Questions and responses 41st Parliament, 2nd session October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Refine your search

Search results for topic:"British Columbia"

Results from historical information do not include searching within the departmental responses.
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-639

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-639

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
June 18, 2014
Answered
September 15, 2014
With regard to government funding, for each fiscal year since 2007-2008 inclusive: (a) what are the details of all grants, contributions, and loans to any organization, body, or group in the province of British Columbia, providing for each (i) the name of the recipient, (ii) the location of the recipient, indicating the municipality and the federal electoral district, (iii) the date, (iv) the amount, (v) the department or agency providing it, (vi) the program under which the grant, contribution, or loan was made, (vii) the nature or purpose; and (b) for each grant, contribution and loan identified in (a), was a press release issued to announce it and, if so, what is the (i) date, (ii) headline, (iii) file number of the press release?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-32

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-32

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
October 16, 2013
Answered
December 2, 2013
With regard to all ministerial visits to British Columbia, from September 1, 2013 to October 16, 2013, that involved discussions or announcements related to energy: (a) what was the total cost of these visits; (b) what were the costs of these visits, broken down by (i) minister, (ii) event, (iii) travel cost per person, (iv) travel cost per event, (v) advertising or promotional cost per event; (c) what is the list of events; and (d) who travelled for these events?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-48

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-48

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Date asked
October 17, 2013
Answered
November 26, 2013
With regard to the Prosperity Mine and New Prosperity Mine proposals: (a) what is the total cost incurred by the government to consider or evaluate both proposals; (b) what is the total amount of funds recovered by the government from the proponent (Taseko Mines LTD); (c) what is the total amount of funds expected to be recovered from the proponent; (d) what is the total amount of funds the government has determined as non-recoverable; and (e) what are the expected costs of continued consideration and evaluation of the project, broken down by costs that will be incurred by the government and costs that will be incurred by the proponent?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-1351

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-1351

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Date asked
May 7, 2015
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to funding for public safety in British Columbia: (a) how much of the $292.6 million allocated by the 2015 Budget to security agencies will be allocated to RCMP support for (i) Surrey, (ii) Delta; and (b) what has been the annual federal contribution to policing and crime prevention in Surrey, broken down by year from 2006 to 2015 inclusively?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-1360

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-1360

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
June 4, 2015
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to psychiatric services in all federal correctional institutions in British Columbia: (a) how many psychiatrists are employed for these institutions; (b) what is the status of employment (full-time, part-time, or on-call) of all employees identified in (a); (c) how many psychiatric positions remain vacant; (d) how many psychiatric assessments were completed in 2014; (e) how many offenders are currently awaiting psychiatric assessments; and (f) what is the impact in the delay of psychiatric assessments on offender rehabilitation, parole eligibility, and on public safety in British Columbia?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-804

41-2
October 16, 2013, to August 2, 2015

Q-804

41st Parliament, 2nd session
Date asked
November 18, 2014
Answered
January 26, 2015
With regard to the Mount Polley mine spill: (a) has the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) or Environment Canada filed charges regarding the spill, (i) if so, what are the details of the charges, (ii) if not, why not; (b) what role are DFO and Environment Canada playing in the ongoing investigation being led by British Columbia conservation officers; (c) are DFO and Environment Canada reviewing the rehabilitation plan developed by Imperial Metals Corporation, (i) if so, what are the findings of any such review, (ii) if not, why not; (d) has the government obtained the approval of the Secwepemc people for the investigation process or the review of the rehabilitation plan; (e) has the government studied the impact of the waste that remains in the Hazeltine Creek and Quesnel Lake Watershed; (f) during and following the rehabilitation process, how will DFO and Environment Canada ensure that there are no ongoing violations of the Fisheries Act; (g) how is the government monitoring and enforcing compliance with best practice standards by Imperial Metals Corporation at its other mine sites; (h) how will the government ensure that there are additional layers of control to prevent loopholes in regulatory oversight and enforcement by the province; (i) will the government be examining any proposals concerning (i) repairs to the tailings storage facility, (ii) the resumption of operations at the mine; (j) how will the government ensure that the interests of the affected First Nations are addressed prior to any resumption of operation; (k) what steps will the government take to ensure that First Nation rights are addressed; and (l) what are the internal tracking numbers of all documents, communications or briefing notes regarding the Mount Polley spill for senior departmental officials at the Regional Director General level and above, at both DFO and Environment Canada?
Top of page