Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Notice Paper

No. 85

Monday, September 28, 2009

11:00 a.m.


Introduction of Government Bills

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

September 24, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a National Food Day”.

September 24, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (security certificates and special advocates)”.

September 24, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish the Department of Peace”.

September 24, 2009 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (minimum wage)”.

September 24, 2009 — Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer) — Bill entitled “An Act regarding free public transit for seniors”.

September 24, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act (annual report)”.

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)

Questions

Q-4242 — September 24, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to the current pandemic of new influenza A (H1N1) virus in Aboriginal (First Nations, Inuit, Metis) communities in Canada: (a) what were the containment measures taken to slow the spread of the virus within households, between households, and among communities; (b) what were the control measures taken in more remote areas to flatten the epidemiological peak; (c) what was the average length of time from symptoms to treatment for those Aboriginal peoples who required a stay in intensive care unit (ICU); (d) what percentage of hospitalizations, ICU cases, and deaths were among Aboriginal peoples, and how do these compare with the Canadian population at large; (e) what was the average length of time on a ventilator and the mean length of stay in an ICU for Aboriginal peoples; (f) what specific measures are being planned to reduce the time to treatment, hospitalizations, ICU, and deaths; (g) when will the results of the preliminary investigation in First Nations communities be available, specifically, (i) how many Aboriginal communities in Canada have a revised H1N1 pandemic influenza plan, (ii) how many have tested their plan, (iii) how many have necessary supplies in place; (h) what specific actions have been undertaken to address the fact that only two of 30 communities in northern Manitoba had a pandemic plan, and none had been tested; (i) where did the Minister of Health obtain the 90 percent figure she used in her August 28 response letter to Drs Bennett and Duncan; (j) what funding have Aboriginal communities requested, and what additional funds have been made available to Aboriginal communities for pandemic planning and response in 2009; (k) is there any encouragement to identify vulnerable people, such as pregnant women and those with underlying medical conditions, to take additional precautions, specifically, (i) how many communities lack necessary clean water for infection control measures, (ii) what funding and progress has been made to address this situation; (l) what measures are being put into place to decrease transmission in households where there is overcrowding; (m) are all Aboriginal people on the priority list for vaccine, or just communities in remote and isolated settings; (n) are anti-virals pre-positioned in all Aboriginal communities, should they be required urgently, and are there provisions for communities without registered nurses; and (o) what measures exist to ensure that remote and isolated communities will have the necessary human resources to ensure appropriate and timely treatment, particularly in communities where weather may impact help?
Q-4252 — September 24, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With respect to the current pandemic of new influenza A (H1N1): (a) who is at the top of the pandemic organizational chart for the country; (b) what gaps still exist in the government’s overarching plan, recognizing that it is an ever-evolving plan, and by what date will identified gaps be addressed; (c) what money remains from the $400 million contained in the budget of 2006 as ‘to be set aside as a contingency to be accessed on an as-needed basis’; (d) what funds have been spent since the start of the pandemic in Canada to address response, specifically, (i) what government departments have tested their pandemic plan, (ii) what departments operationalized their plans or part of their plans in the spring, and updated their plans since the lessons learned from the spring; (e) should there be an election, what is the pandemic preparedness plan for Elections Canada, both to protect the health and well-being of its employees and Canadians; (f) what are the outstanding issues among medical personnel in terms of preparedness, and how are these issues being addressed; (g) what was the process for monitoring swine herds prior to April 24, 2009, and how has it increased since that date; (h) what is the purpose behind the absence of a Canadian notifiable swine influenza surveillance system; (i) what is known of the clinical spectrum of the disease at this time, and what are the possible long-term impacts on lungs, and other organs, and potential long-term costs to the healthcare system; (j) by what date are provincial and territorial vaccine distributions plans to be in place, what oversight exists to ensure they are in place, and will they be made public; (k) what contingency plans are being put in place should Canadian distributors run out of stock of N95 masks; (l) will there be a compensation package should there be challenges with the vaccine; (m) what recommendations are being made to those with chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and immunocompromised patients, and how is this information being relayed to these groups to see their doctor now; (n) what are the details of the “alternative strategies” being developed by provinces and territories; (o) what are the details of adding a “small amount of amantadine” to the National Emergency Stockpile System, and is its use in combination thought to be effective when the virus is resistant to amantadines; (p) are there any other alternative therapies being explored to address antiviral resistance and, if so, what funds are being allocated to the effort; (q) will 500 ventilators meet the potential intensive care unit (ICU) burden considering Canada’s ICU cases were around 20% of its hospitalized, compared to 15% in heavily impacted communities in the southern hemisphere; and (r) what do recent modelling studies show?
