MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
|
|
Meeting No. 94
|
|
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
|
The
Standing Committee on Finance met in a televised session at 3:36 p.m. this
day, in Room 253-D, Centre Block, the Chair, James Rajotte, presiding.
|
Members of the
Committee present: Mark Adler, Hon. Scott Brison, Guy Caron, Shelly
Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Cathy McLeod, Peggy Nash, James
Rajotte and Dave Van Kesteren.
|
Acting Members
present:
Dan Albas for Randy Hoback, Mike
Allen for Shelly Glover, Mike Allen for Cathy McLeod,
Stella Ambler for Dave Van Kesteren, David Anderson for
Brian Jean, David Anderson for Dave Van Kesteren,
Scott Armstrong for Brian Jean, Robert Aubin for Guy
Caron, Hon. Mauril Bélanger for Hon. Scott Brison,
Denis Blanchette for Hoang Mai, Denis
Blanchette for Peggy Nash, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe for Peggy Nash, Tarik Brahmi for Guy Caron, Peter
Braid for Mark Adler, Peter Braid for Cathy McLeod,
Gordon Brown for Mark Adler, Gordon
Brown for Randy Hoback, Paul Calandra for Randy
Hoback, Paul Calandra for Dave Van Kesteren, John
Carmichael for Brian Jean, Corneliu Chisu for Randy Hoback, Raymond Côté for Wayne Marston, Patricia
Davidson for Shelly Glover, Dean Del Mastro for Randy
Hoback, Pierre-Luc Dusseault for Wayne Marston, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay for Shelly Glover, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay for Cathy McLeod, Mylène Freeman for Hoang Mai, Robert
Goguen for Randy Hoback, Claude Gravelle for Wayne
Marston, Claude Gravelle for Peggy Nash, Dan
Harris for Peggy Nash, Hon. Laurie Hawn for Mark Adler,
Hon. Laurie Hawn for Shelly Glover, Hon. Laurie Hawn for Brian Jean, Bryan
Hayes for Cathy McLeod, Bryan Hayes for Dave Van
Kesteren, Ed Holder for Brian Jean, Ed Holder for Cathy McLeod, Ted Hsu for Hon. Scott
Brison, Roxanne James for Brian Jean, Peter Julian for Peggy Nash, Randy
Kamp for Shelly Glover, Randy Kamp for Dave Van
Kesteren, Hon. Mike Lake for Randy Hoback, Kevin
Lamoureux for Hon. Scott Brison, Kellie Leitch for
Mark Adler, Kellie Leitch for Randy Hoback, Kellie Leitch for Cathy McLeod, Kellie
Leitch for Dave Van Kesteren, Dave MacKenzie for Cathy McLeod, Hon. John McCallum for Hon. Scott Brison, Costas Menegakis for Randy Hoback, Costas
Menegakis for Brian Jean, Costas Menegakis for James
Rajotte, Larry Miller for Randy Hoback, Christine Moore for Hoang Mai, Pierre
Nantel for Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo for Hoang Mai, Massimo
Pacetti for Hon. Scott Brison, LaVar Payne for Shelly
Glover, LaVar Payne for Randy Hoback, Ève Péclet for Guy Caron, Hon. Geoff
Regan for Hon. Scott Brison, Michelle Rempel for
James Rajotte, Blake Richards for Randy Hoback, Blake Richards for Dave Van Kesteren, Bev Shipley for
Cathy McLeod, Scott Simms for Hon. Scott Brison, Jinny Jogindera Sims for Guy Caron, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan for Wayne Marston, Joy Smith for James
Rajotte, Kevin Sorenson for Mark Adler, Brian Storseth for Dave Van Kesteren, Mark
Strahl for Mark Adler, Glenn Thibeault for Guy Caron,
Glenn Thibeault for Peggy Nash, Philip
Toone for Hoang Mai, Philip Toone for Wayne Marston,
Nycole Turmel for Hoang Mai, Nycole
Turmel for Wayne Marston, Mike Wallace for Brian Jean, Mark
Warawa for Brian Jean and David Wilks for Brian Jean.
|
Associate
Members present: Harold Albrecht,
Russ Hiebert, Ed Komarnicki, Wladyslaw Lizon and Tilly O'Neill
Gordon.
|
Other Members
present:
Lise St-Denis, Hon. Tim Uppal
and Hon. Lynne Yelich.
|
In attendance: Library of Parliament: Daniel Benatuil, Analyst; Mark
Mahabir, Analyst; Sebastian Spano, Analyst; June
Dewetering, Chief Analyst. House of Commons: Andrew
Bartholomew Chaplin, Procedural Clerk; Rémi Bourgault, Procedural Clerk; Paul
Cardegna, Procedural Clerk; Cynara Corbin, Procedural Clerk; Isabelle Dumas,
Procedural Clerk; Joann Garbig, Procedural Clerk; Marc-Olivier Girard,
Procedural Clerk; Monique Hamilton, Procedural Clerk; Christine Holke David,
Procedural Clerk; Julie Lalande-Prud'homme, Procedural Clerk; Simon Larouche,
Procedural Clerk; Chad Mariage, Procedural Clerk; David-Andrés Novoa,
Procedural Clerk; Jean-François Pagé, Procedural Clerk; Julie Pelletier,
Procedural Clerk; Marie-France Renaud, Procedural Clerk; Alexandre Roger,
Procedural Clerk; Jean-Michel Roy, Procedural Clerk; Marlene Sandoval,
Procedural Clerk; Michelle Tittley, Procedural Clerk; Lucie
Tardif-Carpentier, Legislative Clerk; Christine Lafrance, Legislative Clerk;
Mike MacPherson, Legislative Clerk; Philippe Méla, Legislative Clerk; Chloé
O'Shaughnessy, Legislative Clerk.
|
Witnesses: Department
of Finance: Ted Cook, Senior Legislative Chief, Tax
Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch.
|
The
Committee proceeded to the consideration of matters related to Committee
business.
Peggy
Nash moved – That the Committee invite the Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister
of Finance, to appear before the Committee regarding the Supplementary
Estimates (B) 2012-2013 before December 4, 2012 and that this meeting be
televised.
Debate
arose thereon.
Shelly
Glover moved – That the motion be amended by replacing “the Honourable Jim
Flaherty, Minister of Finance” with “department officials”.
Debate
arose thereon.
At
3:38 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
4:25 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At
4:29 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
5:14 p.m., the sitting resumed.
Shelly
Glover moved – That the debate on the motion be now adjourned.
The
question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to, by a show of hands:
YEAS: 6; NAYS: 5.
|
Pursuant to the Order of Reference of
Tuesday, October 30, 2012, the Committee resumed consideration of Bill C-45,
A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in
Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures.
The
Committee commenced its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
|
|
STATEMENT BY THE CHAIR
“I
want to outline for members the motion adopted by the Committee on October
31, 2012, in relation to the study of Bill C-45, A second Act to implement
certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and
other measures. I would like to remind the Committee of certain important
elements of this motion.
First
of all, with respect to the timing, in paragraph (d) of the motion
adopted by the Committee, it states that:
“
…the Chair may limit debate on each clause to a maximum of five minutes per
party per clause before the clause is brought to a vote”.
So
it's five minutes per clause. This is prior to 11:59 p.m., not for
amendments. I just want to make sure everyone understands that.
I
have two more items. The second point is with respect to the end of debate.
Paragraph (f) of the motion adopted by the Committee states:
“(f)
if the Committee has not completed the clause-by-clause consideration of Bill
C-45 by 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday, November 21, 2012, the Chair shall put,
forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment, each and
every question necessary to dispose of clause-by-clause consideration of the
Bill…”.
At
that point, I will deal with all of the clauses that are left, if we have not
completed our work by 11:59 p.m.
The
third point is an amendment that has been sent to this Committee. As you
recall, the motion called for the Chair to communicate with other committees
and invite them to submit suggested amendments to the Finance Committee. I
have received answers from all of the committees, none of which have
forwarded any amendments.
However,
there is an amendment from a member. This amendment will be considered by the
Finance Committee according to paragraph (c) of the motion. This
amendment is from Dr. Fry, who is a member of the Health Committee.
In
paragraph (c) of the motion adopted by the Committee, it states:
“(c)
any amendments suggested by the other standing committees…shall be deemed to
be proposed during the clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-45…”.
To
explain this so that everyone understands, if we go past 11:59 p.m., at that
point I will just be putting the votes on the clauses. If we have amendments
left to deal with, I will not be putting forward votes on those amendments.”
A
point of order was raised by Brian Jean as to the Chair's interpretation of
the motion previously adopted by the Committee.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The
Chair ruled that all motions in amendment submitted to the clerk for
inclusion in the package of amendments for clause-by-clause consideration
would not be considered to be deemed moved.
Whereupon,
Brian Jean appealed the decision of the Chair.
At
5:31 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
6:52 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The
question: “Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?” was put and the
decision was overturned by a show of hands: YEAS: 1; NAYS: 10.
Accordingly,
all of the clauses and all of the motions in amendment submitted to the clerk
for inclusion in the package of amendments for clause-by-clause consideration
were deemed moved and disposed of as follows:
Pursuant to Standing Order 75(1), consideration of Clause 1 was
postponed.
The Chair called Clause 2.
On
Clause 2,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 42 on page 2.
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 2 with
the following:
|
|
“employer
after June 30, 2013 and before 2014 that are attributable to the taxpayer's”
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 2 with the
following:
|
|
“coverage
after 2013 under a group sickness”
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 2 with the
following:
|
|
“(ii)
all amounts contributed in 2014 in”
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 4 on page 3.
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 3 with the
following:
|
|
“(5)
Subsection (2) applies to the 2014”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 3 with the
following:
|
|
“(6)
Subsection (3) applies to the 2015 and”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
After
debate, Clause 2 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott
Brison — 5.
|
|
On
Clause 3,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 3 with the
following:
|
|
“(2)
Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”
Ted
Cook answered questions.
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After
debate, Clause 3 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott
Brison — 5
|
|
On Clause 4,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 4, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 4 with the
following:
|
|
“that
begin after June 30, 2013.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
4 carried on division.
|
|
On Clause 5,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by deleting line 31 on page 4 to line 18
on page 7.
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum— 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 5
with the following:
|
|
“(b)
the amount becomes owing after June 30, 2013;”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 39 on page 7.
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum— 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 7 with the
following:
|
|
“incurred
after June 30, 2013. However, any”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 7 with the
following:
|
|
“on
or before the day that is 730 days after the”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 7 with the
following:
|
|
“begin,
after June 30, 2013.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
5 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, John
McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 6,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 9
with the following:
|
|
“and
fiscal periods that end after June 30, 2013. However, in respect of
acquisitions of”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 10 with the
following:
|
|
“on
July 1, 2013 and ends on the day that is”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 10 with the
following:
|
|
“545
days after the day on which the ways and”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
6 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, John McCallum — 5.
|
|
On Clause 7,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 7, be amended
(a)
by deleting lines 22 to 34 on page 10.
|
(b)
by deleting line 39 on page 10 to line 35 on page 12.
(c)
by deleting lines 8 and 9 on page 13.
|
(d)
by deleting lines 12 to 20 on page 13.
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 11 with the
following:
|
|
“that
period in the amount of $500,000;”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
7 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, John McCallum — 5.
A point of
order is raised regarding the participation of a member who is not a regular
member of the Committee.
Debate arose
thereon.
|
|
RULING
BY THE CHAIR
|
|
The
Chair ruled that, in order to obtain the right to speak, a Member who is not
a regular Member of the Committee must substitute a regular Member or have
the consent of the Committee, as provided on page 1018 of House of Commons
Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
Whereupon,
Kevin Lamoureux appealed the decision of the Chair.
|
|
The
question “Shall the decision be sustained?” was put and the decision was
sustained by a show of hands: YEAS: 10; NAYS: 1.
|
|
On Clause 8,
Ted Cook
answered questions.
After debate, Clause
8 carried on division.
|
|
On Clause 9,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 12 on page 14 with
the following:
|
|
“9.
(1) Paragraph 37(1)(b) of the Act is re-”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting line 12 on page 14 to line 12
on page 16.
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 15 with the
following:
|
|
“before
2017, or”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 13 and 14 on page 16.
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 16 with the
following:
|
|
“expenditures
made after 2016.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren— 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 16 with the
following:
|
|
“expenditures
made after 2017.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 16 on page 16 with the following:
“in
respect of expenditures made after 2016”
|
(b)
by replacing line 19 on page 16 with the following:
|
“2017.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 16 on page 16 with the following:
|
“in
respect of expenditures made after 2018”
|
(b)
by replacing line 19 on page 16 with the following:
|
|
“2019.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 16 with the
following:
|
|
“on
January 1, 2017.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren— 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 16 with the
following:
|
|
“on
January 1, 2019.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark
Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
After debate, Clause
9 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:
Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5.
|
|
On Clause 10,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 16
with the following:
|
|
“(2)
Subsection (1) comes into force on July 1, 2013.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
At
8:55 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
9:10 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
After
debate, Clause 10 carried on division.
|
After debate, Clause
11 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash — 4.
|
|
After debate, Clause
12 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison
— 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
After debate, Clause
13 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison
— 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
After debate, Clause
14 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.
|
|
After debate, Clause
15 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison
— 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 16,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 26 and 27 on page 20
with the following:
|
|
“(3)
Subsections (1) and (2) come into force on July 1, 2013.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
16 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.
|
|
On Clause 17,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 17, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 20 with the
following:
|
|
“that
begin, after June 30, 2013.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
17 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Sorenson, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.
|
|
On Clause 18,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 18, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 3 on page 23 with the following:
|
|
“after
June 30, 2013, other than — if a”
(b)
by replacing lines 11 to 13 on page 23 with the following:
|
|
“that
occurs before 2014, or a winding-up of the subsidiary corporation into the
parent corporation that begins before 2014, if”
|
(c)
by replacing lines 16 to 18 on page 23 with the following:
|
|
“July
1, 2013 or was obligated as evidenced in writing before July 1, 2013 to
acquire control of the subsidiary”
|
(d)
by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 23 with the following:
|
|
“tion
as evidenced in writing before July 1, 2013 to amalgamate with, or wind up,”
|
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing lines 29 to 32 on page 23
with the following:
|
|
“made
after August 13, 2013 other than a disposition made before 2014 pursuant to
an obligation under a written agreement entered into before August 14, 2013
by parties that”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
After debate, Clause
18 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.
|
|
On Clause 19,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 24 with the
following:
|
|
“into
force on July 1, 2013.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
19 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.
|
|
On Clause 20,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 24 with the
following:
|
|
“into
force on July 1, 2013.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai,
Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
20 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.
|
|
On Clause 21,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 21, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 26 with the
following:
|
|
“of
dispositions made after June 30, 2013.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
21 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.
|
|
On Clause 22,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 30 with the
following:
|
|
“disposition
made after June 30, 2013,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 30 with the
following:
|
|
“before
August 14, 2013, the portion of”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 30 with the
following:
|
|
“ship
by a taxpayer before 2014 to a person”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 30
with the following:
|
|
“into
by the taxpayer before July 1, 2013. A taxpayer is not considered to be”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 31 with the
following:
|
|
“into
force on July 1, 2013, except that”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 31 with the
following:
|
|
“(a)
before August 14, 2013; or”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 31 with the
following:
|
|
“2014
pursuant to an obligation under a”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 31 with the
following:
|
|
“August
14, 2013 by parties that deal with”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
After debate, Clause
22 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.
|
|
After debate, Clause
23 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison
— 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
After debate, Clause
24 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison
— 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
After
debate, Clause 25 carried on division.
At
11:18 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
11:32 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
On Clause 26,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(i)
for the 2013 taxation year, $70,000,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(i)
for the 2013 taxation year, $79,999,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(ii)
for the 2014 taxation year, $60,000,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(ii)
for the 2014 taxation year, $79,999,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(iii)
for the 2015 taxation year, $50,000;”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(iii)
for the 2015 taxation year, $79,999,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(iv)
for the 2016 taxation year, $40,000,
(v)
for the 2017 taxation year, $30,000,
(vi)
for the 2018 taxation year, $20,000, and
(vii)
for the 2019 taxation year, $10,000; and
(b)
for the 2020 and subsequent taxation”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“years,
$79,999.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(i)
for the 2013 taxation year, 70%,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(i)
for the 2013 taxation year, 79.99%,”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(ii)
for the 2014 taxation year, 60%, and”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(ii)
for the 2014 taxation year, 79.99%, and”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(iii)
for the 2015 taxation year, 50%; and”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 33 with the
following:
|
|
“(iii)
for the 2015 taxation year, 79.99%; and”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 34 with the
following:
|
|
“(iv)
for the 2016 taxation year, 40%,
(v)
for the 2017 taxation year, 30%,
(vi)
for the 2018 taxation year, 20%, and
(vii)
for the 2019 taxation year, 10%; and
(b)
for the 2020 and subsequent taxation”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 34 with the
following:
|
“years,
79.99%.”
|
After
debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy
Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
After debate, Clause
26 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
On Clause 27,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 5 on page 34 to line 6 on page 35 with the following:
|
|
“27.
(1) Paragraph (a) of the definition “invest-”
(b)
by deleting lines 14 to 23 on page 35;:
|
(c)
by deleting line 26 on page 36 to line 11 on page 37;:
|
(d)
by deleting lines 14 to 24 on page 42;:
|
(e)
by deleting line 6 on page 43 to line 34 on page 44;:
|
(f)
by deleting lines 6 to 36 on page 45; and:
|
(g)
by deleting lines 4 and 5 on page 46.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing lines 5 to 26 on page 34
with the following:
|
|
“27.
(1) The definition “first term shared-use-”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 26 on page 34 to line 5
on page 35.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 34 with the
following:
|
|
“property
of a taxpayer) acquired before 2017”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 34 with the
following:
|
|
“property
of a taxpayer) acquired before 2019”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 35 with the
following:
|
|
“(a.1)
19.99% of the amount by which the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 26 to 43 on page 36.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 36 with the
following:
|
|
“(ii)
99.99% of an expenditure described in”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 5 on page 37.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 11 on page 37.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 29 on page 43.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 30 to 39 on page 43.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 40 on page 43 to line 3
on page 44.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 4 to 7 on page 44.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 8 to 12 on page 44.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 13 to 29 on page 44.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 30 and 31 on page 44.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 44 with the
following:
|
|
“respect
of expenditures made after 2016.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 44 with the
following:
|
|
“respect
of expenditures made after 2017.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 44 with the
following:
|
|
“(32)
Subsections (9), (24) and (25)”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 44 with the
following:
|
|
“(32)
Subsections (2), (24) and (29)”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 44 with the
following:
|
|
“2018.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by adding after line 34 on page 44 the
following:
|
|
“(32.1)
Subsections (2) and (29) apply in respect of expenditures made after 2016.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by adding after line 34 on page 44 the
following:
|
|
“(32.1)
Subsections (9) and (25) apply in respect of expenditures made after 2016.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 45 with the
following:
|
|
“(33)
Subsections (18), (20) to (22) and”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by adding after line 3 on page 45 the
following:
|
|
“(33.1)
Subsection (3) comes into force on January 1, 2017.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 36 on page 45.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing lines 7 to 9 on page 45 with
the following:
|
|
“taxation
years that end after 2016, except that for taxation years that include
January 1, 2017”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 7 on page 45 with the following:
|
|
“taxation
years that end after 2018, except”
|
(b)
by replacing line 9 on page 45 with the following:
|
|
“1,
2019”
|
(c)
by replacing line 18 on page 45 with the following:
|
|
“taxation
year and before 2019 is of the”
|
(d)
by replacing line 22 on page 45 with the following:
|
|
“taxation
year and after 2018 is of the”
|
(e)
by replacing line 31 on page 45 with the following:
|
|
“taxation
year and before 2019 is of the”
|
(f)
by replacing line 35 on page 45 with the following:
|
|
“taxation
year and after 2018 is of the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 45 with the
following:
|
|
“taxation
year and before 2017 is of the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 45 with the
following:
|
|
“taxation
year and after 2016 is of the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 45 with the
following:
|
|
“taxation
year and before 2017 is of the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 45 with the
following:
|
|
“taxation
year and after 2016 is of the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 46 with the
following:
|
|
“(37)
Subsections (23) and (28)”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 46 with the
following:
|
|
“come
into force on February 1, 2022.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
Clause 27
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Kevin
Lamoureux — 1.
|
|
Clause 28
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
Clause 29
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 30,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 30, be amended by replacing lines 37 to 39 on page 50
with the following:
|
|
“after
June 30, 2013.
(4)
Subsection (2) comes into force on July 1, 2013.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 30
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
Clause 31
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 32
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 33
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai,
Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 34
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 35
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai,
Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 36
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 37
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 38
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 39
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 40,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 40, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 80 with the
following:
|
|
“(2)
Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
Clause 40
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
Clause 41
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 42,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 42, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 5 on page 81 with the following:
|
|
“42.
(1) The portion of subsection 180(1) of the Act before paragraph (a)
is replaced by the following:
180.
(1) An appeal to the Federal Court of
Appeal
pursuant to subsection 172(3) may be
instituted
by filing a notice of appeal in the
Court
within 60 days from
(2)
Subsection 180(1) of the Act is”
(b)
by replacing line 18 on page 81 with the following:
|
|
“(3)
The portion of subsection 180(1) of the Act after paragraph (d) is
replaced by the following:
as
the case may be, or within such further time
as
the Court of Appeal or a judge thereof may,
either
before or after the expiration of those 60
days,
fix or allow.
(4)
Subsections (1) to (3) come into force or are”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash,
Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
Clause 42
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 43
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 44,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 44, be amended
(a)
by replacing lines 17 and 18 on page 87 with the following:
|
|
“(3)
Subsection (1) applies after June 30, 2013, except that the definition
“advantage””
(b)
by replacing, in the English version, line 23 on page 87 with the following:
|
|
“rangement
acquired before July 1, 2013”
|
(c)
by replacing line 35 on page 87 with the following:
|
|
“after
2013 in respect of the note or”
|
(d)
by replacing line 37 on page 87 with the following:
|
|
“June
30, 2013 in respect of the arrange-”
|
(e)
by replacing line 8 on page 88 with the following:
|
|
“after
June 30, 2013 and income earned,”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 44
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai,
Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1.
|
|
On Clause 45,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 45, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 22 on page 88 with the following:
|
|
“arrangement
after July 1, 2013.”
|
(b)
by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 90 with the following:
|
|
“(2)
Subsection (1) applies after June 30, 2013. For the purposes of section
207.61 of”
|
(c)
by replacing lines 28 and 29 on page 90 with the following:
|
|
“tion
arrangement acquired before July 1, 2013 to provide for commercially
reasonable”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike
Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai,
Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 45
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai,
Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1.
|
|
On Clause 46,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 46, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 22 on page 92 with the following:
|
|
“(2)
Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”
(b)
by replacing lines 27 to 31 on page 92 with the following:
|
|
“(a)
before July 1, 2013; or
(b)
before 2014 pursuant to an obligation arising under a written agreement or
arrangement entered into before July 1, 2013.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 46
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
Clause 47
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 48
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 49,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 99 with the
following:
|
|
“time
after June 30, 2013 in respect of a class”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 99 with the
following:
|
“June
30, 2013 and before that time by the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 102
with the following:
|
“(i)
the amount became owing after June 30, 2013, or”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 103 with the
following:
|
|
“July
1, 2013 and is a debt obligation”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 103 with the
following:
|
|
“after
June 30, 2013 and at or before that”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 114 the
following:
|
“(26)
This section does not apply to a CRIC that is listed on a designated stock
exchange.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 114 with the
following:
|
|
“that
occur after June 30, 2013. However,”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 114 with the
following:
|
“actions
that occur before 2014 between”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 114 with the
following:
|
|
“before
July 1, 2013 between the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 114
with the following:
|
|
“into
between the parties before July 1, 2013, and”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 115 with the
following:
|
|
“730
days after the day on which this Act”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 116 with the
following:
|
|
“time
after June 30, 2013 of any class of”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 116 with the
following:
|
|
“time
after June 30, 2013 in respect of a class”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 117 with the
following:
|
|
“June
30, 2013 and before that time by the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 49
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren —6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
On Clause 50,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 122 with the
following:
|
|
“that
end after June 30, 2013, except that”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 122
with the following:
|
|
“(a)
for taxation years that include July 1, 2013, the amount of each dividend”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 122 with the
following:
|
|
“taxation
year that are after June 30, 2013”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 122 with the
following:
|
|
“(b)
before August 14, 2013, subsection”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 50
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
On Clause 50,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 51, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 125 with the
following:
|
|
“June
30, 2013.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 51
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
Clause 52
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
Clause 53
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash— 4.
|
|
On Clause 54,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 54, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 128 with the
following:
|
|
“transaction
that occurs after June 30, 2013.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
Clause 54
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.
|
|
Clause 55
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 56
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 57
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy
Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 58
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 59
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 60
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 61
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy
Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.
At
1:01 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 1:14 a.m.,
the sitting resumed.
|
|
On Clause 62,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 134 with the
following:
|
|
“clause
37(8)(a)(ii)(B) of the Act is 64.99% of the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 134 with the
following:
|
|
“that
end after 2015, except that for taxation”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash,
Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended
(a)
by replacing lines 16 and 17 on page 134 with the following:
|
|
“that
end after 2017, except that for taxation years that begin before 2019 the
reference to”
|
(b)
by replacing line 24 on page 134 with the following:
|
|
“year
and before 2018 is of the number of”
|
(c)
by replacing line 28 on page 134 with the following:
|
|
“year
and after 2018 is of the number of”
|
(d)
by replacing line 32 on page 134 with the following:
|
“year
and after 2018 is of the number of”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 134 with the
following:
|
|
“years
that begin before 2017 the reference to”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 134 with the
following:
|
|
“year
and before 2016 is of the number of”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 134 with the
following:
|
|
“year
and in 2016 is of the number of days”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash,
Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 134 with the
following:
|
|
“year
and after 2016 is of the number of”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
Clause 62
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 63, be amended by deleting lines 34 to 39 on page 134.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 63, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 135 with the
following:
|
|
“expenditures
incurred after December 31, 2016.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash,
Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian
Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 63, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 135 with the
following:
|
|
“of
expenditures incurred after 2016.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
Clause 63
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
On Clause 64,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 64, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 135 with the
following:
|
|
“(2)
Subsection (1) applies after 2016.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
Clause 64
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 65
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 66
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Mauril Bélanger —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 67
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Mauril Bélanger —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
On Clause 68,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 68, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 137 with the
following:
|
|
“(2)
Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy
Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback,
Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.
|
|
Clause 68
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 69
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Mauril Bélanger —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 70
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Mauril Bélanger —
7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.
|
|
Clause 71
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 72
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 73
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 74
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 75
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 76
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 77
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 78
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 79
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 80
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 81
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 82
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 83
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 84
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 85
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 86
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 87
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 88
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 89
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 90
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 91
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 92
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 93
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 94
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 95
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 96
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 97
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 98
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 99
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 100
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 101
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 102
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 103
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 104
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 105
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 106
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 107
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 108
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 109
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 110
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 111
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 112
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 113
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 114
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 115
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 116
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 117
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Guy Caron, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 118
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 119
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 120
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 121
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 122
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 123
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 124
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 125
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 126
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 127
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 128
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 129
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 130
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 131
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 132
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 133
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 134
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 135
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 136
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 137
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 138
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 139
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 140
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 141
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 142
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 143
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 144
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 145
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 146
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 147
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 148
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 149
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 150
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 151
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 152
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 153
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 154
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 155
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang
Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 156
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève
Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 157
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève
Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 158
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève
Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 159
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève
Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 160
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève
Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 161
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 162
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 163
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
Clause 164
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet,
Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
On Clause 165,
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
At
2:38 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 3:08 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1;
NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on division.
At
4:21 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:39 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
At
5:36 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:48 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger —
1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder,
Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.
At
6:00 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 12:13 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John
Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne
Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash —
10.
At
12:56 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 1:42 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At
1:42 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 1:43 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At
1:44 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 1:47 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash —
10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force
324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.
At
2:00 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 3:24 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, David Anderson, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 8.
At
3:25 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 4:10 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on division.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on division.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on division.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on division.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on division.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle— 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle— 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended
by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be
amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:
|
“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into
force 364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy
McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston,
Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
Clause 165 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas
Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5.
|
Clause 166
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert
Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
Clause 167
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert
Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
Clause 168
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert
Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
Clause 169 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del
Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
Clause 170
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert
Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
Clause 171
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert
Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Scott Brison — 10; NAYS: Claude
Gravelle — 1.
|
|
|
|
Clause 172
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert
Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 173,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“equipment
that”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 65 per cent of the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 64 per cent of the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 63 per cent of the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 62 per cent of the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 61 per cent of the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 60 per cent of the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 65 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 65 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 65 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 64 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas
Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 64 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 64 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 63 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 63 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 63 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 62 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 62 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 62 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 61 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 61 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 61 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 60 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 60 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
obstructs more than 60 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more
than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“width
of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main
channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“width
of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main
channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman,
Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 203
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“width
of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main
channel at low”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 203 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“weir
or other fishing equipment that, in the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
At
4:48 p.m., by unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 115(5), it was
agreed that the Committee continue to sit to finish with clause 173.
|
|
|
|
Clause 173
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott
Brison — 7; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle — 4.
At
4:48 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 115(5), the sitting was suspended.
At 5:39 p.m.,
the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 174,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 174, be amended by adding after line 16 on page 204 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(8)
The Environmental Damages Fund referred to in subsection (6) is to be
administered by a board chaired by the Minister and composed of one
representative from each province and territory, and three representatives
from each of the following:
(a)
Aboriginal peoples;
(b)
environmental non-governmental organizations.
(9)
The representatives appointed to the board referred to in subsection (8)
shall hold office without remuneration and shall not be reimbursed for
expenses incurred in the course of their duties.”
|
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
|
|
|
Clause 174
carried on division.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 175,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 25 on page 204
with the following:
|
|
|
|
““Aboriginal”,
in relation to a fishery, means a fishery for
the
harvesting of fish by an Aboriginal organization,
or
any of its members, for the purpose of using
the
fish as food or earning a moderate livelihood or
for
social or ceremonial purposes, and includes
a
traditional Aboriginal fishery, whether or not
it
is currently active, and an Aboriginal fishery
recognized
by a treaty or land”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5;NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 24 to 27 on page 204
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“the
fish as food, for social, ceremonial or traditional purposes;”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division:
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 204 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(2)
Within five years after the definition “Aboriginal”, as enacted by subsection
133(3) of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, comes into
force, a comprehensive review of the application and operation of the
definition shall be undertaken, in consultation with representatives of
Canada's Aboriginal peoples, by such committee of the House of Commons as may
be designated or established by that House for that purpose.
(3)
The committee referred to in subsection (2) shall, within a year after a review
is undertaken pursuant to that subsection or within such further time as may
be authorized by the House of Commons, submit a report on the review to
Parliament, including a statement of any changes that the committee
recommends.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 175
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert
Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
Clause 176
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison
— 7; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, — 4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 177,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 177, be amended by deleting line 30 on page 205 to line
11 on page 206.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 177, be amended by deleting line 30 on page 205 to line
11 on page 206.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude
Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback,
Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Paul Calandra — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 177
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Cathy McLeod, Paul Calandra, Scott Brison — 7;
NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 4.
At
5:49 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:57 p.m.,
the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
On
Clause 178,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“on
the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“two
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1;
NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley,
Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle —
10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“three
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“four
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“five
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“six
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“seven
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“eight
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“nine
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“10
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“11
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“12
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“13
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“14
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“15
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“16
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“17
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
“18
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“19
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“20
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“21
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“22
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“23
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“24
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“25
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“26
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“27
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“28
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“29
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“30
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“31
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“32
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“33
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“34
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“35
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“36
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“37
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“38
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène
Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“39
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“40
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“41
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“42
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“43
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“44
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“45
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“46
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“47
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“48
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“49
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“50
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“51
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“52
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“53
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“54
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“55
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“56
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène
Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“57
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“58
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“59
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“60
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“61
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“62
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“63
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“64
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“65
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“66
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“67
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“68
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“69
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“70
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“71
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“72
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“73
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin,
Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.
At
6:30 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
6:39 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At
6:39 p.m., Peggy Nash took the Chair.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“74
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“75
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“76
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“77
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“78
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“79
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“80
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“81
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“82
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“83
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“84
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“85
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“86
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“87
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“88
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“89
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“90
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“91
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“92
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“93
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“94
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“95
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“96
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“97
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“98
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“99
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“100
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“101
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“102
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“103
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“104
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave
MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“105
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“106
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“107
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“108
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“109
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“110
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“111
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“112
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“113
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“114
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“115
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“116
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“117
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“118
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“119
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“120
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“121
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“122
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“123
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“124
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“125
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“126
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“127
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“128
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“129
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“130
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“131
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“132
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“133
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“134
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“135
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“136
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“137
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“138
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“139
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“140
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“141
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“142
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“143
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“144
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“145
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“146
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“147
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“148
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“149
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“150
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“151
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“152
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“153
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“154
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“155
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“156
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“157
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“158
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“159
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 12 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“178.
Sections 173 to 176 come into force on the later of June 1, 2013 and the day
on which subsection 147(1) of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity
Act comes into force.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“160
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“161
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“162
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“163
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“164
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“165
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“166
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“167
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“168
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“169
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“170
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“171
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“172
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“173
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“174
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“175
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“176
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“177
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“178
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“179
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“180
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“181
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“182
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“183
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“184
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“185
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“186
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“187
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“188
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“189
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“190
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“191
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“192
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“193
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“194
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“195
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“196
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“197
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“198
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“199
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“200
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“201
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“202
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“203
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“204
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“205
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“206
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“207
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“208
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“209
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“210
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“211
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“212
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“213
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“214
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“215
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“216
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“217
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“218
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“219
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“220
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“221
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“222
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“223
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“224
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“225
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“226
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“227
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“228
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“229
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“230
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“231
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“232
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“233
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“234
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“235
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“236
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“237
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“238
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“239
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“240
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“241
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“242
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“243
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“244
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“245
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“246
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“247
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“248
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“249
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“250
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“251
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“252
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“253
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“254
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“255
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“256
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“257
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“258
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“259
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“260
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“261
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“262
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“263
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“264
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“265
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“266
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“267
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“268
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“269
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“270
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
“271
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“272
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“273
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“274
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“275
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“276
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“277
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“278
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“279
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“280
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“281
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“282
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“283
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“284
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“285
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“286
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“287
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“288
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“289
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“290
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“291
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Peggy Nash — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“292
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“293
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“294
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“295
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“296
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“297
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“298
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“299
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“300
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
At
8:28 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
8:40 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“301
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“302
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“303
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“304
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“305
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“306
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“307
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“308
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“309
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“310
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“311
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“312
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“313
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“314
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“316
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“317
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“318
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“319
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“320
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“321
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“322
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“323
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“324
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“325
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“326
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“327
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“328
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“329
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“330
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“331
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“332
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“333
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“334
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“335
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“336
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“337
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“338
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“339
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“340
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“341
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“342
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“343
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“344
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“345
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“346
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“347
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“348
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“349
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“350
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“351
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“352
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“353
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“354
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“355
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul
Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“356
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella
Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“357
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“358
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“359
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“360
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“361
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“362
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“363
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“364
days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
|
|
Clause
178 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Joy
Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie,
Stella Ambler — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault — 3.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 179,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 206 with
the following:
|
|
“179.
The Bridge to Strengthen Trade and Avoid Legal Recourse Act,”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 206 with
the following:
|
|
“179.
The Detroit River International Crossing Act,”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
“1.
This Act may be cited as the Bridge To Strengthen Trade and Avoid Legal
Recourse Act.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 206
with the following:
|
|
“1.
This Act may be cited as the Detroit River International Crossing Act.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 206 with
the following:
|
|
“approaches
to the bridge, as the project is understood to exist on the day on which this
Act receives royal assent.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 34 to 36 on page 207
with the following:
|
|
“3.
