Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 60 of 104
2020-09-23 [p.7]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved, — That the debate be now adjourned....
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved, — That the debate be now adjourned.
Collapse
2020-03-09 [p.290]
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(17), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of ...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(17), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That, notwithstanding Standing Order 81, for the supply period ending March 26, 2020, three additional allotted days shall be added for a total of 10, provided that one of the additional days is allotted to the Conservative Party, one of the additional days is allotted to the Bloc Québécois, and one of the additional days is allotted to the New Democratic Party, and, if necessary to accommodate these additional days, the supply period may be extended to April 2, 2020, and no allotted day shall fall on a Wednesday or a Friday.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 20 -- Vote no 20) - View vote details.
YEAS: 169, NAYS: 146
Accordingly, the consideration of motions to concur in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2020, and interim supply for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021, was postponed to a later date.
Collapse
2020-02-28 [p.283]
The order was read for the consideration of the business of supply.Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (P...
Expand
The order was read for the consideration of the business of supply.
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved, — That, notwithstanding Standing Order 81, for the supply period ending March 26, 2020, three additional allotted days shall be added for a total of 10, provided that one of the additional days is allotted to the Conservative Party, one of the additional days is allotted to the Bloc Québécois, and one of the additional days is allotted to the New Democratic Party, and, if necessary to accommodate these additional days, the supply period may be extended to April 2, 2020, and no allotted day shall fall on a Wednesday or a Friday.
Debate arose thereon.
Collapse
2020-02-28 [p.285]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), ...
Expand
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), in relation to the business of supply.
The debate continued.
Collapse
2020-01-27 [p.97]
Q-154 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government revenue from taxes or duties related to cannabis sales: ...
Expand
Q-154 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government revenue from taxes or duties related to cannabis sales: (a) what was the original projected revenue from these taxes or duties in (i) 2018, (ii) 2019; (b) what was the actual revenue generated from these taxes or duties in (i) 2018, (ii) 2019; and (c) what is the projected revenue from these taxes or duties in each of the next five years? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-431-154.
Collapse
2020-01-27 [p.97]
Q-155 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to RCMP requests for cooperation directed at the Privy Council Office ...
Expand
Q-155 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to RCMP requests for cooperation directed at the Privy Council Office (PCO) or the Office of the Prime Minister (PMO) since January 1, 2016: (a) how many requests for cooperation have been denied by PCO or PMO; and (b) what are the details of each denied request, including (i) date of request, (ii) date of response, (iii) highest official in PCO or PMO who authorized the denial, (iv) summary and topic of request, (v) reason for denial? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-431-155.
Collapse
2020-01-27 [p.97]
Q-156 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to the Minister of Middle Class Prosperity: what is the minister's def...
Expand
Q-156 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to the Minister of Middle Class Prosperity: what is the minister's definition of the middle-class? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-431-156.
Collapse
2019-12-05 [p.13]
The Speaker informed the House that the following members have been appointed members of the Board of Internal Economy f...
Expand
The Speaker informed the House that the following members have been appointed members of the Board of Internal Economy for the purposes and under the provisions of the Parliament of Canada Act, R.S. 1985, c. P-1, sbs. 50(2), namely:
— Mr. LeBlanc and Mr. Rodriguez, members of the Queen's Privy Council;
— Mr. Holland and Ms. Petitpas Taylor, representatives of the government caucus;
— Ms. Bergen and Mr. Strahl, representatives of the Conservative Party of Canada caucus;
— Mrs. DeBellefeuille, representative of the Bloc Québécois caucus; and
— Mr. Julian, representative of the New Democratic Party caucus.
Collapse
2019-06-19 [p.5712]
Q-2500 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government commitments and the 271 commitments which, according to...
Expand
Q-2500 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government commitments and the 271 commitments which, according to the Mandate Tracker, the current government has failed to complete as of May 3, 2019: (a) what is the government’s excuse or rationale for not accomplishing each of the 271 commitments not listed as completed or met, broken down by individual commitment; and (b) of the 271 commitments which have not been completed, which ones does the government anticipate completing prior to October 2019? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2500.
Collapse
2019-06-18 [p.5679]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), two concerning medical assistance in dying (Nos. 421-04520 and 421-04521);...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), two concerning medical assistance in dying (Nos. 421-04520 and 421-04521);
Collapse
2019-05-28 [p.5361]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconde...
