Statutory Debates
Parliament has seen fit to include in
several statutes, provisions governing special “statutory” debates.
These special debates are a form of parliamentary supervision and review of
specific statutory provisions. In some cases, the statutory provision is
designed to be permissive; in others, it is
mandatory. [154]
Statutory debates can be grouped into two
broad categories, although the procedures pertaining to the debates are similar.
The first category provides for a general review of an Act or a particular
aspect of it. The second and most common category provides for a debate to
confirm, revoke or amend an order, regulation, declaration, proclamation,
guideline or other instrument of delegated legislation issued pursuant to the
statute in question. Some of these statutes make regulations subject to
affirmative resolution of Parliament. This obliges both Houses to adopt the
regulations, ostensibly by holding a debate on them, before they can come into
effect. [155]
Conversely, regulations subject to negative resolution of Parliament are in
effect until revoked by resolution of both Houses, again presumably after a
debate. [156]
Since the 1960s, several statutory debates
have taken place. In 1971, for example, pursuant to the Government
Organization Act, 1970, the House considered and adopted a motion to
establish a Ministry of State for Science and
Technology. [157]
In
1974, the House debated a motion requesting the Minister of Veterans Affairs to
continue provisions of the Veterans’ Land Act scheduled to expire
on March 31,
1975. [158]
One was
held in 1977 in an attempt to advance the expiration date of the
Anti-Inflation
Act. [159]
Two
occurred consecutively in late 1980 when Members sought to revoke two
proclamations tabled by the government in relation to the Petroleum
Administration Act: one proclamation concerned regulations prescribing
maximum prices for various qualities and kinds of crude oil, the other
proclamation involved regulations prescribing prices for natural
gas. [160]
Another
took place in 1985 when Members invoked a provision in the Western Grain
Transportation Act to move a motion to use a parliamentary day to examine a
progress report on the Act and any outstanding issues of interest to western
farmers. [161]
One
statutory debate took place in September 1992 when, pursuant to the
Referendum Act, the House adopted a motion approving the text of a
referendum
question. [162]
The
most recent debate occurred in December 1992 when Members sought to amend the
Special Economic Measures (Haiti) Ships Regulations in accordance with
provisions set down in the Special Economic Measures Act for amending or
revoking orders and regulations regarding economic sanctions
programs. [163]
Until 1986, the Electoral Boundaries
Readjustment Act contained provisions which allowed Members to discuss their
objections to a report of an Electoral Boundaries Commission on the floor of the
House. Four debates — in 1966, 1973, 1976 and 1983 — were held under
the Act’s
provisions. [164]
In
1986, the Act was amended so that these reports are now tabled in the House and
automatically referred to a parliamentary committee established for the purpose
of dealing with electoral
matters. [165]
Objections are filed with and considered by this committee.
Initiating Debate
The manner in which statutory debates are
triggered depends upon the provisions contained in each statute. For statutes
which allow a debate to be held, such a debate may be initiated by a Minister
who, within a specified time, files a notice of motion with the Speaker for the
confirmation of an order, regulation, declaration, proclamation, guideline or
other instrument of delegated legislation issued in accordance with the
law. [166]
The initiation of a debate to revoke such
instruments typically requires that a notice of motion signed by a minimum
number of Members or Senators, as the case may be, be filed with the
Speaker. [167]
Where
statutes require that a debate take place on the use of an instrument of
delegated legislation, the relevant provisions typically specify that a
confirmation motion signed by a Minister must be laid before Parliament within a
specified time. [168]
After notice has been filed in accordance
with House rules and transferred to the Order Paper under the rubric
“Statutory
Order”, [169]
debate must take place within a set number of days as prescribed in the given
statute. For example, in 1974, debate pursuant to the Veterans’ Land
Act had to take place within 15 days, and the House adopted a motion fixing
the dates for the
debate. [170]
In 1977,
debate pursuant to the Anti-Inflation Act was required to take place
within 15 days of the notice being
filed [171]
and, in
1980, pursuant to the Petroleum Administration Act, within four sitting
days. [172]
It appears
that in both cases the dates for the debate were fixed through all-party
consultation. In 1985, pursuant to subsection 62(6) of the Western Grain
Transportation Act, which stipulated that debate had to take place within 60
days of the notice being filed, the Speaker assigned the day for the
