Questions and responses 41st Parliament, 2nd session October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"Economic diversification"

Results from historical information do not include searching within the departmental responses.
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-169

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-169

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
December 5, 2013
Answered
January 27, 2014
With regard to the Canadian Initiative for the Economic Diversification of Communities Reliant on Chrysotile: (a) how many private businesses have applied for repayable loans to date and what are these businesses; (b) what are the amounts of the repayable loans extended to private businesses to date, broken down by business; (c) how many business support organizations have applied for grants to date and what are these organizations; (d) what are the amounts granted to business support organizations to date, broken down by business support organization; (e) how many non-profit organizations have applied for grants to date and what are these organizations; (f) what are the amounts granted to non-profit organizations to date, broken down by organization; (g) how many municipalities and regional county municipalities (RCMs) have applied for grants to date and what are these municipalities and RCMs; and (h) what are the amounts granted to municipalities and RCMs to date, broken down by municipality and RCM?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-198

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-198

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
January 23, 2014
Answered
March 24, 2014
With regard to applications received from Saskatchewan for Western Economic Diversification Canada’s Western Innovation (WINN) Initiative: (a) how many applications were received for the first intake, completed on December 8, 2013; (b) how many are complete and meet the program’s criteria, and how much funding did they request; (c) how many proceeded to stage two of the application process, and how much funding did they request; (d) how many passed stage two, and how much funding did they request; (e) how many applications did the department expect to receive from Saskatchewan, (i) how many did it expect to proceed to stage two, (ii) how much funding did they expect be to requested at each stage; (f) what research was done to determine the need for the program in Saskatchewan; (g) did the department find that the demand for the financing available through WINN was not being met by the private sector in Saskatchewan; and (h) how many of WINN’s contributions does the government plan to be repaid in ten years?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-1074

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-1074

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
February 23, 2015
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to Western Economic Diversification Canada (WD) and their grant category entitled “Clean Technology/Clean Energy”: (a) how does WD define the grant category “Clean Technology/Clean Energy” for the purposes of a successful project application; (b) which energy sectors does WD deem to be included or excluded in this category; (c) how many applicants for the program were deemed to qualify for the category “Clean Technology/Clean Energy”; and (d) which applicants have received grants or loans under the “Clean Technology/Clean Energy” category?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1075

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-1075

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
February 23, 2015
Answered
May 25, 2015
With regard to the Western Diversification Program (WDP) for each fiscal year from 2012-2013 to 2014-2015, year-to-date: (a) how many companies, non-profits or other eligible organizations applied for funding; (b) what is the total amount of funding that has been awarded, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) federal electoral riding, (iii) date the funding was approved, (iv) date the funding was actually provided to each approved project; (c) what outreach activities were used to acquire potential applicants and what are the details of individuals or entities invited to briefings organized by Western Economic Diversification (WD); (d) what is the success rate of funding applications, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) federal electoral riding; (e) what is the average amount of funding granted, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) federal electoral riding; and (f) what are the requirements imposed by WD for financial commitments by other sources in order to qualify for a WDP award?
Top of page