|
Q-1331
|
Monday, June 15, 2026 |
With regard to the Defence Investment Agency and the decision by the Government to select Saab’s Global Eye as a preferred supplier for the Airborne Early Warning and Control platform: (a) what are the details of all meetings which have taken place with Saab officials since October 1, 2025 including, for each, (i) the date, time, location and duration, (ii) whether the Global Eye was discussed at the meeting, (iii) the officials from Saab and Canadian staff or officials in the room, (iv) the subjects specifically raised in each meeting including any specific reference to requirements, (v) what promises were made by Saab in each of the meetings or follow-up correspondence in relation to their bid for the program, (vi) whether anyone in the government verified that the meeting was appropriately recorded in the Lobbyist Registry; (b) which individuals at National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces were consulted by the Defence Investment Agency concerning requirements and how many times were the individuals consulted before Saab’s Global Eye was selected as the preferred supplier; and (c) did the exempt staff, or ministers at the Department of National Defence engage with military officials when it came to the determination of requirements for the Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft and the selection of the Global Eye as the preferred supplier, and, if so, who were the ministers or exempt staff who engaged with the military officials when it came to determining the requirements and selection the Global Eye and what were the dates, times, locations and duration of each of these interventions? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1330
|
Monday, June 15, 2026 |
With regard to the Department of National Defence, the Canadian Armed Forces and the decision by the government to select Saab’s Global Eye as a preferred supplier for the Airborne Early Warning and Control platform: (a) how many meetings have taken place with Saab officials since October 1, 2025, and what are the details of each, including (i) the date, time, location and duration, (ii) whether the Global Eye was discussed at the meeting, (iii) the officials from Saab and Canadian staff or officials in the room for these meetings, (iv) the subjects specifically raised in each meeting including any specific reference to requirements, (v) what promises were made by Saab in each of the meetings or follow-up correspondence in relation to their bid for the program, (vi) if anyone in the government verified that the meetings were all appropriately recorded in the Lobbyist Registry; (b) did the government evaluate Saab’s Global Eye against all government requirements for the Department of National Defence Airborne Early Warning and Control platform, and, if so, what were those requirements; (c) how did Canada evaluate the Global Eye against the other leading offerings from L3Harris and Boeing and what is the summary of the criteria against which the three options were evaluated before Saab’s platform was selected as the preferred supplier; (d) which individuals at the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces are responsible for determining requirements for the Airborne Early Warning and Control platform, and how many times were the individuals consulted before Saab’s Global Eye was selected as the preferred supplier; (e) what were the concerns identified by the Department of National Defence or the Canadian Armed Forces in relation to the Global Eye and how were these concerns overcome before Saab’s platform was identified and selected as the preferred supplier; and (f) did the exempt staff, or ministers at the Department of National Defence engage with military officials when it came to the determination of requirements for the Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft and the selection of the Global Eye as the preferred supplier, and, if so, who were the ministers or exempt staff who engaged with the military officials when it came to determining the requirements and selection the Global Eye and what were the dates, times, locations and duration of each of these intervention? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1289
|
Thursday, June 11, 2026 |
With regard to the Canadian Armed Forces: (a) since December 5, 2022, how many members were recruited into the Canadian Armed Forces used fraudulent or otherwise invalid university degrees, broken down by, the (i) the Regular Force, (ii) the Reserve Force, (iii) Military Occupational Structure identification, (iv) rank; (b) since January 1, 2020, how many members graduated from the Regular Officer Training Plan with a degree who have subsequently failed the Development Period 1.1 (officially known as the Infantry Dismounted Platoon Commander Course), resulting in failing to meet their Employment Functional Point, broken down by (i) year, (ii) Military Occupational Structure identification; and (c) of the graduates from the Regular Officer Training Plan who failed to meet their Employment Functional Point, how many were released from the Canadian Armed Forces before completing their mandatory five year service obligation? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1218
|
Monday, May 25, 2026 |
