Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION

Journals

No. 106

Monday, November 29, 2010

11:00 a.m.



Prayers
Private Members' Business

At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business.

The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill S-210, An Act to amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act and the Auditor General Act (involvement of Parliament), as reported by the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development without amendment.

Mr. Woodworth (Kitchener Centre), seconded by Mr. Calkins (Wetaskiwin), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.

Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.

Pursuant to Standing Order 98(2), Mr. Woodworth (Kitchener Centre), seconded by Mr. Calkins (Wetaskiwin), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.

Debate arose thereon.

The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, December 1, 2010, immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business.

Interruption

At 11:47 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 12:00 p.m., the sitting resumed.

Government Orders

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), seconded by Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of Health), — That Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Balanced Refugee Reform Act and the Marine Transportation Security Act, be now read a second time and referred to a legislative committee.

The debate continued.

Statements By Members

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements.

Oral Questions

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

Question of Privilege

A question of privilege having been raised by Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), the Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege;

Whereupon, Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Davies (Vancouver East), moved, — That the matters in the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented to the House on November 23, 2010, be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.

Debate arose thereon.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.

Daily Routine Of Business

Tabling of Documents

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:

— No. 403-0917 concerning wharfs and harbours. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-102-01;
— Nos. 403-0975 and 403-0976 concerning Canada's railways. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-84-03;
— No. 403-0986 concerning transportation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-7-17.

Presenting Reports from Committees

Mr. Blaney (Lévis—Bellechasse), from the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented the Third Report of the Committee, "Recruitment, Intake and Integration: What Does the Future Hold for Immigration to Official Language Minority Communities?". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-143.

Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 12 to 17, 19, 20, 23, 24, 26 to 29 and 31) was tabled.


Presenting Petitions

Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows:

— by Ms. Davies (Vancouver East), one concerning housing policy (No. 403-1140);
— by Mr. Masse (Windsor West), one concerning cruelty to animals (No. 403-1141);
— by Ms. Gagnon (Québec), one concerning the electoral system (No. 403-1142);
— by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), one concerning veterans' affairs (No. 403-1143) and one concerning funding aid (No. 403-1144);
— by Mr. Allen (Welland), one concerning the Criminal Code of Canada (No. 403-1145) and one concerning health care services (No. 403-1146);
— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1147).

Questions on the Order Paper

Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-434, Q-435, Q-437, Q-439, Q-440, Q-465, Q-475, Q-476, Q-505, Q-518, Q-520 and Q-522 on the Order Paper.


Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return:

Q-432 — Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to the Universal Child Care Plan: (a) how many child care spaces have been created each year, broken down by province, since the program’s inception in 2006; (b) how much has been spent each year, since 2006, on the development of child care spaces; (c) how many companies have made use of the 25 percent tax credit to create new child care spaces; (d) how many spaces have been created to date using this credit; and (e) what is the dollar value of the credits used? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-432.

Q-433 — Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to the firearms training program for Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers: (a) how many CBSA officers have participated in firearms training since the program’s inception in 2006; (b) how many CBSA officers have successfully passed the program; (c) how many CBSA officers are currently armed; (d) how many years will it take to train and arm all remaining CBSA officers and how much money does the government expect to spend on training for these CBSA officers; (e) what dollar amount has been spent so far on this program; (f) what government studies have been done on the effectiveness of this initative; (g) for every study in (f), what is the (i) title, (ii) author, (iii) date of publication, (iv) brief synopsis of its conclusions; (h) how many times has a CBSA officer used his or her weapon in the line of duty; (i) for every incident in (h), where did the incident take place and what is a brief description of the incident? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-433.

Q-436 — Mr. Kania (Brampton West) — With regard to projects funded by the Recreational Infrastructure Canada program in the riding of Brant, what is the total number of jobs created or sustained for each project, according to reports submitted to the government, pursuant to Schedule "H" of the Recreational Infrastructure Funding Agreement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-436.

