Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 60 of 189
2020-09-24 [p.11]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Counc...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— Nos. 431-00237, 431-00250, 431-00253, 431-00296, 431-00301 and 431-00303 concerning foreign affairs;
— Nos. 431-00238, 431-00242, 431-00244, 431-00245, 431-00247, 431-00273, 431-00283, 431-00285 and 431-00288 concerning the environment;
— No. 431-00239 concerning agriculture;
— Nos. 431-00240, 431-00241, 431-00243, 431-00246, 431-00251, 431-00258, 431-00259, 431-00260, 431-00265, 431-00268, 431-00271, 431-00279, 431-00280, 431-00281, 431-00292, 431-00293, 431-00297 and 431-00298 concerning justice;
— Nos. 431-00248, 431-00255, 431-00269, 431-00275, 431-00299 and 431-00300 concerning social affairs and equality;
— Nos. 431-00249, 431-00262 and 431-00287 concerning Indigenous affairs;
— Nos. 431-00252, 431-00263, 431-00290 and 431-00294 concerning health;
— Nos. 431-00254, 431-00256, 431-00274 and 431-00302 concerning natural resources and energy;
— Nos. 431-00257, 431-00267, 431-00272 and 431-00291 concerning the democratic process;
— Nos. 431-00261 and 431-00284 concerning fisheries;
— No. 431-00264 concerning culture and heritage;
— No. 431-00266 concerning civil and human rights;
— No. 431-00270 concerning media and telecommunications;
— No. 431-00276 concerning citizenship and immigration;
— No. 431-00277 concerning animals;
— No. 431-00278 concerning infrastructure;
— Nos. 431-00282 and 431-00286 concerning transportation;
— No. 431-00289 concerning the correctional system;
— No. 431-00295 concerning government services and administration.
Collapse
AbortionAéroport Montréal Saint-Hubert LongueuilAir trafficAir transportationAnimal rights and welfareApplication processArtistsAsylumBeesBituminous sandsBorders ...Show all topics
2020-08-12 [p.534]
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House recognize that reopening businesses and the economy entails taki...
Expand
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House recognize that reopening businesses and the economy entails taking far more action to support parents, especially women, who are worried about going back to work without knowing their kids will be safely cared for in child care and school, and therefore call on the government to: (a) increase its transfer to provinces and territories for affordable child care by $2 billion; (b) transfer funding to provinces and territories to support a safe return to school; and (c) work with all provinces and territories to ensure all federal funds are dedicated to the health and safety of children across the country, while ensuring the transfers to Quebec are unconditional.
Collapse
2020-04-11 [p.339]
Pursuant to order made earlier today and to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Rodriguez (Leader of the Government in the Hou...
Expand
Pursuant to order made earlier today and to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Rodriguez (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— Nos. 431-00046, 431-00054, 431-00055, 431-00081, 431-00090 and 431-00100 concerning health;
— Nos. 431-00047, 431-00053, 431-00103 and 431-00122 concerning animals;
— Nos. 431-00048, 431-00058, 431-00063, 431-00069, 431-00080, 431-00082 and 431-00104 concerning natural resources and energy;
— No. 431-00049 concerning civil and human rights;
— Nos. 431-00050, 431-00067, 431-00072, 431-00076, 431-00083, 431-00089, 431-00097, 431-00105, 431-00108, 431-00109, 431-00111, 431-00112, 431-00114 and 431-00121 concerning justice;
— Nos. 431-00051, 431-00068, 431-00084, 431-00085, 431-00086, 431-00088, 431-00092, 431-00095, 431-00106, 431-00115, 431-00116 and 431-00117 concerning foreign affairs;
— Nos. 431-00052, 431-00091, 431-00096, 431-00099 and 431-00101 concerning fisheries;
— Nos. 431-00056 and 431-00066 concerning transportation;
— Nos. 431-00057, 431-00060, 431-00061, 431-00062, 431-00065, 431-00071, 431-00074, 431-00077, 431-00078, 431-00079, 431-00087, 431-00098, 431-00113 and 431-00123 concerning the environment;
— Nos. 431-00059, 431-00064, 431-00093 and 431-00110 concerning taxation;
— No. 431-00070 concerning culture and heritage;
— Nos. 431-00073, 431-00075, 431-00107 and 431-00120 concerning Indigenous affairs;
— No. 431-00094 concerning the democratic process;
— No. 431-00102 concerning employment and labour;
— No. 431-00118 concerning social affairs and equality;
— No. 431-00119 concerning veterans' affairs.
Collapse
AfghanistanAir accidentsAlgeriaAnimal experimentationAnimal rights and welfareArmy of the Guardians of the Islamic Rev ...AsylumAvon RiverBacklogsBack-to-work legislationBees ...Show all topics
2020-03-11 [p.303]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Counc...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— No. 431-00037 concerning civil and human rights;
— No. 431-00038 concerning the environment;
— No. 431-00039 concerning fisheries;
— No. 431-00040 concerning foreign affairs.
Collapse
2020-02-25 [p.262]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. Bérubé (Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou), seconded by Mr....
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. Bérubé (Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou), seconded by Mr. Beaulieu (La Pointe-de-l'Île), Bill C-223, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (adequate knowledge of French in Quebec), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Collapse
2020-02-25 [p.262]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), seconded by Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette)...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), seconded by Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), Bill C-226, An Act to amend the Canadian Multiculturalism Act (non-application in Quebec), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Collapse
2020-01-31 [p.142]
— by Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), one concerning civil and human rights (No. 431-00049);...
Expand
— by Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), one concerning civil and human rights (No. 431-00049);
Collapse
2020-01-27 [p.74]
— by Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), one concerning civil and human rights (No. 431-00037);...
