Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Tuesday, May 6, 2008 (No. 89)


Report Stage of Bills

Bill C-5
An Act respecting civil liability and compensation for damage in case of a nuclear incident
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 -- Motions Nos. 1 to 9, 11, 12, 16 to 18 and 21.
Statement and selection by Speaker — see Debates of May 5, 2008.

Resuming Debate

Group No. 1
Motion No. 1 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 2 to 4, 8, 11, 12 and 16.
Motion No. 5 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 17 -- Question put only if Motion No. 5 is negatived.
Motion No. 18 -- Question put only if Motion No. 5 is negatived.
Motion No. 6 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 21 -- Question put only if Motion No. 6 is negatived.
Motion No. 7 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 9 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 1 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5 be amended by deleting Clause 21.
Motion No. 2 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5 be amended by deleting Clause 22.
Motion No. 3 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 23, be amended by replacing lines 23 and 24 on page 7 with the following:
“contains nuclear material, financial security to”
Motion No. 4 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 24, be amended by deleting lines 39 to 42 on page 7 and lines 1 to 18 on page 8.
Motion No. 5 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5 be amended by deleting Clause 26.
Motion No. 6 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5 be amended by deleting Clause 30.
Motion No. 7 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5 be amended by deleting Clause 32.
Motion No. 8 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 34, be amended by deleting lines 15 to 23 on page 11.
Motion No. 9 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5 be amended by deleting Clause 47.
Motion No. 11 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 61, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 31 on page 16 with the following:
“Majesty in right of Canada the total of all amounts paid by the Minister under this Act.”
Motion No. 12 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 62, be amended by deleting lines 19 to 26 on page 17.
Motion No. 16 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 66, be amended by deleting lines 3 and 4 on page 19.
Motion No. 17 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 66, be amended by deleting lines 7 to 9 on page 19.
Motion No. 18 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 66, be amended by deleting lines 10 to 12 on page 19.
Motion No. 21 — May 5, 2008 — Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-5, in Clause 68, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 3 on page 20.

Bill C-29
An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (accountability with respect to loans)
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 -- Motions Nos. 1 to 3.
Statement and selection by Speaker — see Debates of December 5, 2007.

Resuming Debate

Group No. 1
Motion No. 1 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 2 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 3 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 1 — February 14, 2008 — Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform), seconded by Mr. Hill (Secretary of State), — That Bill C-29, in Clause 4, be amended by deleting lines 13 to 17 on page 2.
Motion No. 2 — February 14, 2008 — Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform), seconded by Mr. Hill (Secretary of State), — That Bill C-29, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing lines 29 to 35 on page 4 with the following:
“case of a candidate, the selection date as defined in section 478.01 in the case of a nomination contestant, the end of the leadership contest in the case of a leadership contestant, and the end of the fiscal period during which the loan was made in the case of a registered party and registered association, is deemed to be a contribution of the”
Motion No. 3 — February 14, 2008 — Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform), seconded by Mr. Hill (Secretary of State), — That Bill C-29, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing lines 32 to 35 on page 5 with the following:
“Officer shall inform the lender of his or her decision; furthermore, the candidate's registered association or, if there is no registered association, the registered party becomes liable for the unpaid amount as if the association or party had guaranteed the loan.”

Bill C-207
An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (tax credit for new graduates working in designated regions)
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 -- Motions Nos. 1 and 2.
Statement and selection by Speaker — see Debates of April 7, 2008.

