Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 277
2011-03-25 [p.1412]
— No. 403-1459 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-09....
Expand
— No. 403-1459 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-09.
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1413]
Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood), from the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented the 11t...
Expand
Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood), from the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented the 11th Report of the Committee, "Effectiveness, Management and Operation of the Expenses Incurred for the G8/G20 Summits". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-240.
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 30, 33, 35, 37, 43 and 56) was tabled.
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1419]
Q-932 — Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to the backdrops used by the government for the announcements fr...
Expand
Q-932 — Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to the backdrops used by the government for the announcements from December 10, 2010, to February 1, 2011, inclusive, and for October 15, 2008, to March 31, 2009, inclusive, for each backdrop purchased, what were: (a) the dates (i) the tender was issued for the backdrop, (ii) the contract was signed, (iii) the backdrop was delivered; (b) the cost of the backdrop; (c) the announcement for which the backdrop was used; (d) the department that paid for the backdrop; and (e) the date or dates the backdrop was used? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-932.
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1427]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred t...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Finance:
Q-947 — Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With respect to programs for young families: (a) how many new programs were introduced and how much money was spent by the government since fiscal year 2006-2007 to date (i) across Canada, (ii) by province; (b) which departments were responsible for program administration; (c) how much money was allocated to programs addressing the needs of young families (i) by department, (ii) by province; (d) how many programs for young families were finished and were not renewed since 2006 to date; and (e) how much money was spent for initiatives to support young families under the Canada Economic Action Plan each fiscal year since 2007-2008 to date (i) in total amount by year, (ii) by province?
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1428]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred t...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Finance:
Q-950 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to federal funding under the Canada Economic Action Plan in the riding of Timmins—James Bay for fiscal year 2008-2009 to date: (a) how many and what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (b) what was the value of the projects that received funding from a department or agency over this period?
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1433]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred t...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Finance:
Q-959 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — With regard to federal funding under the Canada Economic Action Plan in the riding of Winnipeg Centre for fiscal year 2008-2009 to date: (a) how many and what projects received funding from a department or an agency over this period; and (b) what was the value of the projects that received funding from a department or an agency over this period?
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1434]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred t...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development:
Q-962 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — With regard to Environment Canada and enforcement: (a) how many full-time enforcement officers are currently employed by the government, broken down by number of (i) inspectors enforcing environmental protection or pollution laws, (ii) investigators enforcing environmental protection or pollution laws, (iii) conservation officers enforcing wildlife laws, (iv) enforcement officers in parks laws; (b) where are each of the officers in (a) based and deployed; (c) what are the budgets and actual expenditures for enforcement for the past five years; (d) what is the breakdown for full-time equivalents in enforcement for headquarters and for the regions for compliance promotion, inspection and investigation, and enforcement, respectively; (e) what increase in full-time equivalents and budget expenditures are anticipated in order to implement the promised improved monitoring regime for the oil sands sector; (f) what is the timeline for the deployment of any increased monitoring and enforcement activity for the oil sands sector; and (g) has the department instituted a specific enforcement and compliance strategy for the oil sands sector?
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1434]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred t...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates:
Q-963 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Edmonton—Strathcona, specifying each department or agency, initiative or program, year and amount?
Collapse
2011-03-25 [p.1437]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred t...
Expand
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates:
Q-971 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of Skeena—Bulkley Valley for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or an agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or an agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects which received funding from a department or an agency over this period?
Collapse
2011-03-24 [p.1405]
— Nos. 403-1433, 403-1438, 403-1448 and 403-1454 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-08....
Expand
— Nos. 403-1433, 403-1438, 403-1448 and 403-1454 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-08.
Collapse
2011-03-21 [p.1356]
— Nos. 403-1288, 403-1300, 403-1343, 403-1359, 403-1405 and 403-1419 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-...
Expand
— Nos. 403-1288, 403-1300, 403-1343, 403-1359, 403-1405 and 403-1419 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-07;
Collapse
2011-03-21 [p.1360]
Q-823 — Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO), o...
Expand
Q-823 — Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO), of which Canada is a Contracting Party: (a) what are the current Contracting Parties to the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, otherwise known as the NAFO Convention; (b) which of these Contracting Parties are known by Canada through its diplomatic relations to have ratified the revised NAFO Convention, as adopted by NAFO in September 2007; (c) which of these Contracting Parties are known to have informed the NAFO Depository or the NAFO Secretariat of their ratification, acceptance and approval of the revised NAFO Convention; (d) how much did Canada spend conducting enforcement of NAFO fisheries conservation measures in the NAFO regulatory area in each of fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, broken down by all departments and agencies; (e) how much did Canada spend on scientific research and fisheries stock assessment in the NAFO regulatory area on NAFO regulated species and on ecosystem research in each of fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, broken down by all departments and agencies; (f) how much did all other NAFO Contracting Parties spend on conducting fisheries enforcement of NAFO conservation measures in the NAFO regulatory area in each year from 2007 to 2010; (g) how much did all other NAFO Contracting Parties spend on scientific research and fisheries stock assessment and ecosystem research in the NAFO regulatory area in each year from 2007 to 2010; (h) how much did Canada contribute directly to the operation and management of the NAFO Secretariat in each of the fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010; (i) how much did all other NAFO Contracting Parties contribute directly to the operation and management of the NAFO Secretariat in each year from 2007 to 2010; (j) using data supplied in response to subquestions (d) to (i) and using the newly adopted and revised contribution formula for the Contracting Parties adopted by NAFO, what would be an estimate of the Canadian financial contribution to NAFO in 2010 and 2011 and what would be the contribution of each of the other NAFO Contracting Parties in those same years; (k) which NAFO Contracting Parties have filed formal objections to any of NAFO’s management decisions in 2010 and for 2011, what was the original NAFO management decision being objected to and the nature of the objection from the Contracting Party, as well as specific details of the unilateral fishing plan taken by the objecting Contracting Party for each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009; (l) how many Canadian citations, NAFO Contracting Party citations or NAFO citations have been issued against fishing vessels of Contracting Parties that were believed to be fishing contrary to NAFO requirements within the NAFO regulatory area, which of these citations resulted in convictions of these fishing vessels, which jurisdiction was responsible for prosecuting these infractions and what penalty was assessed as a result of these convictions in each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009; (m) what was the total number of at-sea fishing days of NAFO Contracting Party fishing vessels operating in the NAFO regulatory area for NAFO regulated species, broken down by Contracting Party; and (n) what was the total number of at-sea fishing days within the NAFO regulatory area conducting on Non-Contracting Parties to the NAFO Convention in each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-823.
Collapse
2011-03-21 [p.1362]
Q-827 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to government expenditures in the communities of Niagara, on an annual basis ...
Expand
Q-827 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to government expenditures in the communities of Niagara, on an annual basis and broken down by department, what is the amount spent: (a) in the ridings of Welland, Niagara West—Glanbrook and Haldimand—Norfolk from 2004 up to and including the current fiscal year; (b) in the former riding of Erie—Lincoln between 1997 and 2004; (c) in the former riding of Erie between 1993 and 1997; and (d) in the ridings of Niagara Falls and St. Catharines from 1993 up to and including the current fiscal year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-827.
Collapse
2011-03-21 [p.1371]
Q-854 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to the Roadmap for Canada’s Linguistic Duality 2008-2013, broken dow...
Expand
Q-854 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to the Roadmap for Canada’s Linguistic Duality 2008-2013, broken down by year: (a) what were the expenditures of each department involved; and (b) to what line item were these expenditures charged? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-854.
Collapse
2011-03-21 [p.1371]
Q-856 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to language training, for each fiscal year from 2005-2006 to 2009-20...
Expand
Q-856 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to language training, for each fiscal year from 2005-2006 to 2009-2010: (a) what were the government’s expenditures, broken down by administrative region, on the language training of public servants for the learning of (i) French, (ii) English; (b) what were the amounts, broken down by administrative region, paid out by the government to third parties for the language training of public servants for the learning of (i) French, (ii) English; and (c) what are the names of the third parties that received funding for this purpose? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-856.
Collapse
Results: 1 - 15 of 277 | Page: 1 of 19

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data