Expand
— by Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), one concerning civil and human rights (No. 431-00037);
Collapse
2019-03-18 [p.4685]
— No. 421-03136 concerning telecommunications. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-78-08;...
Expand
— No. 421-03136 concerning telecommunications. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-78-08;
Collapse
2019-02-06 [p.4573]
At 5:47 p.m., by unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred ...
Expand
At 5:47 p.m., by unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That, given:
(a) the House has great respect for provincial jurisdiction and trust in provincial institutions;
(b) the people of Quebec are burdened with completing and submitting two tax returns, one federal and one provincial; and
(c) the House believes in cutting red tape and reducing unnecessary paperwork to improve the everyday lives of families; therefore,
the House call on the government to work with the Government of Quebec to implement a single tax return in Quebec, as adopted unanimously in the motion of the National Assembly of Quebec on May 15, 2018.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 990 -- Vote no 990) - View vote details.
YEAS: 80, NAYS: 191
Collapse
2019-02-05 [p.4562]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kell...
Expand
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved, — That, given:
(a) the House has great respect for provincial jurisdiction and trust in provincial institutions;
(b) the people of Quebec are burdened with completing and submitting two tax returns, one federal and one provincial; and
(c) the House believes in cutting red tape and reducing unnecessary paperwork to improve the everyday lives of families; therefore,
the House call on the government to work with the Government of Quebec to implement a single tax return in Quebec, as adopted unanimously in the motion of the National Assembly of Quebec on May 15, 2018.
Debate arose thereon.
Collapse
2019-02-05 [p.4566]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky R...
Expand
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
Collapse
2019-02-05 [p.4566]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesda...
Expand
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, February 6, 2019, at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders.
Collapse
2019-01-30 [p.4545]
— by Mr. Bernier (Beauce), one concerning telecommunications (No. 421-03136);...
Expand
— by Mr. Bernier (Beauce), one concerning telecommunications (No. 421-03136);
Collapse
2018-11-01 [p.4214]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Beaulieu (La Pointe-de-l'Île), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repe...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Beaulieu (La Pointe-de-l'Île), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), Bill C-421, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (adequate knowledge of French in Quebec), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Collapse
2018-09-17 [p.3927]
Q-1619 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to government spending in the federal ridin...
Expand
Q-1619 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to government spending in the federal ridings of Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia and Gaspésie–Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine, respectively, between October 19, 2015, and today: (a) how much did the government invest in projects under the Canada Community Infrastructure Program and the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program, broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project; and (b) how much did the government invest through the various government programs other than the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program (such as, but not limited to, the New Building Canada Fund—Quebec, New Horizons and the various Canadian Heritage funds), broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1619-01.
Collapse
2018-05-22 [p.3252]
Q-1618 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to the methods used by Statistics Canada: (...
Expand
Q-1618 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to the methods used by Statistics Canada: (a) what method did Statistics Canada use to calculate the unemployment rate and full-time and part-time employment rates in Canada in 2017-18, (i) do the current methods differ from those used in 2015 and in 2010, (ii) if the answer to (a)(i) is affirmative, that the current methods differ from those used in 2010 and 2015, how do they differ; (b) what data collection procedures did Statistics Canada use for the unemployment rate and full-time and part-time employment rates for 2017-18, (i) do the current procedures differ from those used in 2015 and in 2010, (ii) if the answer to (b)(i) is affirmative, that the current procedures differ from those used in 2010 and 2015, how do they differ; (c) what calculation methods and data collection procedures were used for the unemployment rate and full-time and part-time employment rates, respectively, in the economic regions of Gaspé-Magdalen Islands (10), Lower St. Lawrence and North Shore (19) and Restigouche-Albert (09) in 2010, 2015, and 2017-18, (i) do the current calculation methods and data collection procedures differ from those used in 2015 and 2010, (ii) if the answer to (c)(i) is affirmative, that the current calculation methods and data collection procedures differ from those used in 2015 and 2010, how do they differ; and (d) what percentage and number of senior citizens receiving a pension were included in the collection of data on the unemployment and employment rates in the economic regions of Gaspé-Magdalen Islands (10), Lower St. Lawrence and North Shore (19) and Restigouche-Albert (09) in 2010, 2015, and 2017-18? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1618.
Collapse
2018-05-22 [p.3253]
Q-1619 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to government spending in the federal ridin...
Expand
Q-1619 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to government spending in the federal ridings of Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia and Gaspésie–Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine, respectively, between October 19, 2015, and today: (a) how much did the government invest in projects under the Canada Community Infrastructure Program and the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program, broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project; and (b) how much did the government invest through the various government programs other than the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program (such as, but not limited to, the New Building Canada Fund—Quebec, New Horizons and the various Canadian Heritage funds), broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1619.
Collapse
2018-03-29 [p.3063]
Q-1498 — Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette) — With regard to federal spending in Quebec ridings for each fiscal year since 2010-11...
Expand
Q-1498 — Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette) — With regard to federal spending in Quebec ridings for each fiscal year since 2010-11, inclusively: what are the details of all grants, contributions, and loans to all organizations, groups, businesses or municipalities, broken down by (i) constituency, (ii) name of recipient, (iii) municipality in which the recipient is located, (iv) date the funding was received, (v) amount received, (vi) granting department or agency, (vii) program under which the grant, contribution or loan was allocated, (viii) nature or purpose? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1498.
Collapse
2018-02-01 [p.2636]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), ...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), Bill C-393, An Act to amend the Canadian Multiculturalism Act (non-application in Quebec), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Collapse
2017-09-21 [p.2142]
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House respect democracy and reaffirm Quebec’s right to debate and legi...
Expand
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House respect democracy and reaffirm Quebec’s right to debate and legislate on all issues under its jurisdiction.
