Interventions in Committee
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 17:54
Expand
Mr. Callaghan, obviously you're well educated, with a Ph.D. in anthropology—
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 17:55
Expand
My wife is an anthropologist. I just wanted to ask, is it hard to fill out the papers as a Ph.D. candidate?
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 17:55
Expand
Are those all part of the bunch you received this morning, for example?
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 17:56
Expand
You said also that you find there's a lack of information coming from VAC to you, but they ask you for a whole load of information.
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 17:57
Expand
You said the diagnosis of the PTSD you are suffering from was not accepted by the ministry?
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 17:59
Expand
Just before turning to Madam Northey, I have a last question for you. I would first like to let you know that it would be good if you could send us the list of each of those papers that you have to fill out. I would like to know what exactly those forms are.
My other question for you is in regard to your saying you have concerns about the OSI clinic. You said you didn't really want to talk about it because you don't want to put it in jeopardy, but it will not be in jeopardy; it will stay there. I would like to hear those concerns you have about the way it is run.
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 18:00
Expand
Could you please write those concerns to the committee and send that through the clerk? Thank you very much.
Madam Northey, I'd like to hear what you have to say concerning the effectiveness of VAC. I think it might be true that they're not plan-centric, outcome driven.
I would just make note of this brainstorming here, so you know. There is the law that has services and benefits. On the other side, you have the veterans who are recipients of these delivery services or benefits, and you have VAC in the middle.
I'm mean I'm just going out there to try to find solutions. When I meet with VAC employees, they're all good people. I might say bad things right now, but it has nothing to do with the people working there.
Sometimes it seems that the ministry is more of an organization there to deal with the restraint budget and to allocate, in the most restrictive manner, the allowances and benefits and the service delivery. It seems it is that instead of being an organization which has to make sure that the people who most need it will receive the benefits and services and that they reach out to the most possible number of veterans.
In a way, its logic is more serving the state than it is serving the beneficiaries, who are the veterans. I think that's what you're saying.
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 19:24
Expand
Madam Northey, the last five minutes were really interesting because, for a few weeks on this committee, we talked about the fact that before it took one year, and now it takes 16 weeks. You said that weeks are important in the waiting time for the approval or disapproval of benefits. You said it's important to calculate the outcomes and the expectations of results, but it's not necessarily what should be looked at first. That's very interesting, because it's like we're stepping out of the paradigm right now.
You said that the most important thing is to see if the expectations of the veterans—in this case it's veterans—are satisfied. But again I feel that's not the goal of the ministry, and maybe it should be looking at what's going on right now. I don't think they're trying to satisfy the expectations of veterans, but trying to satisfy the way the state wants to deal with veterans.
That was just an aside.
About the Legion, sir, I was at the 46th congress of the Legion in Newfoundland this weekend. I was talking to a lot of commanders in the province and everything. They are also getting sick and tired of civilians in the Legion. They say good things about that, of course, but they feel that civilians have turned the Legion into a social club to fill in times when they're bored, more than an organization for getting together and talking about problems that are realized and things of that sort.
I simply want to tell you that some officials in the Legion feel the same way as you do about the Legion.
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 19:27
Expand
The only problem is that the common force of veterans is weakened as a result of the fact there are so many groups going their own way, but that's the reality.
You talk about denial by design. I would like you to maybe talk about that a little bit.
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 19:29
Expand
So if the system is designed to find any possible way to deny the benefits, that means there is an unofficial rule, implicitly. Is that what you're suggesting?
Collapse
View Alupa Clarke Profile
CPC (QC)
View Alupa Clarke Profile
2016-06-13 19:30
Expand
Also, you talk about the disgusting practice like there being no stamp. I agree with you. I would be very, very mad if I had to add a stamp to send my information to the government, even more in the case of a veteran. Could you share with us other practices that you find disgusting?
Collapse
Results: 46 - 60 of 156 | Page: 4 of 11

|<
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|