Questions and responses 42nd Parliament, 1st session December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"Performance bonuses"

Results from historical information do not include searching within the departmental responses.
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1486

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1486

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
February 5, 2018
Answered
March 26, 2018
With regard to expenditures on signing bonuses (ledger code 50632), since November 4, 2015, broken down by department and agency: (a) what is the total amount, broken down by month; (b) how many individuals received such a bonus, broken down by month; (c) what is the range of bonuses paid out; and (d) what criteria are used to determine whether or not an employee receives a signing bonus?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-953

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-953

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 3, 2017
Answered
May 19, 2017
With regard to at-risk and bonus payments to employees of the federal public service, broken down by year from 2013 to 2016 and by department or agency: (a) how many federal public servants received at-risk payments; (b) how many federal public servants received bonus payments; (c) what amount was allocated in each department’s budget for at-risk payments; (d) what amount was allocated in each department’s budget for bonus payments; (e) what was the cumulative amount of at-risk payments paid out in each department; (f) what was the cumulative amount of bonus payments paid out in each department; (g) how many public servants were eligible for at-risk pay but did not receive it; (h) what were the reasons given for each public servant who received an at-risk payment; (i) what were the reasons given for each public servant who received a bonus payment; and (j) what were the reasons given for each public servant who was eligible for an at-risk payment but did not receive it?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1580

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1580

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
March 19, 2018
Answered
May 4, 2018
With regard to at-risk and bonus payments to employees of the federal public service, broken down by year for fiscal years 2015-16 and 2016-17 and by department or agency: (a) how many federal public servants received at-risk payments; (b) how many federal public servants received bonus payments; (c) what amount was allocated in each department’s budget for at-risk payments; (d) what amount was allocated in each department’s budget for bonus payments; (e) what was the cumulative amount of at-risk payments paid out in each department; (f) what was the cumulative amount of bonus payments paid out in each department; (g) how many public servants were eligible for at-risk pay but did not receive it; (h) what were the reasons given for each public servant who received an at-risk payment; (i) what were the reasons given for each public servant who received a bonus payment; and (j) what were the reasons given for each public servant who was eligible for an at-risk payment but did not receive it?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-960

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-960

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 4, 2017
Answered
May 29, 2017
With regard to the announced 372.5 million dollars in repayable loans provided by the government to Bombardier: (a) was the government told during its negotiations with Bombardier that the financial assistance provided by the government would be used for bonuses to executives; (b) did the terms of the financial assistance include any guarantees that the loans would not go towards executive bonuses; and (c) if the answer in (b) is affirmative, what are the details of such guarantees?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1710

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1710

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 25, 2018
Answered
June 11, 2018
With regard to the testimony at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance on March 1, 2018, by the Assistant Commissioner, International, Large Business and Investigations Branch of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), regarding monetary incentives and debt collection at the CRA: (a) what percentage and what absolute value of assessed taxes, including personal, corporate, and excise taxes, did CRA not collect between 2007 and 2017 inclusively, broken down by year; (b) of the taxes owing but not collected in (a), what percentage of debts (i) were collected in the following year, (ii) were collected within two years, (iii) were collected within five years, (iv) were collected after five years, (v) have not been collected to date; (c) what options or authorized measures can CRA deploy to recover tax debts; (d) of the debts in (a) which were eventually collected, what percentage were recovered by each of the measures in (c), broken down by year; (e) by what criteria are CRA employees evaluated with respect to success or failure to collect debts owing; (f) for auditors, assessors, and collectors at CRA, what performance metrics are considered for employee evaluations and how are they ranked or weighted; (g) on what evidence is the audit change rate of 75% based; (h) what is the acceptable error rate for audits and assessments respectively; (i) what measures exist at CRA to reduce the error rate of individual auditors and assessors; and (j) what protocols exist at CRA to correct errors made by auditors or assessors before objections or appeals are filed by affected taxpayers?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-121

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-121

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 21, 2016
Answered
June 14, 2016
With respect to budgets at the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Canada (INAC) from 2010-2011 to 2016-2017: (a) what amount was budgeted to each INAC regional office and program area, broken down by (i) program area, (ii) fiscal year; (b) how much of those amounts identified in (a) were spent; (c) what amount of the total budgeted funds were returned to Treasury Board as unspent; (d) what incentives do regional and headquarter offices have to lower their spending below budgeted amounts; (e) how many INAC personnel received financial bonuses for their work, broken down by fiscal year; (f) what were the amounts of each bonus identified in (e); and (g) what was the total amount spent by INAC on bonuses in each province and territory, broken down by fiscal year?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1284

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1284

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
October 25, 2017
Answered
December 11, 2017
With regard to bonuses, performance pay, or paid incentives under other names for employees of the Canada Revenue Agency, since November 4, 2015: (a) what bonus programs currently exist in each division or section of the Canada Revenue Agency; (b) for each bonus program in (a), what are the titles of the bonus programs; (c) for each bonus program in (a), what are the criteria or circumstances under which an employee is paid a bonus; (d) for each bonus program in (a), how many bonus payments may an employee receive in a year; (e) for each bonus program in (a), what is the annual maximum an employee may receive in bonuses; (f) for each bonus program in (a), how is the maximum amount an employee can be paid in bonuses calculated; (g) for each bonus program in (a), how many employees received bonuses in fiscal year 2016 and fiscal year 2015 respectively; and (h) for each bonus program in (a); what if any changes to the qualifying criteria have been made between January 2014 and October 2017?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-841

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-841

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
February 7, 2017
Answered
April 3, 2017
With regard to executive performance pay or bonus payments made by Public Services and Procurement Canada to its employees since November 4, 2015: (a) what is the total amount paid out; (b) how many individuals received payments, broken down by (i) the dates that each individual was awarded executive performance pay or bonuses, (ii) the branch and region that each individual belonged to at the time they received executive performance pay or bonuses; (c) what is the average amount of the payments; and (d) what is the highest amount of the payments?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-654

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-654

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
December 5, 2016
Answered
January 30, 2017
With regard to bonuses paid out for employees of Shared Services Canada, since November 4, 2015: (a) how many employees have received bonuses; (b) what is the total amount paid out in bonuses; (c) how many employees have received performance bonuses; (d) what is the total amount paid out in performance bonuses; and (e) what is the total amount paid out in performance bonuses to employees at the EX-01 level or higher?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1914

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1914

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
September 18, 2018
Answered
November 5, 2018
With regard to reports that the government is paying $3,800,000 in retention bonuses for three top Kinder Morgan Canada executives: are the retention bonuses part of the $4,500,000,000 purchase price the government is paying Kinder Morgan, or are the bonus payments a separate expenditure?
Top of page