Collapse
2017-08-16 [p.2085]
— Nos. 421-01512 and 421-01513 concerning the holding of referendums. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-163-01;...
Expand
— Nos. 421-01512 and 421-01513 concerning the holding of referendums. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-163-01;
Collapse
2017-06-13 [p.1919]
— by Mr. Boudrias (Terrebonne), two concerning the holding of referendums (Nos. 421-01512 and 421-01513);...
Expand
— by Mr. Boudrias (Terrebonne), two concerning the holding of referendums (Nos. 421-01512 and 421-01513);
Collapse
2017-04-06 [p.1589]
Q-880 — Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît) — With regard to infrastructure spending: since Budget 2016 was tabled, what infras...
Expand
Q-880 — Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît) — With regard to infrastructure spending: since Budget 2016 was tabled, what infrastructure projects for post-secondary institutions in Quebec have received grants, broken down by (i) riding, (ii) funding program, (iii) total project budget, (iv) amount of federal grants, in dollars and as a percentage of the total project budget, (v) date of the announcement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-880.
Collapse
2016-09-19 [p.713]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— Nos. 421-00301, 421-00316, 421-00485 and 421-00492 concerning the protection of the environment. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-3-08;
Collapse
2016-09-16 [p.713]
— Nos. 421-00431, 421-00432, 421-00433 and 421-00549 concerning oil and gas exploration. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-...
Expand
— Nos. 421-00431, 421-00432, 421-00433 and 421-00549 concerning oil and gas exploration. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-67-01;
Collapse
2016-09-19 [p.724]
Q-206 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to the 25 ports or wharves that the governme...
Expand
Q-206 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to the 25 ports or wharves that the government wants to divest in the regions of the Lower St. Lawrence, the Gaspé and the North Shore (specifically in the communities of Baie-Comeau, Baie-Johan-Beetz, Blanc-Sablon, Cap-aux-Meules, Carleton, Chandler, Gaspé, Gros Cacouna, Harrington Harbour, Kégaska, La Romaine, La Tabatière, Les Méchins, Matane, Miguasha, Mont-Louis, Natashquan, Paspébiac, Pointe-au-Père (breakwater), Rimouski, Saint-Augustin, Tête-à-la-Baleine, and Vieux-Fort): what are the estimated costs of repairing each of these 25 ports or wharves, broken down by port or wharf? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-206.
Collapse
2016-06-17 [p.665]
— by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), one concerning oil and gas exploration (No. 421-00549);...
Expand
— by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), one concerning oil and gas exploration (No. 421-00549);
Collapse
2016-06-14 [p.604]
— by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-00492);...
Expand
— by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-00492);
Collapse
2016-06-08 [p.583]
— by Mr. Plamondon (Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel), three concerning oil and gas exploration (Nos. 421-00431 to 421-00433);...
Expand
— by Mr. Plamondon (Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel), three concerning oil and gas exploration (Nos. 421-00431 to 421-00433);
Collapse
2016-03-09 [p.251]
Q-34 — Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) — With regard to the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889: (a) does the ...
Expand
Q-34 — Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) — With regard to the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889: (a) does the middle of the main channel of the Ottawa River, from the head of Lake Temiscamingue to the intersection by the prolongation of the western limits of the Seigneurie of Rigaud, such mid-channel being as indicated on a map of the Ottawa Ship Canal Survey by Walter Shanly, C.E., still delineate the boundary between Ontario and Quebec; (b) are copies of the Order of the Governor-General in Council, dated July 21, 1886, that approved the mid-channel boundary described in (a), available to members of the public, and if not, why not; (c) are certified copies of the map referred to in the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889, showing the mid-channel described in (a), available to members of the public, and if not, why not; and (d) has either the Province of Quebec or the Province of Ontario challenged the location of the boundary since the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889, received Royal Assent? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-34.
Collapse
2015-06-18 [p.2832]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Paradis (Minister of International Development and Ministe...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Paradis (Minister of International Development and Minister for La Francophonie) for Mr. Rickford (Minister of Natural Resources and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario), seconded by Ms. Rempel (Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification)), Bill C-74, An Act to implement the accord between the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec for the joint management of petroleum resources in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
His Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to implement the accord between the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec for the joint management of petroleum resources in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”.
Collapse
2015-06-17 [p.2805]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on a ...
Expand
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on a Ways and Means motion to introduce an Act to implement the accord between the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec for the joint management of petroleum resources in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. (Ways and Means No. 25)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 461 -- Vote no 461) - View vote details.
YEAS: 185, NAYS: 91
Collapse
2015-06-12 [p.2752]
Q-1220 — Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — With regard to fishing in Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince...
Expand
Q-1220 — Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — With regard to fishing in Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia, from 1990 to the present: (a) what are the fees and associated costs for fishing permits, broken down by (i) species, (ii) type of equipment used, (iii) province, (iv) year; and (b) what is the total fishing quota for each species, broken down by (i) species, (ii) province, (iii) year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1220.
Collapse
2015-06-11 [p.2739]
Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance) laid upon the Table, — Notice of a Ways and Means motion to introduce an Act to implem...
Expand
Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance) laid upon the Table, — Notice of a Ways and Means motion to introduce an Act to implement the accord between the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec for the joint management of petroleum resources in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. (Ways and Means No. 25) — Sessional Paper No. 8570-412-26.
Pursuant to Standing Order 83(2), at the request of Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), an Order of the Day was designated for the consideration of this Ways and Means motion.
Collapse
2015-01-26 [p.1975]
Q-774 — Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to the statutes, regulations, policies and practices gover...