(1) Section 6 of the International Bridges and”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 28 on page 208 the
following:
|
|
“(3)
The exemptions provided for in subsections (1) and (2) apply in respect of
obligations that accrue after the 30th anniversary of the coming into force
of this section.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 208 with
the following:
|
|
“published
in the Canada Gazette and posted on the website of Transport Canada.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 209 with
the following:
|
|
“tion,
they must file with the Minister, and receive his or her approval for, a plan
that”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 209 with
the following:
|
|
“(2)
The person must hold a public consultation and consult with the Minis-”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 18 on page 209 the
following:
|
|
“(3)
After the plan is filed with the Minister, it is posted on the website of
Transport Canada.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 209 with
the following:
|
|
“with
the Minister, and receive his or her approval for, a plan that includes all”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 209 with
the following:
|
|
“work,
undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 209 with
the following:
|
|
“(2)
The person must hold a public consultation and consult with the Minis-”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 40 on page 209 the
following:
|
|
“(4)
After the plan is filed with the Minister, it is posted on the website of
Transport Canada.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 40 on page 209 the
following:
|
|
“(4)
Before a person begins to carry on any work, undertaking or activity for a
purpose referred to in subsection (1) that is likely to affect fish habitat
in an Aboriginal fishery, as defined in subsection 133(3) of the Jobs,
Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, the person must consult any
Aboriginal organization whose members harvest fish from that habitat.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 210 with the
following:
|
|
“with
the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a plan that includes
all”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 210 with the
following:
|
|
“the
residences of its individuals and the Minister must approve the plan.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 10 and 11 on page 210
with the following:
|
|
“(2)
The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with the
Minister of the Environment before filing it.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 11 on page 210 the
following:
|
|
“(2.1)
The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the
Department of Transport.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 210 with
the following:
|
|
“construction,
they must file with the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 210 with
the following:
|
|
“to
the construction and the Minister must approve the plan.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 210 the
following:
|
|
“(2)
The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with
conservation experts and the Minister of the Environment before filing the
plan.
(3)
The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the
Department of Transport.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 210 with
the following:
|
|
“the
Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a plan that includes all
measures to”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 36 and 37 on page 210
with the following:
|
|
“(2)
The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with the
Windsor Port Authority before filing it.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 37 on page 210 the
following:
|
|
“(3)
The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the
Department of Transport.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 211 with the
following:
|
|
“with
the Minister and, when approved by the Minister, it”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 8 on page 211 the
following:
|
|
“(4)
The amended plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of
the Department of Transport.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 211 with
the following:
|
|
“apply
to the designation, but the designation must be published in the Canada
Gazette and posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 212 with the
following:
|
|
“the
Omnibus Act No. 2, 2012 is deemed to”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 8 on page 213 the
following:
|
|
“(4)
The agreement must be tabled in both Houses of Parliament and posted on the
website of the Department of Transport.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 28 to 30 on page 213
with the following:
|
|
“not
more than $50,000; and
(b)
in any other case, to a fine of not more than $5,000,000.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 214 the
following:
|
|
“29.
The Minister must table annually in each House of Parliament a report on
measures taken to ensure compliance with plans filed under sections 7 to 11,
on agreements entered into by the Minister under section 22 and on the
prosecution of offences under section 24.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 179
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7;
NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault
— 4.
|
|
Clause 180
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7;
NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault
— 4.
|
|
Clause 181
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7;
NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault
— 4.
|
|
Clause 182
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7;
NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault
— 4.
|
On Clause 183,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 183, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 215
with the following:
|
|
“3.
Section 6 of the”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 183
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7;
NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault
— 4.
|
|
On Clause 184,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 184, be amended by replacing line 41 on page 215 with
the following:
|
|
“the
work, undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 184, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 216 with
the following:
|
|
“the
work, undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause
184 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7;
NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault
— 4.
|
|
Clause 185
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 186 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 187
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 188
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 189
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 190 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 191
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 192 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 193
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 194 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 195
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 196
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 197
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 198
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 199
carried on the following recorded division: Y YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 200 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 201
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 202
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
On Clause 203,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 203, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 39 on page 225
with the following:
|
|
“subsection
(1), whenever any Bill is introduced in the House of Commons to amend this
Act in a manner that would in the opinion of the Chief Actuary materially
affect any of the estimates contained in the most recent report made under
that subsection, the Chief Actuary shall prepare a report as set out in
subsection (3) and provide it to the Minister of Finance, who shall table
that report before the House within five sitting days after receiving it.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 203
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 204
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 205
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
Clause 206
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —
3.
|
|
Clause 207
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —
3.
|
|
On Clause 208,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 208, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 3 on page 228
with the following:
|
|
“in
accordance with the regulations and is submitted to the Minister by the
council of the band.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 208, be amended by deleting lines 16 to 19 on page 228.
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 208, be amended by adding after line 19 on page 228 the
following:
|
“40.2
The Minister shall prepare an annual report on the number of requests for
designation or surrender, and the number of such requests that resulted in a
designation or surrender, during that year and, within four months after the
end of each year, shall cause a copy of the report to be laid before each
House of Parliament.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 208
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —
3.
|
|
On Clause 209,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 209, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 228 the
following:
|
“(2)
Within five years after this Division comes into force, a comprehensive
review of the provisions and operation of this Division shall be undertaken,
in consultation with representatives of the First Nations, by such committee
of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by that House
for that purpose.
(3)
The committee referred to in subsection (2) shall, within a year after a
review is undertaken pursuant to that subsection or within such further time
as may be authorized by the House of Commons, submit a report on the review
to Parliament, including a statement of any changes that the committee recommends.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 209
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —
3.
|
|
On Clause 210,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 228 with
the following:
|
|
“Appeal,
$325,300;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 229 with
the following:
|
|
“(a)
the Chief Justice of Quebec, $325,300;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 229 with
the following:
|
“Appeal,
$296,700 each;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 229 with
the following:
|
“$325,300;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 230 with the
following:
|
“Appeal,
$296,700 each;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 230 with
the following:
|
“$325,300;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 230 with
the following:
|
“Appeal,
$ 296,700 each;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 24 and 25 on page 230
with the following:
|
“(a)
the Chief Justice of Manitoba, $325,300;
(b)
the six Judges of Appeal, $296,700 each;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 230 with
the following:
|
“$325,300;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 230 with
the following:
|
“(b)
the 12 Justices of Appeal, $296,700 each;”
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 231 with the
following:
|
“Island,
$325,300;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 231 with the
following:
|
“Division,
$296,700 each;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 231
with the following:
|
“$325,300;
(b)
the six Judges of Appeal, $296,700 each;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 28 and 29 on page 231
with the following:
|
“(a)
the Chief Justice of Alberta, $325,300;
(b)
the 10 Justices of Appeal, $296,700 each;”
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 2 to 4 on page 232
with the following:
|
“Labrador,
$325,300;
(b)
the five Judges of Appeal, $296,700 each;
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
Whereupon,
Kevin Lamoureux appealed the decision of the Chair.
The
question “Shall the decision be sustained?” was put and the decision was
sustained by a show of hands: YEAS: 10; NAYS: 1.
|
|
Clause 210
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 212, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 21 on page 233
with the following:
|
|
“after
receiving it.
(8)
If the Minister of Justice disagrees with the recommendations of the
Commission, the response to the report shall provide the reasons.
(9)
Within 30 days after the issuance of the response, the Minister of Justice
shall try to resolve the disagreement with the Commission.
(10)
The Minister of Justice shall cause the tabling in each House of Parliament
of a report prepared by the Minister and the Commission.
(11)
The report shall be referred
by
that House to a committee of that
House
that is designated or established by that
House
for the purpose of considering matters
relating
to justice.
(12)
Following issuance of the response referred to in subsection (7) or the
tabling of the report referred to in subsection (10), if applicable, the
Minister of Justice shall, within a reasonable period, cause to be prepared
and introduced a bill to implement the response or the report, as the case
may be.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
Clause 211
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS:
— 0.
|
|
On
Clause 212,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 212, be amended by replacing lines 18 and 19 on page 233
with the following:
|
|
“after
receiving it. Following that response he or she shall, within a reasonable”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine
Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry
Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 212
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin
Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —
3.
|
|
Clause 213
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 214
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: —
0.
|
|
Clause 215
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 216
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: —
0.
|
|
Clause 217
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: —
0.
|
|
Clause 218
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: —
0.
|
|
Clause 219
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 220
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 221
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 222
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
On Clause 223,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 223, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 20 on page 239 with the following:
|
|
“the
employee is entitled under this Part, twelve”
(b)
by replacing line 24 on page 239 with the following:
|
|
“(b)
in the case of any other complaint, twelve”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 223
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 224
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
On Clause 225,
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 225, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 244 the
following:
|
|
“251.102
(1) The Minister shall, on or before December 31 next following the end of
each fiscal year, prepare a report on the reviews conducted under 251.101(3)
that includes the following information:
(a)
the number of reviews where the payment order or the notice was confirmed;
(b)
the number of reviews where the payment order or the notice was rescinded or
varied; and
(c)
an assessment of the length of time required to complete the reviews.
(2)
The Minister must, during the fiscal year after the fiscal year for which the
report is prepared, cause the report to be laid before each House of
Parliament.”
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn
Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.
|
|
Clause 225
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 226 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: —
0.
|
|
Clause 227
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 228
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 229
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 230
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 231 carried
on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: —
0.
At
10:14 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 10:31 p.m.,
the sitting resumed.
|
On Clause 232,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika
Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler,
Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler,
Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
At
11:10 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
11:14 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella
Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
“into
force 154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
“into
force 155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark
Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay,
Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.
At
12:23 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
12:39 a.m., the sitting resumed.
At
12:39 a.m., James Rajotte took the Chair.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik
Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik
Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler,
Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
At
12:57 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
1:14 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“into
force 364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Philip
Toone, Hoang Mai, Tarik Brahmi — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 232
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Philip Toone, Hoang Mai, Tarik Brahmi, Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards — 11; NAYS — 0.
|
|
Clause 233
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod,
Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip
Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 234
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 235
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 236
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 237
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 238
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 239
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 240
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 241
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 242
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 243
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 244
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 245
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 246
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 247
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 248
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 249
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 250
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 251
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 252
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 253
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 254
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 255
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 256
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 257
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 258
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 259
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 260
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 261
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 262
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 263
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril
Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe
— 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 264
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 265,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 18 to 22 on page 258.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 18 to 22 on page 258.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 23 to 28 on page 258.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 265
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 259 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“given
under subsection (1) and, with respect to any personal information given that
is not necessary for lawful investigation activities, establishing the requirement
to dispose of that information within two years after it is collected.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 266
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 267,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 267, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 260 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“conveyance
and shall establish, with respect to any personal information that is given
as prescribed but that is not necessary for enforcement or intelligence
activities, the requirement to dispose of that information within two years
after it was collected.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 267
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 268,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 268, be amended by adding after line 19 on page 260 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(2)
No later than three years after the coming into force of sections 264 and
266, the appropriate committee of each House, as determined by the rules of
that House, is to review the impact of those sections on privacy rights.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 268
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 269
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 270
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 271
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 272
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 273
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 274
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 275
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
On
Clause 276,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 263 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“province
that the council considers appro-”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 263 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“in
that province that the council considers”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, —
10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing lines 32 to 35 on page 263
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(3.1)
No person shall be included on a list referred to in subparagraph (3)(a)(i)
or (ii) without the approval of the Minister.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 276
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 277
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 278
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 279
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 280
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
On
Clause 281,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 281, be amended by adding after line 39 on page 265 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“51.
(1) The Minister shall prepare an annual report on the hazardous materials
information review activities during that year and, within four months after
the termination of each year, shall cause a copy of the
report
to be laid before each House of Parliament.
(2)
The Minister shall send a copy of the
report
to the lieutenant governor of each
province
forthwith after a copy of the report is laid before a House of Parliament
under subsection
(1).”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D.
Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 281
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 282
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 283
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 284
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 285
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 286
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 287
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 288
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne
D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6;
NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
289 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake
Richards — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
At
2:52 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
3:18 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
Clause
290 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
291 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
292 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
293 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
294 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
295 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
296 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
297 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn,
Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 298,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks— 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod,
Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod,
Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
“comes
into force 181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod,
Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David
Wilks — 10.
At
5:02 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
5:15 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe,
Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy
McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“comes
into force 364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
Clause 298
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
299 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
300 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
301 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
302 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
303 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
304 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
305 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
306 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 307,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 272 with the
following:
|
|
“(8.91)
If an employer’s premium is $15,000”
|
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 272 with the
following:
|
|
“P2
— (P1 — P3)”
|
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by adding after line 14 on page 272 the
following:
|
|
“P3
is the amount of the employer’s portion of the premium refunded for 2011.”
|
|
The
Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the
financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of
Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.
|
|
|
|
Clause
307 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 308,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing lines 32 and 33 on page 272
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“system
or, in accordance with the regulations, by non-electronic means. The”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(1.02)
The requirements established in accordance with subsection (1.01), including
any regulations made under subsection 14(3), only apply for a period of 12
months from the date on which subsection (1.01) comes into force and, within
a further period of six months, the impact and effectiveness of the
electronic travel authorization must be assessed and the assessment reported
to each House of Parliament.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
308 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 309,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 12 on page 273
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“the
regulations must include provisions to provide for non-electronic means of
application.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
309 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 310,
|
|
|
|
Clause 310
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 311,
|
|
|
|
Clause 311
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5
|
|
|
|
On Clause 312,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 312, be amended by adding after line 39 on page 273 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(3)
Within 12 months after the coming into force of subsection (2), a review
shall be conducted of the fees for the provision of services described in
that subsection and of the merit of applying the User Fees Act to
those fees, and the review shall be compiled into a report to be tabled in
each House of Parliament.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
312 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 313,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by adding after line 24 on page 274 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(4)
Within 12 months after the coming into force of subsection (3), a review
shall be conducted of the fees for the provision of services described in
that subsection and of the merit of applying the User Fees Act to
those fees, and the review shall be compiled into a report to be tabled in
each House of Parliament.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
313 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
Clause
314 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On New Clause
314.1,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45 be amended by adding after line 19 on page 275 the following new
clause:
|
|
|
|
“314.1
Section 308 comes into force one year after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 315,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315.
The portion of subsection 8(1) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing
Corporation Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
8.
(1) No person shall be appointed or continue as President or as a director if
that person”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy
Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315.
Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act
is replaced by the following:
(c)
has reached the age of seventy-five years; or”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315.
Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act
is replaced by the following:
(c)
has reached the age of eighty years; or”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315.
Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act
is replaced by the following:
(c)
has reached the age of eighty-five years; or”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315.
Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act
is replaced by the following:
(c)
has reached the age of ninety years; or”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315.
Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act
is replaced by the following:
(c)
has reached the age of ninety-five years; or”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp,
Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“315.
Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act
is replaced by the following:
(c)
has reached the age of one hundred years; or”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.
|
|
|
|
Clause
315 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril
Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks
— 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 316,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 316, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 275 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“1.
This Act may be cited as the Partial Navigation”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
316 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 317,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(7)
Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by
adding the following:
(2)
When considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister must
consider if it would protect the public right of navigation, including the
exercise of that right, and be consistent with the purpose of this Act.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(7)
Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by
adding the following:
(2)
When considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister shall
consider if it would protect the public right of navigation, including the
exercise of that right, and be consistent with the purpose of this Act.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
317 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On New Clause
317.1,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45 be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following new
clause:
|
|
|
|
“317.1
The Act is amended by adding the following after section 2.1:
PURPOSE
2.2
The purpose of this Act is
(a)
to recognize that the federal government has a role as trustee of public
resources; and
(b)
to protect navigation by protecting all navigable waters in Canada and the
water levels and water flow necessary for navigation.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45 be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following new
clause:
|
|
|
|
“317.1
The Act is amended by adding the following after section 2.1:
PURPOSE
2.2
The purpose of this Act is
(a)
to recognize that the federal government has a role as trustee of public
resources; and
(b)
to protect navigation by protecting all navigable waters in Canada and the
water levels and water flow necessary for navigation.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 318,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 25 on page 277 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“SPECIAL
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2.2
(1) There is established a committee to be known as the Special Advisory
Committee consisting of the following representatives:
(a)
two employees of the Department of Transport designated by the Minister, one
of whom is assigned to the Navigable Waters Protection Program;
(b)
one employee of the Department of the Environment designated by the Minister
of the Environment;
(c)
one employee of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans designated by the
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans; and
(d)
one representative of the Canadian Marine Advisory Council designated by that
council.
(2)
The committee shall exercise all the powers and perform all the duties and functions
of
the Minister under this Act, except those referred to in section 27 and in
subsections 28(2) and 29(3).”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Tarik Brahmi — 2; NAYS: Mike Allen,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang
Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 29 on page 277 with the following:
|
|
“navigable
water”
|
|
(b)
by deleting line 32 on page 277 to line 15 on page 278.
|
|
(c)
by replacing line 20 on page 278 with the following:
|
|
“navigable
water”
|
|
(d)
by replacing line 42 on page 279 with the following:
|
|
“navigable
water that”
|
|
(e)
by replacing line 29 on page 281 with the following:
|
|
“any
navigable water”
|
|
(f)
by replacing line 4 on page 282 with the following:
|
|
“navigable
water that”
|
|
(g)
by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 282 with the following:
|
|
“or
across any navigable water only if the construction, placement, ”
|
|
(h)
by replacing line 35 on page 283 with the following:
|
|
“shall
immediately”
|
|
(i)
by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 284 with the following:
|
|
“through
or across any navigable water to repair, alter or remove it”
|
|
(j)
by replacing line 33 on page 284 with the following:
|
|
“water
— shall”
|
|
(k)
by replacing line 15 on page 285 with the following:
|
|
“—
to secure,”
|
|
(l)
by replacing line 37 on page 285 with the following:
|
|
“minor
water — or”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 8 to 10 on page 278
with the following:
|
|
“(3)
The Minister shall accept the request if he or she determines that it would
not, when assessed against the factors listed in subsection 5(4), substantially
interfere with navigation, in which case the work is”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 8 to 10 on page 278
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(3)
The Minister shall give favourable consideration to accepting the request if
he or she determines, taking into account the factors listed in subsection
5(4), that it would not substantially interfere with navigation, in which
case the work is”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 15 on page 278 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(4)
The Minister shall provide the owner with written reasons for any decision
made in response to a request under subsection (1) and shall make those
reasons publicly accessible.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 15 on page 278 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(4)
The Minister shall provide the owner with written reasons for any decision
made in response to a request under subsection (1) and shall make those
reasons publicly accessible.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 16 on page 279
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“Minister
(a)
may require from the owner any additional information that the Minister considers
appropriate; and
(b)
must require from the owner the deposit of any information specified”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 16 to 23 on page 279
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“(b)
the deposit of all plans in the local land registry
or
land titles office or any other place specified
by
the Minister and the provision of notice of the proposed work and of the
deposit of the plans by advertising
in
the Canada Gazette and in one or more newspapers that are published in
or near the place where the work is to be constructed.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 279 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“the
owner. The Minister shall provide to the owner and make publicly accessible
written reasons for any determination made in relation to the proposal,
including a decision to issue or refuse to issue an approval under section
6.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 279 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“the
owner. The Minister shall provide to the owner and make publicly accessible
written reasons for any determination made in relation to the proposal,
including a decision to issue or refuse to issue an approval under section
6.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 280 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“Minister
and made publicly accessible 30 days before the transfer takes place.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 280 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“Minister
and made publicly accessible 30 days before the transfer takes place.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
318 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 319,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 319, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 286
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
in any minor water — so that, in the Minister's opinion, it”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi,
Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn,
Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
319 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 320,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 320, be amended by replacing lines 11 to 13 on page 287
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“abandoned
in any navigable water, other than in any minor water, the Minister may,
under the restric-”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
320 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 321,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended
(a)
by deleting lines 9 and 10 on page 289.
|
|
|
|
(b)
by adding after line 7 on page 290 the following:
|
|
“(1.1)
The Governor in Council must make regulations respecting the water levels and
water flow necessary for navigation.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended
(a)
by deleting lines 9 and 10 on page 289.
|
|
|
|
(b)
by adding after line 7 on page 290 the following:
|
|
“(1.1)
The Governor in Council must make regulations respecting the water levels and
water flow necessary for navigation.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended
(a)
by replacing lines 15 to 17 on page 289 with the following:
|
|
“through
or across any navigable waters, other than any minor waters;”
|
|
(b)
by replacing lines 10 to 12 on page 290 with the following:
|
|
“(b)
designating any navigable waters, in whole or in part, as minor waters;”
|
|
(c)
by replacing lines 17 to 19 on page 290 with the following:
|
|
“through
or across any navigable waters, other than minor waters; and”
|
|
(d)
by deleting lines 1 to 21 on page 291.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:
|
|
“(a)
designating any works as minor works if it is in the
public
interest to do so;”
|
|
(b)
by replacing line 12 on page 290 with the following:
|
|
“listed
in the schedule if it is in the public interest to do so;”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended
(a)
by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:
|
|
“(a)
designating any works as minor works if it is in the
public
interest to do so;”
|
|
|
|
(b)
by replacing line 12 on page 290 with the following:
|
|
“listed
in the schedule if it is in the public interest to do so;”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 13 on page 291 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(d)
is required for the protection of fish habitat; or
(e)
is required for the protection of the environment.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 13 on page 291 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(2.1)
The Governor in Council shall, by regulation, add to the schedule, in
relation to a request that is accepted under section 4, any water in, on,
over, under, through or across which the work is constructed or placed, or
proposed to be constructed or placed.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 21 on page 291 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(5)
Following any amendment to the schedule, the Minister must publish in the Canada
Gazette all scientific and administrative research and studies that he or
she considered before recommending the amendment.
(6)
The requirement referred to in subsection (5) also applies to the schedule as
it reads on the day on which this section comes into force.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik
Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie
Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
321 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
|
|
|
|
Clause 322
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone —
5.
At
6:32 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 6:42 a.m.,
the sitting resumed.
At 6:42 a.m.,
Peggy Nash took the Chair.
|
|
|
|
Clause
323 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
324 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 325
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 326
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 327
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 328,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 294 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“RIGHT
OF ACTION
39.01
An individual may bring an action for damages in public nuisance in respect
of any navigable waters, including those listed in the schedule, without the consent
of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages if
(a)
the individual has suffered or will likely suffer damages as a result of the
public nuisance; and
(b)
the public nuisance has interfered or will likely interfere with the individual's
own right of navigation.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne
Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod,
Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 294 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“RIGHT
OF ACTION
39.01
An individual may bring an action for damages in public nuisance in respect
of any navigable waters, including those listed in the schedule, without the
consent of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages if
(a)
the individual has suffered or will likely suffer damages as a result of the
public nuisance; and
(b)
the public nuisance has interfered or will likely interfere with the
individual's own right of navigation.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston
— 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 294 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“$50,000
in any other case.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne
Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod,
Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 294 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“$60,000
in any other case.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne
Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod,
Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 294 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“$70,000
in any other case.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne
Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod,
Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
328 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 329
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 330
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril
Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 331,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 331.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the
following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen,
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Wayne Marston,
Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 9.
|
|
|
|
Clause
331 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
On New Clause
331.1,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45 be amended by adding after line 27 on page 300 the following new
clause:
|
|
|
|
“Review
331.1
Two years after the coming into force of this section, the Minister must
undertake a review of the capacity of the federal and provincial court
systems to absorb the increased workload and of the the effect the Navigation
Protection Act has had on those court systems.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne
Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod,
Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 332,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 332, be amended by deleting lines 19 to 33 on page 301.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne
Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod,
Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
332 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
333 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
334 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
335 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
336 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
337 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
338 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
339 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
340 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
341 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
342 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
343 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
344 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
345 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
346 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
347 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
348 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
349 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
350 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
351 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
352 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
353 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
354 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS:
Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.
At
7:00 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
7:03 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
Clause
355 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike
Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff
Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
356 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
357 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 358,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 309 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“within
30 days after the decision that is the”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 3;
NAYS: Mike Allen, Guy Caron, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 7.
|
|
|
|
Clause
358 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
359 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
360 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
361 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 362,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 362, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 310 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“(2)
This section may not be brought into force until after the Minister
designated for the purpose of the Canada Grain Act has tabled a report
in the House of Commons that contains the following information:
(a)
the expected annual cost to the Commission of requiring licensees to obtain a
prescribed security in accordance with section 45.1 of the Act;
(b)
the expected annual cost savings for producers of requiring licensees to
obtain a prescribed security; and
(c)
the percentage of grain produced that is expected to be covered by a
prescribed security.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff
Regan — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 362
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu,
Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis
Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
363 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
364 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
365 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
366 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
367 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
368 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 369,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 314 with
the following:
|
|
|
|
“cause
the grain to be officially inspected or inspected by a third party”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff
Regan — 6; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave
Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
369 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
370 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
371 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
372 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
373 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
374 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
375 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
376 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
377 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
378 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
379 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
380 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
381 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
382 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
383 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
384 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
385 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
386 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
387 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
388 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
389 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
390 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
391 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
392 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
393 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
394 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
395 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
396 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
397 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
398 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
399 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
400 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
401 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
402 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
403 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
404 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
405 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
406 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
407 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
408 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause
409 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS:
Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
On Clause 410,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force on the day following the day this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force two days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force three days after the day on which this
Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force four days after the day on which this
Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force five days after the day on which this
Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force six days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force seven days after the day on which this
Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force eight days after the day on which this
Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force nine days after the day on which this
Act receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 10 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 11 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 12 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 13 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 14 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 15 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 16 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 17 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 18 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 19 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 20 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 21 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 22 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 23 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 24 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 25 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 26 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 27 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 28 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 29 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 30 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 31 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 32 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 33 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 34 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 35 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 36 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 37 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 38 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 39 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 40 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 41 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 42 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 43 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 44 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 45 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 46 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 47 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 48 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 49 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 50 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 51 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 52 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 53 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 54 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 55 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 56 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 57 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 58 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 59 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 60 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 61 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 62 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 63 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 64 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 65 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 66 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 67 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 68 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 69 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 70 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 71 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu
Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 72 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 73 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 74 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 75 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 76 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 77 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 78 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 79 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 80 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 81 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 82 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 83 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 84 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 85 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 86 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 87 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 88 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 89 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 90 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 91 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 92 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 93 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 94 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 95 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 96 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 97 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 98 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 99 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 100 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 101 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 102 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 103 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 104 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 105 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 106 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 107 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 108 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 109 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 110 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 111 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 112 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 113 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 114 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 115 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 116 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 117 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 118 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 119 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 120 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 121 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 122 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 123 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 124 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 125 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 126 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 127 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 128 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 129 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 130 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 131 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 132 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 133 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 134 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 135 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 136 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 137 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 138 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 139 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 140 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 141 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 142 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 143 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 144 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 145 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 146 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 147 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 148 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 149 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 150 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 151 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 152 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 153 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 154 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 155 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 156 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 157 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 158 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 159 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 160 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 161 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 162 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 163 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 164 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 165 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 166 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 167 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 168 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
At
8:29 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
8:37 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 169 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 170 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 171 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 172 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 173 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 174 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 175 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 176 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 177 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 178 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 179 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 180 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 181 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 182 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 183 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 184 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 185 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 186 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 187 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 188 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 189 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 190 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 191 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 192 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 193 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 194 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 195 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 196 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 197 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 198 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 199 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 200 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 201 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 202 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 203 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 204 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 205 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 206 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 207 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 208 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 209 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 210 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 211 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 212 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 213 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 214 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 215 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 216 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 217 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 218 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 219 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 220 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 221 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 222 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 223 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 224 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 225 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 226 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen,
Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 227 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 228 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 229 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 230 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 231 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 232 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 233 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 234 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 235 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 236 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 237 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 238 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 239 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas,
Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 240 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 241 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 242 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 243 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 244 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 245 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 246 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 247 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 248 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 249 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 250 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 251 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 252 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
At
9:05 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
9:07 a.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 253 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van
Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 254 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 255 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 256 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 257 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 258 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 259 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 260 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 261 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 262 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 263 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron,
Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 264 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 265 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 266 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 267 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 268 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 269 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 270 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 271 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 272 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 273 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 274 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 275 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 276 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 277 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 278 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 279 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 280 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 281 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 282 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 283 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 284 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 285 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 286 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 287 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 288 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 289 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 290 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 291 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 292 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan
Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 293 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 294 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 295 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 296 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 297 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 298 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 299 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 300 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 301 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 302 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 303 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 304 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 305 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 306 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 307 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 308 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 309 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 310 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 311 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 312 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 313 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 314 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 315 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 316 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 317 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 318 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 319 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 320 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 321 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 322 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 323 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 324 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 325 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 326 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 327 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 328 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 329 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 330 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 331 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 332 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 333 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 334 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 335 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 336 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 337 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 338 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 339 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 340 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 341 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 342 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 343 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 344 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 345 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 346 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 347 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 348 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 349 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 350 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 351 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 352 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 353 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 354 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 355 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 356 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 357 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 358 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 359 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 360 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 361 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 362 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 363 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane
Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331
with the following:
|
|
|
|
“than
sections 390 to 409, come into force 364 days after the day on which this Act
receives royal assent.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston,
Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause 410
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
|
|
Clause 411 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 412 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 413 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 414 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 415 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 416 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 417 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 418 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 419 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 420 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 421 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 422 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 423 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 424 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 425 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette — 9; NAYS: Wayne Marston — 1.
|
|
Clause 426 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 427 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 428 carried on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter
Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 429 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
Clause 430 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 431 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.
|
|
On Clause 432,
|
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 432, be
amended by deleting lines 43 and 44 on page 335.
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 432, be
amended by deleting lines 43 and 44 on page 335.
|
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
Clause 432 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron,
Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 433 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 434 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 435 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 436 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 437 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
On Clause 438,
|
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 438, be
amended by replacing lines 25 to 27 on page 342 with the following:
|
“(3) After receiving the report
referred to in section 66.3 and its summary, the Minister shall cause them to
be laid before each House of”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 438, be
amended by adding after line 29 on page 342 the following:
|
“(4) The report and summary laid
before Parliament stand permanently referred to any parliamentary committee
that may be designated or established to review matters relating to
employment insurance.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
Clause 438 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
Clause 439 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 440 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 441 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 442 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 443 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 444 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
On Clause 445,
|
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 445, be
amended by adding after line 15 on page 348 the following:
|
“(2) After receiving a report
submitted under subsection (1), the Minister shall cause it to be laid before
each
House of Parliament on any of the next
15 days
during which that House is sitting.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
Clause 445 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.
|
|
Clause 446 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 447 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 448 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 449 carried on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter
Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 450 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 451 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 452 carried on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter
Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 453 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 454 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 455 carried on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter
Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 456 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 457 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 458 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 459 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 460, be
amended by replacing lines 43 and 44 on page 350 with the following:
|
“General of Canada, who must submit a
report of the audit to the Minister.
(2) After receiving the report
referred to in subsection (1), the Minister shall cause it to be laid before
each House of Parliament on any of the next 15 days during which that House
is sitting.”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette,
Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 3; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas,
Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron — 7.
|
|
Clause 460 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 461 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 462 carried on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter
Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 463 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
Clause 464 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 465 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 466 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 467 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 468 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 469 carried on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter
Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 470 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 471 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 472 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 473 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
On Clause 474,
|
|
Clause 474 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott
Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 475 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 476 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 477 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 478 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 479 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 480 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 481 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 482 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 483 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 484 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 485 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 486 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 487 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 488 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 489 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 490 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 491 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 492 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 493 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 494 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 495 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 496 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 497 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 498 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 499 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 500 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 501 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 502 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 503 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: M Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 504 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 505 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 506 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 507 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 508 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 509 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 510 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 511 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 512 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 513 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 514 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.
|
|
Clause 515 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4.
|
|
On Clause 516,
|
|
That Bill C-45, in Clause 516, be
amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 389 with the following:
|
“Agency must consult with the
President of the Treasury”
|
The question was put on the amendment and
it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette,
Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 6.
|
|
Clause 516 carried on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace,
Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 6; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan
Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 4
|
|
Schedule 1 carried on division.
|
|
On Schedule 2,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 2.