With regard to the Department of National Defence's "Seamless Canada" initiative: (a) what is the overall annual budget for Seamless Canada; (b) how many full-time employees are dedicated to the Seamless Canada initiative; (c) what is the amount that has been spent on travel expenses related to the initiative, broken down by year, since 2018; (d) what is the amount that has been spent on hospitality expenses related to the initiative, broken down by year, since 2018; (e) on what dates and at what locations has the Seamless Canada Steering Committee met, broken down by year, since 2018; (f) for each meeting in (e), what expenses were incurred, overall and broken down by type of expense; (g) has Seamless Canada been subject to any program evaluation since 2018, and, if so, what are the details, including the findings; (h) what mechanism exists for Canadian Armed Forces members to offer feedback on Seamless Canada, and, according to the feedback received, what percentage of Canadian Armed Forces members are dissatisfied with Seamless Canada; (i) what is the average delay time for a redeployed Canadian Armed Forces member to be assigned a family doctor; (j) what is the average delay time for a redeployed Canadian Armed Forces member to receive a new driver's licence; and (k) what is the average delay time for a redeployed Canadian Armed Forces member to obtain childcare spaces, when required? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1118
|
Thursday, April 23, 2026 |
With regard to the Canadian Armed Forces: (a) which occupations (Military Occupational Structure Identification) are projected to reach authorized staffing levels, otherwise known as Preferred Manning Level, in (i) four years, (ii) 10 years, (iii) 25 years, (iv) an undetermined number of years; (b) how many current training staff at Canadian Forces Leadership and Recruit School are externally sourced temporary staff; (c) how many trainer positions are there, broken down by occupation (Military Occupational Structure Identification); (d) how many trainer positions are unfilled, broken down by occupation (Military Occupational Structure Identification); (e) how many trainers are reservists on full or short term Class B service; (f) which occupations (Military Occupational Structure Identification) do not mandate the Canadian Forces Aptitude Test; (g) between January 1, 2025, and April 22, 2026, how many total Canadian Armed Forces members have left the Canadian Armed Forces, broken down by rank and occupation (Military Occupational Structure Identification); and (h) what currently are the five most distressed occupations (Military Occupational Structure Identifications) in the Canadian Armed Forces? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 10, 2026 |
|
Q-1117
|
Thursday, April 23, 2026 |
With regard to the Canadian Armed Forces: (a) between January 1, 2025, and April 22, 2026, what is the total Trained Effective Strength in the Canadian Armed Forces, broken down by month; (b) how many Canadian Armed Forces members are currently on the Basic Training List; (c) between April 1, 2025, and April 22, 2026, how many Canadian Armed Forces members achieved Trained Effective Strength (also known as Operational Functioning Point); (d) which occupations are at under 80% staffing capacity, otherwise known as Preferred Manning Level; (e) between January 1, 2025, and April 22, 2026, broken down by quarter and sorted by each occupation (Military Occupational Structure Identification), what are the wait times for people on Personnel Awaiting Training; (f) how many authorized clothing items are missing to fully clothe and equip all Canadian Armed Forces recruits at Canadian Forces Leadership and Recruit School St. Jean; (g) between December 5, 2022, and April 23, 2026, broken down by month, what is the number of recruits and Canadian Armed Forces members that are permanent residents who failed to pass (i) the Basic Military Qualification course, (ii) Developmental Period 1 occupational training; and (h) what countries (by name) are considered "high risk" for the purposes of background checks and security clearances for people joining the Canadian Armed Forces? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 10, 2026 |
|
Q-1116
|
Thursday, April 23, 2026 |
With regard to the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence: (a) between January 1, 2025, and April 22 2026, broken down by month and province or territory, how many residential housing units were (i) built, (ii) acquired; (b) between January 1, 2025, and April 22, 2026, how many residential housing units were demolished or otherwise disposed of; and (c) how many residential housing units are designated for future demolition or disposal? |
Answered |
Wednesday, June 10, 2026 |
|
Q-600
|
Thursday, November 20, 2025 |
With regard to the statement on page 210 of budget 2025, "Implementing a Fleet Divestment Strategy: [...] The Department of National Defence will divest fleets reaching end of service life, saving costly repairs and sustainment costs. Divestment will be coordinated with investments in modernized replacement capabilities": (a) which fleets will be subject to divestment, broken down by platform; (b) what is the timeline for each platform divestment; (c) what is the number of units in each fleet subject to divestment, broken down by platform; and (d) what is the breakdown of the expected $1.1 billion in cost savings by fleet and platform type? |
Answered |
Monday, January 26, 2026 |
