Committee
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 30 of 465
Sofia Marquez
View Sofia Marquez Profile
Sofia Marquez
2020-08-13 15:13
Expand
They are Amit Singh, a political staffer, as well as...she's been a witness, Michelle Kovacevic. I think that's her last name.
Collapse
View Peter Julian Profile
NDP (BC)
Thanks, Mr. Chair.
Thanks to our witnesses for being here. We hope you stay safe and healthy during this pandemic, and we appreciate your providing some answers, because there have been a lot of contradictions through this saga.
Ms. Marquez, I have a number of questions for you around meetings, if you don't mind. The first is, we've had testimony at this committee from Minister Chagger testifying that on April 17 she had a meeting with Craig Kielburger and a WE official.
Did you arrange that meeting and were you the other person on that call?
Collapse
View Peter Julian Profile
NDP (BC)
Did you arrange the meeting as well?
Could you let us know if the minister at that point informed you and Mr. Kielburger about any details about what became the CSSG?
Collapse
Sofia Marquez
View Sofia Marquez Profile
Sofia Marquez
2020-08-13 15:34
Expand
The conversation at that point was within the context of having already shared our social entrepreneurship proposal. We had the opportunity to talk to the minister about the current state of affairs of how WE as an organization was pivoting many of its programs into a virtual setting and what we were seeing on the ground in real time because of the pandemic. It was a combination of both of those things.
Collapse
View Pierre Poilievre Profile
CPC (ON)
View Rhéal Fortin Profile
BQ (QC)
View Rhéal Fortin Profile
2020-08-12 16:31
Expand
Okay.
On May 8, we learned that the Prime Minister had reservations about the contract and that he postponed the decision until the next cabinet meeting, on May 22. So, if I understand correctly, you were not at the meeting on May 8, but you were at the meeting on May 22.
Was there any discussion of a potential conflict of interest for the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance?
Collapse
View Mary Ng Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Mary Ng Profile
2020-08-12 16:31
Expand
We had a meeting on the 22nd. This is where we as a cabinet discussed this item. Of course, I'm not going to get into the details of the discussion at cabinet, but I know that both the Prime Minister and the finance minister have spoken to this committee and publicly and indicated that they should have recused themselves from that May 22 cabinet meeting, and have apologized for not doing so.
Collapse
View Mary Ng Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Mary Ng Profile
2020-08-12 16:32
Expand
Monsieur Fortin, I am not at liberty to share the discussions in cabinet, but I can say that both the minister and Prime Minister have indicated that they—
Collapse
View Pierre Poilievre Profile
CPC (ON)
View Pierre Poilievre Profile
2020-08-12 18:06
Expand
All right. Thank you very much.
It is as follows: “Whereas the Prime Minister shut down Parliament in March; whereas a modified and limited parliamentary committee of the whole has only met five times in the last two months, most recently today, August 12, 2020, from which the Prime Minister was absent to take a “personal day”; whereas his absence meant he could not answer questions about his $500-million grant he made to a group that had paid his family more than $500,000 in fees and expenses; whereas the Prime Minister has taken off 20 days in six weeks, meaning nearly half of the calendar days have been days off—”
Collapse
View Pierre Poilievre Profile
CPC (ON)
View Pierre Poilievre Profile
2020-08-12 18:06
Expand
It is, and here it is. It's that “The House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance calls on the government to suspend the Prime Minister's pay until he returns to work and takes questions in Parliament.”
Collapse
View Wayne Easter Profile
Lib. (PE)
View Wayne Easter Profile
2020-08-12 18:07
Expand
I really don't think that motion is in order. I'll have to defer to the clerk, but I don't think it relates to the business of this committee, so I'm ruling it out of order.
Collapse
View Pierre Poilievre Profile
CPC (ON)
View Pierre Poilievre Profile
2020-08-12 18:07
Expand
Well, Mr. Chair, if I may, it does relate to the business of this committee because of the “whereas” referring to the $500-million grant to WE. That is a COVID grant that was authorized under COVID spending, for which this committee has been given the exclusive authority.
Furthermore, pay for members of the government is a financial matter.
The Chair: Mr. Poilievre—
Hon. Pierre Poilievre: This is the finance committee, so it is very much in order.
Collapse
Results: 1 - 30 of 465 | Page: 1 of 16

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data