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover,
Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Denis
Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 9.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 6 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“6.1”
Column
1: “Crystal Lake”
Column
2: “51o27'29" N, 120o45'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 6 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“6.1”
Column
1: “Sheridan Lake”
Column
2: “51o31'09" N, 120o53'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 6 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“6.1”
Column
1: “Thomson Lake”
Column
2: “51o49'59" N, 120o58'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“7.1”
Column
1: “Eugene Lake”
Column
2: “51o27'00" N, 120o42'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“7.1”
Column
1: “Montana Lake”
Column
2: “51o25'59" N, 120o39'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“7.1”
Column
1: “Rutherford Lake”
Column
2: “51o28'00" N, 120o44'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“7.1”
Column
1: “Webb Lakes”
Column
2: “51o28'00" N, 120o40'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Akehurst Lake”
Column
2: “51o19'59" N, 120o28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Azure Lake”
Column
2: “52o22'59" N, 120o07'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item
: “8.1”
Column
1: “Bonaparte Lake”
Column
2: “51o15'00" N, 120o34'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Caribou Lake”
Column
2: “51o01'59" N, 120o28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Caverhill Lake”
Column
2: “51o19'59" N, 120o24'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Clearwater Lake”
Column
2: “52o16'00" N, 120o13'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Heller Lake”
Column
2: “51o09'29" N, 120o34'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Lupin Lakes”
Column
2: “51o16'59" N, 120o22'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Machete Lake”
Column
2: “51o22'59" N, 120o34'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Mahood Lake”
Column
2: “51o55'00" N, 120o24'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Mayson Lake”
Column
2: “51o13'44" N, 120o24'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne
Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike
Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
At
10:38 a.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
12:19 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At
12:19 p.m., James Rajotte took the Chair.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Otter Lake”
Column
2: “51o31'59" N, 120o40'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo,
Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Tobe Lake”
Column
2: “51o25'59" N, 120o32'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“8.1”
Column
1: “Wilson Lake”
Column
2: “51o31'00" N, 120o39'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 10 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“10.1”
Column
1: “Adams Lake”
Column
2: “51o10'00" N, 119o34'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 10 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“10.1”
Column
1: “Murtle Lake”
Column
2: “52o07'59" N, 119o37'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 2 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 15 on page 400 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“15.1”
Column
1: “Seine River”
Column
2: “49o53'58" N, 97o08'21" W”
Column
3: “49o22'37" N, 96o06'31" W”
Column
4: “From the Sandilands Provincial Forest to the Red River Spillway”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 17 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“17.1”
Column
1: “Lesser Slave Lake”
Column
2: “55o26' 25" N, 115o29'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 17 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“17.1”
Column
1: “Peerless Lake”
Column
2: “56o36'59" N, 114o40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 17 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“17.1”
Column
1: “Utikuma Lake”
Column
2: “55o49'59" N, 115o25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“18.1”
Column
1: “Calling Lake”
Column
2: “55o14'31" N, 113o18'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace,
Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“18.1”
Column
1: “Lac La Biche”
Column
2: “54o51'22" N, 112o03'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“18.1”
Column
1: “Lake Claire”
Column
2: “58o34'59" N, 112o04'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“18.1”
Column
1: “North Wabasca Lake”
Column
2: “56o02'54" N, 113o54'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 19 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“19.1”
Column
1: “Lake Tobin”
Column
2: “53o35'00" N, 103o30'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 19 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“19.1”
Column
1: “Winnifred Lake”
Column
2: “59o13'52" N, 110o24'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Horners Lake”
Column
2: “50°13'30" N, 100°01'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Slater Lake”
Column
2: “50°42'49" N, 100°10'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mispetoon Lake”
Column
2: “52°30'31" N, 100°10'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kelly Lake”
Column
2: “52°06'58" N, 100°10'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cedar Lake”
Column
2: “53°19'45" N, 100°10'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Polly Lake”
Column
2: “49°00'49" N, 100°12'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mwoak Lake”
Column
2: “55°35'36" N, 100°12'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Karrak Lake”
Column
2: “67°15'00" N, 100°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Slaughterhouse Lakes”
Column
2: “49°01'16" N, 100°17'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Morins Lake”
Column
2: “49°00'26" N, 100°18'15" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace,
Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Garry Lake”
Column
2: “65°58'00" N, 100°18'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Stadnyks Lake”
Column
2: “50°38'04" N, 100°20'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Angikuni Lake”
Column
2: “62°12'00" N, 99°59'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Morton Lake”
Column
2: “50°32'54" N, 100°23'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pump Lake”
Column
2: “56°53'28" N, 100°26'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Granville Lake”
Column
2: “56°17'59" N, 100°28'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Blue Lake”
Column
2: “49°04'58" N, 100°30'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Warrens Lake”
Column
2: “50°25'52" N, 100°30'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Skunk Lake”
Column
2: “54°08'00" N, 100°34'37" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bower Lake”
Column
2: “49°03'21" N, 100°04'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kapiskitowakomak Lake”
Column
2: “53°57'53" N, 100°40'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Swan Lake”
Column
2: “52°29'58" N, 100°43'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dunsheath Lake”
Column
2: “57°03'17" N, 100°46'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Garry Lake”
Column
2: “65°50'00" N, 100°48'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Armark Lake”
Column
2: “66°29'00" N, 100°50'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Triple Lake”
Column
2: “51°20'10" N, 100°59'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mencini Lake”
Column
2: “58°30'59" N, 101°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Veronica Lake”
Column
2: “56°53'12" N, 101°10'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Summit Lake”
Column
2: “56°37'05" N, 101°12'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Horn Lake”
Column
2: “52°28'45" N, 101°15'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Burrows Lake”
Column
2: “51°25'35" N, 101°02'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ennadai Lake”
Column
2: “60°58'00” N, 101°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace,
Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Carlson Lake”
Column
2: “57°25'34” N, 101°24'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wolf Lakes”
Column
2: “52°21'20” N, 101°26'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette,
John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike
Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bog Lake”
Column
2: “52°57'29” N, 101°30'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Armit Lake”
Column
2: “52°32'55” N, 101°35'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pistol Lake”
Column
2: “54°54'33” N, 101°36'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Princess Beatrice Lake”
Column
2: “55°25'19” N, 101°38'55" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Waterbury Lake”
Column
2: “55°31'00” N, 101°47'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cliff Lake”
Column
2: “54°48'41” N, 101°50'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Trickett Lake”
Column
2: “52°28'00” N, 101°52'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Saskoba Lake”
Column
2: “54°27'30” N, 101°53'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Diamond Lake”
Column
2: “50°38'15” N, 101°09'17" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kamilukuak Lake”
Column
2: “62°28'16” N, 102°00'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Reindeer Lake”
Column
2: “57°20'00” N, 102°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Skeleton Lake”
Column
2: “49°49'00” N, 102°14'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Batty Lake”
Column
2: “54°48'00” N, 102°14'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Arlone Lake”
Column
2: “67°23'00” N, 102°14'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amisk Lake”
Column
2: “54°35'00” N, 102°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis
Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul
Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McLellan Lake”
Column
2: “49°50'00” N, 102°23'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly
Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Whitbread Lake”
Column
2: “54°59'00” N, 102°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rudolph Lake”
Column
2: “56°35'00” N, 102°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pikusikun Lake”
Column
2: “58°53'00” N, 102°28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pagato Lake”
Column
2: “56°08'00” N, 102°30'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lawton Lake”
Column
2: “58°32'00” N, 102°33'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Boyer Lake”
Column
2: “59°16'00” N, 102°36'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “MacAlpine Lake”
Column
2: “66°32'00” N, 102°45'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Croome Lake”
Column
2: “65°48'00” N, 102°47'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dubawnt Lake”
Column
2: “63°03'46” N, 102°05'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gilbert Lake”
Column
2: “55°51'00” N, 102°51'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
At
12:46 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
12:47 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bourassa Lake”
Column
2: “53°37'00” N, 102°54'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hewgill Lake”
Column
2: “59°22'00” N, 102°54'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Snowbird Lake”
Column
2: “60°41'01” N, 102°56'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kasba Lake”
Column
2: “60°18'01” N, 102°07'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Limestone Lake”
Column
2: “54°38'00” N, 103°13'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wollaston Lake”
Column
2: “58°15'00” N, 103°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “White Lake”
Column
2: “56°00'00” N, 103°16'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cross Lake”
Column
2: “56°47'00” N, 103°02'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Deschambault Lake”
Column
2: “54°47'00” N, 103°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Obre Lake”
Column
2: “60°22'01” N, 103°03'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nixon Lake”
Column
2: “61°34'01” N, 103°39'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pointer Lake”
Column
2: “55°38'00” N, 103°45'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Blackman Lake”
Column
2: “56°28'00” N, 103°48'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dwyer Lake”
Column
2: “57°57'00” N, 103°53'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wholdaia Lake”
Column
2: “60°43'01” N, 104°10'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Howitson Lake”
Column
2: “55°32'00” N, 104°18'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cadot Lake”
Column
2: “52°18'00” N, 104°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Firedrake Lake”
Column
2: “61°25'01” N, 104°30'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Selwyn Lake”
Column
2: “60°00'00” N, 104°30'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sid Lake”
Column
2: “62°16'01” N, 104°04'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Andrew Hastings Lake”
Column
2: “55°56'00” N, 104°47'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Biologist Lake”
Column
2: “64°16'36” N, 104°05'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Contact Lake”
Column
2: “55°25'00” N, 104°52'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wolf Lake”
Column
2: “51°15'00” N, 104°08'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kipabiskau Lake”
Column
2: “52°34'00” N, 104°09'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “La Ronge Lake”
Column
2: “55°10'00” N, 105°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Old Lake”
Column
2: “53°28'00” N, 105°12'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Keith Lake”
Column
2: “55°59'00” N, 105°12'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Black Lake”
Column
2: “59°12'00” N, 105°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mountain Lake”
Column
2: “60°54'01” N, 105°20'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Middle Foster Lake”
Column
2: “56°38'00” N, 105°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Petallen Lake”
Column
2: “49°53'00” N, 105°28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Beauvais Lake”
Column
2: “60°27'01” N, 105°31'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra,
Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
At
12:58 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
1:02 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Vermette Lake”
Column
2: “61°22'01” N, 105°38'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Montreal Lake”
Column
2: “54°20'00” N, 105°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kitiga Lake”
Column
2: “69°15'00” N, 105°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Coyne Lake”
Column
2: “61°30'01” N, 105°05'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bodie Lake”
Column
2: “62°58'01” N, 105°52'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Jean Lake”
Column
2: “53°37'00” N, 105°53'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fuchs Lake”
Column
2: “55°34'00” N, 105°56'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mary Frances Lake”
Column
2: “63°19'01” N, 106°13'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dymond Lake”
Column
2: “61°25'01” N, 106°14'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pearce Lake”
Column
2: “55°58'00” N, 106°16'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Porter Lake”
Column
2: “52°12'00” N, 106°17'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Penylan Lake”
Column
2: “61°50'01” N, 106°20'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “LaHaise Lake”
Column
2: “61°58'01” N, 106°20'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Odin Lake”
Column
2: “60°38'01” N, 106°23'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cree Lake”
Column
2: “57°30'00” N, 106°30'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Smyth Lake”
Column
2: “55°13'00” N, 106°33'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pinehouse Lake”
Column
2: “55°32'00” N, 106°35'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Healey Lake”
Column
2: “64°20'01” N, 106°45'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Oman Lake”
Column
2: “59°42'00” N, 106°45'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Musclow Lake”
Column
2: “63°47'01” N, 106°57'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hunting Lake”
Column
2: “54°18'00” N, 106°59'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fraser Lake”
Column
2: “61°00'01” N, 106°07'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Music Lake”
Column
2: “56°09'00” N, 107°11'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Glew Lake”
Column
2: “54°11'00” N, 107°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Belton Lake”
Column
2: “55°32'00” N, 107°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Doré Lake”
Column
2: “54°46'00” N, 107°17'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Clinton-Colden Lake”
Column
2: “63°55'01” N, 107°29'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fabien Lake”
Column
2: “62°58'01” N, 107°37'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Northring Lake”
Column
2: “64°57'00” N, 107°48'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Camp Lake”
Column
2: “53°26'00” N, 107°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Yackle Lake”
Column
2: “57°06'00” N, 107°51'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fishing Lake”
Column
2: “66°40'00” N, 107°51'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Artillery Lake”
Column
2: “63°09'01” N, 107°52'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Aitch Lake”
Column
2: “65°35'30” N, 107°54'15" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tarantula Lake”
Column
2: “64°32'01” N, 107°58'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fishpoint Lake”
Column
2: “54°08'00” N, 107°06'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lamarre Lake”
Column
2: “61°55'01” N, 107°08'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sorenson Lake”
Column
2: “60°50'01” N, 108°10'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kunes Lake”
Column
2: “67°19'00” N, 109°36'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Primrose Lake”
Column
2: “54°55'00” N, 109°45'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ghurka Lake”
Column
2: “65°01'00” N, 109°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Anarin Lake”
Column
2: “63°28'01” N, 109°54'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Misteagun Lake”
Column
2: “63°17'01” N, 110°10'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Banning Lake”
Column
2: “69°35'00” N, 110°10'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “MacLellan Lake”
Column
2: “63°15'01” N, 110°02'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “MacKay Lake”
Column
2: “63°55'05” N, 110°25'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Quartermoon Lake”
Column
2: “65°01'00” N, 108°12'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qiviut Lake”
Column
2: “65°45'55” N, 108°14'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Frobisher Lake”
Column
2: “56°20'00” N, 108°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McArter Lake”
Column
2: “56°52'00” N, 108°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Moore Lake”
Column
2: “59°02'00” N, 108°02'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Churchill Lake”
Column
2: “55°55'00” N, 108°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Aylmer Lake”
Column
2: “64°05'01” N, 108°30'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Millard Lake”
Column
2: “58°09'00” N, 108°34'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Crellin Lake”
Column
2: “57°58'00” N, 108°36'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bayley Lake”
Column
2: “59°04'00” N, 108°37'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mackey Lake”
Column
2: “59°54'00” N, 108°04'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nero Lake”
Column
2: “59°31'00” N, 108°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wren Lake”
Column
2: “60°20'01” N, 108°42'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Polynia Lake”
Column
2: “75°07'00” N, 108°43'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Peter Pond Lake”
Column
2: “55°55'00” N, 108°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Green Lake”
Column
2: “59°38'00” N, 108°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lunar Lake”
Column
2: “65°12'50” N, 108°50'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Migration Lake”
Column
2: “64°58'00” N, 108°51'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Blow Lake”
Column
2: “59°35'00” N, 108°52'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Halliday Lake”
Column
2: “61°21'01” N, 108°56'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kadman Lake”
Column
2: “59°33'00” N, 108°56'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dalgliesh Lake”
Column
2: “60°01'01” N, 108°57'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tarpon Lake”
Column
2: “64°45'01” N, 109°00'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Grampus Lake”
Column
2: “60°38'01” N, 109°12'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ingebrigt Lake”
Column
2: “50°22'00” N, 109°19'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hjalmar Lake”
Column
2: “61°33'01” N, 109°25'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nonacho Lake”
Column
2: “61°59'01” N, 109°28'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Alexander Lake”
Column
2: “59°37'25” N, 110°28'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Leane Lake”
Column
2: “52°33'54” N, 110°03'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de Gras”
Column
2: “64°30'01” N, 110°30'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Benna Thy Lake”
Column
2: “60°38'01” N, 110°33'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hidden Lake”
Column
2: “53°21'12” N, 110°38'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Jerome Lake”
Column
2: “54°03'49” N, 110°42'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Benjamin Lake”
Column
2: “63°13'00” N, 110°45'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Contwoyto Lake”
Column
2: “65°42'01” N, 110°50'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Berens Lake”
Column
2: “60°23'01” N, 110°50'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ogilvie Lake”
Column
2: “62°17'01” N, 110°52'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hanging Ice Lake”
Column
2: “60°13'01” N, 110°55'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Thekulthili Lake”
Column
2: “61°00'01” N, 110°06'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sandhill Lake”
Column
2: “62°17'01” N, 110°08'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Augustine Lake”
Column
2: “61°05'01” N, 111°13'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pettit Lake”
Column
2: “61°40'01” N, 111°15'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hilltop Lake”
Column
2: “63°21'00” N, 111°02'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fly Lake”
Column
2: “65°41'00” N, 111°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wishbone Lake”
Column
2: “65°40'00” N, 111°26'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qalgiliumaniq”
Column
2: “71°37'02” N, 111°05'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bat Lake”
Column
2: “54°38'54” N, 111°58'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Deskenatlata Lake”
Column
2: “61°03'01” N, 111°58'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Field Lake”
Column
2: “54°43'42” N, 111°59'17" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fingers Lake”
Column
2: “65°43'00” N, 111°09'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rupp Lake”
Column
2: “63°50'01” N, 112°15'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Faulkner Lake”
Column
2: “62°11'01” N, 112°17'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Delmar Lake”
Column
2: “63°08'01” N, 112°02'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Credit Lake”
Column
2: “64°39'01” N, 112°30'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Windy Lake”
Column
2: “54°35'54” N, 112°35'41" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Chipp Lake”
Column
2: “62°28'01” N, 112°38'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cleft Lake”
Column
2: “62°29'01” N, 112°40'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hanikahimajuk Lake”
Column
2: “66°04'50” N, 112°42'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mad Lake”
Column
2: “62°07'01” N, 112°45'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bud Lake”
Column
2: “62°20'01” N, 112°47'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lockhart Lake”
Column
2: “63°40'01” N, 112°05'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lake Claire”
Column
2: “58°35'00" N, 112°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bambi Lake”
Column
2: “62°59'01" N, 112°54'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Consolation Lake”
Column
2: “62°32'01" N, 112°55'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Garnett Lake”
Column
2: “63°30'01" N, 112°58'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Big Lake”
Column
2: “64°51'01" N, 113°00'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Napaktulik Lake”
Column
2: “66°20'00" N, 113°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Saunders Lake”
Column
2: “62°37'01" N, 113°12'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dome Lake”
Column
2: “62°46'01" N, 113°16'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Imaq”
Column
2: “70°16'02" N, 113°25'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Chipewyan Lakes”
Column
2: “56°57'00" N, 113°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Angelique Lake”
Column
2: “64°38'01" N, 113°26'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Preble Lake”
Column
2: “59°58'44" N, 113°27'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hingilik Lake”
Column
2: “66°32'15" N, 113°29'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Criss Lake”
Column
2: “63°05'01" N, 113°31'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Prestige Lake”
Column
2: “62°57'01" N, 113°39'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Baldhead Lake”
Column
2: “64°37'01" N, 113°39'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Thoolezzeh Lake”
Column
2: “64°03'01" N, 113°04'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Point Lake”
Column
2: “65°15'01" N, 113°04'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bliss Lake”
Column
2: “62°39'01" N, 113°43'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Elbow Lake”
Column
2: “62°33'01" N, 113°05'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Victory Lake”
Column
2: “62°40'01" N, 113°05'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Alderson Lake”
Column
2: “49°01'47" N, 113°58'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Webb Lake”
Column
2: “62°51'01" N, 113°06'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Woodenpan Lake”
Column
2: “53°27'43" N, 113°09'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Walsh Lake”
Column
2: “62°35'01" N, 114°16'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Greyling Lake”
Column
2: “62°41'01" N, 114°17'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Morris Lake”
Column
2: “63°06'01" N, 114°02'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “One Arm Lake”
Column
2: “62°33'01" N, 114°20'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Vee Lake”
Column
2: “62°33'11" N, 114°21'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Octopus Lake”
Column
2: “62°22'31" N, 114°27'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sandy Lake”
Column
2: “60°31'30" N, 114°35'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ethel Lake”
Column
2: “53°46'54" N, 114°52'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Elbow Lake”
Column
2: “50°38'23" N, 115°00'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Corner Lake”
Column
2: “64°19'01" N, 115°10'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fortune Lake”
Column
2: “64°27'01" N, 115°11'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pete Lake”
Column
2: “64°07'01" N, 115°11'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Valley Lake”
Column
2: “66°45'00" N, 115°11'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cranston Lake”
Column
2: “64°21'01" N, 115°12'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mayurlihuk”
Column
2: “71°27'11" N, 115°13'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Schwerdt Lake”
Column
2: “64°23'01" N, 115°16'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Canoe Lake”
Column
2: “67°00'30" N, 115°18'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sphinx Lake”
Column
2: “64°28'01" N, 115°22'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Margaret Lake”
Column
2: “58°57'13" N, 115°24'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lesser Slave Lake”
Column
2: “55°26'26" N, 115°29'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Buffalo Lake”
Column
2: “60°13'00" N, 115°30'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tundra Lake”
Column
2: “67°25'40" N, 115°32'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Acasta Lake”
Column
2: “65°22'01" N, 115°33'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rodrigues Lake”
Column
2: “64°47'01" N, 115°38'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Spanner Lake”
Column
2: “64°27'01" N, 115°04'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John
McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike
Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gossan Lake”
Column
2: “64°28'01" N, 115°47'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Damoti Lake”
Column
2: “64°11'01" N, 115°05'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Alford Lake”
Column
2: “52°04'00" N, 115°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne,
Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Baseline Lake”
Column
2: “54°14'02" N, 115°54'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tahiryuhuk”
Column
2: “70°37'17" N, 115°57'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Louis Lake”
Column
2: “52°24'44" N, 115°07'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Niaqualuk”
Column
2: “70°38'44" N, 116°01'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Strutt Lake”
Column
2: “63°20'01" N, 116°14'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bent Lake”
Column
2: “65°04'01" N, 116°15'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Three Islands Lake”
Column
2: “67°21'00" N, 116°22'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Shoti Lake”
Column
2: “63°07'01" N, 116°26'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Crapeau Lake”
Column
2: “64°49'01" N, 116°27'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Grant Lake”
Column
2: “64°54'01" N, 116°30'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Peltier Lake”
Column
2: “66°07'01" N, 116°35'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wopmay Lake”
Column
2: “65°07'01" N, 116°40'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Elbow Lake”
Column
2: “67°27'00" N, 116°51'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ketcheson Lake”
Column
2: “63°52'01" N, 116°52'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nec Lake”
Column
2: “63°17'01" N, 116°53'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hislop Lake”
Column
2: “63°31'01" N, "116°55'05 W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum
— 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen,
Kellie Leitch — 6.
