Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Questions
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Committees of the Whole House
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
Introduction
Nature of Private Bills
Principles of Private Bill Procedure
Form of a Private Bill
Legislative Process for Private Bills
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-125
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
23. Private Bills Practice
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[101]
Should the Committee receive new information after its report has been tabled, it may present a new report on the matter. For example, new evidence may be received showing that the other interested persons were sufficiently informed or that amended notices or additional notices have since appeared (
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 595;
Beauchesne
, 4
th
ed., p. 349).
[102]
Standing Order 135(1). In actual practice, an entry of the tabling is recorded in the
Journals
for that day (see, for example,
Journals
, July 9, 1975, p. 691; November 5, 1975, p. 824; November 1, 1976, p. 89; October 21, 1977, p. 24). This procedure differs from that for public bills which are introduced during Routine Proceedings either under the rubric “Introduction of Government Bills” or under the rubric “Introduction of Private Members’ Bills”. See
Chapter 10, “The Daily Program”
, and
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
, for additional information.
[103]
Standing Orders 89 and 135(1). These bills are not subject to the random draw procedure.
[104]
Standing Order 92(3).
[105]
Standing Order 135(2). See, for example,
Journals
, June 8, 1994, p. 547; May 5, 1999, p. 1812.
[106]
Standing Order 92(3).
[107]
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 599. The House may not debate any printed evidence taken by a Senate committee during the second reading stage (see Speaker’s ruling,
Journals
, December 4, 1962, pp. 354-5).
[108]
See
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
, for detailed information on these kinds of amendments. If second reading is delayed three or six months (adoption of the hoist amendment), or if the bill is rejected, no new bill with the same intent may be introduced during the same session (
Beauchesne
, 4
th
ed., p. 353). An amendment interjecting a matter of public policy into a private bill has been ruled out of order (see Speaker’s ruling,
Debates
, March 21, 1927, p. 1419). Similarly, an amendment expanding the scope of a private bill was also ruled out of order. In 1948, a Member moved that a private bill (
An Act respecting The Bell Telephone Company of Canada
) not be read a second time but “that it be resolved that in the opinion of this House no company should ask Parliament for an increase in authorized capital in excess of one hundred per cent”. The Deputy Speaker ruled the amendment out of order as it “would affect all bills which will hereafter be introduced into the house…” See
Debates
, April 30, 1948, pp. 3502-3.
[109]
Standing Order 141(1). In the first six years of Confederation, the House referred all private bills to the Standing Committee on Private Bills or to the Standing Committee on Banking and Commerce or the Standing Committee on Railways, Canals and Telegraph Lines (
Todd
, 3
rd
ed., p. 64). This rule was changed in 1873, when the House agreed that private bills should be sent to standing committees after second reading to allow time for the bills to be printed (
Dawson
, p. 247). From 1876 to 1965, all private bills were referred to the Standing Committee on Private Bills or to the Standing Committee on Banking and Commerce, the Standing Committee on Railways, Canals and Telegraph Lines or to the Standing Committee on Miscellaneous Bills. From 1965 to 1986, private bills were referred after second reading to the Standing Committee on Finance, Trade and Economic Affairs, the Standing Committee on Transportation and Communications or to the Standing Committee on Miscellaneous Private Bills. In 1986, the Standing Order was amended to refer all private bills to legislative committees after second reading (
Journals
, February 13, 1986, pp. 1709-10). However, since the beginning of the Thirty-Fifth Parliament (1994-97), all private bills have been considered in Committees of the Whole. See, for example,
Journals
, June 14, 1994, p. 584; June 22, 1994, p. 660; September 17, 1996, p. 633; April 14, 1997, p. 1383. See also
Debates
, May 10, 1966, pp. 4958-9; March 16, 1967, p. 14085, for comments on the consideration of private bills in a Committee of the Whole.