Expand
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard), — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, commencing upon the adoption of this Order and concluding on Friday, June 21, 2019:
(a) on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, the ordinary hour of daily adjournment shall be 12:00 a.m., except that it shall be 10:00 p.m. on a day when a debate, pursuant to Standing Order 52 or 53.1, is to take place;
(b) subject to paragraph (e), when a recorded division is requested in respect of a debatable motion, including any division arising as a consequence of the application of Standing Order 61(2) or Standing Order 78, but not including any division in relation to the Business of Supply or arising as a consequence of an order made pursuant to Standing Order 57, (i) before 2:00 p.m. on a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday, it shall stand deferred until the conclusion of Oral Questions at that day’s sitting, or (ii) after 2:00 p.m. on a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday, or at any time on a Friday, it shall stand deferred until the conclusion of Oral Questions at the next sitting day that is not a Friday, provided that, if a recorded division on the previous question is deferred and the motion is subsequently adopted, the recorded division on the original question shall not be deferred;
(c) notwithstanding Standing Order 45(6) and paragraph (b) of this Order, no recorded division in relation to any government order requested after 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 20, 2019, or at any time on Friday, June 21, 2019, shall be deferred;
(d) the time provided for Government Orders shall not be extended pursuant to Standing Order 45(7.1) or Standing Order 67.1(2);
(e) when a recorded division, which would have ordinarily been deemed deferred to immediately before the time provided for Private Members’ Business on a Wednesday governed by this Order, is requested, the said division is deemed to have been deferred until the conclusion of Oral Questions on the same Wednesday;
(f) any recorded division which, at the time of the adoption of this Order, stands deferred to immediately before the time provided for Private Members’ Business on the Wednesday immediately following the adoption of this Order shall be deemed to stand deferred to the conclusion of Oral Questions on the same Wednesday;
(g) a recorded division requested in respect of a motion to concur in a government bill at the report stage pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), where the bill has neither been amended nor debated at the report stage, shall be deferred in the manner prescribed by paragraph (b);
(h) for greater certainty, this Order shall not limit the application of Standing Order 45(7);
(i) when one or several deferred recorded divisions occur on a bill at report stage, a motion, “That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass”, may be made in the same sitting;
(j) no dilatory motion may be proposed after 6:30 p.m., except by a Minister of the Crown;
(k) notwithstanding Standing Orders 81(16)(b) and (c) and 81(18)(c), proceedings on any opposition motion shall conclude no later than 5:30 p.m. on the sitting day that is designated for that purpose, except on a Monday when they shall conclude at 6:30 p.m. or on a Friday when they shall conclude at 1:30 p.m.;
(l) during consideration of the estimates on the last allotted day, pursuant to Standing Order 81(18), when the Speaker interrupts the proceedings for the purpose of putting forthwith all questions necessary to dispose of the estimates, (i) all remaining motions to concur in the Votes for which a notice of opposition was filed shall be deemed to have been moved and seconded, the question deemed put and recorded divisions deemed requested, (ii) the Speaker shall have the power to combine the said motions for voting purposes, provided that, in exercising this power, the Speaker will be guided by the same principles and practices used at report stage;
(m) when debate on a motion for the concurrence in a report from a standing, standing joint or special committee is adjourned or interrupted, the debate shall again be considered on a day designated by the government, after consultation with the House Leaders of the other parties, but in any case not later than the 31st sitting day after the interruption; and
(n) Members not seeking re-election to the 43rd Parliament may be permitted to make statements, on Tuesday, June 4, and Wednesday, June 5, 2019, at the expiry of the time provided for Private Members’ Business for not more than three hours, and that, for the duration of the statements, (i) no member shall speak for longer than ten minutes and the speeches not be subject to a question and comment period, (ii) after three hours or when no Member rises to speak, whichever comes first, the House shall return to Government Orders; (Government Business No. 30)
And of the amendment of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil), — That the motion be amended:
(a) in paragraph (b), by deleting all the words after the words "provided that" and substituting the following "any recorded division demanded in respect of a motion to amend the Standing Orders or to make changes to the usual practices of the House shall stand deferred to the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on Wednesday, October 23, 2019";
(b) in paragraph (e), by adding the following "provided that any recorded division demanded in respect of a motion to amend the Standing Orders or to make changes to the usual practices of the House shall stand deferred to immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business on Wednesday, October 23, 2019";
(c) by deleting paragraphs (i), (k) and (l); and
(d) in paragraph (m), by deleting the word "31st" and substituting the following "20th".
The debate continued.