Resuming Debate

Group No. 1
Motion No. 1 -- Question put separately.
Amendment to Motion No. 2 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 2 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 1 — April 7, 2008 — Mr. Bouchard (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord), seconded by Mr. Roy (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-207 be amended by restoring the title as follows:
“An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (tax credit for new graduates working in designated regions)”
Motion No. 2 — April 7, 2008 — Mr. Bouchard (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord), seconded by Mr. Roy (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-207 be amended by restoring Clause 1 as follows:
“1. The Income Tax Act is amended by adding the following after section 118.7:
118.71 (1) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.
“base period” means the first 52 weeks of the aggregate of all periods each of which is a period during which the individual
(a) holds qualifying employment; and
(b) ordinarily performs the duties of the qualifying employment at an establishment of the individual’s employer situated in a designated region or is ordinarily attached to such an establishment.
“designated educational institution” has the meaning assigned by subsection 118.6(1).
“designated region” has the meaning assigned by section 3 of the Regional Development Incentives Act.
“qualifying employment” means an office or employment that the individual begins to hold in the 24-month period that follows the date on which the individual successfully completes the courses and, where applicable, the internships leading to the awarding of a recognized diploma, or the date on which the individual is awarded a recognized diploma that is a master’s or doctoral degree under an educational program requiring the writing of an essay, dissertation or thesis, if
(a) the individual begins to perform the duties of the office or employment after January 1, 2007;
(b) at the time that the individual takes up the office or employment, the establishment of the individual’s employer at which the individual ordinarily performs the duties of that office or employment, or to which the individual is ordinarily attached, is situated in a designated region; and
(c) the knowledge and skills obtained during the individual’s training or educational program are related to the duties performed by the individual in connection with the office or employment.
“recognized diploma” means a degree, diploma or attestation awarded by a designated educational institution.
(2) For the purpose of computing the tax payable under this Part by an individual for a taxation year, there may be deducted an amount equal to the lesser of
(a) the amount that is 40% of the aggregate of all amounts each of which is the salary or wages of the individual for the year from qualifying employment and attributable to the individual’s base period; and
(b) the amount by which $8,000 exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the individual is deemed to have paid to the Receiver General under this section for a preceding taxation year.
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), an individual who was resident in a designated region in Canada immediately before the individual’s death is deemed to be resident in a designated region in Canada at the end of December 31 of the year in which the individual died.”
Amendment to Motion No. 2 — April 7, 2008 — Mr. Crête (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup), seconded by Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 1 of Bill C-207 be amended by deleting all the words in paragraphs 118.71(1) and (2) and substituting the following:
“118.71 (1) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.
“base period” means the first 52 weeks of the aggregate of all periods each of which is a period during which the individual
(a) holds qualifying employment; and
(b) ordinarily performs the duties of the qualifying employment at an establishment of the individual’s employer situated in a designated region or is ordinarily attached to such an establishment.
“designated educational institution” has the meaning assigned by subsection 118.6(1).
“designated region” has the meaning assigned by section 3 of the Regional Development Incentives Act.
“qualifying employment” means an office or employment that the individual begins to hold in the 24-month period that follows the date on which the individual successfully completes the courses and, where applicable, the internships leading to the awarding of a recognized diploma, or the date on which the individual is awarded a recognized diploma that is a master’s or doctoral degree under an educational program requiring the writing of an essay, dissertation or thesis, if
(a) the individual begins to perform the duties of the office or employment after January 1, 2008;
(b) at the time that the individual takes up the office or employment, the establishment of the individual’s employer at which the individual ordinarily performs the duties of that office or employment, or to which the individual is ordinarily attached, is situated in a designated region; and
(c) the knowledge and skills obtained during the individual’s training or educational program are related to the duties performed by the individual in connection with the office or employment.
“recognized diploma” means a degree, diploma or attestation awarded by a designated educational institution.
(2) For the purpose of computing the tax payable under this Part by an individual for a taxation year, there may be deducted an amount equal to the lesser of
(a) the amount that is 40% of the aggregate of all amounts each of which is the salary or wages of the individual for the year from qualifying employment;
(b) $3,000; and
(c) the amount by which $8,000 exceeds the aggregate of all amounts each of which is an amount that the individual deducted under this section for the purpose of computing the tax payable, or that the individual is deemed to have paid to the Receiver General under this section for a preceding taxation year.”.

Bill C-265
An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (qualification for and entitlement to benefits)

Notices of Motions

Motion No. 1 — April 24, 2008 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — That Bill C-265 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Motion No. 2 — April 7, 2008 — Mr. Lessard (Chambly—Borduas) — That Bill C-265 be amended by restoring Clause 3 as follows:
“3. Subsections 7(1) to (5) of the Act are replaced by the following:
7. (1) An insured person qualifies if the person
(a) has had an interruption of earnings from employment; and
(b) has had during their qualifying period at least 360 hours of insurable employment.”
Motion No. 3 — April 7, 2008 — Mr. Lessard (Chambly—Borduas) — That Bill C-265 be amended by restoring Clause 4 as follows:
“4. Subsections 7.1(1) and (2) of the Act are replaced by the following:
7.1 (1) The number of hours that an insured person requires under section 7 to qualify for benefits is increased to
(a) 525 hours if the insured person accumulates one or more minor violations,
(b) 700 hours if the insured person accumulates one or more serious violations,
(c) 875 hours if the insured person accumulates one or more very serious violations, and
(d) 1050 hours if the insured person accumulates one or more subsequent violations
in the 260 weeks before making their initial claim for benefit.”