Skip to main content
Start of content

FINA Committee Meeting

Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS
 
Meeting No. 56
 
Thursday, February 3, 2011
 

The Standing Committee on Finance met in a televised session at 8:47 a.m. this day, in Room 237-C, Centre Block, the Chair, James Rajotte, presiding.

 

Members of the Committee present: Kelly Block, Hon. Scott Brison, Robert Carrier, Shelly Glover, Russ Hiebert, Cathy McLeod, Massimo Pacetti, Daniel Paillé, James Rajotte, Paul Szabo and Mike Wallace.

 

Acting Members present: Carol Hughes for Thomas J. Mulcair.

 

In attendance: Library of Parliament: Mark Mahabir, Analyst; Brett Stuckey, Analyst.

 

Witnesses: As an individual: Hon. Donald James Johnston, Founding Partner, Heenan Blaikie LLP.

 
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the Committee on Monday, October 4, 2010, the Committee resumed its study of Tax Evasion and Offshore Bank Accounts.
 

The Hon. Donald James Johnston made a statement and answered questions.

 

At 10:17 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 10:19 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 
The Committee proceeded to the consideration of matters related to Committee business.
 
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the Committee on Thursday, February 3, 2011 the Committee commenced its study on the Production of Documents
 

Scott Brison moved, — That the Committee report the following to the House of Commons: Whereas the Committee passed a motion on November 17th, 2010 which stated in part:

The committee also orders that the Government of Canada provide the committee with electronic copies of the following:

• Five-year projections of total corporate profits before taxes and effective corporate tax rates (2010-11 to 2014-15);

And whereas the Government of Canada responded to the committee on November 24th by stating that:

"Projections of corporate profits before taxes and effective corporate income tax rates are a Cabinet confidence. As such, we are not in a position to provide these series to the Committee."

And whereas the Committee’s motion of November 17th, 2010 also stated in part:

That the committee also orders that the Government of Canada provide the committee with electronic copies of the following documents as they relate to each justice bill listed in Mr. Brison's motion of October 6 as well as the following bills: S-2, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts, S-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and another Act, S-7, An Act to deter terrorism and to amend the State Immunity Act, S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (auto theft and trafficking in property obtained by crime), S-10, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts, C-48: An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to the National Defence Act (Protecting Canadians by Ending Sentence Discounts for Multiple Murder Acts), C-50: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (interception of private communications and related warrants and orders) (Improving Access to Investigative Tools for Serious Crimes Act), C-51: An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Competition Act and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act (Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act), C-52: An Act regulating telecommunications facilities to support investigations :

• the incremental cost estimates broken down by Capital, Operations & Maintenance and Other categories

• the baseline departmental funding requirement excluding the impacts of the bills and Acts, broken down by Capital, Operations and Maintenance and Other categories;

• the total departmental Annual Reference Level (ARL), including all quasi-statutory and non-quasi-statutory items, including Capital, Operations and Maintenance and Other categories, including the incremental cost estimates;

• detailed cost accounting, analysis and projections, including assumptions, for each of the bills and Acts, conducted in accordance with the Treasury Board Guide to Costing;

And whereas the Government of Canada responded to the committee on December 1st by stating that:

"The issue of whether there are any costs associated with the implementation of any of the Government’s Justice bills is a matter of Cabinet confidence and, as such, the Government is not in a position to provide such information or documents."

Accordingly, the Committee wishes to draw the attention of the House on what appears to be a breach of its privileges by the Government of Canada’s refusal to provide documents ordered by the Committee, and recommends that House take whatever measures it deems appropriate.

 

After debate, the question was put on the motion and it was agreed to, by a show of hands: YEAS: 6; NAYS: 5.

 

At 10:35 a.m., the Committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.

 



Jean-François Pagé
Clerk of the Committee

 
 
2011/03/28 10:10 a.m.