Questions and responses 41st Parliament, 2nd session October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"Law enforcement"

Results from historical information do not include searching within the departmental responses.
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-295

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-295

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
February 5, 2014
Answered
March 24, 2014
With regard to Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: (a) what is the current policy of the government, particularly the Department of Justice, about the use or invocation of Section 33; and (b) since 2006, how many times has the government directed, suggested, contemplated or requested an analysis, examination or consideration from departmental officials within the Department of Justice, the Privy Council Office, or any government department, about the possible use of Section 33?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-92

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-92

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
October 23, 2013
Answered
December 9, 2013
With regard to fisheries enforcement by the government: (a) what fines have been issued since 2006, broken down by (i) infraction, (ii) date, (iii) trial outcome, where applicable, (iv) fine amount paid, (v) the recipient of the funds from the fine; (b) for each trial in (a)(iii), what is (i) the name of the prosecutor, (ii) the name of the Judge, (iii) the initial fine, (iv) the penalty assessed by the Court; and (c) what conservation groups or other organisations, excluding the Receiver General, have received any proceeds from any such enforcement actions and what justification exists for their receipt of these proceeds?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-223

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-223

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
January 23, 2014
Answered
March 6, 2014
With regard to the Bouchard Stream in Dorval, Quebec: (a) what environmental monitoring has been conducted on the health of this waterway; (b) what efforts has the government made to analyze the impact of Trudeau Airport on this waterway; (c) what efforts has the government made to ensure that the operator of the airport, Aéroports de Montréal, is complying with applicable acts and regulations pertaining to environmental issues, including, but not limited to, the Canadian Fisheries Act and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act; (d) does the government's policy call for the introduction of (i) enforcement mechanisms, (ii) legislation to address Aéroports de Montréal's impact on this waterway; and (e) has this waterway been designated as protected by the government at any time, (i) if so, under which acts (including the current Navigable Waters Protection Act) and during which years, (ii) if not, why was it not considered to warrant protection by the government?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-572

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-572

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
June 5, 2014
Answered
September 15, 2014
With regard to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and Articles 39 and 40 of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Conservation and Enforcement Measures: what have been the outcomes of citations issued in Canadian waters to foreign fishing vessels over the past five years?
Top of page