Questions and responses All Sessions January 17, 1994, to present

Refine your search

No search texts entered

Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2484

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2484

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
May 2, 2019
Answered
June 19, 2019
With regard to taxpayer-funded flights taken by David MacNaughton, Canadian Ambassador to the United States, since March 2, 2016: (a) what are the details of all flights, including (i) dates, (ii) city of origin, (iii) city of destination, (iv) cost; and (b) what is the total amount spent on flights by the Ambassador?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2470

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2470

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
May 1, 2019
Answered
June 17, 2019
With regard to the 2016 compliance agreement signed by SNC-Lavalin and Elections Canada: has Elections Canada received any communication from the government, including from any minister’s office, about SNC-Lavalin since November 4, 2015, and, if so, what are the details of all communication, including (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) form (email, letter, telephone, etc.), (v) subject matter, (vi) summary of contents?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2088

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2088

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
November 28, 2018
Answered
January 28, 2019
With regard to communication sent or received by Statistics Canada since January 1, 2017: (a) what are the details of all communication between Statistics Canada and the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, the Office of the Minister or the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, including (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title, (v) subject matter, (vi) summary of contents, (vii) format (email, letter, teleconference, etc.); (b) what are the details of all communication between Statistics Canada and banks or other financial institutions, including (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title, (v) subject matter, (vi) summary of contents, (vii) format (email, letter, teleconference, etc.); and (c) what are the details of all communication between Statistics Canada and the Office of the Prime Minister or the Privy Council Office, including (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title, (v) subject matter, (vi) summary of contents, (vii) format (email, letter, teleconference, etc.)?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1385

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1385

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
December 5, 2017
Answered
January 29, 2018
With regard to the Privy Council Office’s "Mandate Letter Tracker" and the 13 commitments listed as “underway with challenges”, as of December 5, 2017: (a) what specifically are the challenges, broken down by commitment; (b) what specific actions is the government planning in order to overcome the challenges, broken down by commitment; and (c) for each of the 13 commitments, does the government plan on keeping its commitment or not?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1384

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1384

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
December 5, 2017
Answered
January 29, 2018
With regard to the Disability Tax Credit and individuals who self-identify with type 1 Diabetes: (a) what percentage of individuals with type 1 Diabetes were (i) approved, (ii) rejected, for the Disability Tax Credit during the 2015-16 fiscal year; and (b) what percentage of individuals with type 1 Diabetes were (i) approved, (ii) rejected, for the Disability Tax Credit between May 2, 2017, and December 5, 2017?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1316

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1316

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
November 8, 2017
Answered
January 29, 2018
With regard to the tweet by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change on November 7, 2017, which stated that “Canada salutes Nicaragua and Syria for joining on to the Paris Agreement!”: what are the titles of all individuals who approved the tweet?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1058

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1058

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 1, 2017
Answered
September 18, 2017
With regard to government action to combat counterfeit art: (a) what is the official position of the government regarding counterfeit art; (b) does the government have any prohibition against using federal funds to rent or purchase counterfeit art; and (c) what actions are taken by the Canada Border Services Agency when counterfeit art or goods are discovered at border crossings or other point of entry?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-362

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-362

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
September 15, 2016
Answered
October 28, 2016
With regard to the consultations on a voluntary supplement to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), undertaken by the previous government, the results of which were due September 10, 2015: (a) what is the status of these consultations; (b) has the Minister of Finance been briefed on these consultations; (c) if the answer to (b) is in the affirmative, what are the details of the briefing materials provided; (d) have these consultations been taken into consideration in order to determine what measures to take in regards to the CPP; (e) have any reports been drafted from the findings of the consultations; and (f) is the Minister of Finance considering doing a similar consultation on the possible enhancement to the CPP?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-361

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-361

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
September 15, 2016
Answered
October 28, 2016
With regard to the government’s Advisory Council on Economic Growth: (a) when does the Council meet; (b) are minutes taken at its meetings; (c) if the answer to (b) is in the affirmative, what are the details of these minutes; (d) what is the process for choosing the advisors; (e) who chooses the advisors; (f) to what degree does the Council have power over the choices of the government in economic matters; (g) how are the Council’s suggestions weighed in relation to that of the Department of Finance; (h) for each of the following members of the Council, what was the reason that they were selected for the Council, and what contribution do they provide to the Council (i) Dominic Barton, (ii) Elyse Allen, (iii) Katherine Barr, (iv) Jennifer Blanke, (v) Kenneth Courtis, (vi) Brian Ferguson, (vii) Suzanne Fortier, (viii) Carol Anne Hilton, (ix) Carol Lee, (x) Christopher Ragan, (xi) Angela Strange, (xii) Ilse Treurnicht; and (i) with regard to (h)(i), what powers does Dominic Barton hold as chair of the Council?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-360

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-360

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
September 15, 2016
Answered
October 28, 2016
With regard to the commitment in Budget 2016 to invest in the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) so as to enhance its efforts to combat tax evasion and avoidance and with regard to the June 7, 2016, meeting of the Standing Committee on Finance’s concerning efforts by the CRA to combat tax avoidance and evasion: (a) did the Minister of Finance, anyone within his office, or Department of Finance, meet with anyone from Canadians For Tax Fairness prior to the release of Budget 2016; (b) if the answer to (a) is in the affirmative, was this meeting, in whole or in part, on the topic of the use of the proposed funds for the CRA included in Budget 2016; (c) were legislative responses to tax evasion and avoidance considered when drafting solutions to these issues, or was the only solution considered a monetary increase to the CRA’s budget; and (d) if the answer to (c) is in the affirmative, was there a cost analysis done on whether legislative measures or additional funding for CRA would be more effective?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-359

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-359

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
September 15, 2016
Answered
November 2, 2016
With regard to the replacement of the universal child care benefit and the Canada child tax benefit with the new Canada child benefit in Budget 2016, what were the Minister of Finance’s considerations concerning families that are just under the cut off adjusted family net income amount of approximately $150 000, who will receive benefits, compared to those at, or slightly above, the $150 000 mark?
Top of page