debate. [173]
In
September 1992, pursuant to the Referendum Act, the debate on the text of
the referendum question took place 24 hours after the notice was
given. [174]
In
December 1992, after a motion for a debate pursuant to the Special Economic
Measures Act had been placed on the Order Paper, the Chair was asked
to rule on its procedural acceptability. The Speaker ruled that the motion was
acceptable and that pursuant to the Act, the House had to consider the
motion within six sitting
days. [175]
The House
agreed to hold the debate later that
day. [176]
Rules of Debate
Duration of Debate
The duration of a statutory debate is
usually prescribed in the legislation, be it one or more sitting days or only a
few hours. On occasion, the House has also adopted motions setting out
additional
guidelines. [177]
For
example, pursuant to subsection 1(3) of the Veterans’ Land Act, the
debate was to take place over two days, without interruption, in accordance with
the rules of the House; the House subsequently adopted a motion establishing the
days of the debate and suspending Private Members’ Business on the first
day of debate. [178]
The debates held pursuant to the Anti-Inflation Act and the Petroleum
Administration Act lasted four and three days respectively, in accordance
with the
statutes. [179]
Subsection 62(6) of the Western Grain Transportation Act stipulated that
the progress report was to be debated without interruption for “a period
not exceeding the duration of the normal business hours of the House on that
day”. A motion to this effect was adopted by the
House. [180]
The
motion also indicated that the order was to be the first item of business. The
debate held in September 1992 pursuant to the Referendum Act lasted two
sitting days. The Act stipulates that a decision must be taken on the
motion by the end of the third sitting day of the
debate. [181]
The
House passed a motion, by unanimous consent, to dispose of the motion after two
days of debate. [182]
The length of the December 1992 statutory debate was set by subsection 7(4) of
the Special Economic Measures Act which limits debate to not more than
three hours, unless the House fixes a longer period by unanimous consent. In
this instance, the House adopted a special order which had the effect of
terminating debate after only two
hours. [183]
A notable exception to the duration of the
debate being prescribed in the legislation is found in the Emergencies
Act. This statute imposes no time limit on debate on a motion for
confirmation of a declaration, or continuation of a declaration, of an emergency
or for debate on a motion to revoke or amend a regulation or order. The
legislation provides that debate continues uninterrupted until such time as the
House is ready for the
question. [184]
Length of Speeches
Unless otherwise specified in the statute,
the length of speeches during a statutory debate is determined by the rules of
the House. [185]
There
have been two exceptions: in 1977 and 1985, the House adopted motions
restricting the length of
speeches. [186]
Interruption of Debate
Most statutes which prescribe provisions
for statutory debates also stipulate that the debate may not be interrupted.
With the exception of the Petroleum Administration
Act, [187]
the
acts pursuant to which statutory debates have been held in the House contained
these “no interruption” provisions. However, in 1977, debate on the
motion pursuant to the Anti-Inflation Act, which took place over four days,
was interrupted on three occasions for the Adjournment Proceedings, after which
the motion to adjourn was deemed withdrawn and debate continued, due to an Order
of the House adopted on May 30,
1977. [188]
In 1985,
the debate held pursuant to the Western Grain Transportation Act
was interrupted for a ministerial statement by the Minister of Finance pursuant
to an Order made by the
House. [189]
Termination of Debate
A statutory debate concludes in accordance
with provisions outlined in the legislation. Typically, if debate has not
concluded earlier, the Speaker is required to interrupt the proceedings at the
expiration of a given sitting day or hour of debate and put the question on the
motion. [190]
If a
confirmation motion is adopted by the House of Parliament in which it was
introduced, the statute will normally prescribe that a message be sent to the
other House requesting its concurrence. If the motion is subsequently adopted by
the other House, the regulation or Order in Council is thereby confirmed,
amended or
revoked. [191]
If a
revocation motion is not adopted by the House in which it originated or by the
House where it was sent for concurrence, the regulation or Order in Council
comes into force or remains unaffected as the case may
be. [192]
Normally, motions moved and debated in
accordance with a statutory provision are voted on at the conclusion of
debate. [193]
In 1985,
the proceedings held pursuant to the Western Grain Transportation Act
expired at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment: no question was put on the
motion nor the amendment
thereto. [194]