Hansard
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 100 of 544
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-14 11:53 [p.29127]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, we will take no lessons from the Conservatives when it comes to softwood lumber. Let me just point out that it was the Conservative example of accepting quotas on softwood lumber that stiffened our spines and stiffened the spines of the steel sector, in refusing to accept tariffs or quotas on steel and aluminum.
The Conservatives are prepared to capitulate and accept crummy trade deals. We are not.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-14 12:07 [p.29130]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me be very clear. Our government has put human rights, including the right of all people to freely practise their religion, at the centre of our foreign policy.
We are very clear that we are living in a time when people around the world and in Canada are facing increased attacks for their religious beliefs. That is absolutely wrong. That includes Christians, it includes Muslims and it includes Jews. Our government is very clear in condemning these acts and in working to prevent them in Canada and in working to prevent them around the world.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 11:17 [p.28889]
Expand
moved that Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, be read the second time and referred to a committee.
She said: Mr. Speaker, I want to start by acknowledging that we are meeting on the traditional territory of the Algonquin people.
I am pleased to rise in the House today to support Bill C-100, the new NAFTA implementation act.
Because of its size and geography, Canada has always been a trading nation. Exports are the very bedrock of our economy and account for fully one third of our GDP. Imports supply our businesses, fuel our production and meet consumers' needs. Naturally, for geographic reasons, a significant proportion of those exports and imports are with our biggest trading partner, the United States.
The vast majority of them cross the border tariff-free because of our North American free trade agreement. The region covered by this North American free trade agreement is now the largest economic region in the world. Together, Canada, the United States and Mexico account for a quarter of the world's GDP, with just 7% of the global population. We exchange goods, services, investment and people in a growing market that now encompasses 486 million consumers and is worth some $22 trillion U.S.
Every day, more than two billion dollars' worth of trade and investment move back and forth between Canada and the United States. Our continental supply chains have strengthened North America's ability to compete and to succeed in the global marketplace, and we benefit from that strength here in Canada.
This successful trading arrangement was the foundation upon which we built the agreement being debated here today, and I am pleased to be here to speak in support of the new NAFTA.
When the U.S. administration announced that it would seek to renegotiate NAFTA, we saw an opportunity to update, modernize and improve a trade agreement that was already a strong foundation for North American commerce. We knew that in order to be effective, it was critical that we present a united front and speak for all Canadians in our negotiation.
We came to the negotiating table united as a country. Throughout our intense negotiations, we stayed focused on what matters most to Canadians: jobs, growth and expanding the middle class. We knew these priorities were Canadians' priorities because we spoke with Canadians, industry, agriculture and labour across the country. We sought advice and insight across party lines and asked current and former politicians, including many premiers and mayors, for their help in shaping Canada's priorities and in championing them.
Crucially, we created a NAFTA advisory council, which counted among its members former politicians from the NDP and the Conservatives, as well as business leaders, labour leaders, agricultural leaders and indigenous leaders.
I would like to pause here to thank the council for the excellent work it has done and continues to do on behalf of our great country.
I would also like to thank Canadians from all across the country, especially from business, labour, agriculture, politicians of all stripes, premiers and mayors for their hard work on the new NAFTA. This was a true team Canada effort, and I am so proud of the way our whole country approached these sometimes difficult negotiations.
I also want to thank my hon. colleagues throughout this House for their advocacy and insight throughout this process. So many of them have been integral to our work.
Throughout the negotiation, we kept our cool in the face of uncertainty and worked on getting a new agreement that would preserve jobs and market access, and in turn, support the middle class and economic growth. We held firm. We held out for a good deal, and that is what we have today.
I would be remiss if I failed to note that a major obstacle remained even after the agreement was signed in Buenos Aires last November: the United States' unjust and illegal section 232 tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum.
When the United States imposed the tariffs, Canada immediately took retaliatory measures by imposing counter-tariffs. Canada stood its ground, asserting that the tariffs were inappropriate between two countries that not only are key national security allies but also have a free trade agreement. We made that clear to the American administration, members of Congress, union leaders and business leaders south of the border. We also made it clear that it would be very difficult to ratify the new agreement as long as the tariffs remained in place.
On May 17, we succeeded in getting the steel and aluminum tariffs eliminated.
As I said when I recently met with workers in Regina and in Saguenay, here is why we have succeeded in getting those tariffs lifted. We knew the facts were on our side. We knew that Canada did not represent a national security threat to the United States. We knew our trade with the United States in steel is balanced and reciprocal. We stayed united. We were patient. We persevered, and in the end, we prevailed.
Now that the tariffs have been fully lifted, we are ready to move forward with the ratification of the new NAFTA. Our aim was to preserve Canada's preferential access to our largest and closest market, and that is what we achieved. This is essential for our businesses, our entrepreneurs, our farmers, and for the millions of jobs and all the middle-class families across Canada who rely on a strong trade relationship with our neighbour.
We succeeded in preserving key elements of NAFTA, including chapter 19, the all-important dispute settlement mechanism. No trading relationship is ever without irritants. In the case of the Canada-U.S. relationship, we are aware of the importance of maintaining an effective mechanism to settle disputes. For us, this was non-negotiable.
