BOIE
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 3684
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
I call the meeting to order.
Welcome to the eleventh meeting of the Board of Internal Economy of the 44th Parliament.
We'll start off with the minutes of the previous meeting.
We have a point of order, or a request from Mrs. DeBellefeuille.
Collapse
View Claude DeBellefeuille Profile
BQ (QC)
Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have a point of order and also a request.
I move to reverse items 6 and 7, and to take item 9 following item 4.
The idea is to concentrate all the decisions concerning members and administrative rules affecting members so that we can review them today. That is my first proposal.
I would like to know if my colleagues agree with that.
Collapse
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
Do we have everyone's agreement?
Mr. Brassard would like to speak
Collapse
View John Brassard Profile
CPC (ON)
View John Brassard Profile
2022-06-16 11:02
Expand
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
While I don't disagree with Madame DeBellefeuille, I think we should be going right in camera and dealing with item 8 first and item 7 second. I think we can defer item 6 in camera to later, and then we move into the public portion of the meeting after that. My suggestion would be that we move to item 4 in the public portion after we finish with those two items in camera. I think they're very timely matters that need to be addressed. That would be my proposal, Mr. Chair.
Collapse
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
Mrs. DeBellefeuille, is this acceptable?
Collapse
View Claude DeBellefeuille Profile
BQ (QC)
I don't object to this, but I still want to warn my colleagues. We may have one more meeting to go. I really want to make sure that, before we leave at the end of June, we have made decisions on all the things that have to do with constituency offices, MPs' budgets, and so on. I would like to make sure that we deal with all of those items today or, perhaps, next week.
Collapse
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
That's fine.
Go ahead, Mr. Julian.
Collapse
View Peter Julian Profile
NDP (BC)
I agree with Mrs. DeBellefeuille on this. Given our agenda, we will meet next week, it is unavoidable. It is better to determine what we want to discuss today. I agree with Mrs. DeBellefeuille that item 4 and item 9 are important and that we need to determine what we will discuss next week.
Since we will also be holding part of the meeting in camera, we need to establish what would be the best way to proceed. It seems to me that we could set a time today to go into closed session, after we have considered items 4 and 9. I would agree to that. The other important items could be deferred to next week.
Collapse
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
Mr. Holland, you have the floor.
Collapse
View Mark Holland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Mark Holland Profile
2022-06-16 11:04
Expand
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
It's my view that we have an agenda in front of us. I'm comfortable with the order that's there. I think, if we want to invert this to be in camera, we could talk about that, but doing so would be left for in camera. I think we should just proceed with the agenda we have.
Collapse
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
Go ahead, Mr. Brassard.
Collapse
View John Brassard Profile
CPC (ON)
View John Brassard Profile
2022-06-16 11:04
Expand
Thank you.
After hearing the discussion again, I think we can get through four items today, two in camera as a priority, and two in public.
If I hear Madame DeBellefeuille correctly, items 9 and 4 are the in public priorities. I agree with that. In camera I would suggest numbers 7 and 8, and if there is an opportunity to meet next week to deal with these other issues, then we're prepared to do that at any point at the beginning of the week or at the end of the week, Mr. Chair.
Thank you. That would be my recommendation.
Collapse
View Anthony Rota Profile
Lib. (ON)
Do we have consent to adopt the new order, which would be item number 8 followed by number 7, and then over to number 4 and then to number 9?
Does that make sense? Did I read that correctly?
Collapse
View Peter Julian Profile
NDP (BC)
I hadn't understood it that way.
Collapse
Results: 1 - 15 of 3684 | Page: 1 of 246

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data