Expand
Q-774 — Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to the statutes, regulations, policies and practices governing the Department of Fisheries and Oceans related to the issuing and administration of commercial fishing licences and fisheries resource allocation decisions: (a) what is the definition of (i) a commercial fishing licence, (ii) a commercial fishing permit; (b) what are the differences between a commercial fishing licence and a commercial fishing permit in terms of (i) the rights and responsibilities of the harvester holding either a licence or a permit respectively, (ii) the rights and responsibilities of the Minister in terms of resource allocation policy; (c) what is the definition of the “Last-in – First-out” (LIFO) policy;
(d) how often has the LIFO policy been acted upon in determining allocations of annual quotas to either commercial fisheries licences or to permit holders that have experienced any year-over-year decline in the total allowable catch, broken down by (i) year, (ii) each such regulated harvesting category within any of the fisheries management areas of each fisheries stock area within the Newfoundland and Labrador, the Gulf, the Maritime and the Quebec regions of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, further broken down in turn by (iii) species fished, (iv) individual fisheries management area within the species stock area within the past ten years, including the total quota levels for each such species and for each such fisheries management area within each stock area in each year; and (e) in each of the occurrences reported in answering (d), for each of the past ten years described, what was the total number of fish licence holders or permit holders who were directly affected by a reduction in quota on a year-over-year basis and were subject to the application and enactment of the LIFO policy, broken down by (i) species, (ii) individual fisheries management area within each fisheries stock area? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-774.
Collapse
2014-11-21 [p.1819]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of ...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return:
Q-742 — Mr. Cotler (Mount Royal) — With regard to the process for filling the vacancy on the Supreme Court of Canada that will be created by the retirement of Justice Louis Lebel: (a) when did the government learn of Justice Lebel’s intention to retire on November 30, 2014; (b) how did the government learn of Justice Lebel’s intention to retire on November 30, 2014; (c) what steps has the government taken to find a replacement for Justice Lebel; (d) when were each of the steps in (c) taken; (e) what individuals, agencies, organizations, or other governments has the government consulted with regard to developing a process to find Justice Lebel’s replacement; (f) what individuals, agencies, organizations, or other governments has the government consulted with regard to choosing Justice Lebel’s replacement; (g) when did the consultations in (e) occur; (h) when did the consultations in (f) occur; (i) what individuals, agencies, organizations, or other governments will the government consult with regard to developing a process to find Justice Lebel’s replacement; (j) what individuals, agencies, organizations, or other governments will the government consult with regard to choosing Justice Lebel’s replacement; (k) when will the consultations in (i) occur; (l) when will the consultations in (j) occur; (m) what date has the government set by which Justice Lebel’s replacement must be nominated; (n) what date has the government set by which Justice Lebel’s replacement must be appointed; (o) by what date does the government intend to nominate Justice Lebel’s replacement; (p) by what date does the government intend to appoint Justice Lebel’s replacement; (q) when were the dates in (m) to (p) set; (r) who set the dates in (m) to (p); (s) based on what factors were the dates in (m) to (p) set; (t) if no dates have been set regarding the nomination or appointment of Justice Lebel’s replacement, why have no dates been set; (u) has the government examined the consequences, legal and otherwise, of allowing a Supreme Court seat to be vacant; (v) what are the results of the examination in (u); (w) when did the examination in (u) begin; (x) when did the examination in (u) end; (y) who carried out the examination in (u); (z) if the government has not carried out the examination in (u), why has it not done so; (aa) will the government examine the consequences, legal and otherwise, of allowing a Supreme Court seat to be vacant; (bb) if the government will not carry out the examination in (aa), why will it not do so; (cc) based on what criteria has the government evaluated candidates to replace Justice Lebel, or, if no evaluations have occurred thus far, based on what criteria will the government evaluate candidates to replace Justice Lebel; (dd) how do the criteria in (cc) differ from those used to evaluate candidates in the appointment processes that led to the appointments of (i) Justice Wagner, (ii) Justice Nadon, (iii) Justice Gascon; (ee) what materials have been sought from the candidates to replace Justice Lebel; (ff) what materials will be sought from the candidates to replace Justice Lebel; (gg) how do the materials in (ee) and (ff) differ from those sought from candidates in the processes that led to the appointments of (i) Justice Wagner, (ii) Justice Nadon, (iii) Justice Gascon; (hh) if the materials in (ee) and (ff) differ from those sought from candidates in the processes that led to the appointments of Justices Wagner, Nadon, and Gascon, (i) why were changes made, (ii) who decided to make these changes, (iii) when was that decision made; (ii) when did the “reconsideration” of the appointment process referred to in the government’s response to Q-543 begin; (jj) who made the decision to reconsider the Supreme Court appointment process; (kk) on what date was the decision in (jj) made; (ll) what has the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process entailed; (mm) who has been involved in the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (nn) what has been the role of each of the individuals in (mm) in the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (oo) what individuals, agencies, organizations, or other governments have been consulted as part of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (pp) were parliamentarians consulted as part of the reconsideration process, and if so, whom; (qq) what meetings have occurred as part of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process, (i) on what dates, (ii) with whom present, (iii) with what goals, (iv) with what outcomes; (rr) what documents, memos, briefing notes, or other materials have been created as part of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (ss) what are the dates of creation and file or reference numbers of the materials in (rr); (tt) who developed the materials in (rr); (uu) to whom have the materials in (rr) been distributed; (vv) what research, reports, books, articles, or other reference materials has the government consulted as part of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (ww) what are the objectives of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (xx) when did the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process end, or if it is ongoing, when does the government intend to end it; (yy) if the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process is ongoing, (i) what will the