Q-4262 — September 24, 2009 — Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona) — How much will the proposed Harmonized Sales Tax for the province of Manitoba cost the average taxpayer in Manitoba for each of the following expenditures: (a) funerals; (b) travel; and (c) purchase of new home?
Q-4272 — September 24, 2009 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — With regard to the potential extradition of Marc Emery: (a) what discussions have taken place between Canadian and American authorities since the time of his arrest in July 2005; (b) who participated in these discussions; and (c) what positions were taken by the Canadian and American authorities at the varying stages of the discussion and negotiation process?
Q-4282 — September 24, 2009 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — With respect to Employment Insurance applications since January 2009 in Canada and in the federal riding of Vancouver East: (a) what is the increase in initial and renewed applications; (b) what is the average waiting time to have these applications processed; (c) have new staff been hired to deal with the increase in applications; (d) if so, how many people were hired and (i) what is the cost of this hiring; and (e) if not, how is the increase being dealt with and (i) what are the costs of processing the increase volume of applications beyond hiring new employees?
Q-4292 — September 24, 2009 — Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — With respect to Canada’s oil industry: (a) what is the total amount of projected royalties or revenues to the federal government from existing and proposed projects to exploit Canada’s oil sands in each fiscal year during the period of 2009- 2018; (b) how much money is the federal government spending by itself, or in cooperation with other levels of government, private or non-government organizations, on environmental protection mitigation measures as the oil sands are exploited; (c) what is the status of oil and gas licensing and permitting with regards to the exploitation of fossil fuels in the Beaufort Sea; (d) what is the status of the proposed pipeline construction from Fort McMurray to the western coast of British Columbia; (e) what role is the federal government contemplating or playing in the process surrounding this pipeline, its potential construction, environmental assessment, and potential funding or financing; and (f) does this role extend to fiscal incentives, loan guarantees, Export Development Canada financing or other measures?
Q-4302 — September 24, 2009 — Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — With respect to properties of interest in the National Capital Region: (a) what properties, land and buildings, in the Electoral District of Ottawa South are presently owned by the federal government, in its entirety, including line departments, boards, agencies, and crown corporations; (b) what specific properties, land and buildings, are owned by the National Capital Commission in the Electoral District of Ottawa South; (c) are any of these subject to sale or development in the next five years; and (d) what is the status of the proposed construction at 1635 Tremblay Road, Ottawa?
Q-4312 — September 24, 2009 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With respect to the use of government owned fleet of Challenger jets since February of 2006: (a) how many times has the fleet been used; (b) what are the names and titles of the passengers present on each flight manifest; (c) who authorized each flight; (d) what were all of the departure points and destinations of these aircrafts; (e) what were the total operational costs associated with each of these flights; and (f) what were the total food and beverage costs associated with each flight?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions

M-439 — September 24, 2009 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act to give preferred status to pension, health and long term disability plan deficits and unpaid severance above any unsecured creditors.

Private Members' Business

C-391 — May 15, 2009 — Ms. Hoeppner (Portage—Lisgar) — Second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security of Bill C-391, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Firearms Act (repeal of long-gun registry).
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr. Anderson (Cypress Hills—Grasslands) — May 26, 2009
Mr. Shipley (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex), Mr. Rickford (Kenora), Mr. Benoit (Vegreville—Wainwright), Mr. Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound), Mr. Hoback (Prince Albert) and Mr. Warkentin (Peace River) — May 27, 2009
Mr. Clarke (Desnethé--Missinippi--Churchill River) and Mr. Lunney (Nanaimo—Alberni) — May 28, 2009
Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale), Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville), Mr. Calkins (Wetaskiwin), Mr. Trost (Saskatoon—Humboldt) and Mr. Boughen (Palliser) — May 29, 2009
Mrs. Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul), Mr. Uppal (Edmonton—Sherwood Park) and Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — June 1, 2009
Mr. Richards (Wild Rose) and Mr. Goldring (Edmonton East) — June 2, 2009
Motion may not be moved, pursuant to Standing Order 91.1(1).

2 Response requested within 45 days