Skip to main content Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
41st PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION

Journals

No. 140

From Wednesday, June 13, 2012 to Thursday, June 14, 2012

2:00 p.m.



Prayers
National Anthem
Statements By Members

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements.

Oral Questions

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

Daily Routine Of Business

Tabling of Documents
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the Board of Internal Economy of the House of Commons for the Administration of the House of Commons. — Sessional Paper No. 8527-411-9. (Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(g), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts)

Motions

By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House offer its support for a moment of silence to be held at the 2012 London Olympics in memory of those killed 40 years ago in the tragic terrorist events of the 1972 Munich Olympics wherein 11 Israeli athletes were murdered.


Tabling of Documents
Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety) laid upon the Table, — Proposed Firearms Information Regulations (Non-restricted Firearms), pursuant to the Firearms Act, S.C. 1995, c. 39, sbs. 118(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-411-492-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security)

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:

— Nos. 411-0913, 411-0987, 411-1055, 411-1100 and 411-1149 concerning the Canada Post Corporation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-13-09;
— Nos. 411-0914, 411-0939, 411-0989, 411-1003, 411-1006, 411-1052, 411-1060, 411-1075, 411-1102, 411-1112, 411-1129, 411-1147, 411-1151, 411-1180 and 411-1183 concerning Old Age Security benefits. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-74-08;
— No. 411-0917 concerning foreign ownership. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-64-08;
— No. 411-0918 concerning the criminal justice system. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-48-03;
— No. 411-0944 concerning childhood development programs. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-83-02;
— No. 411-0948 concerning Canada's railways. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-25-05;
— No. 411-0949 concerning the Canadian Coast Guard. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-19-09;
— No. 411-1019 concerning the labelling of food products. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-96-02;
— Nos. 411-1041, 411-1054, 411-1097 and 411-1148 concerning the Katimavik program. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-95-02;
— Nos. 411-1047, 411-1067, 411-1115 and 411-1119 concerning China. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-18-12;
— Nos. 411-1125, 411-1126, 411-1141 and 411-1167 concerning poverty. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-46-11;
— Nos. 411-1127 and 411-1128 concerning abortion. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-61-10;
— Nos. 411-1132, 411-1133 and 411-1136 concerning the Criminal Code of Canada. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-32-12;
— No. 411-1134 concerning the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-6-13;
— No. 411-1135 concerning environmental assessment and review. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-27-18;
— Nos. 411-1137 and 411-1198 concerning alcoholic beverages. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-58-06.

Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior), seconded by Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), Bill C-434, An Act to prohibit the planting, cultivation, release, sale and importation of seeds incorporating or altered by variety-genetic use restriction technologies (V-GURTs), also called “Terminator technologies”, and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.


Motions

Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), moved, — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Wednesday, November 23, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 3)

Debate arose thereon.

Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved, — That this House do now adjourn.

The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:

(Division No. 283 -- Vote no 283)
YEAS: 118, NAYS: 159

YEAS -- POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Blanchette
Boivin
Borg
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brison
Byrne
Caron
Charlton
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Coderre
Comartin
Cotler
Crowder
Cullen

Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Eyking
Fortin
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hsu
Hughes
Hyer

Jacob
Julian
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Latendresse
LeBlanc (Beauséjour)
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
Mai
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mulcair
Murray
Nantel
Nash
Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti

Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Savoie
Scarpaleggia
Scott
Sellah
Sgro
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
St-Denis
Sullivan
Thibeault
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 118

NAYS -- CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Aspin
Baird
Bateman
Benoit
Bernier
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Butt
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chisu
Chong
Clarke
Clement
Daniel
Davidson

Dechert
Del Mastro
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Galipeau
Gallant
Gill
Glover
Goguen
Goldring
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hillyer
Hoback
Hoeppner
Holder
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake
Lauzon

Lebel
Leef
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menegakis
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Paradis
Payne
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Raitt
Rajotte
Rathgeber
Reid
Rempel
Richards
Rickford

Ritz
Saxton
Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
Stanton
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Toews
Trost
Trottier
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Wilks
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 159

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Wednesday, November 23, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 3)

The debate continued.

The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Monday, June 18, 2012, at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment.


Presenting Petitions

Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows:

— by Mr. Wilks (Kootenay—Columbia), one concerning abortion (No. 411-1328);
— by Mr. Kellway (Beaches—East York), two concerning environmental assessment and review (Nos. 411-1329 and 411-1330) and one concerning climate change (No. 411-1331);
— by Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt), one concerning foreign aid (No. 411-1332);
— by Mr. Lemieux (Glengarry—Prescott—Russell), four concerning the Criminal Code of Canada (Nos. 411-1333 to 411-1336);
— by Mr. Valeriote (Guelph), one concerning funding aid (No. 411-1337);
— by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), one concerning the taking of blood samples (No. 411-1338) and one concerning funding aid (No. 411-1339);
— by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River), one concerning abortion (No. 411-1340);
— by Ms. Raynault (Joliette), two concerning Old Age Security benefits (Nos. 411-1341 and 411-1342);
— by Ms. Murray (Vancouver Quadra), twelve concerning Old Age Security benefits (Nos. 411-1343 to 411-1354);
— by Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga), one concerning nuclear weapons (No. 411-1355) and one concerning the Criminal Code of Canada (No. 411-1356);
— by Mr. Sullivan (York South—Weston), one concerning transportation (No. 411-1357);
— by Mr. Braid (Kitchener—Waterloo), one concerning immigration (No. 411-1358) and one concerning hazardous products (No. 411-1359);
— by Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam), one concerning the fishing industry (No. 411-1360);
— by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), one concerning the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (No. 411-1361);
— by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), one concerning foreign aid (No. 411-1362);
— by Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina), two concerning transportation (Nos. 411-1363 and 411-1364);
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (No. 411-1365) and one concerning budget measures (No. 411-1366).

Questions on the Order Paper

Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-634 and Q-638 on the Order Paper.


Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return:

Q-626 — Ms. Borg (Terrebonne—Blainville) — Regarding the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) and digital television: (a) how many complaints has the CRTC received about the transition to digital television; and (b) how many people no longer have access to television since the transition to digital television, based on the CRTC’s estimates? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-626.

Q-627 — Ms. Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue) — With regard to all contracts issued by each department, agency and crown corporation to Xe Services since January 1, 2011, what is the: (a) description of the contents of the order; (b) date of payment; (c) total amount awarded; and (d) event reason for purchase? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-627.

Q-628 — Ms. Doré Lefebvre (Alfred-Pellan) — With regard to private security contracts for each department and crown corporation, for each year since 2007: (a) what is the name of the providing company; (b) what is the cost of the contract; (c) what are the terms of the contract, including (i) hours of security provided, (ii) cost per hour of security, (iii) other costs, (iv) any other stipulations of contracts; (d) what was the location of security use; (e) what is the budgetary line where the expense is accounted for; and (f) was this contract open for competition or sole-sourced? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-628.

Q-629 — Ms. Doré Lefebvre (Alfred-Pellan) — With regard to Kingston Penitentiary, Kingston’s Regional Treatment Centre and the Leclerc Institution, for each facility: (a) what are the current occupation levels of inmates; (b) what are the current employment levels, broken down by (i) title, (ii) salary; (c) what is the current plan for the transfer of inmates, including (i) location(s) of potential transfers, (ii) cost of transfers of inmates; (d) what will be done with the existing facilities; and (e) has the potential purchase of public prisons been the subject of any reports or studies, and, if yes, what are the (i) dates, (ii) authors, (iii) names of the documents? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-629.

Q-630 — Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas) — With regard to spending by the government, the Prime Minister’s Office, and the Privy Council Office on promotional items for each year since 2007: (a) by vendor name, how much was spent on (i) hockey pucks, (ii) golf balls, (iii) sports jerseys, (iv) plastic wrist bands; (b) what was the total amount spent by each department and office; (c) what are the dates of each contract awarded; and (d) were these contracts open competitions? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-630.

Q-631 — Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas) — With regard to all contracts issued by each department, agency and Crown corporation to MPrinthouse (7332319 Canada) since January 1, 2009: (a) what was the content of the order; (b) what was the date of payment; (c) what was the total amount awarded; (d) what was the event or reason for purchase; and (e) were these contracts open competitions? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-631.

Q-632 — Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas) — With regard to all contracts issued by each department, agency and Crown corporation to Marketeks (6066356 Canada) since January 1, 2009: (a) what was the content of the order; (b) what was the date of payment; (c) what was the total amount awarded; (d) what was the event or reason for purchase; and (e) were these contracts open competitions? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-632.

Q-633 — Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas) — With regard to all contracts issued by each department, agency and Crown corporation to Wavertree (3252906 Canada) since January 1, 2009: (a) what was the content of the order; (b) what was the date of payment; (c) what was total amount awarded; (d) what was the event or reason for purchase; and (e) were these contracts open competitions? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-633.

Q-635 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — What is the total amount of government funding allocated within the constituency of Vancouver East during the fiscal year 2011-2012, broken down, (i) by department or agency, (ii) for each department or agency, by initiative or project? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-635.

Q-636 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — With regard to Canada’s Economic Action Plan 2012, within the Health Portfolio: (a) with respect to Health Canada, (i) where will positions be cut, by branch and by division, (ii) which programs will be cut or eliminated, (iii) of programs cut or terminated, how many of these programs provide services to Canada’s Aboriginal, Inuit, or Métis peoples; and (b) with respect to Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (PMPRB), (i) where will jobs be cut, by division, (ii) which programs will be cut or eliminated, (iii) what is the process and average timeline for a medication price review, (iv) will this process or timeline be changed due to funding cuts? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-636.

