Skip to main content Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Order Paper

No. 86

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

10:00 a.m.


Order of Business

Daily Routine of Business — at 10:00 a.m.

Tabling of Documents

Introduction of Government Bills

Statements by Ministers

Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations

Presenting Reports from Committees

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

No. 1
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act (programming provided by the Corporation)”.
No. 2
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 (prohibition against oil tankers in Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound)”.
No. 3
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Business Development Bank of Canada Act and the Canada Student Loans Act (student loan system more supportive of students)”.
No. 4
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to prevent the use of the Internet to distribute pornographic material involving children”.
No. 5
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to promote the teaching of aboriginal history and culture in Canada's schools”.
No. 6
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (interest rates on debts owed) and to make a consequential amendment to the Income Tax Regulations”.
No. 7
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Canadian Autism Awareness Day”.
No. 8
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “ An Act respecting a National Appreciation Day”.
No. 9
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act (marriage after the age of sixty years)”.
No. 10
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (qualification for and entitlement to benefits)”.
No. 11
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Leif Erickson Day”.
No. 12
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the labelling of bottled water”.
No. 13
January 26, 2009 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda)”.
No. 14
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Wheat Board Act (members of the board)”.
No. 15
January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deductibility of expense of tools provided as a requirement of employment)”.
No. 16
January 27, 2009 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (goods and services tax on school authorities)”.
No. 17
January 28, 2009 — Mr. Volpe (Eglinton—Lawrence) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (electronic stability control)”.
No. 18
January 29, 2009 — Mr. Mark (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a Memorial Wall for Canada's fallen soldiers and peacekeepers”.
No. 19
January 29, 2009 — Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (no interest on repayments)”.
No. 20
January 29, 2009 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sports betting)”.
No. 21
January 30, 2009 — Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (benefits for illness, injury or quarantine)”.
No. 22
February 2, 2009 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Access to Information Act (improved access)”.
No. 23
February 2, 2009 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mischief against educational or other institution)”.
No. 24
February 23, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (telephone, fax and Internet service to campaign offices)”.
No. 25
February 23, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deduction for medical doctors in underserviced areas)”.
No. 26
February 23, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (sponsorship of relative)”.
No. 27
March 2, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (elimination of statutory release) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”.
No. 28
March 5, 2009 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (military dependants)”.
No. 29
March 5, 2009 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (mutual fund trust accounting principles)”.
No. 30
March 6, 2009 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (consent)”.
No. 31
March 23, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — Bill entitled “An Act to limit the use of phosphorus in dishwasher detergent”.
No. 32
March 23, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (use of hand-held cellular telephone while operating a motor vehicle)”.
No. 33
March 31, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a day to honour Canada’s marine industry”.
No. 34
April 16, 2009 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — Bill entitled “An Act to designate the second day of April as Canadian Autism Awareness Day”.
No. 35
April 16, 2009 — Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (minimum wage)”.
No. 36
April 28, 2009 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish National Ovarian Cancer Month”.
No. 37
April 28, 2009 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Pierre Elliott Trudeau Day”.
No. 38
June 5, 2009 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (amphetamines)”.
No. 39
June 12, 2009 — Mr. Norlock (Northumberland—Quinte West) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a National Hunting, Trapping and Fishing Heritage Day”.
No. 40
June 17, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — Bill entitled “An Act to prohibit sweatshop labour goods”.
No. 41
September 10, 2009 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (members who cross the floor)”.
No. 42
September 10, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 (equity investments)”.
No. 43
September 10, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 and the Income Tax Act (pension contribution holidays)”.
No. 44
September 10, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (employer-sponsored pension plans)”.
No. 45
September 16, 2009 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — Bill entitled “An Act regarding the inclusion of the Queen Charlotte Islands as a prescribed northern zone under the Income Tax Act”.
No. 46
September 17, 2009 — Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the Insurance Business (Banks and Bank Holding Companies) Regulations”.
No. 47
September 24, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a National Food Day”.
No. 48
September 24, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (security certificates and special advocates)”.
No. 49
September 24, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish the Department of Peace”.
No. 50
September 24, 2009 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (minimum wage)”.
No. 51
September 24, 2009 — Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer) — Bill entitled “An Act regarding free public transit for seniors”.
No. 52
September 24, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act (annual report)”.

First Reading of Senate Public Bills

Motions

No. 1
February 12, 2009 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, February 12, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 2
February 23, 2009 — Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, February 12, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 3
February 25, 2009 — Mr. Murphy (Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, February 23, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 4
February 26, 2009 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, February 26, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 5
February 26, 2009 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, February 26, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 6
March 9, 2009 — Mr. Lessard (Chambly—Borduas) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, March 9, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 7
March 12, 2009 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 8
March 19, 2009 — Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 9
March 25, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 10
March 25, 2009 — Mr. Weston (Saint John) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 11
March 31, 2009 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, March 25, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 12
March 31, 2009 — Mr. Masse (Windsor West) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, presented on Tuesday, March 31, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 13
April 27, 2009 — Mrs. Lavallée (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, April 23, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 14
April 27, 2009 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, April 23, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 15
May 6, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 16
May 14, 2009 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, May 14, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 17
May 14, 2009 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 18
May 25, 2009 — Mr. Blais (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 19
May 25, 2009 — Mr. Cardin (Sherbrooke) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, April 1, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 20
May 25, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 21
May 26, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 22
May 26, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 23
May 26, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, April 1, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 24
May 26, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, February 12, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 25
May 26, 2009 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Monday, May 4, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 26
June 10, 2009 — Mr. Calandra (Oak Ridges—Markham) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 27
June 10, 2009 — Mr. Lee (Scarborough—Rouge River) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 28
June 10, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 29
June 15, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 30
June 16, 2009 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — That the Third Report of the Standing Joint Committee on the Library of Parliament, presented on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 31
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 12, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Saturday, October 10, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 32
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, October 16, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 33
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, October 16, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 34
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, October 16, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 35
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, October 16, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 36
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 37
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 38
June 18, 2009 — Mr. Harris (St. John's East) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, October 15, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 39
September 10, 2009 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, October 16, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 40
September 10, 2009 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 41
September 14, 2009 — Mr. Rodriguez (Honoré-Mercier) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, April 23, 2009, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 42
September 15, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, June 25, 2009, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, October 23, 2009, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.

Presenting Petitions

Questions on the Order Paper

    The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.

Government Orders

Statements by Members — at 2:00 p.m.

Oral Questions — not later than 2:15 p.m. until 3:00 p.m.

Government Orders

Private Members' Business — from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.