Skip to main content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA
42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION

Journals

No. 187

Monday, June 5, 2017

11:00 a.m.



Prayer
Private Members' Business

At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business.

The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on the Status of Women of Bill C-345, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (pregnant and nursing employees).

Ms. Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue), seconded by Ms. Boutin-Sweet (Hochelaga), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on the Status of Women.

Debate arose thereon.

Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the Order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper.

Government Orders

Ms. Monsef (Minister of Status of Women) for Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Ms. Qualtrough (Minister of Sport and Persons with Disabilities), moved, — That, in the opinion of the House, climate change is a global problem that requires a global solution; and that, despite the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement, Canada remain committed to the implementation of the Agreement, as it is in the best interest of all Canadians. (Government Business No. 15)

Debate arose thereon.

Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by adding the following:

“in particular, the interest of taking a realistic and achievable approach, as the previous government did, and finding the appropriate balance between protecting the environment and growing the economy in a way that does not increase the overall tax burden on Canadians”.

Debate arose thereon.

Mr. Choquette (Drummond), seconded by Ms. Boutin-Sweet (Hochelaga), moved the following subamendment, — That the amendment be amended by deleting all the words after the words “realistic and achievable approach,” and substituting the following:

“and finding the appropriate balance between protecting the environment and growing the economy and that the House therefore call on the government to commit to new science-based targets that deliver on Canada’s undertakings from the Agreement, and to specific measures and investments to achieve those greenhouse gas reductions”.

Debate arose thereon.

Statements By Members

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements.

Oral Questions

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

Daily Routine Of Business

Tabling of Documents

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Alghabra (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs (Consular Affairs)) laid upon the Table, — Copy of the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, and Explanatory Memorandum, adopted at Geneva on October 19, 1996. — Sessional Paper No. 8532-421-41.


Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Alghabra (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs (Consular Affairs)) laid upon the Table, — Copy of the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance, and Explanatory Memorandum, adopted at Geneva on November 23, 2007. — Sessional Paper No. 8532-421-42.


Presenting Reports from Committees

Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), from the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented the 28th Report of the Committee, "Public Accounts of Canada 2016". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-234.

Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 30, 31, 35 and 61) was tabled.


Introduction of Private Members' Bills

Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), seconded by Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil), Bill C-357, An Act to amend the Public Service Superannuation Act (Group 1 contributors), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.


Presenting Petitions

Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows:

— by Mr. Falk (Provencher), one concerning immigration (No. 421-01435);

— by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-01436);

— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-01437) and one concerning genetic engineering (No. 421-01438);

— by Mr. Paradis (Brome—Missisquoi), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-01439);

— by Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove), one concerning assisted suicide (No. 421-01440) and one concerning sex selection (No. 421-01441);

— by Mr. Stewart (Burnaby South), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-01442).

Government Orders

Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-44, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and one sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and

That, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at report stage and fifteen minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the said stages of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.

Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

(Division No. 291 -- Vote no 291)
YEAS: 166, NAYS: 124

YEAS -- POUR

Aldag
Alghabra
Alleslev
Amos
Anandasangaree
Arseneault
Arya
Ayoub
Bagnell
Bains
Baylis
Beech
Bennett
Bibeau
Boissonnault
Bossio
Bratina
Breton
Brison
Caesar-Chavannes
Casey (Cumberland—Colchester)
Casey (Charlottetown)
Chagger
Champagne
Chan
Chen
Cormier
Dabrusin
Damoff
DeCourcey
Dhillon
Drouin
Dubourg
Duclos
Duguid
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Dzerowicz
Easter
Ehsassi
El-Khoury
Ellis
Erskine-Smith
Eyolfson
Fergus
Fillmore
Finnigan
Fisher
Fonseca
Fortier
Fragiskatos
Fraser (West Nova)
Fraser (Central Nova)
Freeland
Fry
Fuhr
Garneau
Goldsmith-Jones
Goodale
Gould
Graham
Grewal
Hajdu
Hardie
Harvey
Hehr
Holland
Housefather
Hussen
Hutchings
Iacono
Joly
Jones
Jordan
Jowhari
Kang
Khalid
Khera
Lambropoulos
Lametti
Lamoureux
Lauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)
LeBlanc
Lebouthillier
Lefebvre
Lemieux
Levitt
Lightbound
Lockhart
Long
Longfield
MacKinnon (Gatineau)
Maloney
Massé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)
May (Cambridge)
McCrimmon
McDonald
McGuinty
McKay
McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)
McLeod (Northwest Territories)
Mendès
Mendicino
Mihychuk
Miller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)
Monsef
Morneau
Morrissey
Murray
Nassif
Nault
Ng
O'Connell
Oliphant
Oliver
O'Regan
Ouellette
Paradis
Peschisolido
Peterson
Petitpas Taylor
Philpott
Picard
Poissant
Qualtrough
Ratansi
Rioux
Robillard
Rodriguez
Romanado
Rota
Rudd
Ruimy
Rusnak
Sahota
Saini
Sajjan
Samson
Sangha
Sarai
Scarpaleggia
Schiefke
Schulte
Serré
Sgro
Shanahan
Sheehan
Sidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)
Sidhu (Brampton South)
Sikand
Simms
Sohi
Sorbara
Tabbara
Tan
Tassi
Trudeau
Vandal
Vandenbeld
Vaughan
Virani
Whalen
Wilkinson
Wilson-Raybould
Wrzesnewskyj
Young
Zahid
Total: -- 166

NAYS -- CONTRE

Aboultaif
Albas
Albrecht
Allison
Anderson
Arnold
Aubin
Barlow
Barsalou-Duval
Beaulieu
Benson
Benzen
Bergen
Bezan
Blaikie
Blaney (North Island—Powell River)
Blaney (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis)
Block
Boucher
Boudrias
Boulerice
Boutin-Sweet
Brassard
Brosseau
Brown
Calkins
Carrie
Choquette
Christopherson
Clarke
Cooper
Cullen
Deltell
Doherty
Donnelly
Dreeshen
Dubé
Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona)
Dusseault
Duvall
Eglinski
Falk
Finley
Fortin
Gallant
Généreux
Genuis
Gill
Gladu
Godin
Gourde
Hardcastle
Johns
Jolibois
Kelly
Kent
Kmiec
Kusie
Kwan
Lake
Lauzon (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry)
Laverdière
Lebel
Leitch
Liepert
Lobb
Lukiwski
MacGregor
MacKenzie
Maguire
Malcolmson
Marcil
Masse (Windsor West)
Mathyssen
May (Saanich—Gulf Islands)
McCauley (Edmonton West)
McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)
Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound)
Moore
Motz
Nater
Nicholson
Nuttall
O'Toole
Paul-Hus
Plamondon
Poilievre
Quach
Rankin
Rayes
Reid
Rempel
Richards
Sansoucy
Saroya
Scheer
Schmale
Shields
Shipley
Sopuck
Sorenson
Stanton
Ste-Marie
Stetski
Stewart
Stubbs
Sweet
Thériault
Tilson
Trost
Trudel
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vecchio
Viersen
Wagantall
Warawa
Warkentin
Watts
Waugh
Webber
Weir
Yurdiga
Zimmer
Total: -- 124

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-44, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1.

Group No. 1

Motion No. 1 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting the short title.

Motion No. 3 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 7.

Motion No. 5 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 23.

Motion No. 6 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 24.

Motion No. 7 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 42.

Motion No. 8 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 43.

Motion No. 9 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 44.

Motion No. 10 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 49.

Motion No. 11 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 50.

Motion No. 12 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 64.

Motion No. 13 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 65.

Motion No. 14 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 113.

Motion No. 15 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 114.

Motion No. 16 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 122.

Motion No. 17 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 123.

Motion No. 18 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 124.

Motion No. 19 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 125.

Motion No. 20 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 126.

Motion No. 21 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 127.

Motion No. 22 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 128.

Motion No. 23 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 129.

Motion No. 24 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 130.

Motion No. 25 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 131.

Motion No. 26 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 132.

Motion No. 27 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 133.

Motion No. 28 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 134.

Motion No. 29 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 135.

Motion No. 30 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 136.

Motion No. 31 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 137.

Motion No. 32 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 138.

Motion No. 33 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 139.

Motion No. 34 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 140.

Motion No. 35 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 141.

Motion No. 36 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 142.

Motion No. 37 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 143.

Motion No. 38 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 144.

Motion No. 39 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 145.

Motion No. 40 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 146.

Motion No. 41 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 147.

Motion No. 42 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 148.

Motion No. 43 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 149.

Motion No. 44 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 150.

Motion No. 45 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 151.

Motion No. 46 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 152.

Motion No. 47 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 153.

Motion No. 48 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 154.

Motion No. 49 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 155.

Motion No. 50 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 156.

Motion No. 51 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 157.

Motion No. 52 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 158.

Motion No. 53 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 159.

Motion No. 54 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 160.

Motion No. 55 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 161.

Motion No. 56 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 162.

Motion No. 57 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 163.

Motion No. 58 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 164.

Motion No. 59 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 165.

Motion No. 60 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 166.

Motion No. 61 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 167.

Motion No. 62 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 168.

Motion No. 63 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 169.

Motion No. 64 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 170.

Motion No. 65 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 171.

Motion No. 66 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 172.

Motion No. 67 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 173.

Motion No. 68 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 174.

Motion No. 69 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 175.

Motion No. 70 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 176.

Motion No. 71 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 177.

Motion No. 72 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 178.

Motion No. 73 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 179.

Motion No. 74 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 180.

Motion No. 75 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 181.

Motion No. 76 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 182.

Motion No. 77 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 183.

Motion No. 78 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 184.

Motion No. 79 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 185.

Motion No. 80 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 186.

Motion No. 81 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 187.

Motion No. 82 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 188.

Motion No. 83 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 189.

Motion No. 84 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 190.

Motion No. 85 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 191.

Motion No. 88 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 312.

Motion No. 89 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 313.

Motion No. 90 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 314.

Motion No. 91 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 315.

Motion No. 92 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 316.

Motion No. 93 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 317.

Motion No. 94 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 403.

Motion No. 95 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 404.

Motion No. 96 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 405.

Motion No. 97 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 406.

Motion No. 98 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 442.

Motion No. 99 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 443.

Motion No. 100 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 444.

Motion No. 101 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 445.

Motion No. 102 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 446.

Motion No. 103 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 447.

Motion No. 104 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 448.

Motion No. 105 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 449.

Motion No. 106 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 450.

Motion No. 107 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 451.

Motion No. 108 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 452.

Motion No. 109 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 453.

Motion No. 110 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 454.

Motion No. 111 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 455.

Motion No. 112 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 456.

Motion No. 113 of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That Bill C-44 be amended by deleting Clause 457.

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 9:44 p.m., pursuant to Order made earlier today under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 3 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 6, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 5 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 7 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 8 to 13, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 14 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 15, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 16 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 17 to 85, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 88 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 89 to 92, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 93 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 94 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 95 to 97, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 98 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 99 to 106, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 107 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 108 to 113, was deferred.

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 30, 2017, the recorded divisions were further deferred until Tuesday, June 6, 2017, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.


The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities of Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act and other Acts respecting transportation and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts.

Mr. Garneau (Minister of Transport), seconded by Mr. Bains (Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.

Debate arose thereon.

Notices of motions

Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of intention to move at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 57, that, in relation to the consideration of Government Business No. 15, the debate not be further adjourned.

Government Orders

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Garneau (Minister of Transport), seconded by Mr. Bains (Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development), — That Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act and other Acts respecting transportation and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.

The debate continued.

Returns and Reports Deposited with the Acting Clerk of the House

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Acting Clerk of the House were laid upon the Table as follows:

— by Mr. Carr (Minister of Natural Resources) — Summary of the Corporate Plan for 2017-2018 to 2021-2022 of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-421-824-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Natural Resources)

— by Ms. Freeland (Minister of Foreign Affairs) — Reports of the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017, pursuant to the Access to Information Act and to the Privacy Act, R.S. 1985, c. A-1 and P-21, sbs. 72(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8561-421-932-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h)(v), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics)

Midnight
Adjournment Proceedings

At midnight, pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed.

After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted.

Accordingly, at 12:26 a.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until later today at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).