At
1:57 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
2:13 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cliff Lake”
Column
2: “67°37'00" N, 116°55'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Faber Lake”
Column
2: “63°56'01" N, 117°15'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Self Lake”
Column
2: “65°18'01" N, 117°15'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tahiqpaaluk”
Column
2: “70°58'02" N, 117°19'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Second Lake”
Column
2: “62°06'01" N, 117°26'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cruickshanks Lake”
Column
2: “65°55'01" N, 117°26'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Libby Lake”
Column
2: “68°14'00" N, 117°26'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qikiqtalik”
Column
2: “71°34'29" N, 117°32'17" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tathlina Lake”
Column
2: “60°33'00" N, 117°32'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fawn Lake”
Column
2: “62°11'01" N, 117°32'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Goose Lake”
Column
2: “54°58'25" N, 117°32'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sharun Lake”
Column
2: “62°05'01" N, 117°33'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Katauyam tahia”
Column
2: “70°47'33" N, 117°34'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qikiqtaqtuuq”
Column
2: “71°54'03" N, 117°34'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Far Lake”
Column
2: “65°59'01" N, 117°45'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Elizabeth Lake”
Column
2: “66°28'01" N, 117°48'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Longtom Lake”
Column
2: “65°10'01" N, 117°50'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Zebulon Lake”
Column
2: “65°03'01" N, 117°50'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Contact Lake”
Column
2: “65°58'01" N, 117°50'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac la Martre”
Column
2: “63°15'01" N, 117°55'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Geraldine Lakes”
Column
2: “52°34'22" N, 117°56'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Malfait Lake”
Column
2: “64°38'01" N, 117°57'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Jim Lake”
Column
2: “66°00'01" N, 117°57'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gay Lake”
Column
2: “66°01'01" N, 117°57'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bill Fraser Lake”
Column
2: “50°26'43" N, 118°12'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Windflower Lake”
Column
2: “62°52'01" N, 118°30'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hottah Lake”
Column
2: “65°04'01" N, 118°30'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bistcho Lake”
Column
2: “59°44'33" N, 118°50'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hornell Lake”
Column
2: “62°20'00" N, 119°25'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ukulele Lake”
Column
2: “50°37'38" N, 119°40'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris,
Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn,
Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bluenose Lake”
Column
2: “68°25'00" N, 119°45'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ussher Lake”
Column
2: “50°30'31" N, 120°17'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Summit Lake”
Column
2: “49°45'14” N, 120°38'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Small Dairy Lake”
Column
2: “50°37'07” N, 120°40'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Knudsen Lake”
Column
2: “54°18'05” N, 120°46'15" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Scot Lake”
Column
2: “51°15'25” N, 120°47'51" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Succour Lake”
Column
2: “51°54'17” N, 120°49'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nicomen Lake”
Column
2: “49°13'31” N, 120°51'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tseepantee Lake”
Column
2: “63°24'00” N, 121°28'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hospital Lakes”
Column
2: “53°04'42” N, 121°29'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Arrowhead Lake”
Column
2: “60°52'30” N, 122°22'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hoagak Lake”
Column
2: “71°33'12” N, 122°23'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nothaykay Lake”
Column
2: “63°36'15” N, 122°43'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Seven Islands Lake”
Column
2: “69°17'01” N, 123°00'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bluefish Lake”
Column
2: “61°11'00” N, 123°19'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lost Hill Lake”
Column
2: “65°40'26” N, 123°22'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Betalamea Lake”
Column
2: “60°08'00” N, 123°34'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rummy Lake”
Column
2: “69°05'01” N, 123°38'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tatui Lake”
Column
2: “65°57'51” N, 123°04'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mid Lake”
Column
2: “61°32'00” N, 123°41'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Carlson Lake”
Column
2: “62°26'00” N, 123°50'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kilekale Lake”
Column
2: “66°39'01” N, 123°59'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pyper Lake”
Column
2: “52°02'35” N, 124°10'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tarn Lake”
Column
2: “51°11'39” N, 124°20'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Natalkuz Lake”
Column
2: “53°26'06” N, 125°12'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Picnic Lake”
Column
2: “72°01'06” N, 125°14'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Stewart Lake”
Column
2: “64°23'45” N, 125°16'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fish Lake”
Column
2: “64°58'00” N, 125°16'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tate Lake”
Column
2: “64°30'30” N, 125°21'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Elbow Lake”
Column
2: “52°04'55” N, 125°41'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Moxley Lake”
Column
2: “53°47'48” N, 125°46'15" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tunago Lake”
Column
2: “66°19'00” N, 125°50'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bell Heather Lake”
Column
2: “62°20'00” N, 125°51'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kidney Lake”
Column
2: “52°09'26” N, 125°52'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tweed Lake”
Column
2: “66°47'00” N, 125°53'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan
Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie
Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mendo Lake”
Column
2: “65°56'00” N, 125°06'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac des Bois”
Column
2: “66°50'01” N, 125°09'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Colville Lake”
Column
2: “67°10'00” N, 126°00'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Babine Lake”
Column
2: “54°45'00” N, 126°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Edie Lake”
Column
2: “65°17'00” N, 126°33'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fish Running Lake”
Column
2: “65°43'20” N, 126°48'27" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ootsa Lake”
Column
2: “53°46'47” N, 126°08'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Heart Lake”
Column
2: “65°12'15” N, 127°10'57" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tadek Lake”
Column
2: “67°02'00” N, 127°23'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gordon Lakes”
Column
2: “51°17'15” N, 127°30'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nightwind Lake”
Column
2: “61°49'00” N, 127°32'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch— 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Canoe Lake”
Column
2: “50°13'44” N, 127°44'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Raven Lake”
Column
2: “67°49'00” N, 128°22'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Big Grassy Lake”
Column
2: “68°43'00” N, 128°51'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Manuel Lake”
Column
2: “66°58'00” N, 128°54'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Zenchuk Lake”
Column
2: “62°05'00” N, 128°09'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Foch Lake”
Column
2: “53°47'04” N, 129°11'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Peters Lake”
Column
2: “60°36'10” N, 131°43'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Leaf Lake”
Column
2: “60°42'09” N, 131°53'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Owen Lakes”
Column
2: “68°27'00” N, 132°12'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fish Trap Lake”
Column
2: “67°57'00” N, 132°13'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rat Lake”
Column
2: “67°25'00” N, 132°18'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar
Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Overflow Lake”
Column
2: “67°44'15” N, 132°32'24" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sunny Lake”
Column
2: “67°51'00” N, 132°41'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bruce Lake”
Column
2: “61°49'00” N, 132°05'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Caribou Lake”
Column
2: “67°59'00” N, 132°52'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pierre Lake”
Column
2: “67°20'15” N, 132°55'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Puzzle Lake”
Column
2: “67°35'00” N, 133°10'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Beaver Lake”
Column
2: “67°38'00” N, 133°23'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tso Lake”
Column
2: “67°25'00” N, 133°41'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bushman Lake”
Column
2: “67°07'30” N, 133°46'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie
Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Atlin Lake”
Column
2: “59°35'00” N, 133°47'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Northern Lake”
Column
2: “61°44'05” N, 133°48'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Frog Creek Fount”
Column
2: “67°12'30” N, 133°48'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6..
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bonnetplume Lake”
Column
2: “68°40'30” N, 133°49'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Holmans Lake”
Column
2: “60°20'51” N, 134°20'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wolf Lake”
Column
2: “69°13'00” N, 134°27'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Old Trout Lake”
Column
2: “69°17'00” N, 135°09'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tawät Män”
Column
2: “62°41'09” N, 136°21'24" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Poplar Lake”
Column
2: “61°37'57” N, 137°32'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McKay Lake”
Column
2: “63°45'27” N, 138°02'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kluane Lake”
Column
2: “61°15'39” N, 138°46'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rencontre Lake”
Column
2: “47°41'23” N, 55°12'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Haynes Lake”
Column
2: “48°45'25” N, 55°29'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Famine Barasway”
Column
2: “47°06'59” N, 55°36'57" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Diversion Lake”
Column
2: “48°49'02” N, 55°52'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Boulder Lake”
Column
2: “48°29'52” N, 56°28'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar
Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Eastern Lake”
Column
2: “51°13'22” N, 56°39'55" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Grand Lake”
Column
2: “48°54'43” N, 57°30'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Squaw Lake”
Column
2: “48°40'25” N, 57°36'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Suzy Lake”
Column
2: “54°06'00” N, 57°46'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tessuialluk Lake”
Column
2: “54°47'08” N, 58°11'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,
LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.
At
2:59 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
3:13 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Grandys Lake”
Column
2: “47°51'54” N, 58°44'27" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Barachois”
Column
2: “47°37'38” N, 59°15'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Kahakaukamat”
Column
2: “50°44'32” N, 60°26'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Grand Lake”
Column
2: “53°41'25” N, 60°33'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Warrens Lake”
Column
2: “54°30'19” N, 60°56'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Naskaupi Lake”
Column
2: “54°15'47” N, 61°28'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tasialuk Lake”
Column
2: “56°09'53” N, 61°30'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Salmon Lake”
Column
2: “54°15'16” N, 61°39'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Seal Lake”
Column
2: “54°20'00” N, 61°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Dumbell Lake”
Column
2: “82°30'00” N, 62°30'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Saputit Lake”
Column
2: “57°27'45” N, 62°37'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lower Dumbell Lake”
Column
2: “82°30'00” N, 62°37'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Uugalik”
Column
2: “67°02'29” N, 62°45'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “St. Peters Lake”
Column
2: “46°25'52” N, 62°46'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pats Camp Lake”
Column
2: “44°48'15” N, 62°48'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Marie Lake”
Column
2: “54°07'26" N, 62°58'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Main Lake”
Column
2: “54°51'41" N, 63°17'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Têtu”
Column
2: “50°32'03" N, 63°25'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Victoria Lake”
Column
2: “82°35'00" N, 63°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Walker Lakes”
Column
2: “59°49'07" N, 64°12'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ijjunaituup Tasingit”
Column
2: “66°20'34" N, 64°23'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Témiscouata”
Column
2: “47°41'01" N, 68°51'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Atikonak Lake”
Column
2: “52°40'00" N, 64°32'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Kakwanesetsitish”
Column
2: “50°24'43" N, 64°04'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6..
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qanurlivik Lake”
Column
2: “60°29'46" N, 64°45'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac aux Bleuets”
Column
2: “48°22'46" N, 64°50'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Drouard”
Column
2: “51°52'00" N, 64°55'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Naqsarjuaap Tasinga”
Column
2: “66°37'05" N, 64°08'13" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Vezina Lake”
Column
2: “54°47'24" N, 65°12'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Windy Lake”
Column
2: “66°30'55" N, 65°27'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pullati”
Column
2: “66°21'33" N, 65°34'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Timmins Lake”
Column
2: “54°02'47" N, 65°36'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Churchills Lake”
Column
2: “44°08'37" N, 65°43'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qulittassaisurvik”
Column
2: “66°23'45" N, 65°48'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Glacier Lake”
Column
2: “66°41'00" N, 65°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Long Lake”
Column
2: “45°29'20" N, 66°14'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ashuanipi Lake”
Column
2: “52°45'00" N, 66°14'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5A; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cavers Lake”
Column
2: “54°38'00" N, 66°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Peckford Lake”
Column
2: “54°49'40" N, 66°17'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rocky Brook Lake”
Column
2: “46°50'42" N, 66°21'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac aux Outardes”
Column
2: “52°34'58" N, 66°28'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Champlain”
Column
2: “45°01'52" N, 73°08'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cunningham Lake”
Column
2: “54°45'43" N, 66°04'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Leila Wynne Lake”
Column
2: “53°05'00" N, 66°46'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Maujean”
Column
2: “55°19'28" N, 66°52'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lorraine Lake”
Column
2: “53°04'00" N, 66°53'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Asquiche”
Column
2: “50°26'58" N, 66°53'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Heintzelman Lake”
Column
2: “81°42'00" N, 66°56'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “White Lake”
Column
2: “52°59'58" N, 66°57'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nip Lake”
Column
2: “52°50'00" N, 67°10'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac à Eustache”
Column
2: “50°09'23" N, 67°12'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Solingue”
Column
2: “50°55'30" N, 67°14'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Premier Lac”
Column
2: “49°27'56" N, 67°20'13" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Boulianne”
Column
2: “49°40'30" N, 67°23'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Hélène”
Column
2: “49°27'57" N, 67°24'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Grèbe”
Column
2: “49°25'29" N, 67°26'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Bergnac”
Column
2: “50°44'11" N, 67°03'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Gambeau”
Column
2: “50°13'26" N, 67°32'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Pohénégamook”
Column
2: “47°29'17" N, 69°16'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lacs de la Réserve de Bois de Chauffage”
Column
2: “49°21'59" N, 67°37'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Teiche”
Column
2: “50°24'21" N, 67°37'57" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Wolf”
Column
2: “49°24'24" N, 67°41'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Oiatalik Lake”
Column
2: “69°16'00" N, 67°42'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Natwayasu”
Column
2: “56°52'47" N, 67°46'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac des Cyprès”
Column
2: “49°44'12" N, 67°59'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Siliac”
Column
2: “52°13'04" N, 68°24'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kilbourne Lake”
Column
2: “81°52'00" N, 68°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac McCormick”
Column
2: “49°33'18" N, 68°03'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Nachicapau”
Column
2: “56°38'33" N, 68°04'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la 303”
Column
2: “49°34'52" N, 68°04'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Petit lac Touladi”
Column
2: “47°47'26" N, 68°45'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Musaraigne”
Column
2: “50°46'01" N, 68°07'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Longspur Lake”
Column
2: “69°47'00" N, 69°12'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Forder Lake”
Column
2: “63°32'00" N, 69°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Grosse Truite”
Column
2: “48°37'07" N, 69°17'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sylvia Grinnell Lake”
Column
2: “64°10'00" N, 69°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Charley”
Column
2: “49°10'46" N, 69°26'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Alfred”
Column
2: “49°57'23" N, 69°27'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Ford”
Column
2: “49°09'50" N, 69°28'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Murray Lake”
Column
2: “81°20'00" N, 69°34'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Carné”
Column
2: “49°34'16" N, 69°36'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Fantôme”
Column
2: “48°26'43" N, 69°38'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Bouchard”
Column
2: “48°36'22" N, 69°42'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Petit lac Tibia”
Column
2: “49°03'28" N, 69°43'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac aux Feuilles”
Column
2: “58°47'58" N, 69°49'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Anakudluk Lake”
Column
2: “64°06'00" N, 69°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Sabot”
Column
2: “49°06'11" N, 69°52'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Vingt-Quatre”
Column
2: “48°29'40" N, 69°59'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qamanaaluk”
Column
2: “62°57'59" N, 69°06'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qikiqtalik”
Column
2: “62°53'01" N, 69°07'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Ovibon”
Column
2: “48°54'21" N, 69°09'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac au Sable”
Column
2: “47°56'32" N, 70°15'24" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Sol”
Column
2: “49°25'51" N, 70°16'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Moussière”
Column
2: “46°49'09" N, 70°16'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Tasikutaaq Sanirarsinga”
Column
2: “60°06'23" N, 70°16'37" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nettilling Lake”
Column
2: “66°29'00" N, 70°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Gironde”
Column
2: “47°55'35" N, 70°21'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Biche”
Column
2: “48°31'19" N, 70°22'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Noir”
Column
2: “47°54'01" N, 70°24'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Savane”
Column
2: “48°43'32" N, 70°26'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Laflamme”
Column
2: “46°48'31" N, 70°29'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Allen”
Column
2: “48°10'21" N, 70°32'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Pont de Fer”
Column
2: “48°16'32" N, 70°32'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Plat”
Column
2: “47°59'43" N, 70°37'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Long”
Column
2: “48°05'37" N, 70°43'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Manouane”
Column
2: “50°42'18" N, 70°44'57" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Carolyn Lake”
Column
2: “81°17'00" N, 70°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Antonio”
Column
2: “49°34'08" N, 70°53'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Paul”
Column
2: “49°06'37" N, 70°54'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Minakan”
Column
2: “49°11'35" N, 70°55'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tasialuk”
Column
2: “70°25'33" N, 70°07'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Escarpé”
Column
2: “48°07'09" N, 70°08'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac aux Visons”
Column
2: “48°26'51" N, 70°09'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lake Hazen”
Column
2: “81°47'50" N, 71°01'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Heart Lake”
Column
2: “75°31'00" N, 100°02'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac des Deux Bucks”
Column
2: “48°52'52" N, 71°11'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Porter”
Column
2: “47°28'31" N, 71°12'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Pic”
Column
2: “48°56'30" N, 71°14'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Fradette”
Column
2: “47°31'51" N, 71°02'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Petit lac du Bottier”
Column
2: “47°36'19” N, 71°02'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Manne”
Column
2: “49°17'33" N, 71°22'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Lakas”
Column
2: “47°30'41" N, 71°23'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Grand lac à Foin”
Column
2: “48°14'25" N, 71°03'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Pilotis”
Column
2: “48°15'47" N, 71°34'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Mirador Brûlé”
Column
2: “49°35'51" N, 71°38'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Barra”
Column
2: “47°22'13" N, 71°39'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Rond”
Column
2: “50°27'50" N, 71°42'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Calme”
Column
2: “50°27'40" N, 71°45'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Cidelosse”
Column
2: “47°29'53" N, 71°46'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac McCormick”
Column
2: “47°25'45" N, 71°47'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Glun”
Column
2: “48°05'16" N, 71°49'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Nessa”
Column
2: “47°16'15" N, 71°53'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Bonhomme”
Column
2: “47°09'24" N, 71°08'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amadjuak Lake”
Column
2: “64°55'00" N, 71°08'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Silly”
Column
2: “47°29'43" N, 72°10'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Petit lac Boisvert”
Column
2: “49°09'54" N, 72°12'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Centurion”
Column
