ENVI Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Minutes of Proceedings
The Chair called Clause 1.
Daniel Watson, Stephen Woodley, by videoconference from Cancun, Mexico, Jim Robb, Janet Sumner, Michael Whittamore and Alan Latourelle made statements and answered questions.
At 5:04 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 5:07 p.m., the sitting resumed.
The Committee commenced its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
On Clause 1,
Ed Fast moved, — That Bill C-18, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 7 to 12 on page 1 with the following:“conservation means, the protection, care, management and maintenance of ecosystems, habitats, wildlife species and populations, within and outside of their natural environment, in order to safeguard the natural conditions for their long-term permanence. (conservation)”
By unanimous consent, Clause 1 was allowed to stand.
On new Clause 1.1,
Pursuant to the order adopted by the Committee on Tuesday, May 10, 2016, the following amendment, submitted by Elizabeth May for the consideration of the Committee, was deemed moved:
That Bill C-18 be amended by adding after line 12 on page 1 the following new clause:
“1.1 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 5:
5.1 The Minister must, in the management of the Park, ensure that protection for its natural resources and natural processes is at least equal to that provided by existing park management plans that apply to areas near the Park.”
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The amendment seeks to amend the Rouge National Urban Park Act by adding a new section 5.1 to the Act.
As House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition, states on page 766:
“An amendment to a bill must be relevant in that it must always relate to the subject matter of the bill or to the clause thereof under consideration.”
Since the amendment is seeking to add a new section to the current Rouge National Urban Park Act that does not relate directly to the changes included in Bill C-18, it is the opinion of the Chair that the amendment is inadmissible.
On Clause 2,
Ed Fast moved, — That Bill C-18, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 15 to 18 on page 1 with the following:“6 (1) The Minister must, in the management of the Park, take into consideration the protection of its natural ecosystems and cultural landscapes and the maintenance of its native wildlife and of the health of those ecosystems.”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Ed Fast and it was negatived, by a show of hands: YEAS: 3; NAYS: 6.
On motion of Mark Gerretsen, it was agreed, — That the Committee do now adjourn.
At 5:27 p.m., the Committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.