Collapse
2019-05-27 [p.5335]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil), moved the following amendment, — That the motio...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended:
(a) in paragraph (b), by deleting all the words after the words "provided that" and substituting the following "any recorded division demanded in respect of a motion to amend the Standing Orders or to make changes to the usual practices of the House shall stand deferred to the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on Wednesday, October 23, 2019";
(b) in paragraph (e), by adding the following "provided that any recorded division demanded in respect of a motion to amend the Standing Orders or to make changes to the usual practices of the House shall stand deferred to immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business on Wednesday, October 23, 2019";
(c) by deleting paragraphs (i), (k) and (l); and
(d) in paragraph (m), by deleting the word "31st" and substituting the following: "20th".
Debate arose thereon.
Collapse
2019-04-10 [p.5134]
Q-2267 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to communications received by the Office of the Prime Minister: on wh...
Expand
Q-2267 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to communications received by the Office of the Prime Minister: on what date was the Office of the Prime Minister informed that the Director of Public Prosecutions had rejected the request by SNC-Lavalin for a deferred prosecution agreement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2267.
Collapse
2019-04-09 [p.5126]
Pursuant to Order made Monday, April 8, 2019, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the...
Expand
Pursuant to Order made Monday, April 8, 2019, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil), — That, given the recent allegations of political interference against the Prime Minister and given that Canadians reject the Prime Minister’s excuse for his actions as simply routine government business, the House call on the government to show respect for the rule of law and immediately:
(a) comply with the letter and spirit of all court orders and requests in relation to the trial of Vice-Admiral Mark Norman;
(b) provide Vice-Admiral Mark Norman’s defence with all records relating to his prosecution, including but not limited to, memos, letters, emails, PIN-to-PIN messages, SMS messages, and handwritten notes, including records that exist on personal electronic devices;
(c) require all current and former Cabinet ministers and their respective political staff and employees of the Privy Council Office since November 2015 to sign an affidavit affirming that no evidence or records related to the prosecution of Vice-Admiral Mark Norman have been destroyed, and that they have personally complied with all relevant court orders; and
(d) indemnify Vice-Admiral Mark Norman and provide legal assistance within 30 days of the adoption of this motion for any invoices that are in arrears, and within 30 days of the invoice date for any subsequent invoices.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 1289 -- Vote no 1289) - View vote details.
YEAS: 121, NAYS: 162
Collapse
2019-04-05 [p.5088]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), three concerning firearms (Nos. 421-03331 to 421-03333);...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), three concerning firearms (Nos. 421-03331 to 421-03333);
Collapse
2019-02-28 [p.4671]
Pursuant to Standing Order 52, Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) asked leave to move the adjournment of the House for the purp...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 52, Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) asked leave to move the adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing a specific and important matter requiring urgent consideration, namely, the alleged political interference regarding a remediation agreement.
The Speaker decided that the matter was proper to be discussed and, pursuant to Standing Order 52(9), directed that it be considered later today, at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment.
Collapse
2019-02-28 [p.4673]
Pursuant to Standing Order 52(10), the House proceeded to the consideration of a motion to adjourn the House for the pur...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 52(10), the House proceeded to the consideration of a motion to adjourn the House for the purpose of discussing an important matter requiring urgent consideration, namely, the alleged political interference regarding a remediation agreement.
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), moved, — That this House do now adjourn.
Debate arose thereon.
At midnight, the Speaker declared the motion adopted.
Collapse
2018-11-29 [p.4376]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03005);...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03005);
Collapse
2018-11-19 [p.4284]
Q-1967 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government procedures in relation to accusations of harassment or ...
Expand
Q-1967 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government procedures in relation to accusations of harassment or misconduct: (a) what is the procedure when there is an accusation against the Prime Minister, including (i) who decides if a complaint has merit and warrants an investigation, (ii) who conducts the investigation, (iii) does the individual conducting the investigation have the ability to recommend sanctions, (iv) are the recommended sanctions binding, (v) what is the policy regarding whether or not the reports and findings are released to the public, (vi) what mechanism, if any, exists for the temporary suspension of certain duties of the Prime Minister pending the outcome of an investigation; and (b) does the procedure in (a) apply to incidents which occurred prior to the individual becoming Prime Minister? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1967.
Collapse
2018-11-19 [p.4284]
Q-1968 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government procedures in relation to accusations of harassment or ...