remainder of the reconsideration entail, (ii) who will be involved in the remainder of the reconisderation, (iii) what will be the role of each of the individuals, agencies, organizations, and governments involved, (iv) when will parliamentarians be consulted, (v) in what way will parliamentarians be consulted; (zz) when did the government last engage in a reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (aaa) in what way is the current reconsideration similar to or different from the last reconsideration; (bbb) what are the results of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (ccc) when will the results of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process be made public; (ddd) what has been the cost of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process; (eee) what is the breakdown of the cost of the reconsideration of the Supreme Court appointment process thus far; (fff) if the reconsideration is ongoing, (i) what will be the total cost of the reconsideration, (ii) what is the breakdown of the cost; (ggg) what process has been or will be used to evaluate candidates and make an appointment to replace Justice Lebel; (hhh) in what way have parliamentarians been involved, or in what way will they be involved, in the process to replace Justice Lebel; (iii) what goals have been served by parliamentary involvement in previous Supreme Court appointment processes; (jjj) how will the goals in (iii) be served in the process to replace Justice Lebel; (kkk) in what way have members of the legal community been involved, or in what way will they be involved, in the process to replace Justice Lebel; (lll) other than parliamentarians and members of the legal community, who has been or will be involved in the process to replace Justice Lebel, and in what way; (mmm) what steps has the government taken, or what steps will the government take, to ensure that Justice Lebel’s replacement is eligible to fill one of the seats reserved for Quebec pursuant to section 6 of the Supreme Court Act; (nnn) who has carried out, or who will carry out, the legal analysis to ensure that Justice Lebel’s replacement is eligible to fill one of the seats reserved for Quebec pursuant to section 6 of the Supreme Court Act; (ooo) when was the legal analysis in (nnn) carried out; (ppp) what has been the cost of the analysis in (nnn); (qqq) what is the breakdown of the cost of the analysis in (nnn); (rrr) what has been, or what will be, the cost of the process to replace Justice Lebel; (sss) what is the breakdown of the cost in (rrr); (ttt) in what way will the process to replace Justice Lebel be (i) transparent, (ii) accountable, (iii) inclusive; and (uuu) will the process used for the appointment of Justice Lebel’s replacement be used for future appointments? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-742.
Collapse
2014-11-19 [p.1795]
Q-741 — Ms. Boivin (Gatineau) — With regard to the distribution of government jobs within departments and agencies in th...
Expand
Q-741 — Ms. Boivin (Gatineau) — With regard to the distribution of government jobs within departments and agencies in the National Capital Region (NCR): (a) how many jobs were located in the Quebec part of the NCR in 2014; (b) how many jobs were located in the Ontario part of the NCR in 2014; (c) how many jobs in the Quebec part of the NCR will be eliminated as a result of the cuts introduced in the last budget; and (d) how many jobs in the Ontario part of the NCR will be eliminated as a result of the cuts introduced in the last budget? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-741.
Collapse
2014-05-26 [p.1050]
Q-448 — Mr. Dion (Saint-Laurent—Cartierville) — With regard to judicial appointments from the province of Quebec: (a) wh...
Expand
Q-448 — Mr. Dion (Saint-Laurent—Cartierville) — With regard to judicial appointments from the province of Quebec: (a) what steps is the government taking to ensure Quebec has full representation on the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC); (b) by when will a Justice to replace Justice Fish assume his or her seat on the SCC and by what process will this vacancy be filled; (c) in what ways is the decision in Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 being studied and analyzed by the government, and what impact is it expected to have on future judicial appointments from Quebec; (d) will the government seek constitutional amendment to allow for the appointment of judges from the federal courts to the Quebec seats on the SCC and, if so, how does the government plan to proceed; (e) does the government anticipate that the decision in Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 will have any impact on its ability to fill vacancies from Quebec in the federal courts and, if so, how; (f) in what ways will the government seek (i) to ensure civil law expertise and the representation of Quebec’s legal traditions and social values on the Court, (ii) to enhance the confidence of Quebec in the Court in the context of future appointments; (g) since the decision in Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6, what discussions or meetings on judicial appointments have occurred with the Government of Quebec and the Barreau du Quebec; (h) in what ways has the question in (e) been studied or will be studied, if any; (i) in what ways has the pool of eligible persons for appointment to Quebec seats on the SCC been defined and identified, broken down by (i) gender, (ii), Aboriginal status, (iii) visible minority status; (j) what qualifications and merit criteria have been identified as necessary and desirable for an appointment to a Quebec seat on the SCC;
(k) what steps have been undertaken to identify potential successors to Justice Lebel upon his anticipated retirement from the SCC; (l) if the process in (k) has not begun, when is it anticipated to begin and what will the first steps be; (m) what regard is given, if any, to the linguistic proficiencies of candidates for Quebec seats at the SCC, in both official languages, (i) at what point in the process is such proficiency assessed, (ii) by whom, (iii) to what standard; (n) does the answer in (m) vary if the vacancy were to arise from another province; (o) in what ways will Quebecers, their government, and their professional orders be consulted and involved in the process to fill present and future vacancies arising from the province at the SCC; (p) in what ways have Supreme Court justices from Quebec been consulted by the government, in the past and present, relative to the appointments process and credentials and will they be consulted in the future; and (q) for judges appointed to Quebec seats on SCC whose appointment and swearing in is subsequently deemed void ab inito, (i) are taxpayers reimbursed in any way for the appointment process by the government, (ii) is the salary of such a judge returned to the government for the period in which it was collected in error, (iii) who makes the determinations in (i) and (ii) and by what process, (iv) what impact does such a determination have on the retirement and pensionable allowances of such a judge if he or she were a federal judge prior to and post appointment to the SCC, (v) are nominees from Quebec informed of the possibility of their appointment and swearing in being deemed void ab initio and, if so, at what point in the process? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-448.
Collapse
2014-05-06 [p.891]
Q-334 — Mr. Cotler (Mount Royal) — With regard to bijuralism and harmonization: (a) what measures are in place to ensure...
