Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Notice Paper

No. 74

Thursday, September 30, 2010

10:00 a.m.


Introduction of Government Bills

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

September 29, 2010 — Mr. Kania (Brampton West) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Pope John Paul II Day”.

September 29, 2010 — Ms. Sgro (York West) — Bill entitled “An Act to promote and strengthen the Canadian retirement income system”.

September 29, 2010 — Mrs. Block (Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the accountability and enhanced financial transparency of elected officials of First Nations communities”.

September 29, 2010 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (personating peace officer)”.

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)

Questions

Q-3892 — September 29, 2010 — Ms. Minna (Beaches—East York) — With regard to Cascade Aerospace: (a) how many complaints have been made to the Labour Program from January 1, 2000 to September 28, 2010 and on what dates was each complaint was received; (b) which of these complaints related to occupational health and safety; (c) how many inspections have taken place during the period indicated in (a) and on what dates did those inspections occur; (d) did any of the inspections in (c) result in a stoppage of work or direction to the employer and, if so, what was the reason for the order to stop work or direction; (e) following the Direction to the Employer made by Health and Safety Officer Betty Ryan on September 23, 2009, under subsection 145(1) of Part II of the Canada Labour Code, did the employer terminate the contraventions by the specified date of October 31, 2009 and, if not, what action was taken by the Labour Program; and (f) will the Labour Program review its handling of the Cascade Aerospace file in light of the time taken to give a direction to the employer after the initial complaint was received?
Q-3902 — September 29, 2010 — Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to the one-third of projects funded by the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund that will not be completed by the end of 2010, as indicated on page 66 of the government’s report entitled “Canada's Economic Action Plan — A Sixth Report to Canadians”, for each project : (a) what city was it in; (b) what is its description; (c) what was the total federal contribution; (d) what is the estimated cost of completing the project at the time of application; (e) what is the current estimate of the total cost of completing the project; (f) on what date was the project approved for funding by the government; (g) on what date was the project publicly announced; and (h) on what date was the contribution agreement for the project signed?
Q-3912 — September 29, 2010 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to the social housing needs in the territories of the Yukon, Northwest and Nunavut: (a) did the government conduct an audit in order to determine the social housing needs of each territory, (i) if so, what are the results, (ii) if not, what are the government’s plans to conduct such an audit; (b) how does the government determine the social housing needs in each territory; (c) how are these needs determined in respect to the aboriginal and non-aboriginal populations; (d) what mechanism does the government have in place to ensure that the aboriginal and non-aboriginal social housing needs are addressed on an equitable basis; (e) what is the average age of social houses in the three territories; (f) how many houses have been constructed per territory since 2006; (g) what is the average occupancy per social house; (h) what is the projected lifespan of a social house; (i) how many social houses have been constructed per territory that are now deemed uninhabitable; and (j) what, if any, plans does the government have to replace uninhabitable homes?
Q-3922 — September 29, 2010 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to the creation of a “University of the North” located in one of the territories: (a) what action has the government taken to determine the (i) need, (ii) benefit, (iii) costs, (iv) potential federal assistance, (v) best location; (b) what efforts have been made to involve each territorial government in such a study; and (c) when will the government make its findings known?
Q-3932 — September 29, 2010 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to government funding of programs for victims of crime in the territories of the Yukon, Northwest and Nunavut: (a) which programs have received funding; (b) what is the government’s portion of funding; (c) what is the status of these programs; (d) what is the take up on the programs by an aboriginal versus non-aboriginal clientele; (e) what is the level of funding that went towards domestic violence victims from these programs; (f) how much money is dedicated to the promotion of these programs; and (g) how are these programs promoted?
Q-3942 — September 29, 2010 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to global warming and its impact on the permafrost and northern infrastructure: (a) what plans does the government have to provide assistance for the costs of repair and replacement of affected infrastructure such as (i) buildings, (ii) highways, (iii) runways, (iv) bridges; (b) will the government conduct an audit of the level of damage and, if so, when; and (c) what is the projected lifespan of the infrastructure affected by global warming?
Q-3952 — September 29, 2010 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With regard to funding by the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario) awarded to COM DEV International Ltd. in the amount of $5,200,000 through the Southern Ontario Development Program (SODP): (a) has the full amount been transferred to COM DEV International Ltd. and, if so, when were the funds transferred and in how many instalments; (b) what amount of the $5,200,000 is to be repaid; (c) what are the repayment amounts and timelines; (d) what was the form of security given by COM DEV International Ltd. for repayment of the loan; (e) what conditions were attached to the funding; (f) how many jobs were expected to be created through the funding; (g) will the government release a copy of COM DEV International Ltd.’s application for funding through the SODP; and (h) will the government release a copy of the final agreement with COM DEV International Ltd.?
Q-3962 — September 29, 2010 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With regard to the Building Canada Fund (BCF) projects in the riding of Kitchener Centre, what is the total number of jobs created or sustained for each project according to reports submitted to the government pursuant to Schedule "C" of the BCF - Communities Component Agreement?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions

M-581 — September 29, 2010 — Ms. Sgro (York West) — That, in the opinion of the House, the Minister of Justice should take the necessary steps to review Canada’s solicitation laws and introduce legislation to address the issues of poverty and substance abuse in relation to sex-trade workers.

Private Members' Business

C-509 — May 28, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Tweed (Brandon—Souris), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Crowfoot), — That Bill C-509, An Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act (library materials), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr. Murphy (Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe) — May 26, 2010
Mr. Trost (Saskatoon—Humboldt) — May 27, 2010
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).

2 Response requested within 45 days