2: “49°03'31" N, 72°12'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Remise”
Column
2: “49°30'31" N, 72°22'13" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Louisette”
Column
2: “50°05'44" N, 72°26'15" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Lanctôt”
Column
2: “47°13'28" N, 72°28'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Alfred”
Column
2: “47°32'50" N, 72°30'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac à la Crécelle”
Column
2: “47°26'31" N, 72°33'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Saint-Michel”
Column
2: “46°24'28" N, 72°41'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Weasel Lake”
Column
2: “81°50'00" N, 72°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Padirac”
Column
2: “48°46'39" N, 72°49'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Bienville”
Column
2: “55°04'45" N, 72°51'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac à l'Ours”
Column
2: “48°06'49" N, 72°56'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Troisième lac du Cordon”
Column
2: “46°31'32" N, 73°01'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Rongeur”
Column
2: “47°30'19" N, 73°10'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Roger”
Column
2: “48°09'06" N, 73°15'27" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Travers”
Column
2: “49°26'21" N, 73°16'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,
Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Canistre”
Column
2: “46°32'40" N, 73°20'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Fiston”
Column
2: “48°31'32" N, 73°21'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Acis”
Column
2: “49°38'48" N, 73°30'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Catignan”
Column
2: “49°36'28" N, 73°30'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Portage”
Column
2: “48°42'25" N, 73°32'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Denis”
Column
2: “47°58'18" N, 73°33'51" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Sinotte”
Column
2: “46°57'08" N, 73°35'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Colombe”
Column
2: “47°25'48" N, 73°35'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Mistassini”
Column
2: “51°00'07" N, 73°37'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Bourgeois”
Column
2: “49°02'55" N, 73°39'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Cyprès”
Column
2: “47°19'58" N, 73°40'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Bleu”
Column
2: “46°12'32" N, 73°43'17" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lacs des Loups Marins”
Column
2: “56°30'31" N, 73°44'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Rancy”
Column
2: “46°27'25" N, 73°49'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Chiron”
Column
2: “49°30'24" N, 73°53'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Augias”
Column
2: “49°42'50" N, 73°53'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Jacques”
Column
2: “46°11'59" N, 73°56'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Verne”
Column
2: “48°07'18" N, 73°56'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Bourgeois”
Column
2: “46°11'59" N, 73°56'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Ola”
Column
2: “48°54'54" N, 73°58'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Malone”
Column
2: “45°57'51" N, 73°58'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Normand”
Column
2: “46°11'14" N, 73°58'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Payne”
Column
2: “59°27'11" N, 73°59'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Albanel”
Column
2: “51°02'28" N, 73°06'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Premier lac en Famille”
Column
2: “47°23'16" N, 73°09'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Abos”
Column
2: “48°58'00" N, 74°01'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tikirajujuk Lake”
Column
2: “64°55'00" N, 74°13'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Magin”
Column
2: “53°33'51" N, 74°14'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Flint Lake”
Column
2: “69°16'00" N, 74°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Madère”
Column
2: “49°17'27" N, 74°16'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Keeka Lake”
Column
2: “65°05'00" N, 74°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Inlet”
Column
2: “49°42'14" N, 74°21'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Thérien”
Column
2: “46°01'31" N, 74°22'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Capri”
Column
2: “45°54'09" N, 74°22'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes,Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Harry”
Column
2: “49°12'38" N, 74°24'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac à l'Eau Claire”
Column
2: “56°06'43" N, 74°26'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Maurice-Thiffault”
Column
2: “47°55'25" N, 74°36'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Coquille”
Column
2: “49°31'36" N, 74°04'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Abeille”
Column
2: “47°05'58" N, 74°42'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Lauzon”
Column
2: “46°09'38" N, 74°44'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Francoeur”
Column
2: “48°13'27" N, 74°46'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Grain de Blé”
Column
2: “46°57'15" N, 74°46'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Vert”
Column
2: “47°37'48" N, 74°46'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Gaétane”
Column
2: “46°39'52" N, 74°49'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Baillairgé”
Column
2: “46°19'49" N, 74°49'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Piling Lake”
Column
2: “69°03'00" N, 74°49'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac aux Moustiques”
Column
2: “46°43'23" N, 74°05'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Passage”
Column
2: “46°11'21" N, 74°50'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Profond”
Column
2: “47°00'11" N, 74°56'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Robert”
Column
2: “45°47'45" N, 74°08'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Violon”
Column
2: “46°13'29" N, 74°09'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Minto”
Column
2: “57°13'07" N, 75°00'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Faucon”
Column
2: “46°59'17" N, 75°01'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel —; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Rampe”
Column
2: “46°16'27" N, 75°12'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Liancourt”
Column
2: “55°00'47" N, 75°14'13" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Moqueur”
Column
2: “45°54'03" N, 75°20'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Uchikwachikanan”
Column
2: “54°08'05" N, 75°21'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Échoam”
Column
2: “46°00'11" N, 75°23'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Angmaluk Lake”
Column
2: “64°59'00" N, 75°24'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Petit lac Puant”
Column
2: “46°17'38" N, 75°25'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Kapimichikamach”
Column
2: “55°10'08" N, 75°25'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Réau”
Column
2: “46°12'39" N, 75°27'57" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de la Perchaude”
Column
2: “46°02'43" N, 75°33'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Wells”
Column
2: “45°59'00" N, 75°34'24" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Kearney”
Column
2: “48°01'43” N, 75°35'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Courchesne”
Column
2: “46°34'05” N, 75°39'56" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Brassard”
Column
2: “45°53'16” N, 75°43'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Aufeis Lake”
Column
2: “69°20'00” N, 75°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Lamb”
Column
2: “47°57'19” N, 75°45'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Sansoucy”
Column
2: “47°29'30” N, 75°49'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Jutras”
Column
2: “48°12'51” N, 75°50'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Rond”
Column
2: “45°41'14” N, 75°50'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rollrock Lake”
Column
2: “81°34'00” N, 75°55'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pedro Lake”
Column
2: “69°25'00” N, 75°08'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Hérisson”
Column
2: “47°49'04” N, 76°00'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after
item
100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Paal”
Column
2: “46°51'17” N, 76°01'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Gilbert”
Column
2: “47°21'19” N, 76°11'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Vitré”
Column
2: “46°36'14” N, 76°12'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Visionnaire”
Column
2: “46°23'39” N, 76°13'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Idéal”
Column
2: “47°04'30” N, 76°14'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de l'Aile”
Column
2: “48°54'15” N, 76°27'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Raycroft Lake”
Column
2: “45°13'07” N, 76°30'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Murray Lake”
Column
2: “45°09'59” N, 76°30'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Fayolle”
Column
2: “47°43'56” N, 76°32'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Vespéral”
Column
2: “46°40'47” N, 76°37'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Warne”
Column
2: “46°56'54” N, 76°39'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cranberry Creek Lake”
Column
2: “44°59'39” N, 76°40'37" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Giblas”
Column
2: “47°14'55” N, 76°40'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “La France Lake”
Column
2: “45°05'22” N, 76°40'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Xousse”
Column
2: “46°57'33” N, 76°43'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Clear Lake”
Column
2: “44°35'29” N, 76°46'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Daniel”
Column
2: “46°19'24” N, 76°48'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Payes Lake”
Column
2: “44°58'23” N, 76°50'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen,Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “West Quinn Lake”
Column
2: “45°05'30” N, 76°54'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lacs du Castor”
Column
2: “46°33'51” N, 76°54'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Russell Lake”
Column
2: “45°08'18” N, 76°54'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert
Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Tamier”
Column
2: “47°05'52” N, 76°56'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Grindstone Lake”
Column
2: “45°00'50” N, 76°57'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Majuqsiivik”
Column
2: “71°40'04” N, 76°57'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Evans”
Column
2: “50°54'13” N, 76°57'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac McAuley”
Column
2: “45°58'35” N, 76°07'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Chavy”
Column
2: “46°47'00” N, 76°08'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac à Crête”
Column
2: “46°01'18” N, 76°08'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de l'Agate”
Column
2: “47°49'09” N, 76°08'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Blanc”
Column
2: “46°24'03” N, 77°14'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Rancio”
Column
2: “47°11'57” N, 77°16'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover,
Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.
At
4:43 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
4:58 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McLaughlin Lake”
Column
2: “45°16'26” N, 77°19'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rahm Lake”
Column
2: “45°03'57” N, 77°19'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Blue Lake”
Column
2: “44°53'26” N, 77°02'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Jomino”
Column
2: “47°10'45” N, 77°21'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Dérome”
Column
2: “47°10'14” N, 77°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Coupal”
Column
2: “46°57'10” N, 77°29'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Stewart Lake”
Column
2: “45°09'23” N, 77°29'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Cranberry Lake”
Column
2: “45°43'52” N, 77°31'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Turquoise Lake”
Column
2: “45°48'42” N, 77°35'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Currie Lake”
Column
2: “44°58'25” N, 77°36'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Calhoun”
Column
2: “46°55'13” N, 77°36'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Desrousseaux”
Column
2: “46°26'01” N, 77°39'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Kâmackawâkâmagak”
Column
2: “47°56'50” N, 77°39'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Tabès”
Column
2: “47°04'55” N, 77°42'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Thomson Lake”
Column
2: “44°37'00” N, 77°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Francoeur”
Column
2: “46°17'00” N, 77°05'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qiuttiivik”
Column
2: “71°46'33” N, 77°50'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac de l'Autruche”
Column
2: “46°22'18” N, 77°54'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Edward”
Column
2: “46°26'20” N, 77°56'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Tremblay”
Column
2: “47°08'11” N, 77°57'37" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac du Colibri”
Column
2: “46°40'40” N, 78°01'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Monmouth Lake”
Column
2: “44°55'55” N, 78°12'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tattler Lake”
Column
2: “45°39'20” N, 78°13'56" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Whitney Lake”
Column
2: “45°34'31” N, 78°16'56" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “South Boot Lake”
Column
2: “45°13'11” N, 78°17'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac à l'Eau Bleue”
Column
2: “46°48'35” N, 78°02'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pondweed Lake”
Column
2: “45°27'36” N, 78°27'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Second Twin Pond”
Column
2: “46°10'27” N, 78°29'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Paul”
Column
2: “46°29'43” N, 78°30'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp,
Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Maiden Lake”
Column
2: “45°35'01” N, 78°41'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bear Lake”
Column
2: “45°20'29” N, 78°42'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Kamaschakwakamach”
Column
2: “54°49'17” N, 78°42'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Scott Lake”
Column
2: “45°29'10” N, 78°43'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Kibisakatciwi”
Column
2: “48°58'02” N, 78°44'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Osler Lake”
Column
2: “45°57'14” N, 78°45'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “St. Nora Lake”
Column
2: “45°09'21” N, 78°49'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Meach Lakes”
Column
2: “45°17'59” N, 78°07'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mallard Lake”
Column
2: “45°34'47” N, 78°08'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Maloney Lake”
Column
2: “47°16'28” N, 79°29'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bass Lake”
Column
2: “44°36'12” N, 79°30'24" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Burnside Lake”
Column
2: “45°24'42” N, 79°30'51" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Garneau Lake”
Column
2: “49°42'30” N, 79°33'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lower Detour Lake”
Column
2: “49°56'28” N, 79°37'17" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bruce Lake”
Column
2: “45°11'10” N, 79°38'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Green Lake”
Column
2: “47°23'13” N, 79°42'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McDonald Lake”
Column
2: “44°55'44” N, 79°46'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Finlayson Lake”
Column
2: “46°41'32” N, 79°48'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Orr Lake”
Column
2: “44°36'30” N, 79°48'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Silver Lake”
Column
2: “45°13'39” N, 79°48'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Abitibi”
Column
2: “48°39'29” N, 79°50'41" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Belle Isle Lake”
Column
2: “47°28'13” N, 79°56'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tasse Lake”
Column
2: “47°05'17” N, 79°58'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bevan Lake”
Column
2: “50°11'31” N, 79°58'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Doig Lake”
Column
2: “48°11'07” N, 79°59'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Mountain Lake”
Column
2: “46°29'38” N, 79°06'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Felst Lake”
Column
2: “50°53'30” N, 80°10'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hybrid Lake”
Column
2: “46°52'33” N, 80°15'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy
McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Swan Lake”
Column
2: “48°14'21” N, 80°16'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Knight Lake”
Column
2: “48°12'48" N, 80°21'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wright Lake”
Column
2: “49°02'12" N, 80°25'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mallard Lake”
Column
2: “45°31'17" N, 80°25'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Burgess Lake”
Column
2: “47°39'57" N, 80°29'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Toad Lake”
Column
2: “45°53'43" N, 80°03'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Colin Scott Lake”
Column
2: “46°49'51" N, 80°30'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hilda Lake”
Column
2: “47°45'12" N, 80°30'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Anderson Lake”
Column
2: “48°32'07" N, 80°36'51" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Moccasin Lake”
Column
2: “47°28'41" N, 80°04'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Daoust Lake”
Column
2: “46°07'04" N, 80°41'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Erichsen Lake”
Column
2: “70°40'00" N, 80°41'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Bonhomme Lake”
Column
2: “46°49'04" N, 80°42'13" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Coutts Lake”
Column
2: “48°16'07" N, 80°44'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “The Sluiceway”
Column
2: “46°53'42" N, 80°45'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ghoul Lake”
Column
2: “47°10'56" N, 80°47'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tobermory Lake”
Column
2: “44°15'20" N, 80°49'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Headquarters Lake”
Column
2: “46°33'18" N, 80°51'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Boat Lake”
Column
2: “44°43'33" N, 81°13'37" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nemag Lake”
Column
2: “46°22'07" N, 81°14'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: CONTRE : Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James,
Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Thorbass Lake”
Column
2: “47°06'42" N, 81°15'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: CONTRE : Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne
James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lue Lake”
Column
2: “47°07'59" N, 81°17'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kidney Lake”
Column
2: “49°14'31" N, 81°18'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ola Lake”
Column
2: “47°33'09" N, 81°21'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pike Lake”
Column
2: “46°40'22" N, 81°22'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “West Cameron Lake”
Column
2: “46°29'49" N, 81°33'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Donnegana Lake”
Column
2: “47°19'06" N, 81°37'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amittuarjuk Lake”
Column
2: “67°17'00" N, 81°38'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pembroke Lake”
Column
2: “47°31'54" N, 81°39'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Quartzite Lake”
Column
2: “67°10'00" N, 81°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bittern Lake”
Column
2: “46°54'56" N, 81°41'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mindedo Lake”
Column
2: “47°57'13" N, 81°49'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Letson Lake”
Column
2: “47°19'44" N, 81°05'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pump Lake”
Column
2: “46°30'28" N, 81°05'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Maumi Lakes”
Column
2: “63°56'55" N, 81°05'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Maltese Lake”
Column
2: “46°49'44" N, 81°51'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “First Lake”
Column
2: “47°09'33" N, 81°51'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sucker Lake”
Column
2: “45°43'18" N, 81°52'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Eastman Lake”
Column
2: “48°13'54" N, 81°55'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Weston Lake”
Column
2: “48°14'57" N, 81°56'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kingulik”
Column
2: “69°26'05" N, 81°59'24" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hall Lake”
Column
2: “68°41'00" N, 82°17'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Alexander Lake”
Column
2: “46°35'14" N, 82°32'37" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bragh Lake”
Column
2: “47°19'17" N, 82°36'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Zadi Lake”
Column
2: “49°42'06" N, 82°40'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Saylors Lake”
Column
2: “47°39'10" N, 83°12'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Asta Lake”
Column
2: “70°21'00" N, 83°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hambone Lake”
Column
2: “48°06'24" N, 83°20'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy
McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ridge Lake”
Column
2: “50°27'36" N, 83°24'27" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Prairie Grass Lake”
Column
2: “47°16'03" N, 83°26'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Conacher Lake”
Column
2: “46°40'04" N, 83°29'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fireline Lake”
Column
2: “48°20'44" N, 83°34'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nagvaak Lake”
Column
2: “67°33'00" N, 83°39'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fra Lake”
Column
2: “48°14'35" N, 83°40'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Giguere Lake”
Column
2: “46°36'25" N, 83°40'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Padre Lake”
Column
2: “48°13'50" N, 83°42'24" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hanlan Lake”
Column
2: “49°49'50" N, 83°47'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tasiruluk Lake”
Column
2: “67°24'00" N, 83°56'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Dingman Lake”
Column
2: “48°11'12" N, 84°15'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Snowgoose Lake”
Column
2: “75°38'00" N, 84°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Finger Lake”
Column
2: “48°10'41" N, 84°36'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bark Lake”
Column
2: “47°34'22" N, 84°36'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Fleming Lake”
Column
2: “72°29'00" N, 84°36'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Phalarope Lake”
Column
2: “75°39'00" N, 84°36'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lower Medhurst Lake”
Column
2: “48°25'10" N, 84°43'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pashoskoota Lake”
Column
2: “48°15'04" N, 84°46'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Otter Lake”
Column
2: “48°01'28" N, 84°46'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tabassa Lake”
Column
2: “48°58'01" N, 84°48'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Roller Lake”
Column
2: “47°54'30" N, 84°49'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bone Lake”
Column
2: “49°02'19" N, 84°49'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mank Lake”
Column
2: “47°40'59" N, 84°05'41" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Martin Lake”
Column
2: “47°09'42" N, 84°06'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Marcil Lake”
Column
2: “72°59'00" N, 85°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Piringajuq Lake”
Column
2: “66°44'00" N, 85°10'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Silaliarutak Lake”
Column
2: “66°47'00" N, 85°10'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “One Island Lake”
Column
2: “48°26'10" N, 85°29'39" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McCulley Lake”
Column
2: “50°34'26" N, 85°40'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott
Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy
Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.