Over the years, we have used dispute settlement mechanisms many times to make impartial decisions for Canadian industry and workers, particularly in the case of softwood lumber.
We also protected the cultural exception. Canada’s cultural industries provide more than 650,000 jobs across the country. Beyond this vital economic role, they are integral to our ability to maintain a strong sense of national identity, tell our stories and express our culture in all of its diversity. By preserving this exception, we will ensure that Canadian culture is protected and that our unique linguistic and cultural identity will not be jeopardized.
NAFTA is an agreement that is a quarter of a century old. In preparing for this negotiation, we heard from Canadian exporters that there were a lot of bread-and-butter issues preventing them from taking full advantage of the deal. We heard what Canadian businesses needed and we responded.
The new NAFTA includes important updates that will modernize our deal for the 21st century and simplify life for Canadian exporters. In fact, in our consultations before the start of the negotiations, we found that about 40% of Canadians doing business with the U.S. did not bother to use their NAFTA preferences at all. It is a stunning number. The new NAFTA will make life easier for business people on both sides of the border by cutting red tape and harmonizing regulations.
Our job as a government is to safeguard economic gains and prevent economic threats. That is what we have done through this modernized agreement.
Consider Canada's automotive sector, which contributes $19 billion to our country's annual GDP. This is a sector that directly employs more than 125,000 people with an additional 400,000 jobs created in after-market services and dealership networks. Unfair tariffs on Canadian cars and car parts would threaten our economy and hundreds of thousands of well-paying jobs and the families they support. Canada was able to negotiate a gold-plated insurance policy for Canadian automobiles and auto parts, protecting our industry from future potential section 232 tariff measures by the U.S. on cars and car parts. This provides added stability and predictability for the car sector and reaffirms Canada as an attractive investment destination.
In addition, the new NAFTA's rules of origin chapter addresses automotive manufacturing wages in North America by including a labour value content requirement. This means that a percentage of the value of a tariff-free NAFTA vehicle must be produced by workers earning at least $16 U.S. an hour. This is a provision that should help level the playing field for Canadian workers.
The new agreement seeks to improve labour standards and working conditions in all three countries. The labour chapter contains key provisions that support fair and inclusive trade, such as enforceable obligations to address issues related to migrant workers, forced or compulsory labour and violence against union members. It promotes increased trade and investment opportunities for small and medium-sized businesses through the small business chapter.
Perhaps one of the achievements I am most proud of is that the investor-state dispute resolution system, which in the past allowed foreign companies to sue Canada, will be gone. This means that Canada can make its own rules about public health and safety, for example, without the risk of being sued. Known as ISDS, this provision has cost Canadian taxpayers more than $300 million in penalties and legal fees.
Over the past 25 years, North American trade in agriculture and agri-food products has nearly quadrupled. Canada and the U.S. enjoy one of the largest agricultural trading relationships in the world. It is worth more than $48 billion U.S. a year. Under this new agreement, Canadian exporters will continue to benefit, including new market access for Canadian exports of refined sugar, sugar-containing products, and margarine. This is significant for our farmers and our food industry.
Importantly, the agreement preserves and maintains Canada's system of supply management for dairy, poultry and egg products, despite strong attempts by the U.S. to dismantle it. While the new NAFTA introduces a specific amount of liberalization of market access, the future of supply management itself—production control, pricing mechanisms and import controls—is not in doubt. To mitigate the impact of these changes, the government will compensate producers for any loss of market share and work with them to further strengthen their industry.
Our shared North American environment is vital to our economic prosperity. The new NAFTA will ensure that our trading partners do not gain an unfair competitive advantage by failing to enforce their environmental laws. It also includes a new environment chapter, subject to the same dispute settlement mechanism, to help uphold air quality and fight marine pollution.
We secured a general exception related to the rights of indigenous peoples. We have ensured that the environment chapter recognizes the important role of indigenous peoples in conservation, sustainable fisheries and forest management.
The new labour chapter includes a non-discrimination clause for employment and occupation, and addresses barriers to the full participation of women in the workforce.
We also ensured that LBGTQ2 individuals are supported. In fact, the new NAFTA is the first international trade deal that recognizes gender identity and sexual orientation as grounds for discrimination in its labour chapter.
In renewing and modernizing NAFTA, it is important to underscore the importance of our long-standing and mutually beneficial trade relationship with the United States. Our relationship is special and enduring because of our geography and history. It is special and enduring because of our close business, family and personal ties. It has been a significant contributor to jobs, economic growth and prosperity in both countries.
Our partnership with Mexico is critically important as well, and the new NAFTA will ensure that the trilateral North American relationship remains mutually beneficial for years to come.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank United States trade representative Ambassador Bob Lighthizer; the former Mexican secretary of the economy, lldefonso Guajardo; his successor, the current Mexican Secretary of the Economy, Graciela Márquez; and Mexican Undersecretary Jesús Seade. All of us worked hard together, and in the end, we achieved a win-win-win deal for our three countries.
With regard to ratification, insofar as it is possible, we intend to move in tandem with our partners. I am in very close contact with my counterparts in both countries as we discuss our domestic ratification processes.
Our government's purpose is to create the conditions to grow a stronger middle class and improve opportunities for all Canadians. That is what we have achieved with the new NAFTA, and this is something all Canadians can be proud of.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 11:35 [p.28891]
Expand
Madam Speaker, the NAFTA negotiations themselves, as my colleague knows, was a trilateral process, with three governments working together. The domestic ratification process is about the domestic processes in each sovereign country.
Our view is that first, it is very important for us to focus on our own domestic ratification process, just as each of our partners will be focusing on their domestic ratification processes. We are very clear that just as I do not think anyone in the House would appreciate Americans or Mexicans coming to Canada and opining on our domestic ratification process, we feel that it is inappropriate for us to opine on the ratification processes in our NAFTA partner countries.
Having said that, we also believe that the best outcome for Canada is to have a process that, as far as possible, moves in tandem with our partners. That requires a lot of close collaboration. I am in fact travelling to Washington tomorrow, where I will meet with Ambassador Lighthizer and with members of Congress to get a little more insight into the U.S. domestic ratification process and share some perspectives on our own legislative process, which can be mysterious to—
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 11:37 [p.28891]
Expand
Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the member for Essex for her hard work on this agreement. I just want to be very clear that reopening this agreement would be opening a Pandora's box.
All Canadians saw how difficult, at times, this negotiation was. They saw the very difficult demands that were put on the table and that Canada, with real resilience, managed to resist, demands like getting rid of chapter 19, demands like getting rid of the cultural exemption and demands like a U.S. national content requirement for the car sector, which would have been devastating to the member's constituents. We worked really hard, and we got a deal that resisted those demands.
It would be foolhardy, it would be toying with the lives and jobs of Canadians, to reopen this negotiation, and we will not.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 11:39 [p.28892]
Expand
Madam Speaker, I want to thank my hon. colleague for his hard work on this agreement and for the very many conversations we have had about it. I also want to take this opportunity to thank the provincial government of British Columbia, which was a very important and very constructive partner in this negotiation.
I would like to particularly, actually, give a shout-out to the Premier of British Columbia. There were a couple of difficult moments when I was in Washington, and he sent me some reassuring text messages. I want to take this opportunity to say to the premier that that meant a lot.
I think the reason our B.C. caucus, the government of B.C. and mayors in B.C. were so supportive was that British Columbia is a province that understands how important trade is, how important trade is for the softwood lumber industry in B.C. and how important trade is for the city of Vancouver.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 11:41 [p.28892]
Expand
Madam Speaker, let me start by thanking the member for Nanaimo—Ladysmith for his question. I think it is one of the first questions he has asked in the House, and it is nice to be having this conversation.
I am also grateful to the member for raising the question of the proportionality clause, or the ratchet clause, which bound Canada to sell a certain proportion of its energy exports to the United States. This is a clause that is gone, and I think that is another real victory for Canada.
I share the member's view, as I said in my comments, that getting rid of ISDS in our trading relationship with the United States is another real win for Canada. As I mentioned, ISDS has cost Canadians more than $300 million, and it has had, academics believe, a regulatory chilling effect in terms of our own ability to regulate for health, safety, the environment and so on.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 11:44 [p.28892]
Expand
Madam Speaker, let me correct my hon. colleague on a point of fact. The U.S. has, in fact, taken a couple of initial steps to begin the clock on the ratification process. That work has begun.
I am absolutely clear, as I believe are the overwhelming majority of Canadians, that we do not want and we do not need a new NAFTA negotiation. Canada has done its work. We have our deal. We are not going to create an opportunity to have this hard-won agreement, with gains for Canada preserving our market access, put in jeopardy.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 14:47 [p.28921]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the NDP is playing a dangerous game.
The New Democrats seem to forget that initially they very much supported the deal. In fact, the NDP leader celebrated the deal at an event in Ottawa, and his Quebec lieutenant, the member for Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, called the new NAFTA the best deal possible to protect workers across the country.
Now they are flip-flopping and want to open Pandora's box.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 14:49 [p.28921]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me quote Hassan Yussuff, president of the Canadian Labour Congress. He said that the new NAFTA “gets it right on labour provisions”.
Canada did its job. We negotiated a great deal for Canadian workers. I am astonished that the NDP, which claims to support working Canadians, is prepared, for the sake of scoring political points, to risk reopening this Pandora's box. I do not think that the car workers in Essex want that to happen.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 15:11 [p.28925]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, it was a Liberal government that created the supply management system and it is a Liberal government that is preserving it.
It is worth noting that the Americans' original goal was to completely dismantle that system. This agreement will provide access to markets, but the most important thing is that the future of supply management is secure. I can also assure my colleague that farmers will be fully compensated.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-11 15:12 [p.28925]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our government's priority is defending Canadians' interests, and that includes the interests of dairy farmers. Our government stood up for our supply management system despite the United States' determined attempts to dismantle it.
I can assure all dairy farmers that they will receive fair and equitable compensation.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-06-04 15:10 [p.28505]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I was in Havana nearly three weeks ago, and I spoke with diplomats at our embassy. I want to thank them for their excellent work, and I want to assure our diplomats and all Canadians that the health and safety of our diplomats and their families is our number one concern.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:26 [p.28347]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the NDP needs to understand that reopening this agreement would be like opening Pandora's box.
We have an agreement that preserves over two billion dollars' worth of trade daily. At best, the NDP is naive. At worst, it is playing political games by suggesting that Canadians would benefit from reopening this agreement.
If the NDP wants to follow Donald Trump's example and withdraw from NAFTA, it should have the guts to say so.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:27 [p.28347]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, there are so many misunderstandings in that question. It is hard to know where to start.
The Mexican president said today, speaking for Mexico, that Mexico intends to move ahead with its ratification process.
As I just said, the NDP is naive at best, and playing political games at worst, to suggest that Canadians would benefit from reopening this deal. If the NDP wants to take a page out of Donald Trump's playbook and withdraw from NAFTA, it should have the courage to tell Canadians that.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:30 [p.28347]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, how soon they forget. Let me remind my Conservative colleagues how urgently they and Stephen Harper urged Canada to capitulate. In October 2017, Stephen Harper wrote in a memo, “It does not matter whether current American proposals are worse than what we have now.”
When it comes to our retaliatory tariffs, which achieved a full lift, the Conservatives urged us, Doug Ford lectured us, on how we needed to drop them. Canadians should be—
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:31 [p.28348]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, it is pretty rich to hear the Conservatives talk about steel and aluminum tariffs.
The Conservatives were on the record and were absolutely wrong in the approach they advocated. Doug Ford's government publicly called for Canada to drop its retaliation. Had we done that, just imagine how devastating the result would have been.
Members on that side of the House agreed with that wrong-headed and, frankly, weak approach.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:32 [p.28348]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I remind my Conservative colleagues that they, along with Mr. Harper, urged Canada to capitulate. In an October 25, 2017 memo, Mr. Harper wrote that it did not matter that current American proposals are worse than what we have now.
The Conservatives openly and publicly called on us to eliminate our countermeasures.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:34 [p.28348]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives have said several times that we should drop our demands, sign a new agreement and capitulate. That is what happened and those are the facts.
Canadians can be happy that we did not follow the Conservatives' example. I think this is a bit embarrassing for the Conservatives.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:35 [p.28348]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I am very glad the member for Durham asked that question because it allows me to clarify a misunderstanding on his part of that part of the bill.
That is a part of the bill that updates the name of NAFTA in the Food and Drugs Act. It does not give any special powers to cabinet and it does not allow for the agreement to be changed.
The member for Durham is entirely mistaken. He clearly has not read the agreement.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:36 [p.28348]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I have already pointed out how the member made a simple mistake in his previous question. Let me give some objective, impartial evidence on how good the new deal is.
The International Trade Commission, which is a U.S. body not likely to put its thumb on the scale in Canada's favour, reported that as a result of the new deal, U.S. exports to Canada would increase by $19.1 billion and Canadian exports would increase to the U.S. by $19.1 billion. That is a win-win.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:40 [p.28349]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the only people who wanted us to give in to Donald Trump's demands were the Conservatives. The advice from Stephen Harper for Canada to capitulate is well known and well documented. So are the urgent calls from the Conservatives, both in the House and in the province of Ontario, for Canada to drop its retaliation.
That retaliation on steel and aluminum tariffs was Canada's strongest trade action since the Second World War. That was central to our success in getting these tariffs lifted.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:41 [p.28349]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, we are very seized with the softwood lumber issue. I have raised it repeatedly with Ambassador Lighthizer, and the Prime Minister raised it with the Vice President yesterday.
Having said that, one of the reasons we were so adamant about not accepting a terrible quota deal for steel and aluminum was because we did not want to follow the wretched Conservative example of accepting quotas for our softwood lumber industry. We learned from the mistakes of the Conservatives. I wish they could learn from their mistakes too.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:42 [p.28349]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, on the issue of softwood lumber, I would emphasize the importance of industry leaders. The member talked about softwood lumber. I want to emphasize how important leadership on the part of softwood lumber industry leaders is. There was a lot of consultation with steel industry leaders, and the softwood lumber industry leaders recommended not making the same mistakes the Conservatives made. We listened to them.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-31 11:44 [p.28350]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the member for Edmonton Strathcona for her hard work on this issue and the question asked earlier this week by the NDP on this important issue.
We are deeply concerned about the human rights situation in China, including restrictions on the freedom of Tibetans. In fact, my parliamentary secretary raised these concerns with Chinese legislators while in China last week. We call on the Government of China to respect the human rights of Tibetans and to engage in a substantive and meaningful dialogue with the Dalai Lama.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-28 14:37 [p.28143]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, what the NDP needs to understand is that reopening this agreement would be like opening Pandora's box. Why is the NDP prepared to risk our economic stability?
It would be naive for the NDP to believe that Canadians would benefit from reopening this agreement. The NDP is playing a very dangerous game.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-28 14:38 [p.28143]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, what the NDP needs to understand is that re-opening this deal would be like opening Pandora's box.
We have an agreement that safeguards more than $2 billion a day in cross-border trade. The NDP are naive at best and playing political games at worst to suggest that Canada would benefit from re-opening the deal.
If the NDP wants to take a page out of Donald Trump's playbook and withdraw from NAFTA, it should have the courage to say so.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-28 15:09 [p.28149]
Expand
moved that a ways and means motion to introduce an act to implement the agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 14:27 [p.28051]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, we held out for a good deal, and that is what we got.
This deal will protect $2 billion per day in trade. The International Trade Commission has announced that once the new deal is in place, Canadian exports to the United States will increase by $19.1 billion a year.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 14:28 [p.28051]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me urge the leader of the New Democrats, who allegedly speaks for working people, to talk to some actual Canadian workers, because that is what I do every day. Canadian workers are delighted that we have secured continued privileged access to the U.S. market, and they are delighted that we have succeeded in a full lift of the 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 14:36 [p.28053]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I know the member for Essex worked for Unifor before entering the House. I would therefore hope that she is familiar with the comments from Unifor leader Jerry Dias. Here is what he had to say: “There are some incredible victories in this deal, things we've been arguing and fighting for for the last 24 years”, and “Traditionally, trade deals have been about profit, not people. I can honestly say these negotiations included discussions about people — about workers.”
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 14:38 [p.28053]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me thank the hon. member for giving me a chance to say something that I think comes as a great relief for all Canadians.
A week ago today, illegal and unjust tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum were lifted. Today, Canada is one of the only countries in the world with unfettered access to the U.S. market, and that is right.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 14:43 [p.28054]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the NDP says one thing in the House, but behind closed doors it admits that this agreement protects Canadian jobs. The leader of the NDP celebrated the agreement at an event held in Ottawa. The member for Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, who is also the NDP's Quebec lieutenant, described the new agreement as the best deal possible.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 14:44 [p.28054]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me continue to quote the member for Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie. He said he wanted to congratulate all the Canadian negotiators on the fantastic job they did, and that the agreement would protect workers across the country. We agree with him on that.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 14:52 [p.28056]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our government strongly believes, as I think is the view of all Canadians, that human rights need to be a part of our foreign policy, even when it is hard to speak out. When it comes to China, the issue that I have been particularly concerned about is the treatment of the Uighurs. That is something that we have spoken about publicly. That is something I have raised directly in meetings with my counterpart, the Chinese foreign minister.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-27 15:13 [p.28059]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 83(1) I wish to table a notice of a ways and means motion respecting an act to implement the agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States.
Pursuant to Standing Order 83(2) I ask that an order of the day be designated for consideration of this motion.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-05-13 14:43 [p.27684]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me start by addressing the question of the Northwest Passage to which the hon. member has alluded.
It is important to state very clearly in the House and for all Canadians who are listening Canada's absolute claim to the Northwest Passage. This is a claim based on geography. It is a claim based on history. It is a claim based on who we are as Canadians, and we are very clear on that, as I was in my meeting with Secretary Pompeo in Finland last week.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-30 14:35 [p.27184]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me address the case of Fan Wei. I want to assure him and his family that Canada is extremely concerned by this sentence. Canada is firmly opposed to the death penalty everywhere in the world. It is cruel and inhumane. Obviously, we are particularly concerned where it is applied against Canadians. We are very seized with this matter.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-30 14:36 [p.27184]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister and I agree about pretty much everything. Let me say that when it comes to the detained Canadians, this is—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-30 14:37 [p.27184]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I do want to say to the hon. members opposite that these are people's lives. This is not a subject for heckling or railing. I take the detention of these two Canadians extremely seriously. I am in very close touch with their families. These are two very, very brave Canadians who are supported by wonderful families. We need to stand with them.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-30 15:06 [p.27190]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the illegal and unjustified U.S. tariffs must be lifted. That is the message we constantly send to the United States, and it has been received.
Yesterday, for example, I spoke with Senator Chuck Grassley, chair of the Senate finance committee. He wrote in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, and I quote, “If these tariffs aren't lifted, USMCA is dead. There is no appetite in Congress to debate USMCA with these tariffs in place.” Those are the Republican senator's own words.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-29 14:33 [p.27103]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our priority, which is also my personal priority, is the well-being and safety of Canadians detained in China. We have rallied an unprecedented number of partners around the world to support Canada's position: Australia, the European Union, France, Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Latvia, and others. I will continue by answering the second question.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-29 14:34 [p.27103]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, as I promised, I will continue to name the countries that have publicly supported Canada: Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Spain, Denmark, the United States and 140 academics and diplomats from around the world. NATO's secretary general appealed directly and publicly to China to consider our serious concerns.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-29 14:35 [p.27104]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I would like to assure every member of this House, and above all the detained Canadians, that their well-being is our government's paramount priority and my paramount concern. We have rallied an unprecedented number of countries around the world to publicly speak out about these detained Canadians and to call for their release, and I will give you the full list, Mr. Speaker, when I answer the next question.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-29 14:36 [p.27104]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I am able to predict my answers, because the questions are so easily predictable and repetitive.
Canada absolutely is back, which is why we have rallied an unprecedented—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-29 15:14 [p.27111]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, all members and all Canadians, myself included, were shocked and saddened by the terrorist attacks committed in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday. April 21 was a tragic day for the world. Over 200 people were killed and hundreds of others were injured in the coordinated bombings that targeted three churches and three hotels in Colombo.
On behalf of the Government of Canada, I would like to express our sincere condolences to the families and friends of those who died and wish those who were injured a quick recovery.
