Questions and responses All Sessions January 17, 1994, to present

Refine your search

No search texts entered

Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-652

43-2
September 23, 2020, to August 15, 2021

Q-652

43rd Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
April 23, 2021
Answered
June 9, 2021
With regard to Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and individuals presenting COVID-19 test results at points of entry, since testing requirements were put into place in January 2021, broken down by type of crossing (land, air): (a) how many individuals did the CBSA intercept with a suspected fraudulent or false test result; (b) how many individuals did the CBSA intercept with a test result that was otherwise deemed unsatisfactory, such as the wrong type of test; (c) of the individuals in (a), how many were (i) admitted to Canada, (ii) denied entry; (d) of the individuals in (a), how many were (i) ticketed or fined by the CBSA, (ii) had their cases referred to the RCMP or other law enforcement agencies; and (e) of the cases in (b), how many were (i) admitted to Canada, (ii) denied entry?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-280

43-2
September 23, 2020, to August 15, 2021

Q-280

43rd Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
December 1, 2020
Answered
January 25, 2021
With regard to the impact of the changes to the broadcasting industry proposed in Bill C-10, An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts: (a) does the government have a projection of what the Canadian media market will look like in five years without the changes in Bill C-10; (b) does the government have a projection of what the Canadian media market will look like in five years with the changes in Bill C-10; (c) what are the government's projections related to the scenarios in (a) and (b); and (d) if the government does not have the projections in (a) or (b), then on what basis are the changes proposed in Bill C-10 being made?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-276

43-2
September 23, 2020, to August 15, 2021

Q-276

43rd Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
November 30, 2020
Answered
January 25, 2021
With regard to the acquisition of land by government departments or agencies, since January 1, 2016, for each transaction: (a) what is the land location; (b) what is the amount paid; (c) what is the size and description of the land; (d) what is the file number; (e) what is the date of transaction; (f) what is the reason for acquisition; and (g) who was the owner of the building prior to government acquisition?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-275

43-2
September 23, 2020, to August 15, 2021

Q-275

43rd Parliament, 2nd session
Asked by
Date asked
November 30, 2020
Answered
January 25, 2021
With regard to the acquisition of buildings by government departments or agencies, since December 1, 2019, for each transaction: (a) what is the location of the building; (b) what is the amount paid; (c) what is the type of building; (d) what is the file number; (e) what is the date of transaction; (f) what is the reason for acquisition; and (g) who was the owner of the building prior to government acquisition?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-406

43-1
December 5, 2019, to August 18, 2020

Q-406

43rd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
March 10, 2020
Answered
May 25, 2020
With regard to the 4,710 individuals who were admitted to Canada in 2019 via humanitarian, compassionate, and other grounds: how many of them were admitted by ministerial exemption, in total and broken down by federal riding?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-281

43-1
December 5, 2019, to August 18, 2020

Q-281

43rd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
February 3, 2020
Answered
April 11, 2020
With regard to the government’s contracting and integrity regime framework: (a) which corporations have been formally investigated under the framework; (b) of the corporations in (a), which ones (i) received sanctions, (ii) were found in violation of the framework but received an exemption or waiver from sanctions, (iii) were found not to be in violation; (c) what are the details of each exemption or waiver from sanctions, including (i) the name of the corporation, (ii) the date the waiver or exemption was granted, (iii) the rationale or justification for the waiver or exemption, (iv) the minister who provided the exemption or waiver?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-280

43-1
December 5, 2019, to August 18, 2020

Q-280

43rd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
February 3, 2020
Answered
April 11, 2020
With regard to the impact of SNC-Lavalin’s guilty plea in December 2019 on fraud charges in relation to the company’s contract to support servicing of minor warships and auxiliary vessels: (a) what impact will the guilty plea have on the scheduled renewal of the contract; (b) what specific considerations will the government take into account when deciding the status of the renewal; (c) what is the projected timeline for either renewing this contract or awarding a new contract to another company; and (d) what changes has the government made to the way it conducts business with SNC-Lavalin following the December 2019 guilty plea?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-150

43-1
December 5, 2019, to August 18, 2020

Q-150

43rd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
December 9, 2019
Answered
January 27, 2020
With regard to the government voting in favour of the anti-Israel resolution at the United Nations on November 19, 2019: (a) why did the government vote in favour of the Palestinian resolution, which was sponsored by North Korea, Egypt, Nicaragua and Zimbabwe; (b) when did the government decide that it was going to vote in that manner; and (c) did the government notify any organization of its intention to vote in that manner prior to November 19, 2019, and, if so, which organizations?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-149

43-1
December 5, 2019, to August 18, 2020

Q-149

43rd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
December 9, 2019
Answered
January 27, 2020
With regard to Canada’s vote of “yes” on the United Nations General Assembly Agenda Item 69 “Right of peoples to self-determination”: what is the government’s rationale for Canada to change its previous vote of “no” on this annual agenda item?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-148

43-1
December 5, 2019, to August 18, 2020

Q-148

43rd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
December 9, 2019
Answered
January 27, 2020
With regard to the government’s proposed Journalism and Written Media Independent Panel of Experts: (a) why does the government require panel members to sign a confidentiality agreement; (b) why will the panel’s deliberations not be held in public; and (c) why will the government not list media applicants which are denied funding?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session. The government is no longer required to respond to this question.

