Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Notice Paper

No. 13

Friday, March 19, 2010

10:00 a.m.


Introduction of Government Bills

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)

March 18, 2010 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

March 18, 2010 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

March 18, 2010 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

March 18, 2010 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

March 18, 2010 — Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

March 18, 2010 — Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

March 18, 2010 — Mr. Bruinooge (Winnipeg South) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Wednesday, March 17, 2010, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

Questions

Q-1472 — March 18, 2010 — Mr. Reid (Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington) — With regard to the Access to Information request made by Mr. Ezra Levant, on November 12, 2009, with a file number of 106-3-2009-00037/GB1: (a) what are the words that have been redacted in the March 3, 2010, reply to Mr. Levant's request; (b) what are the words contained within any redacted sections that were withheld under section 17 of the Access to Information Act (the Act); (c) what are the words contained within any redacted sections that were withheld under subsection 19(1) of the Act; (d) what are the words contained within any redacted sections that were withheld under subsection 20(1) of the Act; (e) what are the words contained within any redacted sections that were withheld under section 23 of the Act; (f) what are the words contained within any redacted sections that were withheld under subsection 16(1) of the Act; (g) what are the words contained within any redacted sections that were withheld under subsection 21(1) of the Act; and (h) what are the redacted names and email addresses on pages 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 21, 49, 50, 52, 55, 57, 58, 84, 87, 90, 106 and 191 of the reply to the request?
Q-1482 — March 18, 2010 — Mr. Murphy (Charlottetown) — With regard to the transfer payment contributions for the Gateways and Border Crossings Fund in the fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011: (a) what is the fiscal breakdown of the program objectives; (b) what is the explanation of the program objectives; (c) what are the results of the program objectives; (d) what are the performance indicators and targets used to audit the performance of the program objectives; (e) how much was originally budgeted for the fund; (f) how much was included in the estimates for the fund in the four aformentioned fiscal years; and (g) how much has been spent from this budget allocation, including a complete listing of the proposed projects?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions

Private Members' Business

C-232 — March 3, 2010 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — Consideration at report stage of Bill C-232, An Act to amend the Supreme Court Act (understanding the official languages), as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights without amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr. Pomerleau (Drummond) — March 13, 2009
Mr. Nadeau (Gatineau) and Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — March 19, 2009
Committee Report — presented on Thursday, November 5, 2009, Sessional Paper No. 8510-402-151.
Report and third reading stages — limited to 2 sitting days, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2).
Motion for third reading — may be made in the same sitting, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2).

2 Response requested within 45 days