I would like to extend my particular sympathy to the diaspora community here in Canada and to those who gathered to grieve in churches here. Canada condemns these despicable attacks. Many of the victims were Christians, targeted at prayer, in church, on one of the holiest days in the Christian calendar.
Easter is a time of renewal and optimism for Christians, a time to reflect on hope for the year ahead, and on Jesus's message of compassion, inclusion and redemption. Christ is risen, we declare with joy. This year, especially for those affected by these attacks, but for all of us, Easter was marred by sadness and mourning. Houses of worship are sanctuaries where the faithful should be free to pray in peace. They are no place for terror.
In Colombo, on April 21, and sadly at a San Diego synagogue this weekend, this sanctity was violated. In San Diego, an anti-Semite opened fire on worshippers marking the end of Passover, killing one person and injuring three others, including the rabbi. Whenever people are targeted because of their faith, anywhere in the world, it is an attack on all of us, an attack on humanity itself.
In the wake of attacks like these, all peace-loving people must come together in sorrow, but we also must resolve, together, not to be bent or cowed by the horror of violence. Instead, we must, together, fight hatred and extremism in all its forms.
When combatting extremism, we must all be mindful of the importance of protecting human rights, particularly the rights of ethnic and religious minorities. We must ensure that all of our people are safe, and we must ensure that all of our rights are protected. We must be confident that we can do both. Indeed, they are mutually reinforcing.
To the people of Sri Lanka, to all Christians, and to all those around the world touched by the Easter Sunday attacks, Canada stands with them.
We will continue to work with them and with our allies and partners around the world to prevent terrorism and violent extremism from spreading further and creating more victims.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-08 14:47 [p.26812]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the illegal and unjust American tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum must be lifted. We consistently send this message to the United States, including at a meeting I had with Secretary of State Pompeo last Wednesday.
American legislators, both Republicans and Democrats, and a dozen U.S. industries have asked Ambassador Lighthizer to lift the tariffs.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-04-02 14:47 [p.26589]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our government knows how proud Canadians are of their public health care system. It is part of our identity as Canadians. We also know that access to drugs is an important issue for many Canadians. That is why budget 2019 contains bold, concrete measures to lay the groundwork for a national pharmacare system. Our government will always stand up for our public health care system.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 20:23 [p.26222]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 5b, in the amount of $5,090,528, under Department of Employment and Social Development — Grants and contributions, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 20:29 [p.26223]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 10b, in the amount of $163,501,480, under Department of Employment and Social Development — Writing off of debts, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 20:35 [p.26224]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $3,283,364, under Department of Finance — Program expenditures and contributions, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 20:42 [p.26225]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $8,211,518, under Department of Fisheries and Oceans — Operating expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 20:52 [p.26226]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 10b, in the amount of $5,000,000, under Department of Fisheries and Oceans — Grants and contributions, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 20:56 [p.26227]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $367,410, under Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development — Operating expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 21:03 [p.26228]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 10b, in the amount of $162,570,467, under Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development — Grants and contributions, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 23:48 [p.26251]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $50,000, under Office of the Senate Ethics Officer — Program expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-20 23:54 [p.26252]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $476,000, under Parks Canada Agency — Program expenditures, grants and contributions, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:05 [p.26254]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 5b, in the amount of $836,112, under Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council — Grants, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:13 [p.26255]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $10,174,531, under Royal Canadian Mounted Police — Operating expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:19 [p.26256]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 5b, in the amount of $1,738,000, under Royal Canadian Mounted Police — Capital expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:25 [p.26257]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 10b, in the amount of $9,900,000, under Royal Canadian Mounted Police — Grants and contributions, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:33 [p.26258]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $18,647,341, under Shared Services Canada — Operating expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:40 [p.26258]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 5b, in the amount of $4,464,382, under Shared Services Canada — Capital expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:46 [p.26259]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $854,678, under Statistics Canada — Program expenditures, in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-21 0:53 [p.26260]
Expand
moved:
That Vote 1b, in the amount of $14,600,000, under The Jacques-Cartier and Champlain Bridges Inc. — Payments to the Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Inc., in the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-19 14:40 [p.26147]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the rules-based international order and the multilateral institutions that underpin it are absolutely essential for the pursuit of the Canadian national interest in the world. That is why we are co-operating fully with the OECD in its work on this issue. I have instructed my department and my staff to do so.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-19 14:42 [p.26147]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, as someone who has stood up for the people of Ukraine, as someone who has stood up for the Crimean Tartars, as someone who has stood up for the people of Venezuela, let me say it is—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-19 14:43 [p.26147]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me say, it is a profound insult to the people living under the Maduro dictatorship, to the people living under Putin's dictatorship, to compare anything happening in—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-19 14:54 [p.26149]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I am extremely proud to speak for Canada, to speak for our amazing country on the international stage.
Because I was not fully heard when the member for Durham posed his astonishing question, let me just say that it is both insulting and absurd to the people of Canada, as well as to the people suffering from the dictatorships of Maduro and Putin, to make any comparison between the two.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-19 14:56 [p.26149]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, since the member has spoken about women and foreign affairs, let me talk about what our government is doing to advance the rights of women in the world. Let me talk about what we are doing to stand up for women's rights activists in Saudi Arabia. Let me talk about what we are doing to stand up for reproductive health and access to reproductive health services for all the women in Canada and the world.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-03-18 15:01 [p.26066]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I do indeed love to talk about the international rules-based order, because that is absolutely essential to the defence of the Canadian national interest in the world.
