government received from 2018 to 2025 with recommendations to support changes to the foreign credentialing system, broken down by (i) type or medium of correspondence, (ii) department or agency in receipt, (iii) type of sender (private Canadian, lobby group, national organization, provincial government), (iv) year received, (v) action taken with correspondence; (n) what policy changes, legislative amendments, pilot programs, or administrative reforms are being considered or developed by the government to reduce barriers for foreign-trained doctors seeking permanent residency, improve coordination between Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada and credentialing bodies and ensure that Canada’s credentialing and immigration systems support physician recruitment; (o) for the years 2020 to 2025, what is the percentage of foreign-trained doctors that received permanent residency vs total permanent residency immigration to Canada; and (p) broken down for each of the years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, what is the estimated percentage of all qualified doctors per Canadian population? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, March 23, 2026 |
|
Q-793
|
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
With regard to paper T1 income tax packages mailed to Canadians: (a) how many packages were automatically mailed to Canadians for each of the tax years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 based on the fact that they filed their previous tax year on paper; (b) what was the cost for each of the tax years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 to automatically mail T1 income tax packages; (c) how many letters were sent to Canadians to inform them that they would not automatically receive a T1 income tax package for 2025; (d) what was the cost to send the letter to Canadians; (e) what is the total estimated cost to mail 2025 T1 income tax packages to Canadians; (f) what is the estimated savings realized for not automatically mailing T1 income tax packages; (g) what are the savings realized from removing Schedule 2, Schedule (S2), Schedule 3, Schedule 5, Schedule 6, Schedule 7, Schedule 9, Schedule 11, Schedule (S11), Schedule 12, Schedule (S12), Schedule 13, and Schedule 15 from the T1 income tax package; (h) for each of the tax years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024, how many paper returns did the Canada Revenue Agency receive for each schedule in (g), listed by tax year and schedule; (i) what is the estimated cost to mail additional schedules for 2025 to Canadians; (j) from December 1, 2025, to January 26, 2026, how many orders for tax packages were received at (i) 1-855-330-3305, (ii) 1-800-959-8281; (k) how many and for what duration was the Canada Revenue Agency's telephone automated service inaccessible, listed by (i) occurrence date, (ii) duration of service disruption, (iii) estimated number of clients effected; and (l) what additional measures is the Canada Revenue Agency implementing to ensure Canadians with limited access to technology like seniors and religious minorities are treated fairly and with respect in submitting paper based returns? |
Awaiting response |
Friday, March 13, 2026 |
|
Q-792
|
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
With regard to the library book rate and the rate for the blind, also known as the Special Services and Handling provisions for materials for the print disabled, from the Canada Post Corporation Act and related regulations: (a) how many parcels were sent using these rates, listed by (i) year, (ii) library book rate or rate for the blind, from the 2018 operating year to present; (b) what is the estimated cost to Canada Post for these rates, listed by operating year since 2018; (c) how much funding does the government provide to support these programs, listed by operating year; (d) what analysis, studies, or consultation materials did the government rely on to decide to remove this provision in proposed amendments to the Canada Post Act, listed by (i) material name, (ii) originator of the material, (iii) date the material was created; (e) how many pieces of correspondence since November 1, 2025, has the government received regarding the removal of the library rate and rate for the blind, listed by (i) medium or type of correspondence, (ii) personal correspondence or from an organization, (iii) month received; (f) how many correspondence advocated for or recommended removing these rates from the Canada Post Act; (g) what positive outcome does Canada Post or the government receive from removing this provision from the legislation; (h) what new rates has Canada Post recommended to the government for implementation; (i) what correspondence, press releases or other communications has Canada Post or the government sent to stakeholders to commit to continuation of these programs, listed by (i) type of communication, (ii) date published, (iii) the location to access this information; (j) when does the commitment to maintain these programs expire; (k) does the government, a minister or Canada Post maintain the authority to end these programs; and (l) what other actions is the government taking to support persons with disabilities and ensure current federal legislation and policy in support of accessibility is respected? |
Awaiting response |
Friday, March 13, 2026 |
|
Q-707
|
Monday, December 8, 2025 |