Q-637 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With regard to the Atlantic Groundfish Licence Retirement Program (AGLRP): (a) has the government handed out payments to all 752 of the former fishers who were involved in the Victor White v. Canada federal court case; (b) if not, how many of the 752 remain to be paid; (c) what is the total number of members of the AGLRP who were not involved in the court case but who had requested reassessment or similar measures before the case went to court and had their decisions delayed as a result, and does the government plan to make payments to these people similar to those payments made to the fishers involved in the court case; and (d) what correspondence containing erroneous tax advice did the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) send to AGLRP members, (i) on what dates were these letters sent, (ii) to what regions were they sent, (iii) what is the total number of individuals who received these letters? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-637.
Government Orders

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-38, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 15).

Group No. 1

Motion No. 1 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 1.

Motion No. 2 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 2.

Motion No. 3 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 4.

Motion No. 4 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 6.

Motion No. 5 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 7.

Motion No. 6 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), — That Bill C-38, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 5 on page 7 with the following:

““political activity” means the making of a gift by a donor to a qualified donee for the purpose of allowing the donor to maintain a level of funding of political activities that is less than 10% of its income for a taxation year by delegating the carrying out of political activities to the qualified donee;”

Motion No. 7 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), — That Bill C-38, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 8 with the following:

“interest, being any activity that contributes to the social or cultural lives of Canadians or that contributes to Canada's economic or ecological well-being.”

Motion No. 8 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 8.

Motion No. 9 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 9.

Motion No. 10 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 10.

Motion No. 11 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 11.

Motion No. 12 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 13.

Motion No. 13 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 16.

Motion No. 14 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-38, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 14 with the following:

“on January 1, 2013 a salary of $137,000.”

Motion No. 15 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 17.

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

Deferred Recorded Divisions

Private Members' Business

Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Ms. Murray (Vancouver Quadra), — That the Standing Committee on Finance be instructed to undertake a study on income inequality in Canada and that this study include, but not be limited to, (i) a review of Canada’s federal and provincial systems of personal income taxation and income supports, (ii) an examination of best practices that reduce income inequality and improve GDP per capita, (iii) the identification of any significant gaps in the federal system of taxation and income support that contribute to income inequality, as well as any significant disincentives to paid work in the formal economy that may exist as part of a “welfare trap”, (iv) recommendations on how best to improve the equality of opportunity and prosperity for all Canadians; and that the Committee report its findings to the House within one year of the adoption of this motion. (Private Members' Business M-315)

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

(Division No. 284 -- Vote no 284)
YEAS: 161, NAYS: 138

YEAS -- POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benoit
Benskin
Bevington
Bezan
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Breitkreuz
Brison
Brosseau
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Bruinooge
Butt
Byrne
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Chong
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Clarke
Cleary
Coderre

Comartin
Côté
Cotler
Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Eyking
Fortin
Freeman
Fry
Galipeau
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goldring
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hiebert
Hsu
Hughes
Hyer

Jacob
Julian
Karygiannis
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (Beauséjour)
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
Lizon
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Murray
Nantel
Nash
Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti
Papillon
Patry
Payne

Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Savoie
Scarpaleggia
Scott
Sellah
Sgro
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
Sorenson
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Tilson
Toet
Toone
Tremblay
Trost
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote
Vellacott
Warawa
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Woodworth
Young (Oakville)

Total: -- 161

NAYS -- CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albas
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Aspin
Baird
Bateman
Bernier
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chisu
Clement
Daniel
Davidson
Dechert
Del Mastro

Devolin
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Gallant
Gill
Glover
Goguen
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hillyer
Hoback
Hoeppner
Holder
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake
Lauzon

Lebel
Leef
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menegakis
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Paradis
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Raitt
Rajotte
Rathgeber
Reid

Rempel
Richards
Rickford
Ritz
Saxton
Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Stanton
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Toews
Trottier
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Wallace
Warkentin
Weston (Saint John)
Wilks
Williamson
Wong
Yelich
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 138

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun


Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Harris (St. John's East), seconded by Mr. Cleary (St. John's South—Mount Pearl), — That the House acknowledge that Canada lags behind international search and rescue norms and urge the government to recognize the responsibility of the Canadian Forces for the protection of Canadians, and to take such measures as may be required for Canada to achieve the common international readiness standard of 30 minutes at all times, from tasking to becoming airborne, in response to search and rescue incidents. (Private Members' Business M-314)

The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:

(Division No. 285 -- Vote no 285)
YEAS: 138, NAYS: 163

YEAS -- POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Bevington
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brison
Brosseau
Byrne
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Coderre
Comartin
Côté
Cotler

Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Eyking
Fortin
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hsu
Hughes
Hyer
Jacob

Julian
Karygiannis
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (Beauséjour)
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Murray
Nantel
Nash
Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti

Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Savoie
Scarpaleggia
Scott
Sellah
Sgro
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 138

NAYS -- CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albas
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Aspin
Baird
Bateman
Benoit
Bernier
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Butt
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chisu
Chong
Clarke
Clement
Daniel

Davidson
Dechert
Del Mastro
Devolin
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Galipeau
Gallant
Gill
Glover
Goguen
Goldring
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hillyer
Hoback
Hoeppner
Holder
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake

Lauzon
Lebel
Leef
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menegakis
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Paradis
Payne
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Raitt
Rajotte
Rathgeber
Reid
Rempel
Richards
Rickford

Ritz
Saxton
Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
Stanton
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Toews
Trost
Trottier
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vellacott
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Wilks
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 163

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun


Pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. James (Scarborough Centre), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River), — That Bill C-293, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (vexatious complainants), as amended, be concurred in at report stage.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

(Division No. 286 -- Vote no 286)
YEAS: 194, NAYS: 107

YEAS -- POUR

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albas
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Andrews
Armstrong
Ashfield
Aspin
Baird
Bateman
Bélanger
Bennett
Benoit
Bernier
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brison
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Butt
Byrne
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chisu
Chong
Clarke
Clement
Coderre
Cotler
Cuzner
Daniel

Davidson
Dechert
Del Mastro
Devolin
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Dykstra
Easter
Eyking
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Fry
Galipeau
Gallant
Garneau
Gill
Glover
Goguen
Goldring
Goodale
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hillyer
Hoback
Hoeppner
Holder
Hsu
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Karygiannis
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake

Lamoureux
Lauzon
Lebel
LeBlanc (Beauséjour)
Leef
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McCallum
McColeman
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
McLeod
Menegakis
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Murray
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Pacetti
Paradis
Payne
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Rae
Raitt
Rajotte
Rathgeber
Regan
Reid
Rempel
Richards

Rickford
Ritz
Saxton
Scarpaleggia
Schellenberger
Seeback
Sgro
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
St-Denis
Stanton
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Toews
Trost
Trottier
Trudeau
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Valeriote
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vellacott
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Wilks
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 194

NAYS -- CONTRE

Allen (Welland)
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bellavance
Benskin
Bevington
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brosseau
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Comartin

Côté
Crowder
Cullen
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Fortin
Freeman
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hughes
Hyer

Jacob
Julian
Kellway
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Nantel
Nash
Nicholls

Nunez-Melo
Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Savoie
Scott
Sellah
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Turmel

Total: -- 107

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun

Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.

Private Members' Business

At 6:33 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina), seconded by Mr. Nicholls (Vaudreuil—Soulanges), — That Bill C-305, An Act to establish a National Public Transit Strategy, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.

The debate continued.

At 7:33 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 93, the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1) the recorded division was deemed requested and deferred until Wednesday, June 20, 2012, immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business.

Government Orders

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-38, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 15).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 8:41 p.m., pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 12, 2012, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 2, 5 and 8 to 12, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 3 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 4 and 15, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 13 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

Group No. 2

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 19.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 21.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 23.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 24.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 25.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 21, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 26.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 22, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 45.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 46.

The question was put on Motion Nos. 16 and the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 17 to 23, was deferred.