When it comes to the OECD, Canada is proud of our participation in this important organization. We have been clear from the start with the OECD that we support its work and will co-operate with it fully.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-02-28 14:56 [p.25928]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the illegal and unjust American tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum must be lifted. We are consistently sending this message to the United States, and it is being received.
American legislators have asked Ambassador Lighthizer to lift these tariffs. Republican Kevin Brady recently said that the tariffs should be lifted. On Monday, I raised this issue directly with the vice-president of the United States, Mike Pence.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-02-05 15:03 [p.25285]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I would like to start by thanking the member for Brampton North for her commitment to this very important issue.
Canada called for a marked acceleration of Sri Lanka's accountability efforts directly at the UN Human Rights Council last March, and at the Commonwealth meeting last April.
Canada will join the United Kingdom, Germany, Macedonia and Montenegro as part of the core group in supporting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka, working toward the upcoming Human Rights Council session.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-31 15:04 [p.25104]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our government, and I believe all Canadians, are absolutely of the view that religious freedom is an essential part of human rights, and these are freedoms we should enjoy not only in Canada but around the world. We are very engaged with our partners around the world in protecting the religious freedom of all people, whether they be Christian or Muslim.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-29 14:50 [p.24974]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I agree with my colleague that the U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum are unfair and illegal. Canada is working on these tariffs at the NAFTA and WTO round tables.
I spoke to Ambassador Robert Lighthizer about this issue yesterday and today. We continue to work on it.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-29 14:51 [p.24975]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, as the member for Essex knows very well, we are not just talking when it comes to the illegal and unjust U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum. We acted decisively on July 1 by imposing retaliatory tariffs, the highest, strongest retaliatory trade action in Canadian history. This action is having results. In fact, just this week, Kevin Brady said in the U.S. that he did not see how the U.S. could ratify NAFTA while these tariffs were still in place.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-28 14:50 [p.24880]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our government has done a great deal of work on this file.
Our top priority is the well-being and safety of the Canadians detained by China. We now have the support of many of our allies, such as Australia, the European Union, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, the Netherlands, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Spain. All these countries have openly supported the Canadian position.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-28 14:53 [p.24881]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, when it comes to China, our top priority is the safety and well-being of the Canadians detained in China. This is a priority for the Prime Minister, for me and for the entire government. These arbitrary detentions are unacceptable to Canadians and to the international community.
The Prime Minister and I have both spoken to a number of international partners. We will stand by the statements of support we have received from many countries.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-28 14:54 [p.24881]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, there are so many false claims in that question that it is hard to even know where to start. However, let me try.
When it comes to our partners in the Asia-Pacific, Canada is proud to have signed the CPTPP, which is entering into force. In fact, we are the only G7 country with trade agreements with every other G7 country. That is a diplomatic and trade triumph.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-28 14:55 [p.24881]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, when it comes to Meng Wanzhou, let me be very clear about the Government of Canada's position. First of all, Canada is a rule-of-law country and we are conducting a fair, unbiased and transparent legal proceeding. In fact, Madam Meng is currently on bail, as the court has ruled. There has been, as is correct, no political involvement in the process. Canada respects our international legal commitments, including our extradition treaty with the United States.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-28 14:56 [p.24881]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the only people playing political games when two Canadians are in a difficult situation are the members opposite, and that is truly reprehensible.
When it comes to the case of Ms. Meng, Canada is a rule-of-law country. We are proud to be a rule-of-law country. We have honoured our extradition treaty commitments, as we honour all of our international treaty commitments, and Ms. Meng has access to our impartial and fair judicial system.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2019-01-28 15:13 [p.24885]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the member to talk to his former colleagues in the NDP. Canadians need an apology from the member for Churchill—Keewatinook Aski and the NDP candidate in York—Simcoe for their defence of a dictatorship that has killed hundreds and injured thousands of peaceful protesters. If the NDP members cannot take a firm and clear stance on the fight of the people of Venezuela for democracy, I do not know what they can take a clear position on.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-11-27 14:30 [p.24032]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I was rather surprised yesterday to hear the member for Durham criticize Canada's retaliatory measures in response to the illegal and unjustified U.S. 232 tariffs. He called our response “dumb”. Our response was perfectly reciprocal, a dollar-for-dollar response. It was essential to defend our industry and our workers.
The Conservatives supported this at the time. Now they are losing their nerve. However, I guess that is no surprise from the party that urged us to capitulate on NAFTA.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-11-27 14:31 [p.24032]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I would like the Conservatives and the leader of the Conservative Party to be very clear. Is it the Conservative position now that Canada should unilaterally drop our retaliatory tariffs, because I want to tell—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-11-27 14:32 [p.24032]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I would like the Conservatives to come clean on what their policy is on Canada's just and correct retaliation, because here is what the Canadian Steel Producers Association said today, “Canada’s retaliatory tariffs are vital in protecting the jobs of 23,000 steelworkers.” We stand with them, do you?
