Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Tuesday, May 25, 2010 (No. 48)


Report Stage of Bills

Bill C-3
An Act to promote gender equity in Indian registration by responding to the Court of Appeal for British Columbia decision in McIvor v. Canada (Registrar of Indian and Northern Affairs)

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Strahl (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency) — That Bill C-3, in Clause 3.1, be amended by
(a) replacing line 10 on page 3 with the following:
“3.1 (1) The Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development shall cause to be laid”
(b) replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 3 with the following:
“force, a report on the provisions and implementation of this Act.”
(c) replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 3 with the following:
“review of any provision of this Act.”
Motion No. 2 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Strahl (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency) — That Bill C-3 be amended by restoring Clause 9 as follows:
“9. For greater certainty, no person or body has a right to claim or receive any compensation, damages or indemnity from Her Majesty in right of Canada, any employee or agent of Her Majesty, or a council of a band, for anything done or omitted to be done in good faith in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties, only because
(a) a person was not registered, or did not have their name entered in a Band List, immediately before the day on which this Act comes into force; and
(b) one of the person’s parents is entitled to be registered under paragraph 6(1)(c.1) of the Indian Act, as enacted by subsection 2(3).”

Bill C-9
An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 4, 2010 and other measures

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 96.
Motion No. 2 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 97.
Motion No. 3 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 1885.
Motion No. 4 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2137.
Motion No. 5 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2138.
Motion No. 6 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2139.
Motion No. 7 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2140.
Motion No. 8 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2141.
Motion No. 9 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2142.
Motion No. 10 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2143.
Motion No. 11 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2144.
Motion No. 12 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2145.
Motion No. 13 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2146.
Motion No. 14 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2147.
Motion No. 15 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2148.
Motion No. 16 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2149.
Motion No. 17 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2150.
Motion No. 18 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2151.
Motion No. 19 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2152.
Motion No. 20 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2153.
Motion No. 21 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2154.
Motion No. 22 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2155.
Motion No. 23 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2156.
Motion No. 24 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2157.
Motion No. 25 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2158.
Motion No. 26 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2159.
Motion No. 27 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2160.
Motion No. 28 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2161.
Motion No. 29 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2162.
Motion No. 30 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2163.
Motion No. 31 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2164.
Motion No. 32 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2165.
Motion No. 33 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2166.
Motion No. 34 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2167.
Motion No. 35 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2168.
Motion No. 36 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2169.
Motion No. 37 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2170.
Motion No. 38 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2171.
Motion No. 39 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2185.
Motion No. 40 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2186.
Motion No. 41 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2187.
Motion No. 42 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2188.
Motion No. 43 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2189.
Motion No. 44 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2190.
Motion No. 45 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2191.
Motion No. 46 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2192.
Motion No. 47 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2193.
Motion No. 48 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2194.
Motion No. 49 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2195.
Motion No. 50 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2196.
Motion No. 51 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2197.
Motion No. 52 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2198.
Motion No. 53 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2199.
Motion No. 54 — May 20, 2010 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-9 be amended by deleting Clause 2200.