Expand
Q-1968 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to government procedures in relation to accusations of harassment or misconduct: (a) what is the procedure when there is an accusation against a cabinet minister, including (i) who decides if a complaint has merit and warrants an investigation, (ii) who conducts the investigation, (iii) does the individual conducting the investigation have the ability to recommend sanctions, (iv) are the recommended sanctions binding, (v) what is the policy regarding whether or not the reports and findings are released to the public, (vi) what is the criteria for deciding if a Member is to be removed from Cabinet pending the outcome of an investigation; and (b) does the procedure in (a) apply to incidents which occurred prior to the individual becoming a cabinet minister? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1968.
Collapse
2018-10-03 [p.4035]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, October 2, 2018, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on ...
Expand
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, October 2, 2018, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), — That, given Terri-Lynne McClintic was convicted of first-degree murder in the horrific abduction, rape and murder of eight-year-old Tori Stafford, and was moved from a secure facility to a healing lodge without fences and where the government has confirmed the presence of children, the House condemn this decision and call upon the government to exercise its moral, legal and political authority to ensure this decision is reversed and cannot happen again in other cases.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 891 -- Vote no 891) - View vote details.
YEAS: 82, NAYS: 200
Collapse
2018-10-02 [p.4028]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Deltell ...
Expand
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved, — That, given Terri-Lynne McClintic was convicted of first-degree murder in the horrific abduction, rape and murder of eight-year-old Tori Stafford, and was moved from a secure facility to a healing lodge without fences and where the government has confirmed the presence of children, the House condemn this decision and call upon the government to exercise its moral, legal and political authority to ensure this decision is reversed and cannot happen again in other cases.
Debate arose thereon.
Collapse
2018-06-20 [p.3872]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), two concerning organ transplants (Nos. 421-02555 and 421-02556);...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), two concerning organ transplants (Nos. 421-02555 and 421-02556);
Collapse
2018-06-19 [p.3837]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning discrimination (No. 421-02521);...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning discrimination (No. 421-02521);
Collapse
2018-06-14 [p.3665]
Q-1722 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to individuals who have crossed the border illegally and are currentl...
Expand
Q-1722 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to individuals who have crossed the border illegally and are currently being housed in accommodations being paid for, funded, or operated by the government: (a) what is the current number of individuals in such accommodations; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by city and province; (c) what is the list of facilities, such as stadiums or hotels where large groups of individuals (more than 100) are being accommodated; (d) for each location in (c), what is the number of individuals housed at each location; and (e) what is the projected total expenditures on such accommodations for the 2018 calendar year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1722.
Collapse
2018-05-31 [p.3386]
Motion No. 405 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by ...
Expand
Motion No. 405 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 405.
Collapse
2018-05-31 [p.3386]
Motion No. 406 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by ...
Expand
Motion No. 406 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 406.
Collapse
2018-05-31 [p.3386]
Motion No. 407 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by ...
Expand
Motion No. 407 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 407.
Collapse
2018-05-31 [p.3386]
Motion No. 408 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by ...
Expand
Motion No. 408 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 408.
Collapse
2018-05-31 [p.3386]
Motion No. 409 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by ...
Expand
Motion No. 409 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 409.
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.
Collapse
2018-05-31 [p.3393]
Motion No. 2 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), — That Bill C-47 be amended by deleting...
Expand
Motion No. 2 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), — That Bill C-47 be amended by deleting Clause 11.
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.
Collapse
2018-05-30 [p.3353]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 405, — That Bill C-74 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 405, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 405.
Collapse
2018-05-30 [p.3353]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 406, — That Bill C-74 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 406, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 406.
Collapse
2018-05-30 [p.3353]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 407, — That Bill C-74 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 407, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 407.
Collapse
2018-05-30 [p.3353]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 408, — That Bill C-74 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 408, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 408.
Collapse
2018-05-30 [p.3354]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 409, — That Bill C-74 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 409, — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 409.
Collapse
2018-05-28 [p.3290]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-47 be amended by dele...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-47 be amended by deleting Clause 11.
Collapse
2018-04-25 [p.3157]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning the tax system (No. 421-02261) and two concerning discrimination (Nos. ...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning the tax system (No. 421-02261) and two concerning discrimination (Nos. 421-02262 and 421-02263);
Collapse
2018-04-17 [p.3113]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved, — That the report of the Ethics Commission...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved, — That the report of the Ethics Commissioner, entitled “The Trudeau Report”, tabled on Monday, January 29, 2018, be concurred in.
Debate arose thereon.