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-11-27 15:03 [p.24038]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our government is absolutely clear on the steel and aluminum tariffs imposed illegally and unjustly by the United States. Our view is that we have to fight these tariffs. We fight them with a strong retaliatory response, we fight them at the WTO and we fight them at NAFTA where we have preserved the chapter 19 tribunals.
What is unclear is the position of the Conservative Party, which seems, today, to be arguing that we should capitulate, just as it did on NAFTA.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-11-26 14:53 [p.23918]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, let me very clear. Canada strongly condemns Russian aggression toward Ukraine in the Kerch Strait and we call on Russia to immediately release the captured Ukrainian crew and vessels.
I spoke on the phone late last night with Ukraine's foreign minister, Pavlo Klimkin, and assured him of Canada's strong support. I have been directly in touch with Jeremy Hunt, the foreign secretary of the U.K., and Federica Mogherini, the high representative of the European Union. We are working closely with our allies. We strongly support Operation Unifier and we are in close touch with Ukrainians.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-11-20 14:55 [p.23620]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, as far as Saudi Arabia and the war in Yemen is concerned, I want to make something clear.
We condemn the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, and we have called for a ceasefire in Yemen.
We are actively looking at other measures, including how we might use the Magnitsky act. Obviously, while we review the situation, no new export permits will be granted.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-22 15:00 [p.22673]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, we condemn the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The explanations provided by Saudi Arabia are inconsistent and lack credibility. We continue to call for a thorough investigation in full cooperation with the Turkish authorities. Those responsible for this murder must be held to account and brought to justice.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-18 14:24 [p.22564]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for the question.
As we told our G7 partners on Tuesday, we are very concerned about the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi. As we told our partners in the G7, of which Canada currently holds the presidency, all those responsible for this situation must be held to account. It is very important. We support the calls for a thorough and transparent investigation into these serious allegations.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-18 14:25 [p.22564]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, of course I do not think that is what Canadians want and that is why I said no such thing. Canada's position on human rights in general, very much including Saudi Arabia, is clear and firm. We took a clear and firm position in August, and I think that is something that Canadians can be proud of.
When it comes to the case of Jamal Khashoggi, we led a G7 foreign ministers' statement, which came out on Tuesday, saying that those responsible must be held to account.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-18 14:48 [p.22568]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, the conclusion of the modernized NAFTA was a major accomplishment for Canada, a major accomplishment for Canadian businesses and for Canadian workers. One of the great achievements in this agreement was to keep de minimis levels low. That is something Canadian small businesses asked us to do. That is something we achieved, and we are glad we were able to do so.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-18 14:58 [p.22570]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I would be delighted to, but I want to start by thanking the member for Cumberland—Colchester for his wisdom and the outstanding advice he gave me personally during the negotiations, especially on chapter 19.
He asks an excellent question. ISDS is now removed from the new trade agreement between Canada and the United States. That will save Canada from frivolous lawsuits like the one the member mentioned.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-18 15:00 [p.22570]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, Canada has spoken out very clearly about human rights and everyone knows it. That definitely includes Saudi Arabia, as everyone saw this summer.
With regard to Jamal Khashoggi, we are working closely with our G7 allies. We all spoke on Tuesday and we are all saying that a thorough and transparent investigation is needed to bring those responsible to justice.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-18 15:01 [p.22571]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question.
I want to point out once again that the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi is very troubling. Canada has made that very clear. That is the message that I sent to the Saudi Arabian foreign minister. I also initiated a discussion on the subject with my counterparts in Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States.
We join our partners in calling for a thorough investigation to identify those responsible.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-15 14:21 [p.22330]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, we refused to capitulate and we got a good deal for Canadians. The agreement will protect billions of dollars in daily trade and support millions of jobs in Canada. The agreement enjoys broad support, whether it is by union leader Jerry Dias, provincial premiers or former ministers from all political parties.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-15 14:22 [p.22330]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, when we were in the heat of the negotiations, all we heard from the Conservatives was that we were being too tough, that I was being too tough, and that we should capitulate. Now that we have a—
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-15 14:23 [p.22330]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, now that we have a deal, they have discovered their Monday morning courage.
We were tough when it mattered. We stood firm, and we got a good deal for Canada.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-15 14:24 [p.22330]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, what we are hearing from the Conservatives is déjà vu all over again. They wanted us to capitulate on NAFTA. We did not. Now they want us to capitulate on steel and aluminum. We will not.
The U.S. has imposed illegal and unjustified tariffs. Canada responded with perfectly reciprocal dollar-for-dollar retaliation. The solution is for both sides to lift their tariffs, and that is what we are insisting on.
Collapse
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
Lib. (ON)
View Chrystia Freeland Profile
2018-10-15 14:46 [p.22334]
Expand
Mr. Speaker, our government's willingness to stand up for human rights around the world, including in Saudi Arabia, is very well known.
When it comes to the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi, we are very concerned. I spoke earlier today about it with the Saudi Arabian foreign minister. I expressed Canada's deep concerns and asked for a thorough, transparent and credible investigation. I emphasized that those responsible must be held to account. We have been in very close touch with our G7 and NATO allies on this issue.
Collapse
Results: 1 - 100 of 544 | Page: 1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data