Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 5641 - 5662 of 5662
2011-06-25 [p.165]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Ms. Raitt (Minister of Labour), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), move...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Ms. Raitt (Minister of Labour), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
2011-06-25 [p.165]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 28 -- Vote no 28)YEAS: ...
Expand
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 28 -- Vote no 28) - View vote details.
YEAS: 158, NAYS: 112
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
2011-06-22 [p.134]
Accordingly, pursuant to Order made Thursday, June 16, 2011, Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mega-trials), ...
Expand
Accordingly, pursuant to Order made Thursday, June 16, 2011, Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mega-trials), was deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed.
Collapse
2011-06-22 [p.142]
The Committee considered the Bill and reported it without amendment....
Expand
The Committee considered the Bill and reported it without amendment.
Collapse
2011-06-22 [p.142]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader o...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
2011-06-22 [p.142]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16)YEAS: ...
Expand
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 156, NAYS: 137
(See list under Division No. 14)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
2011-06-22 [p.143]
The Committee considered the Bill and reported it without amendment....
Expand
The Committee considered the Bill and reported it without amendment.
Collapse
2011-06-22 [p.144]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader of...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
2011-06-22 [p.144]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 20 -- Vote no 20)YEAS: ...
Expand
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 20 -- Vote no 20) - View vote details.
YEAS: 156, NAYS: 137
(See list under Division No. 14)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-3, An Act to implement certain provisions of the 2011...
Expand
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-3, An Act to implement certain provisions of the 2011 budget as updated on June 6, 2011, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:Group No. 1 — Mot...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 7.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Group No. 1Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-3...
Expand
Group No. 1
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 20.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-3 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 21.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-3 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 22.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-3 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 23.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-3 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 24.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-3 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 25.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-3 be amended...
Expand
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 26.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 1....
Expand
Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 1.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.123]
Group No. 1The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 1 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded...
Expand
Group No. 1
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 1 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), — That Bill C-3 be amended by deleting Clause 20.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 8 -- Vote no 8) - View vote details.
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 157
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 2 to 7 were also negatived on the same division.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.125]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), mo...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
2011-06-21 [p.125]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 9 -- Vote no 9)YEAS: 15...
Expand
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 9 -- Vote no 9) - View vote details.
YEAS: 158, NAYS: 133
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
Collapse
Results: 5641 - 5662 of 5662 | Page: 189 of 189

|<
<
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data