House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
| 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
|
JournalsNo. 359 Tuesday, November 27, 2018 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
| Prayer |
| Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 421-02728 concerning a national day. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-131-07;
|
— No. 421-02743 concerning the protection of the environment. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-3-63;
|
— Nos. 421-02746 and 421-02786 concerning health care services. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-31-51;
|
— No. 421-02768 concerning immigration. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-23-25.
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
|
Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), from the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented the 54th Report of the Committee, "Report 5, Socio-economic Gaps on First Nations Reserves—Indigenous Services Canada, of the 2018 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-483. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response. |
|
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 112 and 119) was tabled. |
Motions |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, any recorded division deferred until Wednesday, November 28, 2018, immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business be deferred anew to immediately after the time provided for Oral Questions that day. |
Presenting Petitions |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), one concerning firearms (No. 421-02967);
|
— by Ms. Mihychuk (Kildonan—St. Paul), two concerning health care services (Nos. 421-02968 and 421-02969), one concerning road transportation (No. 421-02970) and one concerning the issuance of visas (No. 421-02971);
|
— by Ms. Boutin-Sweet (Hochelaga), one concerning the labelling of food products (No. 421-02972).
|
| Government Orders |
|
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Ms. Petitpas Taylor (Minister of Health), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and not more than one sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and |
|
That, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration at report stage and on the day allotted to the consideration at the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the stage of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 951 -- Vote no 951) | |
| YEAS: 156, NAYS: 115 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Ellis LeBlanc Rioux Total: -- 156 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Deltell Laverdière Rayes Total: -- 115 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments; |
|
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 2 to 4, 6 to 8 and 10 to 23). |
| Group No. 1 |
|
Motion No. 2 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 17. |
|
Motion No. 3 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 247. |
|
Motion No. 4 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 352. |
|
Motion No. 6 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 444. |
|
Motion No. 7 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 445. |
|
Motion No. 8 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 454. |
|
Motion No. 10 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 514. |
|
Motion No. 11 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 591. |
|
Motion No. 12 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 675. |
|
Motion No. 13 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 676. |
|
Motion No. 14 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 677. |
|
Motion No. 15 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 678. |
|
Motion No. 16 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 679. |
|
Motion No. 17 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 680. |
|
Motion No. 18 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 681. |
|
Motion No. 19 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 682. |
|
Motion No. 20 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 683. |
|
Motion No. 21 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 684. |
|
Motion No. 22 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 685. |
|
Motion No. 23 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 692. |
|
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
| Statements By Members |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
| Oral Questions |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
| Government Orders |
|
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments; |
|
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 2 to 4, 6 to 8 and 10 to 23). |
|
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
| Messages from the Senate |
|
A message was received from the Senate informing this House that the Senate has passed the following bills to which the concurrence of the House is desired: |
| Government Orders |
|
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments; |
|
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 2 to 4, 6 to 8 and 10 to 23). |
|
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
|
At 5:45 p.m., pursuant to Order made earlier today under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 4 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 6 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 7, 8, 10 and 11, was deferred. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 12 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 13 to 22, was deferred. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 23 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments. |
| Group No. 1 | |
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 2 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 17. |
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 952 -- Vote no 952) | |
| YEAS: 79, NAYS: 200 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Eglinski Maguire Shipley Total: -- 79 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Duguid Lambropoulos Poissant Total: -- 200 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 3 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 247. |
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 953 -- Vote no 953) | |
| YEAS: 79, NAYS: 200 (See list under Division No. 952) |
|
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 4 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 352. |
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 4 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 954 -- Vote no 954) | |
| YEAS: 79, NAYS: 200 (See list under Division No. 952) |
|
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 6 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 444. |
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 6 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 955 -- Vote no 955) | |
| YEAS: 79, NAYS: 200 (See list under Division No. 952) |
|
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 7, 8, 10 and 11 were also negatived on the same division. |
|
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 12 of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 675. |
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 12 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 956 -- Vote no 956) | |
| YEAS: 79, NAYS: 200 (See list under Division No. 952) |
|
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 13 to 22 were also negatived on the same division. |
|
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 23 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), — That Bill C-86 be amended by deleting Clause 692. |
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 23 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 957 -- Vote no 957) | |
| YEAS: 79, NAYS: 200 (See list under Division No. 952) |
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Ms. Hajdu (Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour) for Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister of Seniors), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 958 -- Vote no 958) | |
| YEAS: 156, NAYS: 123 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Ellis LeBlanc Ratansi Total: -- 156 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Deltell Lake Richards Total: -- 123 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
| Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Government Orders |
|
Pursuant to Order made Friday, November 23, 2018, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Qualtrough (Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Accessibility), seconded by Mr. Sohi (Minister of Natural Resources), — That Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, be now read a third time and do pass. |
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), seconded by Mr. Barlow (Foothills), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
|
|
“Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities for the purpose of reconsidering:
|
|
(a) clauses 5, 11, 18, 23, 111, and 148 with the view to include dates and timelines to ensure that the Bill will advance accessibility in Canada;
|
|
(b) clauses 15, 16, 75, 93, 95, and 146.1(1) with the view to remove permissive language to ensure that accessibility requirements are made and enforced;
|
|
(c) clauses 46, 55, 59, 64, and 68 with the view to not allow organizations to be exempted from complying with accessibility requirements; and
|
|
(d) clause 207 with the view to require the government to act.”.
|
|
|
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 959 -- Vote no 959) | |
| YEAS: 115, NAYS: 163 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Diotte Lake Richards Total: -- 115 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Ellis Lebouthillier Rioux Total: -- 163 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Pursuant to Order made Friday, November 23, 2018, the question was deemed put on the main motion, a recorded division was deemed requested and the motion was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 960 -- Vote no 960) | |
| YEAS: 278, NAYS: 0 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Duncan (Etobicoke North) Laverdière Richards Total: -- 278 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed. |
|
| Private Members' Business |
|
At 6:58 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
|
The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights of Bill C-417, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (disclosure of information by jurors). |
|
Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), seconded by Mr. Rankin (Victoria), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. |
|
Debate arose thereon. |
| Motions |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House: (a) any recorded division requested in relation to the third reading stage of Bill C-75, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, or the third reading stage of Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, be deferred until Monday, December 3, 2018, at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment; and (b) at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions on Thursday, November 29, 2018, the House revert back to the rubric “Motions” for the purpose of considering a motion to concur in the 66th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs. |
| Private Members' Business |
|
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), seconded by Mr. Rankin (Victoria), — That Bill C-417, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (disclosure of information by jurors), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. |
|
The debate continued. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the Order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper. |
| Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), a paper deposited with the Clerk of the House was laid upon the Table as follows: |
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade) — Report of the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board on the administration of Part I (Staff Relations) of the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, pursuant to the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, R.S. 1985, c. 33 (2nd Supp.), s. 84. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-421-515-05. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates)
|
| Adjournment Proceedings |
|
At 7:58 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
|
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
|
Accordingly, at 8:28 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |