Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Questions
Introduction
Oral Questions
Written Questions
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-150
Notes 151-200
Notes 201-222
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Committees of the Whole House
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
11. Questions
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[201]
Debates
, May 12, 1971, p. 5733.
[202]
Standing Order 39(1).
[203]
Debates
, May 5, 1971, p. 5515. See also
Debates
, February 25, 1991, p. 17590; March 8, 1991, p. 18237.
[204]
See, for example,
Debates
, November 18, 1994, p. 7993-4; December 13, 1994, pp. 9003-6; December 15, 1994, pp. 9116-8.
[205]
Debates
, October 2, 1991, p. 3147. The government has circumvented this procedural limitation by having a government Member place a question on the
Order Paper
requesting cost amounts for the preparation of responses to written questions for specified time periods (see, for example,
Debates
, April 7, 1992, pp. 9410-1; May 8, 1992, p. 10435; June 19, 1992, p. 12455; April 26, 1993, p. 18462).
[206]
Debates
, February 21, 1990, p. 8618; May 15, 1991, p. 100; February 9, 1995, pp. 9425-7; May 27, 1998, pp. 7281-3; February 8, 1999, pp. 11531-3. In the 1995 case, John Cummins (Delta) raised a question of privilege on December 13, 1994, in regard to the accuracy of the response he had received to a written question on November 18, 1994 (
Debates
, November 18, 1994, pp. 7993-4; December 13, 1994, pp. 9003-6). Two days later, the government supplied the Member with a supplementary answer to his question (
Debates
, December 15, 1994, pp. 9116-8). Later that same day, Mr. Cummins rose on a question of privilege to protest that the supplemental answer contained discrepancies (
Debates
, December 15, 1994, pp. 9153-5). On February 9, 1995, the Speaker ruled that it was a matter of interpretation of the wording of the question placed on the
Order Paper
which had subsequently led to a disagreement over certain facts in the answer supplied by the government (
Debates
, pp. 9425-7).
[207]
Debates
, February 28, 1983, p. 23278.
[208]
Standing Order 39(5)(
a
).
[209]
The rule change limiting the number of questions to four may have contributed to broader questions requiring more extensive research.
[210]
Debates
, May 18, 1989, p. 1891; March 10, 1992, p. 7938; May 6, 1996, pp. 2366-7; February 8, 1999, pp. 11531-3.
[211]
Debates
, May 18, 1989, p. 1890.
[212]
Standing Order 39(5)(
b
). The Adjournment Proceedings are discussed in detail earlier in this chapter.
[213]
Standing Order 39(7).
[214]
Consent has been denied on occasion (
Debates
, June 1, 1992, pp. 11169-70; March 13, 1995, p. 10397). The same request was later made and granted (
Debates
, June 5, 1992, p. 11477; March 17, 1995, p. 10671).
[215]
See, for example,
Journals
, September 23, 1994, p. 725; December 13, 1996, pp. 1018-9. The government has also presented a revised return (see
Journals
, April 2, 1998, p. 664).
[216]
Journals
, November 16, 1962, pp. 285-7, in particular p. 286. See also
Debates
, November 22, 1994, pp. 8077-8, where a Member rose on a point of order to complain that the government had tabled only one part of an answer to his question and the government responded that the responses would not be forthcoming because they were substantial. The Parliamentary Secretary to the Government House Leader suggested that if the Member insisted on additional information, the question could be placed again on the
Order Paper
.
[217]
Standing Order 39(6). The rule has been invoked only once, on February 16, 1923 (
Debates
, pp. 343-4).
[218]
Debates
, June 14, 1989, pp. 3023-6. See also
Debates
, May 30, 1989, pp. 2333-44.
[219]
Standing Order 39(5)(
b
). See, for example,
Debates
, November 20, 1992, p. 13720; September 25, 1995, p. 14819.
[220]
Journals
, April 11, 1991, pp. 2904-10, in particular pp. 2909-10.
[221]
For a discussion on this matter, see
Debates
, March 10, 1992, pp. 7936-8.
[222]
Debates
, April 12, 1991, p. 19459.