Questions and responses 45th Parliament, 1st session May 26, 2025, to present

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"Canadian Anti-Hate Network"

Q-482

45-1
May 26, 2025, to present

Q-482

45th Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
October 20, 2025
Answered
December 5, 2025
Response from
32 federal institutions
With regard to funding and contracts provided by departments and agencies to the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, since January 1, 2016: (a) what are the details of all such funding, broken down by year, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) type of funding (grant, loan, contract), (iv) purpose of the funding, (v) location where the funding was to be used; (b) how much of the funding in (a) was funneled to Antifa or other extremist groups; (c) if the government is not aware of the amount in (b), what is the estimated amount; and (d) what measures, if any, does each department and agency have in place to ensure funding provided to the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and other similar types of groups does not get funneled to Antifa-related organizations?

Q-908

45-1
May 26, 2025, to present

Q-908

45th Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
February 25, 2026
Answered
April 13, 2026
Response from
Department of Canadian Heritage
With regard to the Department of Canadian Heritage’s determination, communicated to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, that the Canadian Anti-Hate Network remains in compliance with its funding agreement despite allegations of political bias raised by the Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and involvement with the violent Antifa movement: (a) what specific criteria, benchmarks or performance indicators were used by the department to assess compliance with the funding agreement; (b) what investigative steps, if any, were undertaken by the department to examine the allegations; (c) did the department consult any external experts, agencies or stakeholders in conducting its assessment, and, if so, who was consulted; (d) what documentation, reports or other evidence were reviewed in evaluating the allegations of political bias or support for violent movements; (e) were any concerns raised internally within the Department of Canadian Heritage regarding the Canadian Anti-Hate Network’s activities, and, if so, how were those concerns addressed; (f) what mechanisms are currently in place to monitor funded organizations on an ongoing basis to ensure continued compliance with funding agreements; and (g) does the department intend to amend the funding agreement or strengthen oversight measures to prevent public funds from supporting organizations engaged in partisan political activity or violent conduct, and, if so, what are the details of those changes?
Top of page