Q-441 — Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North) — With respect to Canada's Economic Action Plan signs, broken down by government department, agency, foundation and Crown Corporation: (a) how many signs were distributed, broken down by province and by federal riding, during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 fiscal years; (b) what was the installation cost of each sign; (c) what is the maintenance cost of each sign; (d) who were the contractors responsible for the installation and maintenance of the signs, broken down by province and by federal riding; (e) which department, agency, foundation or Crown Corporation is responsible for each sign and sign location; and (f) how many signs, broken down by province and federal riding, are planned to be installed by the end of fiscal year 2010-2011? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-441.

Q-442 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With respect to the 400th anniversary of the founding of Cupids, Newfoundland and Labrador: (a) what is the total dollar amount spent by the government for the 400th anniversary of Cupids; (b) what non-monetary support was provided by the government to assist with the celebrations; (c) what was the government’s budget for the celebrations; and (d) how much was actually spent on the celebrations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-442.

Q-444 — Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North) — With regard to government polling from January 1, 2006 to September 22, 2010: (a) how much was spent annually (i) broken down by department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission, (ii) broken down by department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission and by province and territory; (b) how much was spent, broken down by type of polling technique (phone, online, focus groups, etc.), (i) annually, (ii) annually by each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission; and (c) what companies received contracts to complete this polling work, broken down by type of polling technique, (i) annually, (ii) annually by each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-444.

Q-447 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to the site of the former CFB Rockcliffe: (a) how much has the Canada Lands Company spent over the past ten years, charged to what budget item, on the site’s development; and (b) of the funding granted to external firms or consultants for this development, how much has gone to each firm or consultant and what are the names of these firms or consultants? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-447.

Q-449 — Mrs. Crombie (Mississauga—Streetsville) — With regard to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency: (a) what specific system is in place to determine exactly how many food inspectors the agency has; (b) how many food inspectors were in place prior to August 31, 2008; (c) how many food inspectors have been hired per quarter since October 15, 2008; (d) what exactly does each inspector inspect; (e) where exactly is each inspector stationed; and (f) what is the total cost per calendar year, beginning in 2008 to present, for the hiring of these inspectors? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-449.

Q-455 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to the expenses of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) for each fiscal year since 2006-2007, up to and including the current fiscal year: (a) what was the total global amount spent on hospitality expenses by each Canadian embassy overseas; (b) how much has each Canadian embassy overseas spent on leasing expenses, catering services, restaurants, alcohol and beverages, bottled water, and petty cash; (c) how much has each Canadian embassy and consulate spent on advertising overseas; (d) what cuts have been made to DFAIT expenditures on Canadian missions overseas during the economic recession and what was the cut in expenditure for each embassy and consulate; (e) what companies have received sole source contracts to provide services for Canadian missions overseas; and (f) how much have Canadian diplomats spent on limousine services, private air services, executive class commercial air services, economy class commercial air services and car rentals? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-455.
Government Orders

The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-47, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 4, 2010 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment.

Mr. Cannon (Minister of Foreign Affairs) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Clement (Minister of Industry), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on division.

Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Cannon (Minister of Foreign Affairs) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Clement (Minister of Industry), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.

Debate arose thereon.

Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid upon the Table as follows:

— by Mr. Baird (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) — Orders in Council approving certain appointments made by the Governor General in Council, pursuant to Standing Order 110(1), as follows:
— P.C. 2010-1397. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-403-9-07. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Finance)
— P.C. 2010-1386 to P.C. 2010-1388, P.C. 2010-1390 and P.C. 2010-1395. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-403-4-09. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates)
— P.C. 2010-1389. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-403-22-06. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology)
— P.C. 2010-1396. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-403-30-07. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security)
— P.C. 2010-1393. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-403-24-09. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities)
— P.C. 2010-1375. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-403-32-06. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs)
— by Mr. Clement (Minister of Industry) — Report of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunication Commission on the operation of the National Do Not Call List for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, pursuant to the Telecommunications Act, 1993, c. 38, s. 41.6. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-403-1026-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology)
Adjournment Proceedings

At 6:30 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed.

After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted.

Accordingly, at 6:46 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).