Questions and responses 41st Parliament, 1st session June 2, 2011, to September 13, 2013

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"Budget 2013 (March 21, 2013)"

Results from historical information do not include searching within the departmental responses.
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1297

41-1
June 2, 2011, to September 13, 2013

Q-1297

41st Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 11, 2013
Answered
May 28, 2013
With regard to new bridges over the St. Lawrence river: (a) what is the specific purpose of the $14 million in table 3.3.2 of Budget 2013 and what is the breakdown of the costs; and (b) with respect to the $124.9 million to build a bridge-causeway between Nun's Island and the Island of Montreal in Chapter 3.3 of Budget 2013, what is the breakdown of the cost?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-1402

41-1
June 2, 2011, to September 13, 2013

Q-1402

41st Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 6, 2013
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to the government’s claim in the 2013 Budget that it has introduced "over 75 measures to improve the integrity of the tax system" since 2006: (a) what are these measures; and (b) which of these measures are directly related to overseas tax evasion?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1342

41-1
June 2, 2011, to September 13, 2013

Q-1342

41st Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 29, 2013
Answered
June 13, 2013
With regard to the changes to the Customs Tariffs on page 433 of Budget 2013 and the removal of the General Preferential Tariff regime on pages 134-5 of Budget 2013: (a) what monitoring will be carried out in relation to changes in (i) consumer prices, (ii) the total GST collected by the government, (iii) the total revenue collected by the government; and (b) what are the benchmarks that these changes need to meet in order to be considered successful?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-1443

41-1
June 2, 2011, to September 13, 2013

Q-1443

41st Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 13, 2013
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to the $65 million dollars provided to Veterans Affairs Canada’s funeral and burial program, managed by The Last Post Fund, over two years as indicated on page 254 of Budget 2013: (a) why did the government choose to provide $63 million in fiscal year 2013-2014 and only $2 million in fiscal year 2014-2015; (b) what happens to the balance of the $65 million if The Last Post Fund fails to spend the allotment corresponding to each fiscal year; (c) which organizations or stakeholders were consulted with regard to this specific funding measure; (d) how much was this program allotted in each year since 2005; (e) how much did this program spend in each year since 2005; and (f) how much does the government expect to spend in each of fiscal years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-1404

41-1
June 2, 2011, to September 13, 2013

Q-1404

41st Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 6, 2013
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to the news release dated May 8, 2013, in which the Minister of National Revenue announced “new measures” to fight overseas tax evasion including “An additional $15 million in reallocated CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) funds that will be used to bring in new audit and compliance resources dedicated exclusively to international compliance issues and revenue collection identified as a result of measures outlined in Economic Action Plan 2013”: (a) what, specifically, are these “new audit and compliance resources”; (b) what is each projected to cost; and (c) from where, within the CRA, will the $15 million be “reallocated”?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1288

41-1
June 2, 2011, to September 13, 2013

Q-1288

41st Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
March 27, 2013
Answered
May 28, 2013
With regard to the section of the Economic Action Plan 2013 starting on page 106 entitled “Creating Jobs by Building Equipment for the Canadian Armed Forces in Canada” and the estimate quoted in this section from the February 2013 Jenkins report of $49 billion in Industrial and Regional Benefits (IRB) obligations that foreign prime contractors are expected to accumulate as a result of defence procurements by 2027: (a) does the government concur with the estimate of $49 billion in IRB obligations as a result of defence procurements by 2027; (b) if not, what is the government’s estimate of IRB obligations as a result of defence procurements by 2027; (c) what specific defence procurements does the government’s estimate of IRB obligations pertain to; (d) for each specific defence procurement included in the government’s estimate of IRB obligations, what is the estimated dollar value (i) of the acquisition, (ii) of operation and maintenance, (iii) of total life-cycle costs, (iv) of the expected IRB obligations; and (e) what documents, reports, or other relevant information were provided by the government in the drafting of the February 2013 Jenkins report with regard to the planned acquisitions?
Top of page