Expand
Q-334 — Mr. Cotler (Mount Royal) — With regard to bijuralism and harmonization: (a) what measures are in place to ensure legislative bijuralism across all departments; (b) since the adoption of the “Policy on Legislative Bijuralism”, how has the Department of Justice (i) ensured that all legal counsel in the Department are made aware of the requirements of legislative bijuralism in order for them to be able to take it into account when advising client departments on legislative reforms, (ii) enhanced the capacity of the Legislative Services Branch to draft bijural legislative texts, (iii) undertook, in drafting both versions of every bill and proposed regulation that touches on provincial or territorial private law, to take care to reflect the terminology, concepts, notions and institutions of both of Canada’s private law systems; (c) since the adoption of the “Policy for Applying the Civil Code of Quebec to Federal Government Activities”, what measures are in place to ensure (i) changes to Quebec’s Civil Code are known and monitored by the government, (ii) assessment of federal legislation relative to changes to Quebec’s Civil Code, (iii) federal legislation is introduced to reflect, where necessary, changes to the Civil Code of Quebec; (d) with respect to the “Index of Bijuralism and Harmonization Caselaw” found online and indicating its most recent update was June 12, 2012, (i) how often is this page updated, (ii) given that some cases thereupon are from 2013, when was this page last updated, (iii) whose responsibility is it to update this page, (iv) what cases are currently being monitored for potential addition to this page; (e) with respect to cases involving bijuralism and harmonization, (i) in what ways are these made known to the Department, (ii) whose responsibility it is to monitor these cases, (iii), what role does the Federal government play in these cases if a party, (iv) what role does the government play if not a party, (v) who makes the determination and as to when the government should intervene if not a party and how is this decision made;
(f) with respect to Bijurilex, whose website at http://www.bijurilex.gc.ca/ appeared not to function as of March 17, 2014, (i) is this website still available, (ii) if not, when was it taken off-line and why, (iii) where can its former contents be found; (g) what resources exist to provide information about the implications and challenges of bijuralism as it relates to legislation; (h) with respect to the bijuralism publication of the Department entitled “THE LINK”, (i) how often is it published, (ii) when is it next expected, (iii) what causes it to be published, (iv) who prepares it, (v) how is it disseminated and to whom; (i) what specialized consultative services are offered to the government with regard to bijuralism issues; (j) when were the most recent services in (i) sought and provided, and at what cost; (k) what studies have been undertaken within the last five years regarding (i) the relationship between federal law and the law of the provinces and territories, (ii) between the common law and civil law legal traditions, (iii) between these legal traditions and Aboriginal law; (l) what studies are presently being undertaken regarding (i) the relationship between federal law and the law of the provinces and territories, (ii) between the common law and civil law legal traditions, (iii) between these legal traditions and Aboriginal law; (m) what training courses on bijuralism and comparative law have been developed for Justice Canada’s legislative drafters, (i) how often are they offered, (ii) how many participate, (iii) are they open to individuals from other departments; (n) what bijural drafting notes and course material for training on bijuralism have been developed in the past five years and by what means are these accessible (i) within the Department of Justice, (ii) across the government, (iii) to the legal community, (iv) to the public; (o) what issues and challenges of legislative bijuralism has the government most recently identified and how does it seek to address these; (p) what issues and challenges of harmonization has the government most recently identified and how does it seek to address these; (q) what is the content of the departmental policy on the application of Quebec civil law to the government; (r) what was the mandate and role of the Civil Code Section upon its creation and how did the role and mandate change over time; (s) in what ways does the government review any situation in which legal rights are in issue or proceeding under Quebec civil law which concerns the government;
(t) in what ways has the government ensured inclusion of Quebec civil law in the curriculum of the Departmental continuing education programs; (u) with respect to the Department’s recognition that “si le bijuridisme vise d’abord le respect et la prise en compte du droit civil et de la common law dans le contexte fédéral, notamment en matière de rédaction et d’interprétation des textes législatifs fédéraux, il n’exclut aucunement le respect et l’intégration d’autres règles propres au droit fédéral, la prise en compte d’autres sources, notamment en matière de droit international, ni le respect d’autres cultures juridiques, plus particulièrement les cultures autochtones” (i) what other rules has the government found to apply to it, (ii) what sources of law has the government recognized other than civil, common, aboriginal, and international law, (iii) what other cultures has the government sought to respect in this regard and how; (v) with which international law sources has the government sought to harmonize its laws and how so; (w) with what aboriginal law sources has the government sought to harmonize its laws and how so; (x) how may the Bijural Terminology Records Research Index be accessed and how often is it updated; (y) of what cases is the government currently aware where the matter at issue is one of bijuralism or harmonization; (z) what statutes would benefit from modification to respect best practices with respect to bijuralism and harmonization; (aa) what statutes have been identified as having bijuralism issues and how have they been so identified; (bb) what statutes require amendment to conform with the solutions proposed in the Bijural Terminology Records Research Index; (cc) is a new Federal Law – Civil Law Harmonization Act being prepared;
