Questions and responses 44th Parliament, 1st session November 22, 2021, to January 6, 2025

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"Class action"

Results from historical information do not include searching within the departmental responses.
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-3175

44-1
November 22, 2021, to January 6, 2025

Q-3175

44th Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
November 18, 2024
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to the Black Class Action Lawsuit (Nicholas Marcus Thompson et al. v. His Majesty the King (T‑1458‑20)), broken down by department: (a) what is the total amount spent to date by the government on this lawsuit; and (b) what is the total amount paid to Fasken, the law firm representing the Crown in this case?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1624

44-1
November 22, 2021, to January 6, 2025

Q-1624

44th Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 14, 2023
Answered
September 18, 2023
With regard to the handling of cases and claims pursuant to the Black Class Action Lawsuit launched in December 2020: how much has been spent by the Department of Justice and the Attorney General in legal fees and court fees in their requests to dismiss the lawsuit?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1618

44-1
November 22, 2021, to January 6, 2025

Q-1618

44th Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 14, 2023
Answered
September 18, 2023
With regard to the handling of cases and claims pursuant to the Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement by the Department of Justice Canada, Indigenous Services Canada and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada: how much has been spent on settled cases, request for direction, and other proceedings where Canada has been either the plaintiff or defendant before the appellate courts (such as the Ontario Superior Court or the Supreme Court of British Columbia), related to survivors of St. Anne’s Residential School between 2013, and June 1, 2023 (i) in total, (ii) broken down by year?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1170

44-1
November 22, 2021, to January 6, 2025

Q-1170

44th Parliament, 1st session
Date asked
January 30, 2023
Answered
March 20, 2023
With regard to the Government of Canada's appeal of the Federal Court decision, dated January 6, 2023, allowing for late claimants in the case of Sherry Heyder, Amy Graham, and Nadin Schultz-Nielsen v. The Attorney General of Canada: (a) did the Minister of National Defence instruct the Department of Justice to commence this appeal; (b) what are the total legal costs incurred to date in this case; and (c) what are the legal costs incurred solely as a result of the appeal of the Federal Court's decision on January 6, 2023?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1616

44-1
November 22, 2021, to January 6, 2025

Q-1616

44th Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 14, 2023
Answered
September 18, 2023
With regard to the handling of cases and claims pursuant to the Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement by the Department of Justice Canada, Indigenous Services Canada, and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada: (a) why did 215 survivors of St. Anne's Indian Residential School not get notice and not get proper evidence for their abuse claims; (b) what exactly were the third party obligations to the Catholic Church that were honoured by the government; and (c) in the documents to be sent, or already sent, to the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation as a result of a memo of agreement signed by the government in 2022, do any contain details of child abuse?
Top of page