House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 129 Friday, February 11, 2011 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-9782 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — With regard to Health Canada’s wait times strategy: (a) what are the most recent wait times as reported by each province in each of the five key areas of the government’s wait times strategy (cancer, heart, diagnostic imaging, joint replacement and sight restoration); and (b) what was the amount of money earmarked for wait time reduction disbursed by the government to each province in each year of the government’s wait times strategy? |
| Q-9792 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Murphy (Charlottetown) — With respect to the June 2001 report entitled “Coastal Impacts of Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise on Prince Edward Island”: (a) have there been any updates to the study since the release of the report in June 2001; and (b) has the government conducted any separate studies since June 2001 on the impacts of climate change and rising sea-levels on Prince Edward Island? |
| Q-9802 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Wilfert (Richmond Hill) — With regard to each of the Air Force's combat support squadrons: (a) does the government intend to close any of these squadrons' facilities and, if so, (i) why, (ii) when; (b) does the government intend to disband any of these squadrons and, if so, (i) why, (ii) when; (c) does the government intend to relocate any of these squadrons and, if so, (i) where to, (ii) when; (d) how many jobs for soldiers and officers, reservists and civilians will be directly affected if any of these squadrons are disbanded or relocated; (e) for each job category listed in (d), how many positions will be (i) eliminated, (ii) relocated; and (f) if the government does not presently intend to close any of these squadrons, has it developed plans for the potential closure or each or any of them, specifying which? |
| Q-9812 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Ottawa Centre, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? |
| Q-9822 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Gatineau, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? |
| Q-9832 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Hull—Aylmer, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-638 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Hiebert (South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale) — That, in the opinion of the House, as the federal budget comes back into balance, the government should give priority to income splitting for families with children. |
| M-639 — February 10, 2011 — Mr. Hiebert (South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale) — |
| WHEREAS section 43 of the Constitution Act, 1982 provides that an amendment to the Constitution of Canada in relation to any provision that applies to one or more, but not all, provinces may be made by proclamation issued by the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada only where so authorized by resolution of the Senate and House of Commons and of the legislative assembly of each province to which the amendment applies; |
| And WHEREAS all the inhabitants in the Province of British Columbia should have the right to private property and not be deprived of that right without due process of law and full, just, and timely compensation; |
| NOW, THEREFORE, the House of Commons resolves that an amendment to the Constitution of Canada be authorized to be made by proclamation issued by His Excellency the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada in accordance with the schedule hereto: |
| SCHEDULE |
| AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA |
| 1. The Constitution Act, 1982 is amended by adding the following after section 7: |
| 7.1 (1) In British Columbia, everyone has the right not to be deprived by any Act of the Legislative Assembly, or by any action taken under the authority of an Act of the Legislative Assembly, of the title, use or enjoyment of real property, or of any right attached to real property, or of any improvement made to or upon real property, unless full, just and timely financial compensation is provided. |
| (2) Subsection (1) applies in respect of |
| (a) any Act of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia, whether the Act came into force before or comes into force after the coming into force of this section; and |
| (b) any action taken under the authority of an Act of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia, whether that action took place before or takes place after the coming into force of this section. |
| 2. The Amendment may be cited as the Constitution Amendment, 2011 (Property Rights in British Columbia), and a reference to the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982 shall be deemed to include a reference to the Constitution Amendment, 2011 (Property Rights in British Columbia). |
Private Members' Business |
| M-515 — October 4, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Goldring (Edmonton East), seconded by Mr. Casson (Lethbridge), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should continue to recognize the vital role of older workers in the Canadian economy and ensure its labour market programs and policies encourage older workers to contribute their skills and experience in the Canadian workforce. |
| Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
| Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|