Questions and responses 40th Parliament, 3rd session March 3, 2010, to March 26, 2011

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"Military vehicles"

Results from historical information do not include searching within the departmental responses.
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-103

40-3
March 3, 2010, to March 26, 2011

Q-103

40th Parliament, 3rd session
Asked by
Date asked
March 8, 2010
Answered
April 23, 2010
With regard to the announced purchase of Close Combat Vehicles (CCV) and Tactical Armoured Patrol Vehicles (TAPV): (a) why was the solicitation of interest and qualifications (SOIQ) postponed to 2010; (b) what industry feedback contributed to non-issuance of the SOIQ; (c) what changes to the government requirements contributed to this decision; (d) what impact did the Department of National Defence (DND) internal reviews have on the CCV procurement process, including whether resources that had been allotted to the CCV procurement process were reallocated and, if applicable, what was the value of those resources and to where were they reallocated; (e) what are the key procurement priorities of DND; (f) what impact does the end of the military mission in Afghanistan have on the decision to not issue the SOIQ as scheduled; (g) what is the timeframe for issuing the SOIQ for the TAPV project and is this on schedule; and (h) if applicable, what are the details of the revised schedule for either project?
Top of page