Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements.

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), — That the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security be instructed to undertake a study on rural crime in Canada and consider factors, including but not limited to: (i) current rural crime rates and trends, (ii) existing RCMP and other policing resources and policies in rural, remote, and Indigenous communities, particularly in relation to population density, policing geographic area, and staff shortages, (iii) current partnerships with provincial, municipal, and Indigenous police forces, (iv) possible recommendations to improve rural crime prevention and to curb emerging crime rates, and that the Committee report its findings to the House within six months of the adoption of this motion; (Private Members' Business M-167)

The question was put on the amendment and it was agreed to on the following division:

Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on the main motion, as amended, of Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), — That the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security be instructed to undertake a study on rural crime in Canada and consider factors, including but not limited to: (i) current rural crime rates and trends, (ii) existing RCMP and other policing resources and policies in rural, remote, and Indigenous communities, particularly in relation to population density, policing geographic area, and staff shortages, (iii) current partnerships with provincial, municipal, and Indigenous police forces, (iv) possible recommendations to improve rural crime prevention and to curb emerging crime rates, (v) measures to increase the tactical and operational effectiveness of Indigenous police forces, (vi) strategies and resources dedicated to the judicial and rehabilitation systems in rural areas, (vii) improved support for victims of rural crime, and that the Committee report its findings to the House within six months of the adoption of this motion. (Private Members' Business M-167)

The question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to.

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant), — That Bill C-330, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (landlord consent), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Health.

The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Stetski (Kootenay—Columbia), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-281, An Act to establish a National Local Food Day, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Saganash (Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-262, An Act to ensure that the laws of Canada are in harmony with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, be now read a third time and do pass.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:

Mrs. Jordan (South Shore—St. Margarets), from the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented the 13th Report of the Committee (Bill C-68, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequence, with amendments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-403.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 95 to 100, 102 and 103) was tabled.

Mr. Fuhr (Kelowna—Lake Country), from the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented the Ninth Report of the Committee, "Main Estimates 2018-19: Vote 1 under Communications Security Establishment, Votes 1, 5, and 10 under Department of National Defence, Vote 1 under Military Grievances External Review Committee, Vote 1 under Military Police Complaints Commission and Vote 1 under Office of the Communications Security Establishment Commissioner". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-404.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 98) was tabled.

Mr. Finnigan (Miramichi—Grand Lake), from the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented the 11th Report of the Committee, "Toward a resilient Canadian agriculture and agri-food system: Adapting to climate change". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-405.

Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 77, 78, 84 to 89, 93 and 94) was tabled.

Mr. Finnigan (Miramichi—Grand Lake), from the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented the 12th Report of the Committee, "Main Estimates 2018-19: Vote 1 under Canadian Dairy Commission, Vote 1 under Canadian Grain Commission and Votes 1, 5 and 10 under Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-406.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 99) was tabled.

Ms. Mihychuk (Kildonan—St. Paul), from the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented the 14th Report of the Committee, "Main Estimates 2018-19: Vote 1 under Canadian High Arctic Research Station, Votes 1, 5, 10, L15 and L20 under Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Votes 1, 5, and 10 under Department of Indigenous Services Canada". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-407.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 110) was tabled.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), from the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented the 47th Report of the Committee, "Report 5, Preparing Women Offenders for Release—Correctional Service Canada, of the 2017 Fall Reports of the Auditor General of Canada". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-408.

Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 92 and 98) was tabled.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Viersen (Peace River—Westlock), moved, — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Report No. 24)

Debate arose thereon.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), moved, — That this House do now adjourn.

The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:

At 5:30 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Casey (Cumberland—Colchester), seconded by Mr. Boissonnault (Edmonton Centre), — That Bill C-391, An Act respecting a national strategy for the repatriation of Aboriginal cultural property, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.

The debate continued.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Casey (Cumberland—Colchester), seconded by Mr. Boissonnault (Edmonton Centre), — That Bill C-391, An Act respecting a national strategy for the repatriation of Aboriginal cultural property, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.

The debate continued.

The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 6, 2018, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Duclos (Minister of Families, Children and Social Development), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-47, An Act to amend the Export and Import Permits Act and the Criminal Code (amendments permitting the accession to the Arms Trade Treaty and other amendments), not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and one sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and

That, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at report stage and 15 minutes before the end of Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the stage of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment.

Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-57, An Act to amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development with amendments;

And of the Motion No. 1.

Motion No. 1 of Mr. Fast (Abbotsford), seconded by Mr. Strahl (Chilliwack—Hope), — That Bill C-57 be amended by deleting Clause 5.

The debate continued on Motion No. 1.

At 9:02 p.m., pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the recorded division was deferred until Thursday, May 31, 2018, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-74, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting the short title.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 2.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 3.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 4.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 5.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 6.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 7.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 8, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 8.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 9, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 9.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 10, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 10.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 11, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 11.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 12, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 12.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 13, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 13.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 14, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 14.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 15, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 15.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 16.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 17.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 18.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 19.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 20.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 21, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 21.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), moved Motion No. 22, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 22.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 23.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 24, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 24.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 25, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 25.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 26, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 26.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 27, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 27.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 28, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 28.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 29, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 29.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 30, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 30.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 31, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 31.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 32, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 32.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 33, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 33.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 34, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 34.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 35, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 35.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 36, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 36.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 37, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 37.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 38, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 38.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 39, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 39.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 40, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 40.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 41, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 41.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 42, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 42.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 43, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 43.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 44, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 44.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 45, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 45.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 46, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 46.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 47, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 47.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 48, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 48.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 49, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 49.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 50, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 50.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 51, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 51.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 52, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 52.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 53, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 53.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 54, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 54.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 55, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 55.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 56, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 56.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 57, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 57.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 58, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 58.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 59, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 59.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 60, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 60.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 61, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 61.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 62, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 62.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 63, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 63.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 64, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 64.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 65, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 65.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 66, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 66.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 67, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 67.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 68, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 68.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 69, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 69.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 70, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 70.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 71, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 71.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 72, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 72.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 73, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 73.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 74, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 74.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 75, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 75.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 76, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 76.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 77, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 77.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 78, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 78.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 79, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 79.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 80, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 80.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 81, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 81.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 82, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 82.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 83, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 83.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 84, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 84.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 85, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 85.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 86, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 86.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 87, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 87.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 88, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 88.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 89, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 89.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 90, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 90.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 91, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 91.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 92, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 92.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 93, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 93.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 94, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 94.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 95, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 95.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 96, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 96.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 97, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 97.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 98, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 98.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 99, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 99.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 100, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 100.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 101, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 101.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 102, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 102.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 103, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 103.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 104, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 104.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 105, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 105.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 106, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 106.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 107, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 107.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 108, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 108.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 109, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 109.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 110, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 110.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 111, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 111.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 112, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 112.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 113, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 113.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 114, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 114.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 115, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 115.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 116, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 116.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 117, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 117.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 118, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 118.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 119, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 119.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 120, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 120.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 121, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 121.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 122, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 122.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 123, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 123.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 124, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 124.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 125, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 125.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 126, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 126.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 127, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 127.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 128, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 128.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 129, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 129.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 130, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 130.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 131, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 131.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 132, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 132.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 133, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 133.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 134, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 134.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 135, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 135.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 136, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 136.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 137, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 137.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 138, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 138.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 139, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 139.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 140, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 140.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 141, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 141.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 142, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 142.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 143, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 143.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 144, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 144.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 145, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 145.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 146, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 146.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 147, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 147.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 148, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 148.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 149, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 149.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 150, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 150.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 151, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 151.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 152, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 152.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 153, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 153.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 154, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 154.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 155, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 155.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 156, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 156.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 157, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 157.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 158, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 158.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 159, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 159.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 160, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 160.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 161, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 161.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), moved Motion No. 162, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 162.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 163, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 163.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 164, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 164.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 165, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 165.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 166, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 166.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 167, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 167.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 168, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 168.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 169, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 169.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 170, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 170.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 171, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 171.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 172, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 172.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 173, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 173.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Généreux (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup), moved Motion No. 174, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 174.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Généreux (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup), moved Motion No. 175, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 175.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 176, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 176.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 177, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 177.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 178, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 178.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 179, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 179.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 180, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 180.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 181, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 181.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 182, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 182.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 183, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 183.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 184, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 184.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 185, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 185.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 186, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 186.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 187, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 187.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 188, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 188.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 189, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 189.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 190, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 190.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 191, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 191.