[110]
For examples of committees examining private bills referred to them, see Legislative Committee on Bill S-9,
An Act to amalgamate the two Corporations known, respectively, as “The Governing Council of the Salvation Army, Canada East” and “The Governing Council of the Salvation Army, Canada West” and to make necessary provisions regarding the charter of the amalgamated corporation
,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, February 15, 1990, Issue No. 1; Legislative Committee on Bill S-10,
An Act respecting the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, May 22, 1990, and May 30, 1990, Issue No. 1.
[111]
Standing Order 141(6). See
Journals
, April 7, 1927, p. 476; July 15, 1931, p. 539; August 9, 1958, p. 397; July 17, 1963, p. 221. See also
Beauchesne
, 4
th
ed., p. 361, for a list of reasons why private bills have been reported back without their preambles having been proven.
[112]
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., pp. 611-2.
[113]
Standing Order 141(3). See Legislative Committee on Bill S-10
, An Act respecting the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, May 22, 1990, and May 30, 1990, Issue No. 1, p. 19, in regard to the Chairman’s decision to cast a vote only in the event of a tie.
[114]
Standing Order 141(7).
[115]
Standing Order 141(5). For examples of private bills being reported back to the House from committee with amendments, see
Journals
, February 17, 1976, p. 1031 (Bill S-30,
An Act to incorporate Continental Bank of Canada
); April 6, 1978, p. 578 (Bill C-1001,
An Act respecting Bell Canada
). While Standing Orders 141(7) and 141(8) describe the procedures to be followed in regard to the reprint of a private bill, the procedures for clause-by-clause consideration in committee of a private bill and the referral back to the House and reprint of a private bill are the same today as those procedures established for the consideration of a public bill in committee. See
Chapter 16, “The Legislative Process”
, and
Chapter 20, “Committees”
.
[116]
Standing Order 141(6). See
Journals
, July 16, 1931, p. 552; August 11, 1958, p. 401; July 18, 1963, pp. 225-6. After the bill is reported back to the House with its preamble unproven and if the House wishes to have the bill reconsidered in committee, the motion to refer the bill back to committee is considered during Private Members’ Business.
[117]
Standing Order 141(4). See
Bourinot
, 4
th
ed., p. 612.
[118]
See, for example,
Journals
, December 18, 1963, p. 697.
[119]
In 1968, prior to the House resolving into a Committee of the Whole to consider a private bill, the sponsor of the bill informed the House that the promoters were not in favour of having their bill amended. The sponsor then asked that the order for consideration of the bill in Committee of the Whole be discharged and the bill be withdrawn from the
Order Paper
. The motion was adopted. See
Debates
, March 14, 1968, p. 7641;
Journals
, p. 774. Pursuant to Standing Order 139, if the promoters do not appear before the committee to proceed with the bill on two separate occasions, the committee is to report the bill back with a recommendation that it be withdrawn. This Standing Order stems from the days when committees considered numerous private bills. If the order was called in committee for the consideration of a private bill and the promoters did not appear, the committee would proceed to the next private bill on its agenda. If the promoters did not appear the second time their private bill was scheduled for consideration, the order would be discharged.
[120]
Standing Order 142. See
Journals
, February 26, 1976, p. 1070, where the Speaker ruled that report stage is part of the legislative process for the passage of a private bill. For an example of a private bill being amended at report stage, see
Journals
, October 28, 1971, p. 896; March 16, 1972, p. 195.
[121]
See, for example,
Journals
, March 15, 1893, p. 161; March 17, 1893, p. 170.
[122]
Standing Order 143.
[123]
See, for example,
Journals
, May 4, 1886, p. 215; May 5, 1886, p. 228; May 14, 1886, p. 267; May 17, 1886, p. 275.
[124]
See, for example,
Journals
, April 15, 1889, pp. 259-61.
[125]
See, for example,
Journals
, March 13, 1990, p. 1338; March 29, 1990, pp. 1435-6; June 6, 1990, p. 1838; June 12, 1990, pp. 1872-3.