House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 9 Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
| June 14, 2011 — The Minister of Public Safety — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Balanced Refugee Reform Act and the Marine Transportation Security Act”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — The Minister of Labour — Bill entitled “An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of air service operations”. |
| Recommendation |
| (Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2)) |
| His Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of air service operations”. |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
| June 14, 2011 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Fisheries Act (deposit in lakes)”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (in-home care of relatives)”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (peace officers)”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (services to a charity or public authority)”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (cruelty to animals)”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (occupational disease registry)”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the development and implementation of a First Nations education funding plan”. |
|
|
| June 14, 2011 — Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing) — Bill entitled “An Act regarding free public transit for seniors”. |
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-232 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Cuzner (Cape Breton—Canso) — With regard to Telus violations of the Do Not Call List (DNCL) and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission’s (CRTC) Alternate Case Resolutions processes: (a) why was it decided that Telus should make a donation to the Carleton University School of Public Policy and Administration as opposed to paying AMPs to the Government of Canada that would benefit all Canadians and who made this decision; (b) what was the amount Telus agreed to pay Carleton University School of Public Policy and Administration; (c) what would have been the maximum possible Administrative Monetary Penalty (AMP) for the violations alleged to have been committed by Telus; (d) what was the process that led to this decision; (e) why was the Carleton University School of Public Policy and Administration selected to be the recipient of this donation, as opposed to any other institution (e.g. Dalhousie University School of Public Administration); and (f) are any of the Commissioners, the Secretary General or any staff member of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission currently an instructor, lecturer, part-time staff member or in any other way connected to the Carleton University School of Public Policy and Administration? |
| Q-242 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Cuzner (Cape Breton—Canso) — With respect to the National Do Not Call List (DNCL), as of May 31, 2011: (a) what is the total number and dollar value of Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) that have been imposed to date by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC); (b) what is the total number and dollar value of AMPs that have been paid to date; (c) what is the total number and dollar value of negotiated settlements that have been reached to date; (d) what is the total number and dollar value of negotiated settlements that have been paid to date; and (e) what is the number of companies who have refused to either pay an AMP or reach a negotiated settlement? |
| Q-252 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to bonuses granted by the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, for each of fiscal years 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, how many bonuses were dispersed and what were the amounts of these bonuses, broken down by: (a) fiscal year; (b) individual personnel; (c) region; and (d) departmental division? |
| Q-262 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With respect to the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and the government’s commitment of $2.85 billion over 5 years for the Muskoka Initiative: (a) for each project or program that qualifies for the renewed $1.75 billion in existing funding, (i) what is its name and objective, (ii) what is the total federal funding commitment, (iii) what is the timeframe for the project or program; (b) for each program or project that qualifies for the new $1.1 billion in funding announced on February 1, 2011, (i) what is its name and objective, (ii) what is the total federal funding commitment, (iii) what is the timeframe for the project or program; (c) for each of the bilateral, multilateral and partnership branches, (i) which partner and country is receiving funding, (ii) how much funding is each partner and country receiving; and (d) what plans does the government have to inform Parliament and the public regarding this spending? |
| Q-272 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to departmental spending from 2006 to present, what were the total costs of rentals and purchases of individual staging, lighting and audio equipment, and production and assorted technical costs for all government announcements and public events? |
| Q-282 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to each meeting of the Treasury Board since April 1, 2009: (a) what was the date of the meeting; (b) where did the meeting occur; (c) who was in attendance; and (d) what was the agenda of the meeting? |
| Q-292 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Nickel Belt, specifying each (i) department or agency, (ii) initiative, (iii) amount? |
| Q-302 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt) — With regard to grants and contributions applications to federal economic development agencies since April 1, 2010, what funding applications were approved by departmental officials but rejected by the Minister's office? |
| Q-312 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt) — With regard to the operating budget freeze at federal economic development agencies: (a) what measures were taken to limit spending in the last fiscal year; (b) how many full-time and part-time employees were lost to attrition; (c) how many full-time or part-time employees were laid off as of April 1, 2011; (d) how many full-time and part-time employees have been hired since April 1, 2011; and (e) what programs will be subject to funding cuts as of April 1, 2011? |
| Q-322 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt) — With regard to the death of two workers at Vale’s Stobie Mine in Sudbury: (a) what actions has the government undertaken to investigate the deaths; (b) which department led the investigation of the accident in the mine; (c) what are the preliminary results of that investigation; (d) what corrective measures have been recommended to prevent the recurrence of such an accident; (e) what sanctions, if any, does the federal government intend to impose against Vale; (f) when was the last federal safety inspection conducted at the Vale mine in Sudbury and what were the conclusions of this inspection? |
| Q-332 — June 14, 2011 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With regard to government funding within the constituency of Guelph: (a) what was the total amount offunding originally announced, broken down by fiscal year, since fiscal year 2006-2007, up to andincluding fiscal year 2010-2011, specifying for each announcement (i) the department or agencyresponsible for the funding, (ii) the program or initiative from which the funding came, (iii) the project name, (iv) the total value of the project; (b) for each announcement identified in (a) what was, (i) the total amount delivered, broken down by fiscal year, since fiscal year 2006-2007, up to and including fiscal year 2010-2011, (ii) the department or agency responsible for the delivered funding, (iii) the program or initiative from whichthe delivered funding came, (iv) the project name, (v) the total value of the project; (c) broken down by fiscal year, since fiscal year 2006-2007, up to and including fiscalyear 2010-2011, in each case where the final, total amount delivered, as specified in (b), was different from the funding amount announced, as specified in (a), what was the reason for this discrepancy? |
| Q-342 — June 14, 2011 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — With regard to infrastructure funding requests since 2006, broken down by infrastructure funding program, including but not limited to the Public Transit Fund, the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund, the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund, the Border Infrastructure Fund, the Infrastructure Canada Program, the Green Infrastructure Fund, and the Building Canada Fund: (a) how many applications for funding have been received; (b) how many applications have been rejected; (c) what is each application that has been rejected, including the date of application; (d) for applications identified in (c), what was the reason for rejection; (e) for applications identified in (c), what was the electoral district of the proposed project; (f) how many applications are pending decision? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
Government Business |
|
| No. 2 — June 14, 2011 — The Leader of the Government in the House of Commons — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, a bill in the name of the Minister of Labour, entitled An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of air service operations, shall be disposed of as follows: (a) commencing when the said bill is read a first time and concluding when the said bill is read a third time, the House shall not adjourn except pursuant to a motion proposed by a Minister of the Crown; (b) the said bill may be read twice or thrice in one sitting; (c) after being read a second time, the said bill shall be referred to a Committee of the Whole; and (d) during consideration of the said bill, no division shall be deferred. |
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
Private Members' Business |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|