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 192, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 192.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 193, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 193.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 194, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 194.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 195, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 195.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 196, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 196.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 197, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 197.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 198, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 198.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 199, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 199.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 200, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 200.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 201, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 201.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 202, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 202.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 203, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 203.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 204, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 204.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 205, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 205.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 206, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 206.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 207, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 207.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 208, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 208.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 209, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 209.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 210, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 210.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 211, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 211.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 212, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 212.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 213, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 213.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 214, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 214.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 215, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 215.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 216, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 216.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 217, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 217.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 218, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 218.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 219, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 219.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 220, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 220.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 221, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 221.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 222, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 222.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 223, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 223.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 224, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 224.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 225, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 225.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), moved Motion No. 226, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 226.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 227, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 227.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 228, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 228.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 229, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 229.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 230, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 230.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 231, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 231.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 232, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 232.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 233, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 233.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 234, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 234.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 235, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 235.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 236, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 236.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 237, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 237.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 238, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 238.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 239, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 239.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 240, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 240.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 241, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 241.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 242, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 242.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 243, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 243.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 244, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 244.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 245, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 245.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 246, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 246.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 247, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 247.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 248, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 248.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 249, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 249.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 250, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 250.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 251, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 251.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 252, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 252.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 253, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 253.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 254, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 254.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 255, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 255.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 256, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 256.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 257, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 257.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 258, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 258.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 259, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 259.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 260, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 260.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 261, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 261.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 262, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 262.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 263, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 263.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 264, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 264.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 265, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 265.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 266, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 266.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 267, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 267.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 268, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 268.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 269, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 269.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 270, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 270.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 271, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 271.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 272, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 272.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 273, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 273.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 274, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 274.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 275, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 275.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 276, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 276.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 277, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 277.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 278, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 278.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 279, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 279.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 280, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 280.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 281, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 281.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 282, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 282.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 283, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 283.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 284, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 284.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 285, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 285.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 286, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 286.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 287, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 287.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 288, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 288.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 289, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 289.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 290, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 290.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 291, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 291.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 292, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 292.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), moved Motion No. 293, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 293.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 294, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 294.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 295, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 295.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 296, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 296.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 297, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 297.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 298, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 298.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 299, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 299.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), moved Motion No. 300, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 300.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 301, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 301.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 302, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 302.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 303, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 303.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 304, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 304.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 305, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 305.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 306, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 306.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 307, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 307.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 308, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 308.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 309, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 309.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 310, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 310.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 311, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 311.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), moved Motion No. 312, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 312.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), moved Motion No. 313, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 313.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), moved Motion No. 314, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 314.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), moved Motion No. 315, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 315.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 316, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 316.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 317, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 317.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), moved Motion No. 318, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 318.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), moved Motion No. 319, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 319.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), moved Motion No. 320, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 320.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), moved Motion No. 321, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 321.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 322, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 322.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 323, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 323.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 324, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 324.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 325, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 325.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 326, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 326.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 327, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 327.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 328, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 328.

Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), moved Motion No. 329, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 329.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 330, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 330.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 331, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 331.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 332, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 332.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 333, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 333.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 334, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 334.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), moved Motion No. 335, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 335.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 336, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 336.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 337, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 337.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 338, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 338.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 339, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 339.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 340, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 340.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 341, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 341.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 342, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 342.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 343, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 343.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 344, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 344.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 345, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 345.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 346, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 346.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 347, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 347.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 348, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 348.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved Motion No. 349, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 349.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 350, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 350.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 351, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 351.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 352, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 352.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 353, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 353.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 354, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 354.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 355, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 355.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 356, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 356.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 357, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 357.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 358, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 358.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 359, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 359.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 360, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 360.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 361, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 361.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), moved Motion No. 362, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 362.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), moved Motion No. 364, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 364.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 365, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 365.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 366, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 366.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 367, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 367.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 368, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 368.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 369, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 369.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 370, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 370.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 371, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 371.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 372, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 372.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 373, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 373.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 374, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 374.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 375, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 375.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 376, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 376.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 377, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 377.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), moved Motion No. 378, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 378.

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach), moved Motion No. 379, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 379.