Q-2517

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2517

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 3, 2019
Awaiting response
N/A
With regard to the government’s proposed Journalism and Written Media Independent Panel of Experts: (a) why does the government require panel members to sign a confidentiality agreement; (b) why will the panel’s deliberations not be held in public; and (c) why will the government not list media applicants which are denied funding?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2401

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2401

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 8, 2019
Answered
May 27, 2019
With regard to Global Affairs Canada providing over $900,000 in funding to Wi’am through a $4.8 million payment to Kairos Canada as part of the government’s Women of Courage: Women, Peace, and Security program: (a) when did the government become aware that it was funding a group which supports the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sactions (BDS) campaign; (b) what is the government’s position on the statement from the director of Wi’am that “The world needs to be liberated from this guilty feeling that Israel has tried to instill in them and the world should be helping Israel shed its victim identity through BDS”; and (c) will the government immediately stop any funding to Wi’am and, if not, why not?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2383

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2383

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
April 4, 2019
Answered
May 27, 2019
With regard to the warning that the government received from Fitch Ratings about the rising debt level: (a) what specific action, if any, is the government prepared to do to ensure that Canada retains the “AAA” credit rating; (b) does the government have any projections on the effect of losing the “AAA” credit on the government’s finances and, if so, what are the projections; and (c) has the government received warnings from any other credit ratings agencies, since January 1, 2017, that it may lose its “AAA” credit rating and, if so, what are the details of any such warnings?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2014

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2014

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
October 23, 2018
Answered
December 10, 2018
With regard to instructions or directives provided by the Office of the Prime Minister to the Privy Council Office (PCO) since November 4, 2015: what instructions or directives were given to PCO in relation to the release of documents as requested by lawyers in the Mark Norman case, or in relation to the alleged leak of information from a November 2015 Cabinet committee meeting, and on what date was each instruction or directive given?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2013

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2013

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
October 23, 2018
Answered
December 10, 2018
With regard to the government’s response to Q-1503 where it indicated that it was aware of six incidents of leaked information, but that only one individual had been under investigation for leaking information: broken down by each of the five instances where information was leaked but an investigation did not take place or no one was placed under investigation, what is the rationale for not pursuing an investigation into each of the instances?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2012

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2012

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
October 23, 2018
Answered
December 10, 2018
With regard to meetings between the RCMP and ministers, exempt staff members, or other government employees in relation to leaks of Cabinet confidences: what are the details of all such meetings, including (i) name and title of minister, exempt staff member or other government employee, (ii) location, (iii) date, (iv) subject matter discussed?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-2010

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-2010

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
October 22, 2018
Answered
December 7, 2018
With regard to the decision by the Minister of National Defence to hire James Cudmore as a Senior Policy Advisor in late 2015 or early 2016: (a) on what date was Mr. Cudmore offered employment in the Office of the Minister; and (b) on what date did Mr. Cudmore begin his employment in the Office of the Minister?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1866

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1866

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 18, 2018
Answered
September 17, 2018
With regard to the new sauna and other upgrades made to Harrington Lake (Lac Mousseau), since November 4, 2015: (a) what are the details of all expenditures, including (i) date, (ii) description of upgrade, (iii) total amount; and (b) what is the breakdown of the amount in (a)(iii) by type of expense, such as installation, re-wiring, ski-trail grooming, etc.?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1861

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1861

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 14, 2018
Answered
September 17, 2018
With regard to the comments by the Commissioner of Lobbying in an interview with the Canadian Press that “If we want to be able to modernize, there is no way we will be able to do it with the current budget”: will the government increase the budget of the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying and, if so, by how much?
Historical information
The information shown below relates to a prior session.

Q-1844

42-1
December 3, 2015, to September 11, 2019

Q-1844

42nd Parliament, 1st session
Asked by
Date asked
June 12, 2018
Answered
September 17, 2018
With regard to the 2018 Canada Summer Jobs funding provided to the Islamic Humanitarian Service: (a) has the group had their funding revoked after Sheikh Shafiq Hudda of the Islamic Humanitarian Service called for genocide and the eradication of Israelis, and if not, why not; and (b) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, on what date was the funding revoked?
Top of page