(dd) what efforts have been made to identify whether a new Federal Law – Civil Law Harmonization Act is necessary and what determines its necessity; (ee) how is proposed legislation vetted or otherwise checked to ensure conformity with bijuralism and harmonization best practices; (ff) in what ways are existing statutes checked to ensure conformity with bijuralism and harmonization best practices; (gg) what prompts the introduction of legislation to address an issue of bijuralism / harmonization; (hh) in what Federal-Provincial-Territorial (FPT)) meetings have bijuralism issues been raised and in what context; (ii) in what FPT meetings have harmonization issues been raised and in what context; (jj) in what ways is Quebec’s new Code of Civil Procedure being analysed by the government, (i) by whom, (ii) with what mandate, (iii) with what purpose; (kk) does Quebec’s new Code of Civil Procedure – fully coming into force in 2015 – suggest any need for legislative response on the part of the Government of Canada to ensure federal law harmonization with civil law practice in Quebec; (ll) does the review of government legislation under the Department of Justice Act include in any way the review of legislation for any issues of bijuralism and, if so, how and to what extent; (mm) does the review of government legislation under the Department of Justice Act include in any way the review of legislation for any issues of harmonization and, if so how, how and to what extent; (nn) to what extent and in what ways are regulations reviewed to ensure conformity with bijuralism best practices; (oo) to what extent has cabinet been informed of the importance of bijuralism, by what means and on what dates; (pp) is bijuralism assessed in any way when filling vacancies at the Department of Justice and, if so, how; (qq) what grants and other programs exist to promote bijuralism (i) within the Department of Justice, (ii) across government, (iii) within the legal community, (iv) at law schools, (v) to the broader public; (rr) what involvements and engagements are being undertaken with respect to bijuralism internationally;
(ss) in what ways and forums has Canada shared its bijuralism expertise and experience with other countries; (tt) does a review of legislation for harmonization issues include any consideration of provincial implementation cost; (uu) in what ways are coming into force provisions used, if any, to assist with harmonization; (vv) is there any federal legislation that has not been reviewed for bijuralism or harmonization issues in any way and, if so, how and why is this so; (ww) are private member’s bills reviewed for issues of bijuralism and harmonization and, if so (i) by whom, (ii) in what context, (iii) with what mandate, (iv) to what extent, (v) reporting to whom, (vi) with what work product, (vii) at what point or points in the Parliamentary process, (vii) with what consequence if an issue is spotted; (xx) with respect to the gap between publications dated 2006 and prior and the most recent publication in 2013 on the “Bijuralism and Harmonization” webpage at http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/harmonization/index.html, (i) why does this gap exist, (ii) were any reports or studies conducted during this time, (iii) if so, were they published and if not, why not, (iv) what materials are being presently prepared or research that may be published on this page; (yy) in what ways does the Department seek to promote contact between the civil law and common law traditions; and (zz) with respect to Canada’s four legal audiences (anglophone common law lawyers, francophone common law lawyers, anglophone Quebec civilian lawyers and francophone Quebec civilian lawyers), in what ways does the department ensure it has the means and resources adequate to address the unique concerns of each with respect to bijuralism and harmonization, and what issues and challenges have been identified? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-334.
Collapse
2013-12-09 [p.359]
Q-82 — Ms. Boutin-Sweet (Hochelaga) — With regard to the Ontario-Quebec Continental Gateway initiative: (a) was there a ...
Expand
Q-82 — Ms. Boutin-Sweet (Hochelaga) — With regard to the Ontario-Quebec Continental Gateway initiative: (a) was there a formal agreement with Quebec with regard to this initiative; (b) if there was an agreement, when will details of the programming be made public; (c) are the budget envelopes set aside for this initiative still available; (d) does the government plan to allocate a specific budget envelope to projects proposed by the Quebec government; (e) what projects have been proposed by the Quebec government; (f) what projects proposed by the Quebec government have received government approval; (g) what impact will the recently announced projects to improve the movement of goods through the Windsor-Detroit corridor have on the overall budget envelope; (h) will funds from the Ontario-Quebec Continental Gateway initiative be used to build the new Champlain Bridge? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-82.
Collapse
2013-12-06 [p.352]
Q-98 — Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — With regard to the commercial wharves in ridings in Quebec and the At...
Expand
Q-98 — Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — With regard to the commercial wharves in ridings in Quebec and the Atlantic provinces: (a) which ones are in operation today, broken down by (i) province, (ii) riding, (iii) municipality; (b) of those mentioned in (a), what are the estimated repair costs, broken down by (i) province, (ii) riding, (iii) municipality, (iv) wharf; and (c) of those mentioned in (a), what are the estimated maintenance costs, broken down by (i) province, (ii) riding, (iii) municipality, (iv) wharf? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-98.
Collapse
2013-11-29 [p.225]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Kenney (Minister of Employment and Social Development) laid upon the Table, — Docu...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Kenney (Minister of Employment and Social Development) laid upon the Table, — Document entitled "Facts on Employment Insurance Disqualifications". — Sessional Paper No. 8530-412-2.
Collapse
2013-11-19 [p.173]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconde...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), Bill C-553, An Act to amend the Canadian Multiculturalism Act (non-application in Quebec), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Collapse
2013-08-21 [p.3458]
— by the Speaker — Report of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Quebec with an addendum dated June 28, 2013...
Expand
— by the Speaker — Report of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Quebec with an addendum dated June 28, 2013, which disposes of the objections raised by Members of the House of Commons, pursuant to the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, R.S. 1985, c. E-3, sbs. 23(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-411-459-09A. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs)
Collapse
2013-06-10 [p.3357]
Q-1323 — Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — With regard to the commercial wharves in the province of Quebec and...
Expand
Q-1323 — Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — With regard to the commercial wharves in the province of Quebec and the Atlantic provinces: (a) what commercial wharves are in operation today, broken down by (i) province, (ii) riding, (iii) municipality; (b) of the wharves mentioned in (a), what are the estimated repair costs, broken down by (i) province, (ii) riding, (iii) municipality, (iv) wharf; and (c) of the wharves mentioned in (a), what are the estimated maintenance costs, broken down by (i) province, (ii) riding, (iii) municipality, (iv) wharf? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-1323.
Collapse
2013-06-03 [p.3256]
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 59th Rep...
Expand
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 59th Report of the Committee (electoral boundaries for Quebec). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-411-252.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 70, 71, 75, 78 and 80) was tabled.
Collapse
2013-05-23 [p.3167]
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 54th Rep...