Collapse
2018-03-19 [p.2760]
Q-1457 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to the destruction of the Golden Lampstand Church and the Zhifang Cat...
Expand
Q-1457 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to the destruction of the Golden Lampstand Church and the Zhifang Catholic Church by the Chinese government: (a) does the government condemn the Chinese government’s actions and, if not, why not; (b) did the government raise any objection to these actions with the Chinese government and, if so, what are the details, including (i) who raised the objection, (ii) what is the title of the Chinese government official who received the objection, (iii) date of objection; and (c) since November 4, 2015, has the government raised the issue of the persecution of Christians by the Chinese government with anyone from the Chinese government and, if so, what are the details? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1457.
Collapse
2017-12-07 [p.2536]
Group No. 1Motion No. 1 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans...
Expand
Group No. 1
Motion No. 1 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Collapse
2017-12-07 [p.2536]
Motion No. 2 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix...
Expand
Motion No. 2 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
Collapse
2017-12-07 [p.2536]
Motion No. 3 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix...
Expand
Motion No. 3 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 3.
Collapse
2017-12-07 [p.2536]
Motion No. 4 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix...
Expand
Motion No. 4 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 6.
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.
Collapse
2017-10-26 [p.2295]
Group No. 1Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), mo...
Expand
Group No. 1
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
Collapse
2017-10-26 [p.2295]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), moved Motion ...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
Collapse
2017-10-26 [p.2295]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), moved Motion ...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 3.
Collapse
2017-10-26 [p.2295]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), moved Motion ...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-24 be amended by deleting Clause 6.
Collapse
2017-06-14 [p.1942]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning health care services (No. 421-01523);...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning health care services (No. 421-01523);
Collapse
2017-06-12 [p.1908]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 30, 2017, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of th...
Expand
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 30, 2017, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Duclos (Minister of Families, Children and Social Development), — That Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Salaries Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Salaries Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act, since the Bill: (a) lacks transparency by failing to disclose the government’s plans with respect to the creation of additional Ministers to be appointed in the future and changes in the financial status of others; and (b) enshrines in law the government’s decision to eliminate regional Ministers responsible for regional economic development agencies.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 314 -- Vote no 314) - View vote details.
YEAS: 117, NAYS: 172
Collapse
2017-06-08 [p.1896]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconde...
Expand
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Duclos (Minister of Families, Children and Social Development), — That Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Salaries Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates;
And of the amendment of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Salaries Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act, since the Bill: (a) lacks transparency by failing to disclose the government’s plans with respect to the creation of additional Ministers to be appointed in the future and changes in the financial status of others; and (b) enshrines in law the government’s decision to eliminate regional Ministers responsible for regional economic development agencies.”.
The debate continued.
Collapse
2017-06-07 [p.1886]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconde...
Expand
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Duclos (Minister of Families, Children and Social Development), — That Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Salaries Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates;
And of the amendment of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-24, An Act to amend the Salaries Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act, since the Bill: (a) lacks transparency by failing to disclose the government’s plans with respect to the creation of additional Ministers to be appointed in the future and changes in the financial status of others; and (b) enshrines in law the government’s decision to eliminate regional Ministers responsible for regional economic development agencies.”.
The debate continued.
Collapse
2017-05-30 [p.1795]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconde...