At
5:47 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At
6:10 p.m., the sitting resumed.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Batise Lake”
Column
2: “49°46'41" N, 85°42'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Romulus Lake”
Column
2: “79°52'00" N, 85°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Arms Lake”
Column
2: “49°33'10" N, 86°01'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Titittiaqtalik Lake”
Column
2: “66°34'00" N, 86°16'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bodkin Lake”
Column
2: “50°29'09" N, 86°22'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis,
LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dusk Lake”
Column
2: “50°10'37" N, 86°22'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cyril Lake”
Column
2: “50°02'42" N, 86°27'03" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ukiaqsiiviarjuk Lake”
Column
2: “66°33'00" N, 86°28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amittutjuaq Lake”
Column
2: “66°37'00" N, 86°28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tumi Lake”
Column
2: “66°49'00" N, 86°28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Slade Lake”
Column
2: “52°02'47" N, 86°30'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Aniguqliq Lake”
Column
2: “66°43'00" N, 86°32'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Stewart Lake”
Column
2: “49°17'33" N, 86°43'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Poulin Lake”
Column
2: “48°50'30" N, 86°57'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Duck Lake”
Column
2: “48°59'49" N, 87°19'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Runham Lake”
Column
2: “50°59'23" N, 87°25'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Calamity Lake”
Column
2: “51°42'12" N, 87°28'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Diversion Lake”
Column
2: “49°04'52" N, 87°03'51" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Pays Plat Lake”
Column
2: “49°05'53" N, 87°32'17" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dorsey Lake”
Column
2: “50°17'59" N, 87°35'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Miles Lake”
Column
2: “67°02'00" N, 87°37'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Meen Lake”
Column
2: “64°58'00" N, 87°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Spree Lake”
Column
2: “50°14'38" N, 87°46'21" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Boobus Lake”
Column
2: “49°28'14" N, 87°09'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pain Lake”
Column
2: “49°26'02" N, 88°01'12" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Chappais Lake”
Column
2: “50°26'42" N, 88°22'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lonely Lake”
Column
2: “49°40'07" N, 88°57'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Naujaalik Lake”
Column
2: “68°03'45" N, 88°60'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lassie Lake”
Column
2: “48°43'28" N, 89°10'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Alliarusia Lake”
Column
2: “68°32'00" N, 89°19'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tamarack Lake”
Column
2: “50°20'07" N, 89°23'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Burk Lake”
Column
2: “48°39'33" N, 89°26'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Livermore Lake”
Column
2: “48°54'01" N, 89°27'41" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Atanirsliq Lake”
Column
2: “68°26'55" N, 89°49'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Turn Lake”
Column
2: “48°26'03" N, 89°50'43" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gillard Lake”
Column
2: “49°40'18" N, 89°58'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Chappelle Lake”
Column
2: “50°10'49" N, 89°59'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amaartok Lake”
Column
2: “68°14'35" N, 89°08'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Imiq Lake”
Column
2: “68°18'25" N, 90°01'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Forsberg Lake”
Column
2: “56°23'43" N, 90°12'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Shinagmabin Lake”
Column
2: “51°42'39" N, 90°15'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pug Lake”
Column
2: “49°16'57" N, 90°18'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Inwood Lake”
Column
2: “49°01'11" N, 90°26'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Clovenhoof Lake”
Column
2: “48°29'08" N, 90°28'37" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Titmarsh Lake”
Column
2: “48°21'19" N, 90°31'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Buda Lake”
Column
2: “48°19'28" N, 90°35'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mission Lake”
Column
2: “63°20'45" N, 90°41'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Oscar Lake”
Column
2: “49°17'43" N, 90°41'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded
division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis,
LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tahirarjuaq Lake”
Column
2: “68°34'15" N, 90°42'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wolf Lake”
Column
2: “50°11'37" N, 90°45'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mud Lake”
Column
2: “48°18'02" N, 90°50'57" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hodgson Lake”
Column
2: “52°52'36" N, 90°52'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Taqaugaq Lake”
Column
2: “69°15'20" N, 90°53'05" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kecheokagan Lake”
Column
2: “52°11'08" N, 90°54'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Coull Lake”
Column
2: “52°01'06" N, 90°59'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gault Lake”
Column
2: “50°23'35" N, 90°07'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kee Lake”
Column
2: “50°17'05" N, 91°12'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lazy Lake”
Column
2: “49°05'45" N, 91°14'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bird Lake”
Column
2: “48°19'03" N, 91°15'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kuutsinaaq Lake”
Column
2: “68°31'45" N, 91°17'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Uluujaq Lake”
Column
2: “69°38'20" N, 91°21'55" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amiksangiq Lake”
Column
2: “69°23'10" N, 91°27'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Marcelle Lake”
Column
2: “49°44'41" N, 91°03'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nest Lake”
Column
2: “48°08'53" N, 91°33'01" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Manaqturvik Lake”
Column
2: “69°28'15" N, 91°35'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Allan Lake”
Column
2: “48°24'13" N, 91°35'33" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Moxness Lake”
Column
2: “48°27'12" N, 91°35'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Folkard Lake”
Column
2: “50°31'22" N, 91°39'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pisky Lake”
Column
2: “49°10'20" N, 91°04'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Jackfish Lake”
Column
2: “49°06'52" N, 91°50'13" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Burwash Lake”
Column
2: “68°50'00" N, 91°53'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Milk Lake”
Column
2: “48°45'47" N, 91°55'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Leach Lake”
Column
2: “49°07'27" N, 91°06'55" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Notley Lake”
Column
2: “52°18'29" N, 92°15'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kastner Lake”
Column
2: “50°36'17" N, 92°22'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cavano Lake”
Column
2: “51°13'51" N, 92°24'11" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McKenna Lake”
Column
2: “50°30'57" N, 92°27'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Seul”
Column
2: “50°19'30" N, 92°29'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lady Melville Lake”
Column
2: “69°08'00" N, 92°30'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Machum Lake”
Column
2: “63°16'00" N, 92°36'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Turtle Lake”
Column
2: “48°47'28" N, 92°41'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Anaway Lake”
Column
2: “49°57'00" N, 92°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Butts Lake”
Column
2: “63°43'00" N, 92°44'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Uqsulik Lakes”
Column
2: “69°50'10" N, 92°55'10" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Atikamaykus Lake”
Column
2: “54°48'27" N, 92°55'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ptarmigan Lake”
Column
2: “76°23'00" N, 92°56'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gibson Lake”
Column
2: “63°30'00" N, 93°12'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Waweyahao Lake”
Column
2: “55°46'11" N, 93°13'28" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sandy Lake”
Column
2: “53°01'09" N, 93°02'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amitsuarjuk Lake”
Column
2: “69°27'10" N, 93°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amitjok Lake”
Column
2: “68°56'25" N, 93°21'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sakwesew Lake”
Column
2: “55°25'06" N, 93°29'06" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hagen Lake”
Column
2: “50°00'09" N, 93°34'15" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sanagak Lake”
Column
2: “70°15'00" N, 93°35'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Jekyll Lake”
Column
2: “69°45'00" N, 93°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Trout Lake”
Column
2: “49°09'07" N, 93°44'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Redfish Lake”
Column
2: “69°32'00" N, 93°45'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Rail Lake”
Column
2: “49°49'42" N, 93°52'56" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pearl Lake”
Column
2: “49°52'05" N, 93°55'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Eleanor Lake”
Column
2: “75°23'00" N, 93°58'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Munro Lake”
Column
2: “62°23'00" N, 94°11'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Beaver Lake”
Column
2: “49°47'18" N, 94°12'55" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gods Lake”
Column
2: “54°40'26" N, 94°14'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kate Austin Lake”
Column
2: “74°41'00" N, 94°17'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hammerhetas Lake”
Column
2: “49°26'36" N, 94°18'02" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Southern Lake”
Column
2: “62°13'00" N, 94°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Banks Lake”
Column
2: “63°08'00" N, 94°28'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Carlbom Lake”
Column
2: “50°31'00" N, 94°31'20" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Quartzite Lake”
Column
2: “62°22'00" N, 94°32'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Andrews Lake”
Column
2: “63°53'00" N, 94°35'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Trout Lake”
Column
2: “49°48'43" N, 94°47'55" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ruins Lake”
Column
2: “74°41'00" N, 94°55'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Blakely Lake”
Column
2: “63°18'00" N, 94°56'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Strip Lake”
Column
2: “74°43'00" N, 94°58'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Teardrop Lake”
Column
2: “74°41'00" N, 94°59'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kaminak Lake”
Column
2: “62°10'00" N, 95°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bear Lake”
Column
2: “53°03'13" N, 95°01'56" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kaokasaseekaki Lake”
Column
2: “52°30'29" N, 95°10'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Maguse Lake”
Column
2: “61°37'00" N, 95°10'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Starr Lake”
Column
2: “50°28'11" N, 95°13'35" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Stamm Lake”
Column
2: “50°35'13" N, 95°16'09" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hyde Lake”
Column
2: “60°36'00" N, 95°17'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bélanger Lake”
Column
2: “49°46'19" N, 95°19'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Martell Lake”
Column
2: “63°52'00" N, 95°21'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Scout Lake”
Column
2: “51°24'42” N, 95°22'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kinsley Lake”
Column
2: “50°32'49” N, 95°25'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Napajut Lake”
Column
2: “61°11'00” N, 95°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tullibee Lake”
Column
2: “53°52'01” N, 95°27'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Carberry Lake”
Column
2: “50°07'35” N, 95°31'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Victory Lake”
Column
2: “62°36'00” N, 95°31'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Harris Lake”
Column
2: “55°53'08” N, 95°32'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Black River Lake”
Column
2: “50°44'34” N, 95°33'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Upper Maguse Lake”
Column
2: “61°48'00” N, 95°34'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Oxford Lake”
Column
2: “54°50'57” N, 95°37'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tehek Lake”
Column
2: “64°55'00” N, 95°38'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sasaginnigak Lake”
Column
2: “51°35'36” N, 95°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ranger Seal Lake”
Column
2: “66°22'00” N, 95°43'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole
Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis,
LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qamanirjuaq Lake”
Column
2: “62°57'00” N, 95°46'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Barren Lake”
Column
2: “74°48'40” N, 95°05'30" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Probe Lake”
Column
2: “71°31'00” N, 95°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Maseenapeekeenekin Lake”
Column
2: “53°48'58” N, 95°50'16" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Waweyasew Lake”
Column
2: “56°29'03” N, 95°52'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Spi Lake”
Column
2: “62°03'00” N, 95°52'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Leonard Neufeld Lake”
Column
2: “54°32'45” N, 95°08'48" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Yeo Lake”
Column
2: “53°03'50” N, 96°00'49" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Koka Lake”
Column
2: “68°31'00” N, 96°15'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tupik Lake”
Column
2: “64°20'10” N, 96°16'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mooney Lake”
Column
2: “57°53'11” N, 96°22'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wasahowakow Lake”
Column
2: “53°27'25” N, 96°23'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Gronbeck Lake”
Column
2: “59°46'35” N, 96°28'53" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Stubner Lake”
Column
2: “59°16'10” N, 96°03'52" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Harling Lake”
Column
2: “61°41'00” N, 96°32'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pitz Lake”
Column
2: “63°57'00” N, 96°32'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qikittalik Lake”
Column
2: “64°25'00” N, 96°39'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Ayaktuukvik Lake”
Column
2: “64°33'00” N, 96°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Molson Lake”
Column
2: “54°12'04” N, 96°45'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Amitsoq Lake”
Column
2: “68°56'00” N, 96°47'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Little Deer Lake”
Column
2: “51°32'38” N, 96°48'46" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Trud Lake”
Column
2: “62°14'00” N, 96°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kingfisher Lake”
Column
2: “50°00'41” N, 96°52'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cecil Nelson Lake”
Column
2: “56°52'19” N, 96°57'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Traer Lake”
Column
2: “58°32'33” N, 96°58'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mowers Lake”
Column
2: “60°13'00” N, 96°08'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lane Lake”
Column
2: “58°56'07” N, 97°10'13" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cook Lake”
Column
2: “55°36'00” N, 97°12'15" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Edmonds Lake”
Column
2: “57°27'45” N, 97°19'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Malaher Lake”
Column
2: “60°10'00” N, 97°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “South Henik Lake”
Column
2: “61°30'00” N, 97°20'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Norris Lake”
Column
2: “50°27'54” N, 97°23'42" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Okotakunusk Lake”
Column
2: “57°09'01” N, 97°24'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Cross Lake”
Column
2: “54°44'55” N, 97°30'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sadeski Lake”
Column
2: “59°38'32” N, 97°31'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pauls Lake”
Column
2: “50°36'38” N, 97°32'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sipiwesk Lake”
Column
2: “55°05'18” N, 97°34'31" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Princess Mary Lake”
Column
2: “63°57'00" N, 97°35'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel —; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Age Lake”
Column
2: “55°59'59" N, 97°36'22" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “North Henik Lake”
Column
2: “61°44'00" N, 97°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tatinnai Lake”
Column
2: “60°55'00" N, 97°41'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “McGorman Lake”
Column
2: “58°24'31" N, 97°42'32" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mystery Lake”
Column
2: “55°50'50" N, 97°43'40" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kekekew Lake”
Column
2: “54°11'17" N, 97°48'50" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dorward Lake”
Column
2: “59°11'37" N, 97°58'45" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Yathkyed Lake”
Column
2: “62°40'00" N, 97°58'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Birthday Bay”
Column
2: “73°50'00" N, 97°08'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Qamanaarjuk Lake”
Column
2: “64°41'00" N, 98°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Playgreen Lake”
Column
2: “54°02'00" N, 98°14'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “George Lake”
Column
2: “49°56'57" N, 98°16'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Steepbank Lake”
Column
2: “50°54'16" N, 98°02'08" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nowyak Lake”
Column
2: “61°50'00" N, 98°21'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Mallery Lake”
Column
2: “63°59'00" N, 98°23'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Soab Lake”
Column
2: “55°14'31" N, 98°24'55" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding
after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wintonick Lake”
Column
2: “59°49'48" N, 98°25'14" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Southern Indian Lake”
Column
2: “57°10'00" N, 98°29'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dalpe Lake”
Column
2: “60°26'00" N, 98°38'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lisowicky Lake”
Column
2: “58°05'45" N, 98°40'54" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Hawk Hill Lake”
Column
2: “61°06'00" N, 98°40'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lac Manitoba”
Column
2: “50°59'00" N, 98°48'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Otter Lake”
Column
2: “61°08'00" N, 98°05'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Younger Lake”
Column
2: “59°53'27" N, 98°58'07" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Greenaway Lake”
Column
2: “54°47'15" N, 98°09'38" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Bate Lake”
Column
2: “61°38'00" N, 99°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tebesjuak Lake”
Column
2: “63°46'00" N, 99°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Aberdeen Lake”
Column
2: “64°30'00" N, 99°00'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Pamiutuq Lake”
Column
2: “63°09'00" N, 99°14'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Menauhswun Lake”
Column
2: “53°31'56" N, 99°16'47" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Farquhar Lake”
Column
2: “59°27'11" N, 99°22'29" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Forsyth Lake”
Column
2: “73°01'00" N, 99°22'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Watterson Lake”
Column
2: “61°14'00" N, 99°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Tulemalu Lake”
Column
2: “62°58'00" N, 99°25'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Wapiyayo Lake”
Column
2: “55°57'23" N, 99°27'26" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Campbell Lake”
Column
2: “50°37'22" N, 99°37'34" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sand Lake”
Column
2: “65°15'00" N, 99°37'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Boland Lake”
Column
2: “61°41'00" N, 99°38'00" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Kameesak Lake”
Column
2: “53°25'19" N, 99°43'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “East Eighteen Lake”
Column
2: “50°27'01" N, 99°47'23" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Dauphin Lake”
Column
2: “51°17'00" N, 99°47'04" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Shumyhora Lake”
Column
2: “59°27'17" N, 99°48'36" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Nueltin Lake”
Column
2: “59°59'56" N, 99°49'59" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Sucharov Lake”
Column
2: “58°34'22" N, 99°05'44" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Findlay Lake”
Column
2: “57°26'09" N, 99°50'25" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Lytwyns Lake”
Column
2: “51°35'50" N, 99°50'58" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Stephenson Lake”
Column
2: “57°09'41" N, 99°52'18" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“101.”
Column
1: “Herblet Lake”
Column
2: “54°55'58" N, 99°54'19" W”
Column
3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting
waterways”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 2 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 22 on page 400 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“22.1”
Column
1: “Thames River”
Column
2: “42o19'11" N, 82o27'18" W”
Column
3: “43o08'54" N, 80o45'40" W”
Column
4: “From Woodstock to Lake St. Clair”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Part 2 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by
adding after item 29 on page 401 in the columns shown the following:
|
|
|
|
Item:
“29.1”
Column
1: “West Branch of Don River”
Column
2: “43o39'02" N, 79o20'52" W”
Column
3: “43o51'14" N, 79o30'47" W”
Column
4: “From Maple to Lake Ontario”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 62 on page 403 the
following:
|
|
|
|
“PART
3
OCEAN
DRAINAGE BASINS
All
navigable waters situated in Canada and included in the Atlantic Ocean
drainage basin, the Hudson Bay drainage basin, the Arctic Ocean drainage
basin, the Pacific Ocean drainage basin or the Gulf of Mexico drainage
basin.”
|
|
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE 2
carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.
|
|
|
|
On
Clause 1,
|
|
|
|
That
Bill C-45, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 4 and 5 on page 1 with
the following:
|
|
“1.
This Act may be cited as the Omnibus Act No.2, 2012.”
|
|
The
question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following
recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms,
Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas
Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.
|
|
|
|
Clause
1 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean,
Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy
Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.
|
|
|
|
The
Title carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.
|
|
|
|
The
Bill carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian
Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6;
NAYS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.
|
|
|
|
ORDERED, — That the Chair report the
Bill to the House.
|
|
|
|
At 7:43 p.m.
on Friday, November 23, 2012, the Committee adjourned to the call of the
Chair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-François
Lafleur,
Suzie Cadieux,
Clerks of the Committee
|
|
|
|
|
|