Expand
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 54th Report of the Committee (extension of deadline for tabling its oppositions to the report of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Quebec 2012). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-411-241.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 75) was tabled.
Collapse
2013-05-23 [p.3168]
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the 54th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, ...
Expand
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the 54th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented earlier today, be concurred in.
Collapse
2013-05-02 [p.3071]
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That this House express its strong belief that the city of Montreal is and shou...
Expand
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That this House express its strong belief that the city of Montreal is and should remain the rightful host of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO); recognize the immense economic benefits the Organization provides, including over one thousand jobs and more than $100 million each year; appreciate the value and contributions of the aerospace industry to the Greater Montreal Region; and that this House fully endorse all efforts by the government of Canada, in cooperation with the province of Québec and the City of Montreal, to ensure that ICAO's headquarters remains in that world-class city, where it belongs, now and into the future.
Collapse
2013-03-08 [p.2848]
Q-1112 — Ms. Sgro (York West) — With regard to transportation, since January 1, 2006, has the government engaged in any ...
Expand
Q-1112 — Ms. Sgro (York West) — With regard to transportation, since January 1, 2006, has the government engaged in any study or consultation concerning the extension or reconstruction of Highways 389 and 138 in the province of Quebec, and if so, what are the titles and file numbers of any reports, studies, dossiers or other documentation related to this matter? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-1112.
Collapse
2013-02-25 [p.2776]
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Report of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Quebec 2012, pursuant to th...
Expand
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Report of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Quebec 2012, pursuant to the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, R.S. 1985, c. E-3, sbs. 21(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-411-459-09. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs)
Collapse
2013-01-28 [p.2650]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Mr. Aubin (Trois-Riv...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Mr. Aubin (Trois-Rivières), Bill C-470, An Act respecting democratic constitutional change, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Collapse
2012-10-25 [p.2202]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Plamondo...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), Bill C-457, An Act to repeal the Clarity Act, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Collapse
2012-09-17 [p.1923]
Q-684 — Mrs. Mourani (Ahuntsic) — With regard to federal contaminated sites in Quebec: (a) what is the name and location...
Expand
Q-684 — Mrs. Mourani (Ahuntsic) — With regard to federal contaminated sites in Quebec: (a) what is the name and location of each contaminated site that has been classified as a high priority by the departments responsible; (b) how long has each of these sites been classified a high priority; (c) what contaminants have been identified at each of these sites; and (d) what is the timeline for the action required for each of these sites? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-684.
Collapse
2012-09-17 [p.1923]
Q-685 — Mrs. Mourani (Ahuntsic) — With regard to the contaminated federal sites in Quebec classified by government depar...
Expand
Q-685 — Mrs. Mourani (Ahuntsic) — With regard to the contaminated federal sites in Quebec classified by government departments as being closed: (a) what is the name and location of each of these sites; (b) what are the required decontamination procedures that have been carried out on these sites to date by the department responsible; and (c) on which dates were these actions taken? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-685.
Collapse
2012-06-20 [p.1879]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of ...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return:
Q-653 — Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — With regard to Canada’s Small Craft Harbours (SCH): (a) what was the amount of funding allocated to each harbour authority for SCH by the government between 2000 and 2011 for Quebec and for New Brunswick, broken down by (i) province, (ii) region, (iii) municipality, (iv) harbour authority, (v) SCH; (b) for each harbour authority for SCH in Quebec and in New Brunswick, what portion of the funds allocated was directed to SCH maintenance and what portion was directed to SCH management between 2000 and 2011, broken down by (i) province, (ii) region, (iii) municipality, (iv) harbour authority, (v) SCH; (c) for each harbour authority for SCH in Quebec and in New Brunswick, what is the amount of funding the government plans to allocate between 2012 and 2017, broken down by (i) province, (ii) region, (iii) municipality, (iv) harbour authority, (v) SCH; (d) for each harbour authority for SCH in Quebec and in New Brunswick, what portion of the funds allocated will be directed to SCH maintenance and what portion will be directed to SCH management between 2012 and 2017, broken down by (i) province, (ii) region, (iii) municipality, (iv) harbour authority, (v) SCH; (e) for each harbour authority for SCH in Quebec and in New Brunswick, have the budgetary and administrative requirements, specifically the audits and financial reports required by Fisheries and Oceans Canada of harbour authorities, changed since 2005 and, if so, what were the requirements before and after 2005 and why were they changed, broken down by (i) province, (ii) region, (iii) municipality, (iv) harbour authority; (f) for each SCH in Quebec and in New Brunswick, which ones are considered by the government to be critical to the fishing industry and which ones non-critical to the fishing industry, broken down by (i) province, (ii) region, (iii) municipality, (iv) harbour authority, (v) SCH; (g) what criteria are used by the government to determine whether a SCH is critical or non-critical to the fishing industry; and (h) for each SCH in Quebec and in New Brunswick, what was the percentage of maintenance costs covered by the government and what was the percentage covered by SCH users between 2000 and 2011, broken down by (i) province, (ii) region, (iii) municipality, (iv) harbour authority, (v) SCH? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-653.
Collapse
2012-06-13 [p.1502]
— No. 411-0949 concerning the Canadian Coast Guard. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-19-09;...
Expand
— No. 411-0949 concerning the Canadian Coast Guard. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-19-09;
Collapse
2012-05-29 [p.1328]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, the rem...
Expand
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, the remainder of the debate pursuant to Standing Order 66, on the motion to concur in the First Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, October 19, 2011, be deemed to have taken place and the motion be deemed agreed to on division. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 2)
Collapse
2012-05-09 [p.1197]
Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam), seconded by Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), moved, — That the First Report...
Expand
Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam), seconded by Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), moved, — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, October 19, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 2)
Debate arose thereon.
Collapse
Results: 1 - 60 of 189 | Page: 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data