Expand
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Hussen (Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, commencing upon the adoption of this Order and concluding on Friday, June 23, 2017:
(a) on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, the ordinary hour of daily adjournment shall be 12:00 a.m., except that it shall be 10:00 p.m. on a day when a debate, pursuant to Standing Order 52 or 53.1, is to take place;
(b) subject to paragraph (e), when a recorded division is demanded in respect of a debatable motion, including any division arising as a consequence of the application of Standing Order 61(2) or Standing Order 78, but not including any division in relation to the Business of Supply or arising as a consequence of an order made pursuant to Standing Order 57, (i) before 2:00 p.m. on a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday, it shall stand deferred until the conclusion of oral questions at that day’s sitting, or (ii) after 2:00 p.m. on a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday, or at any time on a Friday, it shall stand deferred until the conclusion of oral questions at the next sitting day that is not a Friday;
(c) notwithstanding Standing Order 45(6) and paragraph (b) of this Order, no recorded division requested after 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 22, 2017, or at any time on Friday, June 23, 2017, shall be deferred, except for any recorded division which, under the Standing Orders, would be deferred to immediately before the time provided for Private Members’ Business on Wednesday, September 20, 2017;
(d) the time provided for Government Orders shall not be extended pursuant to Standing Order 45(7.1) or Standing Order 67.1(2);
(e) when a recorded division, which would have ordinarily been deemed deferred to immediately before the time provided for Private Members’ Business on a Wednesday governed by this Order, is demanded, the said division is deemed to have been deferred until the conclusion of oral questions on the same Wednesday;
(f) any recorded division which, at the time of the adoption of this Order, stands deferred to immediately before the time provided for Private Members’ Business on the Wednesday immediately following the adoption of this Order shall be deemed to stand deferred to the conclusion of oral questions on the same Wednesday;
(g) a recorded division demanded in respect of a motion to concur in a government bill at the report stage pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), where the bill has neither been amended nor debated at the report stage, shall be deferred in the manner prescribed by paragraph (b);
(h) for greater certainty, this Order shall not limit the application of Standing Order 45(7);
(i) no dilatory motion may be proposed after 6:30 p.m.;
(j) notwithstanding Standing Orders 81(16)(b) and (c) and 81(18)(c), proceedings on any opposition motion shall conclude no later than 5:30 p.m. on the sitting day that is designated for that purpose, except on a Monday when they shall conclude at 6:30 p.m. or on a Friday when they shall conclude at 1:30 p.m.; and
(k) when debate on a motion for the concurrence in a report from a standing, standing joint or special committee is adjourned or interrupted, the debate shall again be considered on a day designated by the government, after consultation with the House Leaders of the other parties, but in any case not later than the twentieth sitting day after the interruption; (Government Business No. 14)
And of the amendment of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), — That the motion be amended:
(a) by adding to paragraph (b) the following: “and if a recorded division is demanded in respect of a motion moved pursuant to Standing Order 57 in relation to any motion dealing with amendments to the Standing Orders or changes to the practices of the House, it shall stand deferred to December 5, 2017, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions;”; and
(b) by deleting all the words in paragraph (j).
The debate continued.
Collapse
2017-05-29 [p.1778]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amend...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended:
(a) by adding to paragraph (b) the following: “and if a recorded division is demanded in respect of a motion moved pursuant to Standing Order 57 in relation to any motion dealing with amendments to the Standing Orders or changes to the practices of the House, it shall stand deferred to December 5, 2017, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions;”; and
(b) by deleting all the words in paragraph (j).
Debate arose thereon.
Collapse
2017-05-01 [p.1636]
Q-908 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to individuals who have sought asylum in Canada since January 1, 2017:...
Expand
Q-908 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to individuals who have sought asylum in Canada since January 1, 2017: (a) how many individuals have sought asylum; (b) what is the breakdown of asylum seekers by country of citizenship; (c) how many individuals have sought asylum at locations other than border crossings; (d) what is the breakdown in (c) by country of citizenship; and (e) in (a) and (c), how many asylum claims were (i) accepted, (ii) rejected? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-908.
Collapse
2017-04-03 [p.1548]
Q-850 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to the Conflict of Interest Act and the Prime Minister, since October ...
Expand
Q-850 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to the Conflict of Interest Act and the Prime Minister, since October 1, 2016: (a) did anyone in the Privy Council Office inform the Prime Minister or the Office of the Prime Minister that riding in a private helicopter may violate the Conflict of Interest Act; (b) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, who informed the Prime Minister or the Office of the Prime Minister; (c) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, who was provided with the information; and (d) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, on what date was the Prime Minister or member of the Office of the Prime Minister informed? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-850.
Collapse
2017-03-22 [p.1504]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning health care services (No. 421-01219)....
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning health care services (No. 421-01219).
Collapse
2017-03-22 [p.1504]
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes), moved, — That th...
Expand
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the Orders of the Day.
Collapse
2017-01-30 [p.1259]
Q-754 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to responses or draft responses of questions on the Order Paper number...
Expand
Q-754 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — With regard to responses or draft responses of questions on the Order Paper numbered Q-336 through Q-568, inclusively, which were submitted to PCO and subsequently returned for revisions: (a) which responses were returned; and (b) for each returned response, (i) to what department, agency, or crown corporation was the response returned, (ii) what was the number of the question, (iii) what was the nature of the requested revision? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-754.
Collapse
2016-12-05 [p.1140]
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), two concerning China (Nos. 421-01002 and 421-01003);...
Expand
— by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), two concerning China (Nos. 421-01002 and 421-01003);
Collapse
Results: 1 - 60 of 104 | Page: 1 of 2

1
2
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data