With regard to federal acts of Parliament that include mandatory statutory review provisions, as of December 8, 2025: (a) how many acts currently in force contain mandatory review clauses, and, for each such act, what is (i) the relevant statutory provision (section and subsection), (ii) the trigger or timing for the review (for example, “within five years of coming into force”), (iii) the prescribed length or scope of the review (for example, “comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of the Act”), (iv) the designated reviewing body (for example, a committee of the Senate, the House of Commons, or both Houses, or a minister); (b) of the acts identified in (a), how many are now past their statutory review deadlines, and, for each overdue review, what is (i) the date the review became due, (ii) the status of the review (for example, initiated, completed but not tabled, not initiated), (iii) the reasons for delay and revised expected timelines; (c) with specific reference to the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act, S.C. 2017, c. 15, section 34, which requires “a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of the Act” five years after the day on which the act comes into force, (i) on what date did the statutory review become due, (ii) what steps have been taken to conduct and complete the review, including the dates of any milestones, (iii) when will the government table the review before Parliament, (iv) if a tabling date is not available, why and when can it reasonably be expected; and (d) for all responses to (a) to (c), what is the responsible department or agency? |
Answered |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
|
Q-634
|
Tuesday, December 2, 2025 |
With regard to Universal Broadband Fund projects in Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, and broken down by project: (a) what is the name of the funding recipient and the amount of federal funding allocated; (b) what is the target completion date of the project as stated in the contribution agreement; (c) what was the actual completion date, if completed; (d) what is the number of households, businesses or farms expected to benefit from the project; (e) what is the type of internet service (fibre, wireless, satellite) being delivered; (f) what is the specific geographic area which the project is funded to cover, based on road and address; (g) what performance audits, service delivery checks or compliance reviews are conducted to ensure that the funded service is delivered as promised; (h) what were the results of the reviews in (g); and (i) is the project completion date projected to change significantly, and, if so, what is the new projected completion date? |
Answered |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
|
Q-582
|
Tuesday, November 18, 2025 |
With regard to Veterans Affairs Canada's decision to significantly restrict access to extracorporeal shockwave therapy for Canadian veterans, effective December 1, 2025: (a) what evidence and medical research did Veterans Affairs Canada rely on to justify limiting extracorporeal shockwave therapy coverage to three sessions per lifetime for chronic tendinopathies and eliminating coverage for erectile dysfunction; (b) did a panel of physicians recommend limiting extracorporeal shockwave therapy access; (c) if so, in (b), which physicians participated in the panel, what literature was reviewed by the panel, what literature on extracorporeal shockwave therapy was decided to be excluded from the panel, and where is the panel’s determination available for public review; (d) how many veterans have received extracorporeal shockwave therapy since its inclusion in the Program of Choice 06 in 2017, and how many are currently undergoing treatment; (e) what consultations, if any, were conducted with veterans, medical professionals, or service providers prior to the July 2025 decision to restrict extracorporeal shockwave therapy coverage, listed by medium and date; (f) what feedback was received from the consultation; (g) has the department assessed the potential physical and mental health impacts of these changes, particularly for veterans managing chronic pain, mobility issues, or conditions such as erectile dysfunction, and, if so, what were the results of the assessment; (h) what alternative therapies or supports, if any, are being offered to veterans who will lose access to extracorporeal shockwave therapy under the new policy; (i) will Veterans Affairs Canada consider grandfathering existing extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment plans or providing transitional support for veterans currently receiving the therapy; (j) was extracorporeal shockwave therapy limited due to costs associated with the treatment or a decision that extracorporeal shockwave therapy does not have positive outcomes for veterans; and (k) what process can veterans take to trigger a Veterans Affairs Canada review of this decision while providing the evidence of the positive outcomes this treatment provides? |
Answered |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
|
Q-572
|
Monday, November 17, 2025 |
With regard to exports of military equipment regulated by the Export and Import Permits Act: (a) has the government been able to confirm the presence of Cadex Defence rifles in use by the Russian military; (b) what enforcement actions has the government taken since July 19, 2023, to enforce the full ban on the export, sale, and transportation of weapons to Russia, listed by occurrence and outcome; (c) what investigations have taken place into the role of third-party intermediaries in facilitating the transfer of Canadian rifles to Russia; (d) what communication has Global Affairs Canada had with Cadex Defence regarding the diversion of its products to sanctioned countries, listed by date and medium of communication; (e) what amendments to regulations will the government make to prevent further exports to Russia; (f) when will these regulations be implemented; (g) what are the highest penalties for violating export controls under the act; and (h) what additional resources is the government committing to prevent and investigate occurrences of illegal arms export, listed by committed funding for new systems or employees? |
Answered |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