Group No. 3

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 24, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 52.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 25, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by adding after line 8 on page 31 the following:

“Whereas the Government of Canada seeks to achieve sustainable development by conserving and enhancing environmental quality and by encouraging and promoting economic development that conserves and enhances environmental quality;

Whereas environmental assessment provides an effective means of integrating environmental factors into planning and decision-making processes in a manner that promotes sustainable development;

Whereas the Government of Canada is committed to exercising leadership, within Canada and internationally, in anticipating and preventing the degradation of environmental quality and, at the same time, in ensuring that economic development is compatible with the high value Canadians place on environmental quality;

Whereas the Government of Canada seeks to avoid duplication or unnecessary delays;

And whereas the Government of Canada is committed to facilitating public participation in the environmental assessment of projects to be carried out by or with the approval or assistance of the Government of Canada and to providing access to the information on which those environmental assessments are based;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 26, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 31 the following:

““comprehensive study” means an environmental assessment of a designated project that is conducted under section 12, and that includes a consideration of the factors required to be considered under section 19.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 28, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 14 to 17 on page 32 with the following:

““environmental assessment” means, in respect of a project, an assessment of the environmental effects of the project that is conducted in accordance with this Act and the regulations.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 30, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 33 with the following:

“mental assessment of a project;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 31, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 33 with the following:

““interested party”, with respect to a”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 32, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 34 with the following:

“project;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 33, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 34 with the following:

“tal effects of a project;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 34, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 34 with the following:

“project;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 35, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 34 with the following:

“environmental effects of a project;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 36, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 34 with the following:

“environmental effects of a project,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 37, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 44 on page 34 with the following:

“carrying out of a project.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 38, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 12 and 13 on page 35 with the following:

“is referred to in section 16 with respect to a project that is subject to an environ-”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 40, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 35 with the following:

“with respect to a project, that a”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 41, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 29 on page 35 with the following:

“with respect to a project, that a group or individual is an interested party if, in its opinion, the group or individual, including those who use adjacent land for recreational, cultural or hunting purposes, is directly — or could potentially be indirectly — affected by the carrying out of the project, or if, in its opinion, the group or individual has relevant information or expertise:”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 42, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 30 on page 35 with the following:

“(a) in the case of a project for”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 43, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 34 on page 35 with the following:

“(b) in the case of a project in”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 44, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 5 on page 36 with the following:

“(a) to protect the environment from any significant adverse environmental effects caused by a project;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 45, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 13 on page 36.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 46, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 36 with the following:

“assessments processes for projects;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 47, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 36 with the following:

“(d) to promote communication, cooperation and consensus between responsible authorities and, fully respecting the fiduciary duties of the Crown and the inherent rights of aboriginal peoples, aboriginal peoples with respect to environmental assessments;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 48, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 36 with the following:

“for timely and meaningful public participation during an environmental assessment process;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 49, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 28 to 33 on page 36 with the following:

“federal lands in Canada, or those that are outside Canada and that are to be carried out or financially supported by a federal authority, are considered in a careful and precautionary manner to ensure that such projects do not cause significant adverse environmental effects;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 50, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 36 with the following:

“(h) to ensure that federal authorities take”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 51, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 38 to 41 on page 36 with the following:

“(i) to ensure that federal authorities possess sufficient regulatory power, and oversight and monitoring capacity, to study and respond to the cumulative environmental effects of physical activities in a region and to guarantee the inclusion and consideration of those study results in environmental assessments.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 52, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 37 to line 27 on page 38 with the following:

“environmental effects — within or outside Canada — that are to be taken into account in relation to an act or thing, a physical activity, a designated project or a project are

(a) any impact that may be caused on biological, ecological, hydrological or chemical systems or other systems of the environment, including any change that may be caused to a listed wildlife species, its critical habitat or the residences of individuals of that species, as those terms are defined in subsection 2(1) of the Species at Risk Act;

(b) any effect of any change referred to in paragraph (a) on

(i) health and socio-economic conditions,

(ii) physical and cultural heritage,

(iii) the current use of lands and resources for traditional purposes by aboriginal persons, or

(iv) any structure, site or thing that is of historical, archaeological, paleontological or architectural significance; and

(c) any change to the project that may be caused by the environment.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 53, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 38 to line 9 on page 39 with the following:

“6. The proponent of a project that is required to undergo an environmental assessment under this Act must not do any act or thing in connection with the carrying out of the project, in whole or in part, if that act or thing may cause an environmental effect referred to in subsection 5(1) unless the proponent complies with the conditions included in the decision statement that is issued to the proponent under subsection 31(3) or section 54 with respect to that project.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 54, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 24 on page 39 with the following:

“than this Act that would permit a project that is required to undergo an environmental assessment under this Act to be carried out in whole or in part unless the decision statement with respect to the project that is issued under subsection 31(3) or section 54 to the proponent of the project indicates that the project is not likely to cause”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 62, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting lines 9 to 20 on page 43.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 63, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 8 on page 45.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 64, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 10 and 11 on page 45 with the following:

“project if it is referred to a review panel under section 38.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 65, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 17 on page 45 with the following:

“a project must ensure that

(a) a screening or comprehensive study of the project is conducted;

(b) a report is prepared with respect to that screening or comprehensive study; and

(c) where applicable, a follow-up program is designed and implemented.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 66, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 22 on page 45 with the following:

“project and preparing the report with respect to the environmental assessment of the project, use any information that is”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 67, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 29 on page 45 with the following:

“environmental assessment of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 68, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 6 to 9 on page 46 with the following:

“25. (1) The responsible authority must ensure that a draft report with respect to the environmental assessment of a project is prepared, and must ensure”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 69, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 46 with the following:

“received from the public, the responsible authority must finalize the report with respect to the environmental assessment of the project and”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 70, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 23 on page 46 with the following:

“spect to a project may delegate to”

(b) by replacing lines 28 to 30 on page 46 with the following:

“project, the preparation of the report with respect to the environmental assessment of the project and any part of the design and implementation of a follow-up program, but must not”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 72, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 47 with the following:

“(2) The decisions must be made”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 74, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 27 on page 47 with the following:

“(6) If, under subsection 23(2), the responsible authority requires the proponent of a project to collect information or undertake a study with respect to the project, then the period that is taken by the proponent, in the responsible authority’s opinion, to comply with the requirement is not included in the calculation of the time limit within which the decisions must be”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 76, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting line 34 on page 47 to line 6 on page 51.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 77, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 51 with the following:

“assessing the environmental effects of projects that is followed by any jurisdic-”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 28 on page 51 with the following:

“project would be an appropriate”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 78, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 33 and 34 on page 51 with the following:

“be given in respect of a project or a class of projects.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 79, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 39 to 43 on page 51 with the following:

“project in relation to which the environmental assessment has been referred”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 80, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 52 with the following:

“(b) the public will be given meaningful opportunities to participate in the assessment that are at least as extensive as those required in relation to an environmental assessment carried out under this Act;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 81, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by adding after line 10 on page 52 the following:

“(c.1) the process to be substituted provides for community knowledge and Aboriginal traditional knowledge to be taken into account;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 82, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 33 on page 52 with the following:

“project that is received by the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 84, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting line 39 on page 52 to line 25 on page 53.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 86, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 35 on page 53 with the following:

“assessment of the project to a review”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 38 on page 53 with the following:

“(a) whether the project may cause”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, lines 2 and 3 on page 54 with the following:

“adverse environmental effects that the project may cause; and”

(d) by replacing, in the English version, line 7 on page 54 with the following:

“environmental effects of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 87, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing, in the English version, line 10 on page 54 with the following:

“assessment of the project to a review”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 18 on page 54 with the following:

“of the project to the Minister; and”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, line 22 on page 54 with the following:

“project.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 88, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing, in the English version, line 28 on page 54 with the following:

“project to a review panel, and a”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 30 on page 54 with the following:

“establishes in relation to the project”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 89, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting lines 33 to 36 on page 54.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 90, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 38 on page 54 with the following:

“mental assessment of a project to a”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 42 on page 54 with the following:

“require the proponent of the project”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 91, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 5 on page 55 with the following:

“ronmental assessment of a project to”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 12 on page 55 with the following:

“of the project, respecting the joint”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, line 15 on page 55 with the following:

“project is to be conducted by that”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 92, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 18 on page 55 with the following:

“mental assessment of a project to a”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 26 on page 55 with the following:

“project, respecting the joint establish-”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, line 28 on page 55 with the following:

“the environmental assessment of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 93, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 30 on page 56 with the following:

“environmental assessment of a”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 35 on page 56 with the following:

“conflict of interest relative to the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 94, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 44 on page 56 with the following:

“environmental assessment of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 95, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 7 on page 57 with the following:

“project and may, at any time,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 96, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 17 on page 57 with the following:

“interest relative to the project”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 97, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 57 with the following:

“the project;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 98, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 15 on page 58 with the following:

“project to the Minister and may, at”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 99, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 58 with the following:

“ing the environmental assessment of a project and preparing the report with”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 22 on page 58 with the following:

“project, use any information that is”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 100, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 29 on page 58 with the following:

“ment of the project, it may require”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 101, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 41 on page 58 with the following:

“environmental assessment of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 102, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 41 on page 59 with the following:

“environmental assessment of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 103, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 60 with the following:

“proponent of the project to collect”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 104, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 14 and 15 on page 60 with the following:

“a project to collect information or undertake a study with respect to the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 105, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 60 with the following:

“49. (1) The Minister may terminate the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 106, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 60 with the following:

“assessment by a review panel of a”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 107, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 60 with the following:

“ment by a review panel of a project if”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 108, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 21 on page 61 with the following:

“of a project is terminated under”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 24 on page 61 with the following:

“the environmental assessment of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 109, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 61 with the following:

“assessment of the project that was”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 110, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 61 with the following:

“appropriate, the project”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 111, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting lines 41 to 43 on page 61.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 112, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 2 on page 62 with the following:

“project is likely to cause significant”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 113, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 62 with the following:

“section 5, the decision maker must”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 114, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by deleting lines 8 to 12 on page 62.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 115, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing, in the English version, line 17 on page 62 with the following:

“effects that the project is likely to”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 20 on page 62 with the following:

“effects that the project is likely to”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 116, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 23 on page 62 with the following:

“subsection 52(1) that the project is”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 29 on page 62 with the following:

“tion that the project is likely to cause”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, line 34 on page 62 with the following:

“project must comply.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 117, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing line 36 on page 62 with the following:

“subsection 52(1) that the project”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 2 on page 63 with the following:

“permit a project to be carried out,”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, line 5 on page 63 with the following:

“tion with which the proponent of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 118, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 63 with the following:

“project that”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 119, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing, in the English version, line 22 on page 63 with the following:

“(a) informs the proponent of the”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 25 on page 63 with the following:

“project and, if a matter was”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, line 28 on page 63 with the following:

“relation to the project; and”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 120, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 31 on page 63 with the following:

“project and that must be complied”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 121, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 63 with the following:

“decision under subsection 52(1) in relation to the project for the purpose”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 39 on page 63 with the following:

“of the project was referred to a”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 122, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 1 on page 64 with the following:

“the environmental assessment of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 123, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing, in the English version, lines 13 and 14 on page 64 with the following:

“the project to collect information or undertake a study with respect to the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 124, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 28 and 29 on page 64 with the following:

“55. The responsible authority must ensure that”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 125, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended by replacing lines 36 and 37 on page 64 with the following:

“tion to a project is”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 126, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 52, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 65 with the following:

“a project is considered to”

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 9 on page 65 with the following:

“project; or”

(c) by replacing, in the English version, line 13 on page 65 with the following:

“relation to the project.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 127, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 53.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 128, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 54.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 129, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 55.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 130, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 56.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 131, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 57.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 132, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 58.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 133, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 59.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 134, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 60.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 135, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 61.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 136, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 62.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 137, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 63.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 138, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 64.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 139, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 65.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 140, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 66.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 141, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 67.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 142, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 67, be amended by replacing lines 20 and 21 on page 98 with the following:

“force on April 30, 2016.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 143, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 68.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 144, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 69.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 145, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 70.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 146, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 71.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 147, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 71, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 99 with the following:

“an application, the Chairperson may propose a motion to put in place a”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 148, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 71, be amended by replacing line 42 on page 99 with the following:

“authorized to deal with the application if a motion for such a representative action is carried by vote of the members of the Board.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 149, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 72.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 150, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 72, be amended by replacing lines 34 to 40 on page 100 with the following:

“(2.1) For greater certainty, if the number of members authorized to deal with an application as a result of any measure taken by the Chairperson under subsection 6(2.2) is less than three, the Board shall elect a third member to satisfy the quorum requirements established under subsection (2).”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 151, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 73.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 152, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 74.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 153, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 75.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 154, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 75, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 101 with the following:

“14. (1) The Chairperson may propose a motion to authorize one”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 155, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 75, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 101 with the following:

“under an authorization that is carried by vote of the Board is considered to have”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 156, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 76.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 157, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 76, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 101 with the following:

“15. (1) The Chairperson or the Board may authorize one”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 158, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 77.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 159, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing lines 41 to 44 on page 101 with the following:

“or 15 becomes incapacitated or dies during the hearing or after the conclusion of the hearing but before making a decision or report, the Board, with the consent of all those who are parties to the hearing, may authorize another member”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 160, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 3 on page 102 with the following:

“incapacity or death occurs during”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 161, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing, in the English version, line 8 on page 102 with the following:

“incapacity or death occurs after”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 162, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 102 with the following:

“tated or dies during the hearing or after”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 163, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing, in the English version, lines 17 to 22 on page 102 with the following:

“(a) the Board may vote in another member to replace the incapacitated or deceased member for the rest of the hearing and to participate in the decision if the incapacity or death occurs during the hear-”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 164, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing lines 24 to 29 on page 102 with the following:

“(b) if the incapacity or death occurs after the conclusion of the hearing but before a decision is given, the remaining members may, if unanimous, give a decision as if the incapacitated or deceased member were present and”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 165, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 102 with the following:

“incapacitated or dies during the hearing”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 166, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing lines 38 to 43 on page 102 with the following:

“(a) the Board may elect another member to replace the incapacitated or deceased member for the rest of the hearing and to participate in the finalizing of the report, if the incapacity or death occurs”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 167, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing line 45 on page 102 to line 3 on page 103 with the following:

“(b) if the incapacity or death occurs after the conclusion of the hearing but before the report is finalized, the remaining members may, if unanimous, finalize the report as if the incapacitated or deceased member were”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 168, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 103 with the following:

“cludes the Chairperson from proposing a motion to take a measure”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 169, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 27 on page 103 with the following:

“do so by the Board and on any terms and conditions that the Board prescribes, continue to inquire into, hear and determine any proceeding to which that person was assigned while that person was a member and the person shall for that purpose be considered to continue to be a member if the continued membership is carried by vote of the members of the Board.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 170, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 78.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 171, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 78, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 103 with the following:

“(1.1) Except in any instances where, based on what the Board considers necessary or desirable in the public interest, the Board considers it is advisable to do so, subsection (1) does not apply in respect”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 172, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 79.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 173, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 79, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 103 with the following:

“(2) Except in any instances where, based on what the Board considers necessary or desirable in the public interest, the Board considers it is advisable to do so, subsection (1) does not apply in respect”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 174, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 80.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 175, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 81.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 176, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 81, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 104 with the following:

“(2) A public hearing may be held in respect of any other matter that the Board considers advisable, however a public hearing need not be held where”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 177, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 82.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 178, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 82, be amended by replacing lines 39 and 40 on page 104 with the following:

“(4) Subsections 121(3) to(5) apply to”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 179, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 83.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 180, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 27 on page 105 with the following:

“shall consider the objections of any interested person or group that, in their opinion, appear to be directly or indirectly related to the pipeline, and may have regard to the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 181, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by adding after line 33 on page 105 the following:

“(c.1) the expected and potential environmental and health impacts, both local and generalized, of the pipeline on surrounding communities and the general public;”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 182, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing lines 41 to 43 on page 105 with the following:

“opinion may be affected, directly or indirectly, by the granting, refusal or dismissal of an application, or by the issuance of a certificate.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 183, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 106 with the following:

“the report must also reference the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 184, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 106 with the following:

“Board. The specified time limit must be”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 185, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing lines 16 to 18 on page 106 with the following:

“respect to the pipeline, the period that is taken by”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 186, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing lines 33 and 34 on page 106 with the following:

“by order, issue a directive to the Board that requires the Board to”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 187, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 107 with the following:

“53. (1) If, after the Board has submitted its report under section 52, any of the considerations set out in subsection 52(2) have changed in respect of the application and approval of the application is no longer deemed to be in the public interest, then the Governor in”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 188, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing line 43 on page 107 with the following:

“(8) The Board’s”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 189, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing lines 7 and 8 on page 108 with the following:

“54. (1) After the Board has submitted a report under section 52 or 53 that determines that the application is in the public interest, the Governor in”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 190, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 108 with the following:

“making the order and must be made public within 15 days after it was made.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 191, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 109 with the following:

“(“the Court”) within 30 days after the day on”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 192, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 109 with the following:

“so, but only if one or more of the considerations set out in subsection 52(2) have changed in respect of the application and approval of the application is no longer deemed to be in the public interest.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 193, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 83, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 31 on page 109 with the following:

“interested person or group, including

(a) persons or groups that are directly affected by the granting or refusing of the application, including those who use adjacent land for recreational, cultural or hunting purposes;

(b) persons or groups that are or could potentially be, in its opinion, indirectly affected by the granting or refusing of the application; and

(c) persons or groups that, in its opinion, have relevant information or expertise.

For greater certainty, a decision of the Board as to whether it will consider the objections or representations of any person or group is conclusive.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 194, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 84.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 195, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 84, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 109 with the following:

“the time limit specified by the Chairperson pursuant to a motion and vote among Board members,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 196, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 84, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 109 with the following:

“son pursuant to a motion and vote among Board members must be no longer than 15 months after the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 197, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 84, be amended by replacing lines 5 and 6 on page 110 with the following:

“(a) prepare a report with respect to its”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 198, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 84, be amended by replacing lines 9 and 10 on page 110 with the following:

“(b) comply with that Act with respect to that assessment.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 199, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 84, be amended by replacing lines 14 to 16 on page 110 with the following:

“paragraph (1)(b) to which the application relates, the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 200, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 84, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 110 with the following:

“Governor in Council under”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 201, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 85.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 202, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 85, be amended by replacing lines 2 to 4 on page 111 with the following:

“the Board shall have regard to all representations referred to in section 55.2.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 203, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 85, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 111 with the following:

“that it specifies,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 204, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 85, be amended by replacing lines 16 and 17 on page 111 with the following:

“(5) The time limit specified by the Board must be no longer than 15 months after the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 205, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 85, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 111 with the following:

“project within the meaning of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 206, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 85, be amended by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 111 with the following:

“(a) prepare a report setting out its opinion of the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 207, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 85, be amended by replacing lines 33 to 35 on page 111 with the following:

“respect to the line or any power line referred to in subsection (1) to which the application relates, the period that is taken by”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 208, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 86.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 209, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 86, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 112 with the following:

“V, except sections 74, 76 to 78, 108, 110 to 111.3,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 210, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 86, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 113 with the following:

“except sections 74, 76 to 78, 108, 110 to 111.3, 114”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 211, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 87.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 212, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 87, be amended by replacing line 44 on page 114 with the following:

“a work to which that Act applies, unless it passes in, on, over, under, through or across a navigable water.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 213, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 88.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 214, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 88, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 117 with the following:

“under which section 58.29 does not apply or leave from the Board under”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 215, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 89.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 216, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 89, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 117 with the following:

“certificate under section 52 or 53 authorizing the”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 217, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 90.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 218, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 90, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 118 with the following:

“was constructed in accordance with the Navigable Waters Protection Act and that passes in, on, over, under, through or”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 219, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 90, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 118 with the following:

“that was constructed in accordance with the Navigable Waters Protection Act and that passes in, on, over, under, through”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 220, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 90, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 119 with the following:

“that was constructed in accordance with the Navigable Waters Protection Act and that passes in, on, over, under, through”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 221, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 90, be amended by deleting lines 14 to 18 on page 119.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 222, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 91.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 223, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 92.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 224, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 93.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 225, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 93, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 124 with the following:

“oil or gas, the Board shall, after all required consultation with members of the public and with First Nations and taking into account all considerations that appear to it to be relevant, satisfy itself that the”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 226, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 94.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 227, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 94, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 124 with the following:

“recommendation, the Board shall, after all required consultation with members of the public and with First Nations, seek to avoid”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 228, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 95.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 229, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 96.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 230, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 97.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 231, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 97, be amended by replacing lines 40 and 41 on page 125 with the following:

“120.5 The Board may issue a ”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 232, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 98.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 233, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 99.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 234, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 100.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 235, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 101.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 236, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 102.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 237, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 103.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 238, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 104.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 239, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 105.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 240, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 106.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 241, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 107.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 242, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 108.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 243, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 109.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 244, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 110.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 245, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 111.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 246, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 112.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 247, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 113.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 248, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 114.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 249, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 115.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 250, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 115, be amended by replacing lines 33 and 34 on page 138 with the following:

“and 99 to 114 come into force on September 1, 2015.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 251, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 115, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 139 with the following:

“force on January 1, 2016.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 252, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 116.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 253, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 117.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 254, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 118.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 255, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 119.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 256, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 120.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 257, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 121.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 258, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 121, be amended by replacing lines 7 and 8 on page 141 with the following:

“June 1, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 259, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 122.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 260, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 123.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 261, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 123, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 141 with the following:

“seven months.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 262, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 124.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 263, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 124, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 141 with the following:

“replace a licence after consulting the public, expert opinion and peer-reviewed scientific evidence, or decide whether it is in the public interest to authorize its transfer, on”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 264, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 124, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 142 with the following:

“the Commission, after consulting expert opinion, the applicant or, in the case of”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 265, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 125.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 266, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 126.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 267, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 127.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 268, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 128.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 269, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 129.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 270, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 130.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 271, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 131.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 272, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 131, be amended by replacing lines 35 and 36 on page 149 with the following:

“force on August 1, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 273, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 132.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 274, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 133.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 275, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 133, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 150 with the following:

“thing impeding the free”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 276, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 133, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 150 with the following:

“that fish may potentially be harvested under the authority of a”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 277, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 133, be amended by replacing lines 5 and 6 on page 151 with the following:

“to fish includes

(a) the death of, or harm to, any fish; and

(b) any temporary or permanent harmful alteration to, or disruption or destruction of, any fish habitat.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 278, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 134.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 279, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 151 with the following:

“programs and, if the Minister has determined, on the basis of the features and scope of the programs, that the programs are equivalent in their capabilities to meet and ensure compliance with the provisions of this Act, otherwise harmonizing those”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 280, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by replacing lines 20 and 21 on page 151 with the following:

“tween the parties and the public, including the exchange and public dissemination of scientific information and any other information relevant to the public; and”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 281, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by replacing lines 22 to 24 on page 151 with the following:

“(c) facilitating public consultation, participation in decision-making processes and the entry into arrangements with third-party stakeholders who are directly or indirectly affected.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 282, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 151 with the following:

“(2) An agreement may, while ensuring the integrity of the federal government's constitutionally defined jurisdiction and responsibility with respect to fisheries, establish”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 283, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 151 with the following:

“the parties, including the exchange and dissemination to the public of scien-”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 284, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 152 with the following:

“into or renewing the agreement that shall ensure that meaningful public participation is sought and taken into consideration.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 285, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by adding after line 14 on page 152 the following:

“(3.1) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), any agreement entered into with a province must ensure the integrity of the federal government's constitutional jurisdiction over fisheries, by

(a) establishing that the province, for the purposes of the agreement, acts as an agent of the federal government in executing the agreement; and

(b) requiring the province, as a condition of the agreement, to report to the Minister.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 286, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 134, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 152 with the following:

“provision under the laws of the province that, after consulation with experts, stakeholders and members of the public, is determined to be equivalent in effect to a provision of the regulations, the Governor in Council may, by order, declare that certain provisions of the regulations do not apply in the”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 287, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 135.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 288, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 135, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 154 with the following:

“commercial, recrea-”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 289, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 135, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 154 with the following:

“in place to prevent serious harm to fish or fish habitat, including those that are part of a commercial, recreational”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 290, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 136.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 291, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 136, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 154 to line 1 on page 155 with the following:

“(2) If, on the basis of expert opinion, the Minister considers it necessary to ensure the free passage of fish or to prevent harm to fish, the owner or person who has the charge, management or control of any water intake, ditch, channel or canal in Canada constructed or adapted for conducting water from any Canadian fisheries waters for irrigating, manufacturing, power generation, domestic or other purposes shall, on the Minister’s request, within the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 292, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 136, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 155 with the following:

“Minister considers, based on expert opinion, sufficient to permit the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 293, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 136, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 155 with the following:

“quantity of water that the Minister considers, based on expert opinion,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 294, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 136, be amended by replacing lines 12 and 13 on page 156 with the following:

“(e) in any way stop, impede or hinder fish from entering or passing through any fishway or canal, or stop, impede or hinder fish from sur-”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 295, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 136, be amended by replacing lines 19 to 21 on page 156 with the following:

“(g) fish in any manner within 25 m downstream from the lower entrance to any fishway, canal, obstacle or leap.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 296, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 137.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 297, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 138.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 298, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 139.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 299, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 139, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 157 with the following:

“32. (1) No person shall kill or harm fish by any”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 300, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 139, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 157 with the following:

“the killing of or harm to fish is done in such a way as to ensure, according to expert advice based on an independent analysis, the absolute minimum destruction of or disturbance to fish populations and habitats necessary in order to carry out the work, undertaking or activity and”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 301, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 139, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 31 on page 157 with the following:

“(2)(a) to (e) that applies to them is guilty of

(a) an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable, for a first offence, to a fine not exceeding $300,000 and, for any subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding $300,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both; or

(b) an indictable offence and liable, for a first offence, to a fine not exceeding $1,000,000 and, for any subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding $1,000,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or to both.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 302, — That Bill C-38 be amended by adding after line 32 on page 157 the following new clause:

“139.1 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 32:

32.1 Every owner or occupier of a water intake, ditch, channel or canal referred to in subsection 30(1) who refuses or neglects to provide and maintain a fish guard, screen, covering or netting in accordance with subsections 30(1) to (3), permits the removal of a fish guard, screen, covering or netting in contravention of subsection 30(3) or refuses or neglects to close a sluice or gate in accordance with subsection 30(4) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable, for a first offence, to a fine not exceeding two hundred thousand dollars and, for any subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding two hundred thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 303, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 140.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 304, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 141.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 305, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 142.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 306, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 142, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 158 with the following:

“(2) If conducted in accordance with expert advice that is based on an independent analysis so as to ensure the absolute minimum of destruction or disruption of fish populations and fish habitat, a person may carry on a work, under-”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 307, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 142, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 158 with the following:

“harm to fish or fish habitat, including those that are part of any commercial,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 308, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 142, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 158 with the following:

“(d) the serious harm to fish or fish habitat is produced as a result of”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 309, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 143.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 310, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 143, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 159 with the following:

“made by the Governor in Council under subsection (5) applicable to that”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 311, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 143, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 159 with the following:

“by the Governor in Council under subsection (5.1) and that is deposited”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 312, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 143, be amended by deleting lines 26 to 29 on page 159.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 313, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 143, be amended by adding after line 10 on page 160 the following:

“(5.2) No regulation made under subsection (5.1) may authorize any deposit of a deleterious substance unless the deposit is conducted in such a manner as to ensure the absolute minimum of destruction or disruption of fish populations and fish habitat.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 314, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 143, be amended

(a) by replacing line 13 on page 160 with the following:

“under subsection (5) or (5.1) shall, when”

(b) by replacing line 15 on page 160 with the following:

“made under paragraph (5)(e) or (5.1)(d) or any”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 315, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 144.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 316, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 144, be amended by replacing lines 46 and 47 on page 161 with the following:

“results or is likely to result in alteration, disruption or serious harm to any fish or fish habitat, including those that are part of a commercial, recreational”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 317, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 144, be amended by replacing lines 20 and 21 on page 162 with the following:

“results or is likely to result in alteration, disruption or serious harm to any fish or fish habitat, including those that are part of a commercial,”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 318, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 144, be amended by replacing lines 5 and 6 on page 163 with the following:

“activity results or has the potential to result in alteration, disruption or serious harm to any fish or fish habitat in an ecologically significant area, the”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 319, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 144, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 164 with the following:

“(c) defining, on the basis of peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion, “ecologically significant area””

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 320, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 145.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 321, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 164 with the following:

“enforcement of this Act, provided that, with regard to the designation of any analyst, the analyst has been independently recognized as qualified to be so designated.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 322, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 164 with the following:

“habitat or serious harm to fish or fish habitat, or”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 323, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing lines 3 and 4 on page 165 with the following:

“prescribed by the regulations of any alteration, disruption or destruction of fish”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 324, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 165 with the following:

“substance in water that is not”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 325, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing lines 20 and 21 on page 165 with the following:

“humans of fish results or could potentially result from the occurrence, then”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 326, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 167 with the following:

“(i) alteration or disruption of fish habitat, or serious harm to fish or fish habitat, including those that are part of a”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 327, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 167 with the following:

“that results in any alteration or disruption of fish habitat, or serious harm to any fish or fish habitat, including those that are part”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 328, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 146.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 329, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 147.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 330, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 148.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 331, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 148, be amended by replacing lines 15 to 21 on page 174 with the following:

“42.1 (1) The Minister shall, as soon as possible after the end of each fiscal year, prepare and cause to be laid before each house of Parliament a report on the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this Act relating to fish habitat protection and pollution prevention for that year, including for those fisheries of particular commercial or recreational value and any fisheries of cultural or economic value for Aboriginal communities.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 332, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 149.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 333, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 149, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 174 with the following:

“(i.01) excluding certain fisheries, on the basis of public consultation and expert opinion, from the defini-”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 334, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 149, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 5 on page 176 with the following:

“(2) The Governor in Council may, by regulation, add”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 335, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 149, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 176 with the following:

“(3) Regulations made under subsection (2)”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 336, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 149, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 176 with the following:

“(5) The Governor in Council may, for the purpose of emergency response and after consulting with experts, make”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 337, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 150.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 338, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 150, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 29 on page 176 with the following:

“recommendation of the Minister following consultation with the public and experts or, if they are made for the purposes of and in relation to the subject matters set out in an order made under section 43.2, on the recommendation of the minister designated under that section following consultation with the public and experts.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 339, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 151.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 340, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 152.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 341, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 153.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 342, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 154.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 343, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 154, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 177 with the following:

“Act may not be commenced later than twenty-five years”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 344, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 155.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 345, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 156.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 346, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 156, be amended by replacing lines 29 and 30 on page 178 with the following:

“and 153 come into force on July 1, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 347, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 157.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 348, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 157, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 178 with the following:

“and, subject to the regulations, after consulting relevant peer-reviewed science, considering public concerns and taking all appropriate measures to ensure that no ecosystem will be significantly adversely affected, renew it no more than once.

(1.1) Before issuing a permit referred to under subsection (1), the Minister shall ensure that the issuance of the permit will not have any adverse effects on critical habitat as it is defined in subsection 2(1) of the Species at Risk Act. ”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 349, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 158.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 350, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 159.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 351, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 159, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 179 with the following:

“mental Registry as well as in the Canada Gazette.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 352, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 159, be amended by replacing line 41 on page 179 with the following:

“(b) in every other case, at least 30 days”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 353, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 160.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 354, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 160, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 180 with the following:

“published in the Environmental Registry and in the Canada Gazette; or”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 355, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 161.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 356, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 161, be amended by deleting lines 32 to 39 on page 180.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 357, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 161, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 10 on page 181.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 358, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 162.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 359, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 163.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 360, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 163, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 181 with the following:

“(6.1) Subject to subsection 73(9), the agreement or permit must set out”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 361, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 163, be amended by deleting line 31 on page 181 to line 8 on page 182.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 362, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 164.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 363, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 165.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 364, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 166.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 365, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 167.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 366, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 168.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 367, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 169.

The question was put on Motion No. 24 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 127 to 141, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 143 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 144 to 146, 149, 151 to 153, 156, 158, 170, 172, 174, 175, 177, 179, 194, 201, 208, 211, 213, 215, 217, 222 to 224, 226, 228 to 230 and 232 to 249, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 252 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 253 to 257, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 259 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 260, 262 and 265 to 271, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 273 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 274, 278, 287, 290, 296 to 298, 303 to 305, 309, 315, 320, 328 to 330, 332, 337, 339 to 342, 344 and 345, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 347 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 349, 350, 353, 355 and 358, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 359 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 362 to 367, was deferred.

Group No. 4

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 368, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 170.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 369, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 171.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 370, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 172.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 371, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 173.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 372, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 174.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 373, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 175.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 374, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 185 with the following:

“financial statements of the Council, and the Council shall make the report available for public scrutiny at the offices of the Council.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 375, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 176.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 376, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 177.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 377, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 186 with the following:

“financial statements of the Council and the Council, shall make the report available for public scrutiny at the offices of the Council.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 378, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 178.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 379, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 179.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 380, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 180.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 381, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 181.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 382, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 182.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 383, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 183.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 384, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 184.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 385, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 185.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 386, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 186.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 387, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 187.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 388, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 188.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 389, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 189.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 390, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 190.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 391, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 191.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 392, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 192.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 393, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 193.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 394, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 194.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 395, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 195.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 396, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 196.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 397, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 197.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 398, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 198.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 399, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 199.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 400, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 200.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 401, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 201.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 402, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 202.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 403, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 203.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 404, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 204.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 405, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 209.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 406, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 210.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 407, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 211.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 408, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 212.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 409, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 213.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 410, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 214.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 413, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 215.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 414, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 216.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 415, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 217.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 416, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 217, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 194 with the following:

“217. This Division comes into force on April 1, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 417, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 218.

Midnight

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 418, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 219.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 419, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 220.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 420, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 221.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 421, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 222.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 422, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 223.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 423, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 224.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 424, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 225.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 425, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 226.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 426, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 227.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 427, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 228.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 428, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 229.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 429, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 230.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 430, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 231.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 431, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 232.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 432, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 233.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 433, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 234.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 434, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 235.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 435, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 236.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 436, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 237.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 437, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 238.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 438, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 239.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 439, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 240.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 440, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 241.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 441, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 242.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 442, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 243.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 443, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 244.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 444, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 245.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 445, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 246.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 446, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 247.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 447, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 248.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 448, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 249.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 449, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 250.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 450, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 251.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 451, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 252.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 452, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 253.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 453, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 254.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 454, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 255.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 455, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 256.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 456, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 257.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 457, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 258.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 458, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 259.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 459, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 260.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 460, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 261.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 461, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 262.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 462, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 263.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 463, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 264.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 464, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 265.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 465, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 266.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 466, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 267.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 467, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 268.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 468, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 269.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 469, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 270.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 470, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 271.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 471, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 272.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 472, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 273.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 473, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 274.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 474, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 275.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 475, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 276.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 476, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 277.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 477, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 278.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 478, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 279.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 479, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 280.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 480, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 281.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 481, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 281, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 226 with the following:

“April 1, 2016.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 482, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 281, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 226 with the following:

“on April 1, 2016.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 483, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 281, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 226 with the following:

“force on May 1, 2016.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 484, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 283.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 485, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 284.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 486, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 285.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 487, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 286.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 488, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 287.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 489, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 288.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 490, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 289.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 491, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 290.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 492, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 291.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 493, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 292.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 494, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 293.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 495, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 294.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 496, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 295.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 497, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 296.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 498, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 297.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 499, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 298.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 500, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 299.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 501, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 300.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 502, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 301.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 503, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 302.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 504, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 303.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 505, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 303, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 235 with the following:

“on September 1, 2015.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 506, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 304.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 507, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 305.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 508, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 306.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 509, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 307.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 510, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 308.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 511, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 309.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 512, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 310.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 513, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 311.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 514, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 312.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 515, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 313.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 516, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 314.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 517, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 314, be amended by replacing lines 8 and 9 on page 242 with the following:

“on May 1, 2013.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 518, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 315.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 519, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 316.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 520, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 317.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 521, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 318.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 522, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 36 on page 243 the following:

“(2) The report referred to in subsection (1) shall include, for the previous calendar year, all information related to any action or enforcement measure taken in accordance with subsection 6(1) under any Act or regulation set out in Part 3 or Part 4 of the Schedule.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 523, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 319.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 524, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 319, be amended

(a) by replacing line 39 on page 243 with the following:

“(2) The Minister shall conduct a comprehensive review of the manage-”

(b) by replacing line 41 on page 243 with the following:

“protected heritage area at least every 10 years, taking into account any feedback received from the public under subsection (2.1),”

(c) by adding after line 43 on page 243 the following:

“(2.1) In every year, the Minister shall

(a) publish on the departmental website the management plan for each national historic site or other protected heritage area; and

(b) open the plan to public consultation and feedback, to be taken into account by the Agency in future decisions regarding changes to the management plan.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 525, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 320.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 526, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 321.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 527, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 322.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 528, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 323.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 529, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 324.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 530, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 324, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 244 with the following:

“(2) The Minister shall conduct a comprehensive review of the management plan for each park at least every 10 years, taking into account any feedback received from the public under subsection (2.1),”

(b) by adding after line 16 on page 244 the following:

“(2.1) In every year, the Minister shall

(a) publish on the departmental website the management plan for each national historic site or other protected heritage area; and

(b) open the plan to public consultation and feedback, to be taken into account by the Agency in future decisions regarding changes to the management plan.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 531, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 325.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 532, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 325, be amended

(a) by replacing line 20 on page 244 with the following:

“(2) The Minister shall conduct a comprehensive review of the manage-”

(b) by replacing line 22 on page 244 with the following:

“at least every 10 years, taking into account any feedback received from the public under subsection (2.1), and shall cause any”

(c) by adding after line 24 on page 244 the following:

“(2.1) In every year, the Minister shall

(a) publish on the departmental website the management plan for each national historic site or other protected heritage area; and

(b) open the plan to public consultation and feedback, to be taken into account by the Agency in future decisions regarding changes to the management plan.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 533, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 353.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 534, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 356.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 535, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 359.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 536, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 361.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 537, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 362.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 538, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 363.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 539, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 364.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 540, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 366.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 541, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 367, be amended by replacing lines 9 and 10 on page 272 with the following:

“force on January 1, 2014.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 542, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 367, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 272 with the following:

“comes into force on January 1, 2014.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 543, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 367, be amended by replacing lines 16 and 17 on page 272 with the following:

“May 1, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 544, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 368.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 546, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 368, be amended by adding after line 34 on page 274 the following:

“(3) Every officer appointed under this section must conduct every operation, wherever it takes place, in a manner respecting the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 547, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 368, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 276 the following:

“(3) For greater certainty, the detention of any person by an officer is not permitted unless the officer has been appointed as a cross-border maritime law enforcement officer under section 7.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 548, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 368, be amended by adding after line 34 on page 277 the following:

“17. The provisions of this Act, the related amendments to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and the consequential amendments to the Criminal Code and the Customs Act cease to have effect at the end of the 15th sitting day of Parliament after June 1, 2017, unless, before the end of that day, the application of those provisions is extended by a resolution passed by both Houses of Parliament.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 549, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 369.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 550, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 370.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 551, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 371.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 552, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 372.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 553, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 373.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 554, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 374.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 555, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 374, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 33 on page 280 with the following:

“374. This Division comes into force on April 30, 2016.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 556, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 377.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 557, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 378.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 558, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 379.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 559, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 380.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 560, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 381.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 561, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 382.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 562, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 383.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 563, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 384.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 564, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 385.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 565, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 386.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 566, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 387.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 567, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 391.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 568, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 392.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 569, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 393.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 572, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 394.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 573, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 395.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 574, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 396.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 575, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 397.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 577, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 398.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 578, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 399.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 579, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 400.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 580, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 401.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 581, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 402.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 582, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 403.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 583, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 404.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 584, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 405.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 585, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 406.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 586, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 407.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 587, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 408.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 588, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 409.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 589, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 410.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 590, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 411.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 591, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 412.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 592, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 413.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 593, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 413, be amended by deleting lines 25 and 26 on page 291.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 594, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 413, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 291 with the following:

“accessible to the public.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 595, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 414.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 596, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 415.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 597, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 416.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 598, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 416, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 292 with the following:

“considers appropriate and must be subject to regulatory approval.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 599, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 416, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 24 on page 293.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 600, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 417.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 601, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 418.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 602, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 419.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 603, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 419, be amended by replacing lines 12 and 13 on page 295 with the following:

“force on January 1, 2016.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 604, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 420.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 605, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 421.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 606, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 422.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 607, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 423.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 608, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 424.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 609, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 425.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 610, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 426.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 611, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 426, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 3 on page 299 with the following:

“426. This Division comes into force on May 1, 2013.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 612, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 427.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 613, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 428.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 614, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 429.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 615, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 430.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 616, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 431.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 617, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 440, be amended by replacing lines 21 and 22 on page 305 with the following:

“force on January 1, 2013.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 618, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 441.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 619, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 442.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 620, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 443.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 621, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 444.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 622, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 444, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 3 on page 306 with the following:

“444. This Division comes into force on April 30, 2016.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 623, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 445.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 624, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 446.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 625, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 447.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 629, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 448.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 631, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 461.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 632, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 463.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 633, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 465.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 634, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 466.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 635, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 467.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 636, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 467, be amended by replacing lines 3 to 5 on page 322 with the following:

“464 and 465, come into force on June 15, 2015.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 637, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 467, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 322 with the following:

“force on July 1, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 638, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 468.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 639, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 469.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 640, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 470.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 641, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 471.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 642, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 472.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 643, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 473.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 644, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 473, be amended by replacing lines 12 and 13 on page 323 with the following:

“tion 4.2, including their issuance and their”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 645, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 473, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 323 with the following:

“available to the public;”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 646, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 474.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 647, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 474, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 324 with the following:

“that he or she considers appropriate for assuring the quality of seeds and seed crops, subject to the conditions set out in subsection (5).”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 648, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 474, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 324 the following:

“(5) For greater certainty, no licence referred to in subsection (1) shall be issued to persons who have a direct commercial interest in the sale, importation or exportation of seeds in Canada.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 649, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 475.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 650, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 475, be amended by replacing lines 18 and 19 on page 324 with the following:

“tion 4.1, including their issuance and their”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 651, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 475, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 325 with the following:

“that he or she considers appropriate for assuring the quality of seeds and seed crops, subject to the conditions set out in subsection (5).”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 652, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 475, be amended by adding after line 9 on page 325 the following:

“(5) For greater certainty, no licence referred to in subsection (1) shall be issued to persons who have a direct commercial interest in the sale, importation or exportation of seeds in Canada.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 653, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 476.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 654, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 477.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 655, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 478.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 656, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 478, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 27 on page 325 with the following:

“478. This Division comes into force on September 15, 2015.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 657, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 479.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 658, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 480.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 659, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 480, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 326 with the following:

“subsection 23(1) and all criteria and factors considered in reaching a decision or sending notice under that subsection, with the exception of all commercially sensitive information;”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 660, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 481.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 661, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 482.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 662, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 484.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 663, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 485.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 664, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 486.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 665, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 486, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 328 with the following:

“January 1, 2013.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 666, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 487.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 667, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 488.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 668, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 489.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 669, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 489, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 329 with the following:

“February 1, 2016.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 670, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 490.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 671, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 491.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 672, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 492.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 673, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 493.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 674, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 494.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 675, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 495.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 676, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 496.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 677, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 497.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 678, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 498.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 679, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 499.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 680, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 500.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 681, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 501.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 682, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 502.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 683, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 503.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 684, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 504.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 685, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 505.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 686, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 505, be amended by replacing lines 9 and 10 on page 333 with the following:

“on January 1, 2016.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 687, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 506.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 688, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 507.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 689, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 508.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 690, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 508, be amended

(a) by replacing line 1 on page 336 with the following:

“(b) humanely dispose of that animal or thing or require”

(b) by replacing line 3 on page 336 with the following:

“care or control of it to humanely dispose of it if, according to expert opinion, treatment under paragraph (a) is not feasible or is not able to be carried out quickly enough to be effective in eliminating the disease or toxic substance or preventing its spread.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 691, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 509.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 692, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 511.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 693, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 514.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 694, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 515.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 695, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 515, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 338 with the following:

“September 1, 2013 or, if it is later, on the day on”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 696, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 516.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 697, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 517.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 698, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 518.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 699, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 519.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 700, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 520.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 701, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 521.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 702, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 522.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 703, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 522, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 340 with the following:

“possible after the end of each fiscal year but”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 704, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 523.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 705, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 524.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 706, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 525.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 707, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 525, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 340 with the following:

“Whereas a strong, efficient and publicly accountable banking sector”

Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), moved Motion No. 708, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 525, be amended by replacing lines 6 to 10 on page 341 with the following:

“And whereas respect for provincial laws of general application is necessary to ensure the quality of the banking services offered;”

Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), moved Motion No. 709, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 525, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 10 on page 341.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 710, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 525, be amended by adding after line 10 on page 341 the following:

“And whereas, in the interest of informed public debate and decision-making, it is in the national interest for the Government of Canada to publicy and transparently account for all financial assistance provided to the Canadian banking sector by the Government of Canada, including that provided through the Bank of Canada and the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation;”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 711, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 526.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 712, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 527.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 713, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 528.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 714, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 529.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 715, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 530.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 716, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 530, be amended by replacing lines 24 and 25 on page 342 with the following:

“on January 15, 2016.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 717, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 531.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 718, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 532.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 719, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 533.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 720, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 534.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 721, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 535.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 722, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 536.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 723, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 537.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 724, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 538.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 725, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 539.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 726, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 540.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 727, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 541.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 728, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 542.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 729, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 543.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 730, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 544.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 731, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 545.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 732, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 546.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 733, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 547.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 734, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 548.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 735, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 549.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 736, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 550.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 737, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 551.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 738, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 552.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 739, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 553.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 740, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 554.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 741, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 555.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 742, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 556.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 743, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 557.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 744, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 558.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 745, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 559.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 746, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 560.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 747, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 561.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 748, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 562.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 749, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 563.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 750, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 564.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 751, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 565.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 752, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 566.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 753, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 567.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 754, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 568.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 755, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 569.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 756, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 570.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 757, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 571.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 758, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 572.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 759, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 573.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 760, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 574.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 761, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 575.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 762, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 576.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 763, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 577.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 764, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 577, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 361 with the following:

“577. This Division comes into force on June 1, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 765, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 578.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 766, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 579.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 767, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 580.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 768, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 581.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 769, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 582.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 770, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 583.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 771, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 584.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 772, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 585.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 773, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 586.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 774, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 587.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 775, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 588.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 776, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 589.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 777, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 590.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 778, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 591.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 779, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 592.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 780, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 593.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 781, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 594.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 782, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 594, be amended by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 365 with the following:

“on April 30, 2016.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 783, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 595.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 784, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 602.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 785, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 603.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 786, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 605.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 787, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 606.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 788, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 607.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 789, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 608.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 790, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 609.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 791, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 610.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 792, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 611.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 793, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 612.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 794, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 613.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 795, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 614.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 796, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 615.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 797, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 616.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 798, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 617.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 799, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 618.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 800, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 619.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 801, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 619, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 378 with the following:

“608(2) and (3) come into force on April 30, 2016.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 802, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 619, be amended by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 378 with the following:

“on July 1, 2014.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 803, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 620.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 804, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 621.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 805, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 622.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 806, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 623.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 807, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 624.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 808, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 625.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 809, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 654.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 810, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 655.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 811, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 656.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 812, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 657.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 813, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 658.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 814, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 659.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 815, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 660.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 816, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 661.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 817, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 662.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 818, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 663.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 819, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 664.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 820, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 665.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 821, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 666.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 822, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 667.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 823, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 668.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 824, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 669.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 825, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 670.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 826, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 671.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 827, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 672.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 828, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 673.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 829, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 674.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 830, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 675.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 831, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 676.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 832, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 677.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 833, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 678.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 834, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 679.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 835, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 680.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 836, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 681.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 837, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 681, be amended by replacing lines 32 to 34 on page 394 with the following:

“681. This Division comes into force on January 1, 2016.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 838, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 684, be amended by replacing lines 6 to 8 on page 396 with the following:

“684. This Division comes into force on September 1, 2012.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 839, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 685.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 840, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 686.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 841, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 687.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 844, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 688.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 845, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 689.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 846, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 690.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 847, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 691.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 848, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 692.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 849, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 693.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 850, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 694.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 851, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 695.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 852, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 696.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 853, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 696, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 401 with the following:

“on September 15, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 854, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 699.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 855, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 699, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 401 with the following:

“2007, is repealed as of April 30, 2015.”

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 856, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 700.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 857, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 701.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 858, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 702.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 859, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 703.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 860, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 704.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 861, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 705.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 862, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 706.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 863, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 707.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 864, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 708.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 865, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 709.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 866, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 710.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 867, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 711.

Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 868, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 712.

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 869, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 753, be amended by replacing lines 8 and 9 on page 424 with the following:

“force on September 1, 2012.”

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved Motion No. 870, — That Bill C-38, in Clause 753, be amended by replacing lines 11 to 13 on page 424 with the following:

“723, 726 and 741 to 751 come into force on June 15, 2015.”

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), moved Motion No. 871, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting the Schedule.

The question was put on Motion No. 368 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 369 to 373, 375, 376 and 378 to 404, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 405 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 406 to 409, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 410 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 413 and 414, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 415 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 417 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 420 and 421, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 418 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 419, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 422 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 423 to 480, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 484 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 485 to 504, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 506 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 507 to 516, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 518 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 519 and 528, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 520 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 521, 523, 525 to 527, 529 and 531, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 533 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 534 to 540, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 544 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 549 to 554, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 556 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 557 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 558 to 566, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 567 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 568, 569, 572 to 575, and 577 to 589, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 590 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 591 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 592, 595 to 597 and 600 to 602, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 604 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 605 to 610, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 612 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 613 to 616, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 617 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 618 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 619 to 621, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 623 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 625, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 624 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 629 and 631 to 635, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 638 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 639 to 642, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 643 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 646 and 649, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 653 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 654 and 655, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 657 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 658, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 660 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 661, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 662 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 663 and 664, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 666 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 667 and 668, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 670 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 671 to 685, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 687 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 688, 689, and 691 to 694, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 696 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 697 to 702, 704, and 705, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 706 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 711 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 712 to 715, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 717 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 718 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 719 to 763, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 765 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 766 to 781, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 783 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 784 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 785 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 786 and 789, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 787 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 788 and 790 to 800, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 803 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 804 to 808, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 809 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 810, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 811 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 812 to 815 and 817 to 836, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 816 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 838 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 839 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 840, 841 and 844 to 852, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 854 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 856 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 857 to 861, and 863 to 866, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 862 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 867 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 868, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 869 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 870, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 871 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-38, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment.

Group No. 1

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 1.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:

Accordingly, Motions Nos. 2, 5 and 8 to 12 were also negatived on the same division.

(Division No. 287 -- Vote no 287)
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 150

YEAS -- POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Bevington
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brison
Brosseau
Byrne
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Coderre
Comartin

Côté
Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Foote
Fortin
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hsu

Hughes
Hyer
Jacob
Julian
Karygiannis
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
MacAulay
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Nantel

Nash
Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti
Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Scott
Sellah
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 133

NAYS -- CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Baird
Bateman
Benoit
Bernier
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chong
Clarke
Clement
Daniel
Davidson

Dechert
Del Mastro
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Galipeau
Gallant
Glover
Goguen
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harper
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hoeppner
Holder
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake
Lauzon
Lebel

Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Paradis
Payne
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Raitt
Rathgeber
Reid
Rempel
Richards
Rickford
Ritz
Saxton

Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Toews
Trost
Trottier
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vellacott
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 150

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun

Accordingly, Motions Nos. 2, 5 and 8 to 12 were also negatived on the same division.

The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 6 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), — That Bill C-38, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 5 on page 7 with the following:

““political activity” means the making of a gift by a donor to a qualified donee for the purpose of allowing the donor to maintain a level of funding of political activities that is less than 10% of its income for a taxation year by delegating the carrying out of political activities to the qualified donee;”

The question was put on Motion No. 6 and it was negatived on the following division:

(Division No. 288 -- Vote no 288)
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 149

YEAS — POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Bevington
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brison
Brosseau
Byrne
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Coderre
Comartin

Côté
Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Foote
Fortin
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hsu

Hughes
Hyer
Jacob
Julian
Karygiannis
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
MacAulay
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Nantel

Nash
Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti
Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Scott
Sellah
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 133

NAYS — CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Baird
Bateman
Benoit
Bernier
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chong
Clarke
Clement
Daniel

Davidson
Dechert
Del Mastro
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Galipeau
Gallant
Glover
Goguen
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harper
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hoeppner
Holder
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake

Lebel
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Paradis
Payne
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Raitt
Rathgeber
Reid
Rempel
Richards
Rickford

Ritz
Saxton
Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Toews
Trost
Trottier
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vellacott
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 149

PAIRED — PAIRÉS

Nil — Aucun

The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 7 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), — That Bill C-38, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 8 with the following:

“interest, being any activity that contributes to the social or cultural lives of Canadians or that contributes to Canada's economic or ecological well-being.”

The question was put on Motion No. 7 and it was negatived on the following division:

(Division No. 289 -- Vote no 289)
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 149

YEAS -- POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Bevington
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brison
Brosseau
Byrne
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Coderre
Comartin

Côté
Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Foote
Fortin
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hsu

Hughes
Hyer
Jacob
Julian
Karygiannis
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
MacAulay
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Nantel

Nash
Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti
Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Scott
Sellah
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 133

NAYS -- CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Baird
Bateman
Benoit
Bernier
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chong
Clarke
Clement
Daniel

Davidson
Dechert
Del Mastro
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Galipeau
Gallant
Glover
Goguen
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harper
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hoeppner
Holder
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake

Lebel
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Paradis
Payne
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Raitt
Rathgeber
Reid
Rempel
Richards
Rickford

Ritz
Saxton
Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Toews
Trost
Trottier
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vellacott
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 149

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 3 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 4.

The question was put on Motion No. 3 and it was negatived on the following division:

(Division No. 290 -- Vote no 290)
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 149

YEAS -- POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Bevington
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brison
Brosseau
Byrne
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Coderre
Comartin

Côté
Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Foote
Fortin
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hsu

Hughes
Hyer
Jacob
Julian
Karygiannis
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
MacAulay
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Nantel

Nash
Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti
Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Scott
Sellah
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 133

NAYS -- CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Baird
Bateman
Benoit
Bernier
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chong
Clarke
Clement
Daniel

Davidson
Dechert
Del Mastro
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Flaherty
Fletcher
Galipeau
Gallant
Glover
Goguen
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harper
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hoeppner
Holder
James
Jean
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent
Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake

Lebel
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menzies
Merrifield
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
O'Connor
O'Neill Gordon
Obhrai
Oda
Oliver
Opitz
Paradis
Payne
Penashue
Poilievre
Preston
Raitt
Rathgeber
Reid
Rempel
Richards
Rickford

Ritz
Saxton
Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Toews
Trost
Trottier
Truppe
Tweed
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vellacott
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Zimmer

Total: -- 149

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun

Accordingly, Motions Nos. 4 and 15 were also negatived on the same division.

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 13 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 16.

The question was put on Motion No. 13 and it was negatived on the following division:

(Division No. 291 -- Vote no 291)
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 150

YEAS -- POUR

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Bevington
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brahmi
Brison
Brosseau
Byrne
Caron
Cash
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Chow
Christopherson
Cleary
Coderre
Comartin

Côté
Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dionne Labelle
Donnelly
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Foote
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Godin
Goodale
Gravelle
Groguhé
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hassainia
Hsu
Hughes

Hyer
Jacob
Julian
Karygiannis
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
MacAulay
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Michaud
Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mourani
Mulcair
Nantel
Nash

Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti
Papillon
Patry
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rae
Rafferty
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Rousseau
Saganash
Sandhu
Scott
Sellah
Sgro
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
Sims (Newton—North Delta)
Sitsabaiesan
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 133

NAYS -- CONTRE

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albas
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Armstrong
Ashfield
Aspin
Baird
Bateman
Bernier
Bezan