CIMM Committee News Release
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration |
HOUSE OF COMMONS CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES OTTAWA, CANADA K1A 0A6 |
Comité permanent de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration |
For immediate release
NEWS RELEASE
Cross-Canada Hearings of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration: An Opportunity for your voice to be heard
Ottawa, December 20, 2004 - The House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration will be traveling to the following cities in March and April 2005: St. John’s, Halifax, Charlottetown, Fredericton, Quebec, Montreal, Toronto, Kitchener-Waterloo, Winnipeg, Regina, Calgary, Edmonton, Vancouver and Victoria. Hearings will be held at each location on the following topics.
A NEW CITIZENSHIP ACT
In the Speech from the Throne of October 2004, the government indicated that its actions will be guided by its commitment to defend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and to be a steadfast advocate of inclusion. An intention to introduce new citizenship legislation was also affirmed:
“What makes our communities work is our deep commitment to human rights and mutual respect. The Government is committed to these values. It will modernize Canada’s Citizenship Act to reaffirm the responsibilities and rights of Canadian citizenship and our values of multiculturalism, gender equality and linguistic duality.”
The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration has indicated that new citizenship legislation will be tabled in Parliament in early 2005 and that it will be referred to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration after first reading. At her appearance on 2 November 2004, Minister Sgro told the Committee: “Give me your suggestions on those areas that are most contentious. At that point, I would ask the department to put them into the legislation, introduce the legislation in February at the first opportunity, and bring it back here and you could do your travels, and so on.”
The Committee has already provided preliminary advice regarding this legislation in a report tabled 30 November 2004. That report was based on evidence received in the 36th and 37th Parliaments during our study of Bills C-63, C-16 and C-18, all citizenship bills that died on the Order Paper.
The Committee will be asking Canadians to once again comment on citizenship issues. While detailed legal analyses of the legislation are sought, we are also asking Canadians to comment more generally on the rights and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship. As we noted in our November 2004 report, two important aspects of the new law must strive to reflect the importance attached to belonging to the Canadian community and we invite Canadians to express their thoughts regarding a preamble for the legislation and the oath of citizenship.
RECOGNITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND CREDENTIALS OF IMMIGRANTS
The best immigrant selection system in the world will ultimately be of little benefit to Canada if economic immigrants are unable to work in their trade or profession. The Committee realizes that this is a complex and multifaceted problem involving many levels of government and literally hundreds of professional and trade organizations. During the Committee’s travel, we intend to meet with provincial counterparts to discuss this issue and we also invite individual Canadians and professional and trade organizations to make submissions and recommendations
Specific questions that will be addressed include the following:
• The Committee would like to see a process in place whereby immigrants will be able to obtain the Canadian equivalency for their professional and trade credentials. What would such a process look like for your profession or trade?
• What would be the costs and challenges of implementing such a process?
• In which occupational fields has there been progress with respect to skills and credential recognition?
• Are problems in labour force integration evidence of shortcomings in Canada’s immigration programs? If so, what changes should be made to federal policies relating to skilled worker recruitment?
• Do other countries offer better models for the integration of newcomers?
FAMILY REUNIFICATION ISSUES
One of the immigration objectives listed in section 3 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act is “to see that families are reunited in Canada.” Similarly, section 4 of the Act states that one of the objectives with respect to refugees is “to support the self-sufficiency and the social and economic well-being of refugees by facilitating reunification with their family members in Canada.” The Committee invites witnesses to discuss their concerns relating to family reunification and welcomes recommendations for improving the current system
The following general topics have been identified as being of particular interest to the Committee:
• The family class sponsorship program;
• Delays in reuniting the families of refugees who have been granted Canada’s protection following the Immigration and Refugee Board determination process; and,
• Family reunification issues arising in the context of the private sponsorship of refugees program.
CHAIR
Andrew Telegdi
VICE-CHAIRS
Meili Faille — Inky Mark
MEMBERS
Diane Ablonczy — David A. Anderson
Colleen Beaumier — Roger Clavet
Hedy Fry — Helena Guergis
Rahim Jaffer — Bill Siksay
Lui Temelkovski
- 30 -
|